More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Joseph Nye

Joseph Nye

Posted: February 9, 2011 03:50 PM

Egypt is fascinating. The old view that we had to support the authoritarians or wind up with radical Islamists has been overtaken by the spread of information that has helped create and empower a new middle. There are more options now, but it is clear that smart policy in an information age will need a more sophisticated understanding of power. We have to deal both with governments and civil societies of other countries, thinking simultaneously in terms of hard power as well as the soft power of narrative and values.

That is the argument of my new book The Future of Power. Two types of power shifts are occurring in this century -- power transition and power diffusion. Power transition from one dominant state to another is a familiar historical event, but power diffusion is a more novel process. The problem for all states in today's global information age is that more things are happening outside the control of even the most powerful governments. In an information-based world, power diffusion is a more difficult problem to manage than power transition.

At an even more basic level, what will it mean to wield power in the global information age of the 21st century? Conventional wisdom has always held that the state with the largest military prevails, but in an information age it may be the state (or non-states) with the best story that wins. Soft power becomes a more important part of the mix.

States remain the dominant actors on the world stage, but they are finding the stage far more crowded and difficult to control. A much larger part of the population both within and among countries has access to the power that comes from information. Governments have always worried about the flow and control of information, and the current period is not the first to be strongly affected by dramatic changes in information technology. Revolutions are not new, nor is transnational contagion, nor non-state actors.

What is new -- and what we see manifested in Egypt today -- is the speed of communication and the technological empowerment of a wider range of actors. An information world will require new policies that combine hard and soft power resources into smart power strategies. This is proving a difficult task as the administration tries to walk a tightrope in the Middle East today.

 
 
 

Follow Joseph Nye on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Joe_Nye

 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donnyraindog
Hi Mom!
08:58 AM on 02/10/2011
Professor nye i am loking forward to reading your new book . I have thought for years the concept of "soft power" needs to be more widely circulated and utilized! On a personal note my father attended prep school with you and although he is to the right of bill buckley and attila the hun he speaks highly of you. Before you get the wrong idea he is also a wonderful man when he doesn,t have his foot in his mouth!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
10:41 PM on 02/09/2011
I don't think it was better put than in this article which rephrases the Tea Party as social media...one could equally substitute "Egypt"...

"Tea Party: Prototype for Emergent Web Organizations"

http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=940&doc_id=197267
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
hornedcog
Tax Tea Now!
10:27 PM on 02/09/2011
Say what you mean and mean what you say. It isn't just for Founding Father anymore.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
10:21 PM on 02/09/2011
Obama and Hillary still seem stuck with Bibi and the Israel Lobby in a paranoid time warp, in which they simply cannot adjust to the obvious reality that Egypt is NOT Iran in '79. So Hillary is leading the charge to betray everything she's claimed to stand for, from her opposition to the Vietnam War on, in order to continue to make American Egyptian policy a jackboot on the throats of 80 million Egyptians, paid for with American tax dollars, in order to create "stability" for 8 million Israelis by ruining the lives of ten times as many Egyptians. Any decent American must do all in his or her power to let the White House know that we do NOT support the support of dictators in our name for Israel any more than we supported the endless dictators America supported for our own "stability" during the Cold War.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
12:02 AM on 02/10/2011
Done, sort of. I requested that, at a minimum, the White House focus on preventing the detention, torture and murder of those known to have ben protesting.
05:26 PM on 02/11/2011
I agree wholeheartedly. American politicians simply do not value the life of an Arabian civilian. 4 Israeli soldiers killed in Gaza: "those Islamic terrorists are taking over the world". 40,000 Lebanese civilians killed by Israel in a belligerent carpet bombing using American weaponry: "Democracy will prevail". The pointless rhetoric and false promises honestly sicken me.
07:15 PM on 02/09/2011
Points well taken. Thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HawaiiShira
He that knows & knows he knows is wise.
04:50 PM on 02/09/2011
Egypt is the shining example of the truism "KNOWLEDGE IS POWER!"