iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Joseph E. Cordell

GET UPDATES FROM Joseph E. Cordell
 

Family Businesses Can Be Under Siege In Divorce

Posted: 10/14/11 12:20 AM ET

If you're a small business owner, a divorce can be reminiscent of "Little Shop of Horrors." But instead of carnivorous plants chanting, "Feed me!" it's your soon-to-be-ex who is the hungry one. For your cash, that is.

Not only is the family business usually the largest marital asset, it's also often the family's main income source.

In order to make a distribution of property in a divorce, it is necessary to determine the value of the marital assets and debts. This difficult, complex task is exacerbated when a family business is involved because spouses tend to develop two different syndromes during the valuation phase, according to the divorce lawyers for men at Cordell and Cordell.

One spouse is afflicted with Sudden Business Losses Syndrome. Symptoms include arguing that the business is tanking and worth nothing. The other spouse invariably contracts Sudden Ivana Trump Syndrome whose side effects include thinking the business is the next Apple Inc.

The spouses will then dig in their heels, fight over whose value is right, and watch as no one wins except for their divorce lawyers' coffers. A judge may ultimately have to decide the value of the business.

In order to avoid this costly scenario and deal with your small business effectively, you need to decide what your business is and choose your valuation method.

First, when deciding on the business division method you need to determine if your business is "property" or "income." This is not just a semantics lesson.

If your business is labeled as "property" (e.g. making money with tangible assets such as an apartment complex), then it is subject to your state's divorce laws for property division.

However, if you call your business "income" (e.g. making money with intangible assets such as a divorce lawyer's practice), then it could be subject to alimony award rules.

The difference? Many states award each spouse one-half of the marital "property" but rarely would a spouse be awarded one-half of the other's "income" as alimony.

When a business is deemed both "property" and "income" then you need to be careful to separate the two in order to avoid a double dip.

If you did not segregate the property from the income, then your business as property could be divided with your spouse receiving her share in addition to you being forced to pay alimony based off the income from the already-divided business.

That's double dipping.

Next, choose your valuation method wisely. It is fairly easy to determine the value of public companies, but family-owned businesses pose a much greater challenge because there is no established market for the sale of those companies.

Choose the wrong method and you could over-value your business and pay more to your ex than it's worth, thus the importance of choosing a method that focuses on certain factors favorable to you at your spouse's expense.

For those with Sudden Business Losses Syndrome, the fair market value method is a popular choice.

This method treats the business as if it were an item of property sellable on the open market. This works well for the unique business (e.g. a decorative spoon collectible store) and the dime-a-dozen one (e.g. a greasy, corner diner) because where the demand is low so is the value. A low purchase price for a hypothetical sale is ideal for the Sudden Business Losses Syndrome-type.

Those with Sudden Ivana Trump Syndrome enjoy using the capitalization of earnings method, which treats the business as a revenue stream valuable to its owners if not to the hypothetical buyers in the open market.

The capitalization rate is based on the rate of return for similar investments, the risk, and the business's historical earnings. So the Sudden Ivana Trump Syndrome spouses will make the cap rate as high as possible in order to justify these phrases:

• "That custard stand is the next Dairy Queen." (rate of return for similar investments)
• "Nothing is as reliable as this business." (minimizing risk)
• "Business was down that year, but look at the trips we took and clothes we bought." (glossing over low-earning years)

After all, the more the business generates for its owners, the more valuable it is - and the more to divide in divorce.

Finally, it is wise for one spouse to buy out the other's interest in the business. If each spouse retained a share and remained involved in the business, disagreements can and will happen.

For the spouses who each take a one-half share, expect a deadlock on any decisions. For the spouse who retains a minority interest in the business, expect oppression.

Remember, you got divorced for a reason.

The process of determining the value of a small business can be very complicated. Your divorce lawyer should be able to assist you in selecting a business valuator and in interpreting the valuator's report.

Joseph Cordell is the Principal Partner of Cordell & Cordell, a nationwide domestic litigation firm focused on men's family law matters. Cordell & Cordell also provides a website dedicated to informing men on the divorce process and the challenges they face. Visit http://www.dadsdivorce.com for more information

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:44 AM on 10/14/2011
Quite frankly, valuing a small business or sole proprietor for divorce is unAmerican, anti-growth, and terrible for the economy. Instead of letting the small business keep its profits to give the employees deserved raises or bonuses, buy more equipment, rent more office space, and expand, the lazy, greedy, do-nothing ex-spouse gets a windfall of undeserved money off the backs of the business owner and the employees. Valuing a small business for divorce and dividing it in half deprives the economy of future jobs and prosperity. Since the divorce lawyers won't fix this, the state legislatures should and outlaw unfair property division of small business and sole proprietors in divorce.
09:39 AM on 10/14/2011
the third number your ex will manipulate is the "growth rate". By falsely alleging that your business will grow at some % until the cows come home, the value of your business is once again inflated beyond reality. Especially if you are the sole proprietor. Small, successful business can have temporary periods of growth. If your spouse ditches you at this point, your business will be valued much too high. But once a business gets big enough, or saturates its markets, or competitors get wind of profits to be made - your "growth rate" can tank or even go negative. Valuators normally make the growth rate number positive, which can be oh so false, and obligate you to payments, even if your business does not have profits to pay.
09:34 AM on 10/14/2011
the next number your ex will manipulate will be the "capitalization rate". The business owner wants this number to take into account all possible business risks. After all, the business owner is gonna have to pay 1/2 the so-called value of this "property division" over time, whether the business has the profits to do so or not. Your ex will downplay your risks to keep the so called risk premium as close to zero as is believable to the judge. Here is where your ex will have any one associated with your business unwittingly be taken advantage under oath to spout positivity about you and your business. Your accountant, business manager, office manager, major customer or supplier may think they are saying something nice about you and not realize that their comments are being used against you to overvalue you business.
09:29 AM on 10/14/2011
dividing your business is like cutting your own baby in half. You are giving real cash to an ex who usually did far less than half, if anything at all to give your business a value. Plus your soon to be ex-spouse's actions during divorce distract you and take your head away from the business.
The name of your ex-spouse's game is to jack-up as high as possible your so-called cash flow by adding in "adjustments" - such as your employee Christmas bonuses and dough you paid for employer sponsored health insurance and other allegedly "frivolous" employee benefits and paying your employees wages "in excess" of someone's invented "normal salary range for that position". This artificially inflates the value of your business and sticks real money in your ex's pocket. Plus you get to pay two lawyers and two business valuators $300+/hour to argue about this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crowepps
01:21 AM on 10/14/2011
These valuation problems also come up for business partnerships, when one partner dies, leaving their share to their surviving spouse, or one partner decides to leave the partnership. Most formal partnership agreements detail exactly how dissolving the business partnership will be handled. It seems to me the sensible way to handle this is to be proactive, and for a married couple who are planning to start a business to have a formal partnership agreement as well so that everyone will be on the same page in advance.

Must say, though, it's been my experience as a court reporter that the people who really take a big hit on private businesses are those who have made a habit of exaggerating the value of their assets on their bank loan applications and overstating their deductions on their income tax by doing things like including everyone in the family's car as a business expense, and having the business pay the home utilities, etc. Both types of chiselers end up turning over more than a fair share to their spouses in order to keep the spouse from ratting them out. This is one area where honestly definitely pays off!
10:13 PM on 10/14/2011
Very good points, all.