More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jose Antonio Vargas

Jose Antonio Vargas

Posted: October 12, 2009 06:40 AM

Your Inbox, Your Self

What's Your Reaction?

You are how you communicate.

If you like having an instant focus group, a pulsating, by-the-second, rat-a-tat-tat burst of soundbites, wisecracks and tidbits, then Twitter is probably the best platform for you. (Text messaging, by extension, is a private one-on-one tweet. Or, in tweet-speak, a "DM," aka Direct Message.)

If you want a more closed-off, only-in-the-company-of-friends stream of information, then Facebook may be your best bet. (Not everyone on Facebook, for example, can see my photos.)

But if you care not a whit about Facebook or Twitter or the upcoming Google Wave -- if you prefer to not let the let the quickening rhythm of digital communication dictate your behavior and take over your life -- then stick to plain old e-mail. You read it when you want, you reply when you can, no sweat.

This suggestion may come as a surprise, being that I'm the Technology and Innovations Editor here at HuffPost. I'm suppose to advocate for what's hot, what's cutting-edge, the latest "it" thing. And I do. For the record, I cannot wait for Google Wave. I religiously check my Facebook page (what, no new wall post?) and find myself increasingly addicted to Twitter (what, no one re-tweeted my shameless plug?). But putting aside all these exciting technological changes, it's important to keep in mind that, more than ever before, information does not control you. You have choices. In other words, pick the platform that works best for you, tech writers be damned.

I write this in response to two recent articles -- the first in the weekly magazine New Scientist and the second in the Wall Street Journal -- that, taken together, point to a radical transformation in virtual communication. They're worth reading. The Journal article argues that e-mail's "reign" nears its end. "In its place, a new generation of services is starting to take hold -- services like Twitter and Facebook and countless others vying for a piece of the new world," writes The Journal's Jessica E. Vascellaro. Over at the New Scientist, Tom Simonite explores the psychology behind Google Wave and how it can further informalize how we communicate online. On Google Wave, you can replay what others write in real-time, which means your stream of consciousness is more transparent than ever.

For many, this may just be the next wave (excuse the pun) in e-mail communication -- e-mail 2.0. "A hosted conversation," as a Google product manager calls it. Others may think it's way too much information -- digital TMI. I don't want my friends to know exactly what I'm typing in real-time, just in case I accidentally type something that gets me in trouble. Some things, after all, are better left to myself.

Because sometimes a plain old e-mail -- not a text, not a tweet, not Facebook update, not a Wave -- is the safest, most personal, most liberating way to go.

How do you communicate? You prefer Twitter over Facebook? Texting over e-mailing? Share your comments below.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dr. Jim Taylor
11:05 AM on 10/14/2009
Great thoughts, Jose!. Two of my own to share. First, I would go one step further. How about using really primitive technology, such as the telephone (real-time, unfiltered communication, plus the benefits of greater emotional recognition due to voice).

Second, yes, it's about control. And I am seeing far too many people who have lost control of their use of technology. They have become 'technoholics' (a topic for a future post on my HP blog). The game has changed, but there are no rules. Consequence: lack of preparedness in using the technology to our greatest benefit with the least harm.
04:09 PM on 10/13/2009
Facebook and Twitter aren't my thing. They just seem like huge time wasters and encourage narcissism. IM is something I'll use at work and occasionally I'll text message via my phone. But I'm pretty old-fashioned. Phone calls and email for me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:58 AM on 10/13/2009
I charge for all communications with me: 25¢ per tweet, 50¢ per blog, $1.00 per email. I auto-deduct from your bank account and I charge interest. This has reduced unwanted messages, lessened the number of electrons flying around, which is very green, and freed up my time. I am available for coffee, just send me a note.
08:07 PM on 10/12/2009
I use them all, they have different purposes, in addition I use private web boards and Usenet.
07:11 PM on 10/12/2009
For me emailing is the best. I find facebook a cliche as friends try to out do one another in who takes the most and best pictures, who took the best vacations, e,t,c e,t.c. I don't have a tweet account. I guess am wierd or old school for my age...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrVee
01:03 PM on 10/12/2009
They all have their place but most will end up in the trash bin along side Myspace.
photo
Imzadi
Proud Progressive for decades
11:08 AM on 10/12/2009
You can lump me in to the group of electronic Luddites - I only use email or {*gasp!*} or a phone call to communicate with people - no Facebook, MySpace or Twitter. I find the latter options self indulgent and egotistical, not to mention a waste of time and rational thought.

You asked for responses - here is my two cents, FWIW. :-)
photo
Shaun Dakin
Robocalls, politics, advocacy, privacy
07:55 AM on 10/12/2009
I use all (twitter, facebook, and email). Throw in IM and I'm addicted!

Personally, I spend more time on Twitter than Facebook.

Shaun Dakin
@EndTheRoboCalls
@PrivacyCampDC
@IsCool