iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Joseph A. Palermo

Joseph A. Palermo

Posted: September 10, 2010 12:19 PM

President Barack Obama at his press conference today drew a stark contrast between his administration and the Republicans in Congress who are dedicated to obstructing any sound economic program for purely short-term political advantage. He also made a convincing case for ditching George W. Bush's reckless, deficit-ballooning government relief program for rich people and corporations. It was a great economics seminar on how the Republican/Chamber of Commerce "free market" policies over the past decade brought the country down to the sorry state it now finds itself. But as a political salve for suffering Democratic congressional and state candidates it didn't do much to change the dominant narrative.

Unfortunately, the president stopped short of making a dramatic announcement that he was appointing Harvard Professor Elizabeth Warren to head the new financial consumer protection bureau. That announcement would have energized the Democratic base and provided candidates at the local level with evidence that the administration in Washington still has a pulse with respect to the interests of middle-class Americans.

But on Professor Warren's future job prospects he was cagey -- unnecessarily so.

"I'll have an announcement soon about how we're going to move forward," is all he said. The only thing this stance accomplishes is to reinforce the narrative that he is still leaning toward Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, and Rahm Emanuel instead of Professor Warren on the central economic issues and attitude toward Wall Street. Elizabeth Warren is quite simply the only person affiliated with the administration in any way who has clearly stood up for the vast majority of Americans who earn $50,000 a year or less. She's been a fighter against the Wall Street interests that Obama seems committed to coddling. Memo to White House: Coddling Wall Street is not very popular these days.

Professor Warren is the "Change" Obama talked about for two years while he was running for president. If he doesn't have the guts to appoint her and names someone else to head that agency it will take even more of the wind out of the sails of the Democratic base going into the elections. He ducked the Warren issue and thereby missed a great opportunity to bridge a small section of the yawning "enthusiasm gap."

The only questions that matter politically right now are: How did the president's press conference today help politicians like California Senator Barbara Boxer, who is being savaged in a barrage of mean-spirited and inaccurate television ads paid for by out-of-state money from the national Chamber of Commerce? And how did the President's remarks today help candidates who are targeted by the $100 million post-Citizens United corporate slush fund managed by Karl Rove called "American Crossroads?"

The Afghanistan portion of his press conference was by far the weakest. The idea that Hamid Karzai is going to do anything to curb "corruption" is a foolish delusion. For a moment the President's eloquence left him and he seemed to be channeling George W. Bush. Someone has got to get through to him that a country that is reeling economically cannot continue the costly illusion of being a global hegemon. The military budgets and the costs of the wars are bleeding the U.S. treasury dry.

The supreme irony here is that there shouldn't be any kind of "enthusiasm gap" going on at all because, let's face it, Obama is the very best president we could ever elect in our corrupt and money-soaked political discourse.

Obama's political hack Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, who sparked Sarah Palin's saccharine wrath by calling progressives "retarded," (whose leaving would be the best development for the Obama White House since the inauguration) has been whispering in the President's ear for two years that there was political gold ($$$) by playing nice with Wall Street and screwing over his progressive base; hence, the great "enthusiasm gap" of 2010!

Remember the lengthy primary of 2007-08? A great many Democrats who comprise the base of the party believed they had cast their vote against Hillary Clinton in order to block a Clinton restoration. Yet it seems a Clinton restoration is what they got. It's not surprising then that two years later these same base voters lack "enthusiasm." The spectacle of a Democratic president forsaking those who elected him to court an imaginary "center," or to "reach out" to a recalcitrant and belligerent Republican minority has an aura of déjà vu to it.

Dispirited Democrats might be a little less dispirited right now if President Obama had beaten up on Wall Street a little more, or forced banks to renegotiate underwater mortgages, or fought for single payer health care, or held to account former Bush officials who were responsible for some of the more egregious abuses, or appointed an Education Secretary who values teachers, or withdrew U.S. military forces from Afghanistan, or . . .

There is an "enthusiasm gap" between Republican and Democratic voters where there shouldn't be. But there also appears to be an outbreak of American amnesia. It wasn't long ago when we could see James Carville on CNN nightly denouncing people who switched their votes from Clinton to Obama as "Judases." In Fall 2010, the meta-text feels like a widespread understated longing on the part of the chattering classes for a 1994-style Republican route. Obama must continue to talk directly to the American people but he also must take concrete steps toward reinvigorating public institutions, unapologetically, and throwing a lifeline to a drowning middle class.

 
 
 

Follow Joseph A. Palermo on Twitter: www.twitter.com/N/A

 
 
  • Comments
  • 242
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
didereaux
The Flying Spaghetti Monster is my Lord & Saviour!
08:00 PM on 09/15/2010
ZAbsolutely the ONLY way Obama is going to bridge any gaps is by finally doing something. Making fine sounding and pretty speeches must be followed by something other than proposing great reforms and then letting those to be reformed write the laws. Which is precisely what has occured on every single major issue that the President has addressed. No, it is almost past time for him to have that backbone transplant and start pushing through meaningful legislation...bitter medicine for us that voted for him to swallow, but it cannot be avoided.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
11:06 AM on 09/12/2010
"He also made a convincing case for ditching George W. Bush's reckless, deficit-ballooning government relief program for rich people and corporations." Really? A convincing case? AFTER calling for $300 BILLION in business tax cuts and a mere $50 billion for jobs? We're sending more to Afghanistan JUST TO TRAIN THEIR MILITARY than we are on American jobs. And you think this is a "convincing case" for ditching government relief programs for corporations? Obama EARNED his "enthusiasm gap" by working hard to create a "reality gap". Yes the GOP will be an unmitigated DISASTER when they sweep into power but it's time to call out the Democratic party as the "gateway drug" that leads to republican victories.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
indie00015
11:55 PM on 09/11/2010
Read Frank Rich and Mo Dowd in their Sunday editorials. They both get it. The President does not.

If you are reading this, Michelle Obama, it's long past time to knock your hubbie up the side of his head and tell him his Presidency is doing a whirlpool 'round the drain and sinking fast. One thing we know about leaders, when they lose the trust of their followers they never get it back. Barry, you've pretty much lost the trust of those who elected you. You have one chance left and that will require a RADICAL CHANGE in leadership style and you'd better hope you retain both houses of Congress.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Mister Biggles
11:18 PM on 09/11/2010
The reality is we had a chance for real change.  We blew it.  And now we're doomed.

Where are the naked women?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lerker
07:13 PM on 09/11/2010
This whole Obama debate has gotten way too intellectual. Are you better off now than you were two years ago? Has Obama done anything to actually help anybody. Is there any action behind all the clever speeches. People that think the answer to those questions is yes are enthusiastic about Mr. Obama and his agenda. People that think Obama is the very best president we could ever elect in our corrupt and money soaked political discourse are excited about Mr Obama. Everybody else is going to feel cheated and misled. They also probably will not want to give Mr Obama another 4 years in the white house.
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
06:32 PM on 09/11/2010
The people who plan to vote Republican in November are suffering from two major maladies: amnesia and stupidity. Have they already forgotten what they did the last time they were in charge? Apparently, they have. The Republican party is called the “Party of No” for a reason: they say “no” to sensible, forward-thinking legislation that helps the country and “yes” to any legislation that puts them and their rich cronies first and the American people last. Though the Democrats are not perfect, they are doing far more for America than the Republicans did in eight years. I will vote Democrat and continue to vote Democrat. I would rather buck this disastrous trend of voting Republican and vote my conscience. People, if you vote Republican two months from now, you will get exactly what you deserve–and I won’t feel sorry for you, because you refused to open your eyes and your ears.
11:49 PM on 09/11/2010
Skunkman, do you know what really fries me is that the folks that I know, who profess to be repubs and who plan to vote that way, have no business being repubs. Many are unemployed, and have been un or under employed for years, have nothing to crow about, have no idea that the repugs are the Big Business party and have no interest in these middle or low class folks than the man in the moon. They don't understand that there is such a chasm between them and folks like John Behner and Eric Cantor - they just don't understand. Eric Cantor dosen't care about them, he cares for Eric Cantor.
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
08:08 AM on 09/12/2010
Good morning cdenton: Well propaganda from the right has poisoned reality
in America so people will ignore the republican obstructionists & vote them in.
It's OK with me. :) It will be fun to see what they got besides giving billionaires
a tax cut. Have a nice Sunday. I can't fan you again but faved anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
06:31 PM on 09/11/2010
As you point out, this goes a lot deeper than "enthusiams gap". (Sounds like something one of many Clintonistas that he appointed, made up.)
It'a a performance gap. He's more like Bush than Clinton.
The problem is that he isn't serving the people that voted for him. He knows it but he thinks he get away with it by blaming the GOP and fudging a bit.
I think he has very low opinion of the average American. I don't think he cares much about us.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Mister Biggles
11:13 PM on 09/11/2010
10000% correct.
billstewart
Not a micro-biologist
02:47 PM on 09/12/2010
I was really looking forward to getting some Hopey Changey Stuff when Obama was elected. I didn't expect him to fix Bush's economic damage overnight (or at all, because I expected the kind of naive Keynesianism we got, but even with radical change in the right directions it would be a slow process.) But I was hoping we'd get somebody who'd close the illegal prison in Gitmo instead of having the Justice Department defending Bush Administration torturers and their policies, and spend 15 minutes fixing Don't Ask Don't Tell back when it would have been an easy win and given him some political momentum, and somebody who would actually lead the Democrats in Congress instead of spending a couple of years whining about how those mean nasty Republicans might filibuster them because they only had a majority in the House and Senate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rory talbot
Former Dem but they r now wing of Corp. party
05:04 PM on 09/11/2010
Because I'm done supporting/enabling/voting for the corporatist wing of the democratic party, here's my proposal folks: Get a list of incumbents. Vote for his challenger. Every time! Let's try that for a few political cycles, watch the high turnover rate, and see if the politicians finally figure it out. This is far better than continuing to vote for the Dems a/k/a the "lesser-of-two-evils". The upside? It will be much harder for lobbyists to buy your politician when they keep getting flipped.
billstewart
Not a micro-biologist
02:53 PM on 09/12/2010
Fail. First of all, since there's a Democratic majority in Congress, that would give us a Republican majority, and they'd mostly be the SAME OLD Republicans who've been getting us into trouble. If you want to always throw out incumbents in the primary elections, that's a much better idea.

But here in California we've got fairly aggressive term limits in the state legislature, and it means that the politicians have an incentive to do stuff that looks good up front, but won't be around when their programs fail or keep spending money the state doesn't have, and the Republicans have an incentive to never raise taxes because that's the Rove/Norquist mantra, and don't care that the Democrats have raised spending (as have the Republican-built prisons and longer prison terms.)
And the lobbyists are the only people providing any semblance of political continuity in Sacramento, so they end up running things much more than if we didn't have term limits.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KidShalleen
If I'm posted, a moderator is asleep.
04:47 PM on 09/11/2010
Boy, how easy it is to be a Rethuglikan. All you have to do is ignore all pertinent facts, slogan-ize to the negative, and brandish not solution one, other than passing the baton to the ones that ruined this country with their voodoo economic solutions.
Here are some bottom line facts, for you to mull over. Enjoy the graph.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/#39107968
05:36 PM on 09/11/2010
Or how about the thing that makes it easiest to be a Republican: cutting taxes? I mean, who doesn't want to have their taxes cut? Fortunately, it seems that at least half of us still have a social conscience and have been able to resist that Siren's call.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KidShalleen
If I'm posted, a moderator is asleep.
06:51 PM on 09/11/2010
PaShaw!!!!!! SHHHHHH!!!!!! Please don't use that word,...social. Someone may think you're a............wait for it.................any minute now.............A SOCIALIST!!!!! LOL
Yeah, like the proverbial money tree. We can have an Interstate road system, a standing Army, Navy, Air Force,and Mariners, and we can pay for it by,......here it comes,....a tax reduction.
And we allk now, tax breaks pay for themselves because the first thing rich people do with their tax break money is invest it in jobs for the middle class.
You gotta wonder if these people ever truly listen to themselves.
Are they really that stupid, or do they think we are???? I guess that's rhetorical.
Fanned, by the way, for being awake
02:05 PM on 09/11/2010
Thanks Joe, eloquent as ever in describing this once promising candidate and now failing president. His call for change was all a sham as he timidly works the legislative margins for little to no gains of consequence (and don't bother telling me HCR was a big gain - except for a trillion $ giveaway to the insurers and big pharma, it isn't). His "teachable" moments and rhetoric are book-ended by ongoing attempts to gain support from recalcitrant republicans and blue dog dems. Long ago he should have fired Rahm and Gibbs for their obvious demeaning of progressives. That he hasn't tells us his disdain mirrors theirs. That he cagily demurs on Elizabeth Warren shows his dismissive attitude towards real economic reform.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mwsomerset
This is not the life I ordered.
01:48 PM on 09/11/2010
If the people who voted for President Obama in 2008 aren't motivated to get out and vote in November......based on what we have been seeing from the party of No the past 19 months and how they pretty much tried to sabotaged all efforts by our President .....then I doubt there is anything anyone can do. That destruction, in and of itself, should be a huge motivating factor. You would think these voters would want to take down the opposition since they are trying to crushed the "hope and change we have been waiting for."
QuietLightTraveler
Scientist, Teacher, Naturalist, Photographer
02:18 PM on 09/11/2010
If you accept the compromised efforts of a corrupted Democratic party and still support them with your vote because it is thought to be the best you can get, you are basically sending the message that Rahm is correct ( "where else are they going to go"), and basically you are forced to accept the crumbs they give you. In the future they will know that a few crubs is all they need to give you. And so, as a result, you have given up the only power you really ever had- your vote.
05:43 PM on 09/11/2010
If the choice was bewteen a serious head cold and pnuemonia and the choice had to be made by stepping out of your house on a Tuesday, how much motivation would it take?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Val Vadeboncoeur
02:27 PM on 09/11/2010
Nonsense. By refusing to fight for anything except prolonged war, this President has turned his back on those voters, and NOT the other way around. He's reaping what he's sowed. Those voters are still there but the candidate they voted for is long gone.
photo
cornelison
College grad. Life-long liberal.
01:47 PM on 09/11/2010
The President can't do it alone. The rest of the Democratic candidates have to make a case before the public as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DougDeWitt
progressive social-capitalist
12:24 PM on 09/11/2010
Joe P, you are one in a million. Fanned, Faved, and willing to paint your house!
03:32 PM on 09/11/2010
I agree with D oug.At least 999,999 of a million won't grant the President the benefit of the doubt.These doom sayers point to the high unemployment rate,the trillion plus deficit year after year, the now "yes' now "no" in so many of the military decisions, the moral lack of leadership , the use of the public money for so many vacations, the lavish lifestyle, the waffling support to Israel, the waffling support to the Palestinians, the reported short work day , the golf outings.Whew.
These things are obviously beyond his control. And,it just keeps getting better.Doesn't it?
12:19 PM on 09/11/2010
Bet Obama goes back to sleep. and lives up to his classic statement, "Nothing will be gained by spending our time and energy laying blame for the past." - President Barack Obama two months in office.

The ended Obama for me. It’s a guarantee that the Bush crap continues.
12:33 PM on 09/11/2010
To a lesser degree it has been continuing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DougDeWitt
progressive social-capitalist
12:54 PM on 09/11/2010
From an international perspective, the US's place on the world stage teetered on the brink of Armageddon under the Bush administration. Where the father had come onstage a knight in shining armour, sheltering little Kuwait from the storm, the son shouted, "YOU'RE SICK!", and convinced America to take the cure... an endless siphon of Your Tax Dollars (no-longer) At Work into the pockets of the Terminator clone of the military-industrial-complex, Blackwater (et.al., its multiple AKA's).

The more rational of our Muslim brethren and sisters believed what they saw, and not what they were told by a conservative mullah-cadre. The concept that the capitalist system is inherently flawed is immediately felt by a remarkably creative intellect for business opportunity in the first place, for the lie that it Must be. Instead it was commented over very strong espresso that "it was natural that the vice-president placed by the corrupt capitalist Halliburton, somehow manipulated the declaration of war from his office. Of course, this is how all Arabic dictators operate as well."

The American electorate quite naturally assumes that its federal government, despite its corruption and myriad collateral flaws, honestly has our best interests at heart. Bless the Naive, for theirs will be in the coffers of those at the reins of the bought-and-paid-for Demo-Republican Congress.

Take your government back from the corporate oligarchy. They can buy your congressman, but they can't buy your Vote!
03:35 PM on 09/11/2010
As you probably know (No? ) the president's academic record as well as SAT's LSAT's has been buried deeper than a BP oil well.But,God help us, I'm beginning to believe Biden's the smart one
12:16 PM on 09/11/2010
"...because, let's face it, Obama is the very best president we could ever elect in our corrupt and money-soaked political discourse."

I can't stop laughing...

I hope Obama speaks non-stop between now and November.