EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Josh Schrei

Josh Schrei

Posted: January 6, 2010 05:29 PM

Avatar and the Vocabulary of Evildoers -- Or, Why James Cameron's Script Isn't as Bad as You Think

What's Your Reaction:

While critics have unanimously agreed that the visual spectacle that is James Cameron's Avatar is beyond compare, there has been less enthusiasm for the plot line, which has been called out as flat and unoriginal.

It's quite true that the movie's script -- which centers on a tribe of indigenous creatures whose ancestral arboreal homeland is being destroyed by contracted soldiers in service of a resource extraction company -- has its weak points, perhaps most notably the endless stream of one-liners that emanate from the film's primary antagonists: corporate evil bad guy Parker Selfridge (played by Giovanni Ribisi) and the muscle behind his operation, Col. Miles Quarritch.

In one memorable moment, Ribisi's character (who apparently keeps a hovering chunk of the hilariously yet somewhat profoundly named mineral "Unobtanium" on his desk at all times just so he can explain its purpose to those of us who may not know) says: "Killing the indigenous looks bad."

In another, he says: "They aren't people, they're savages" while his Colonel sidekick says: "Let's scatter the roaches... I want to be home before dinner."

While it's easy to smirk at lines like this and dismiss them as boorish screenwriting, the sad truth is they actually hit much closer to home than one might think. The history of colonialism and destruction of indigenous peoples brings with it a panoply of one-liners and inhumane vernacular that would make even Cameron cringe.

In the 1990s, Freeport-McMoran mining company blasted the top off a mountain in West Papua, poisoned the water supply of thousands of indigenous residents, hired Indonesian soldiers to "protect" the mine from any insurgents, and quite possibly had two of the tribal leaders killed. The notorious CEO of Freeport, JimBob Moffett, was later quoted as saying that "the environmental impact of my mine is equivalent to me pissing in the Arafura sea."

Chevron spokesman Don Campbell, speaking about a lawsuit filed against the company by 30,000 indigenous and peasant farmers in Ecuador over the systematic rape, destruction, and poisoning of their land, told a reporter, "We're going to fight this until hell freezes over, and then we'll fight it out on the ice."

The same company's corporate lawyer, in Joe Berlinger's powerful film Crude, sits on camera with a stone face while looking at pictures of tumor-addled children and exclaims that there is no evidence that oil contamination causes cancer and blames the cancer on the indigenous people themselves because of their lack of hygiene.

Slightly more to the point is Christophe de Margerie, CEO of French oil company Total, who in August of last year bluntly said that critics of Total's destructive operations in Burma can "go to hell."

Historically, the vernacular of colonialism has followed a consistent track of smug superiority, debasement, and dehumanization, putting -- as Ribisi's character does in Avatar -- particular emphasis on the word "savage."

The British used the word with relish, alternately using it to refer to every one of their conquered peoples, starting with the Scots and the Irish and then moving briskly through the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. In 1919, after slaughtering 349 men, women, and children in Amritsar India, British Brigadier General Reginald Dyer still maintained that Indians were savages who would "never be enlightened."

Yes, 1919 was a long time ago -- relatively. But as late as 1983, in my hometown of Santa Fe, New Mexico, the town's central monument honored Don Diego De Vargas's victory over the "savages" (during which twelve native chiefs were hung in the public square). This victory was commemorated every year -- until it was finally stopped several years ago -- by a Fiesta parade in which a man dressed in Native garb was paraded around the town in chains.

Most recently, in Peru, after police attacked indigenous protesters in the Amazon basin, killing over a dozen and injuring several hundred, Peruvian President Alan Garcia demonstrated his overt hatred of the indigenous by characterizing them as "savage and barbaric." He went on to say that:

"These people don't have crowns....These people aren't first-class citizens."

While the word "savage" is debasing and degrading, it still denotes some level of humanity in the native. When the United States Army detonated a series of nuclear bombs on Rongelap Atoll in the 1950s and then moved the indigenous people back to the blast site in order to measure the effects of radiation on test subjects, for example, it stated, "While it is true that these people do not live the way civilized people do, it is also true that they are more like us than the mice."

The next level of debasement is to dehumanize altogether, i.e. to compare people who are about to be killed to insects or other lower life forms. During the Rwandan genocide, less than two decades ago, Rwandan Public Radio was calling on all law abiding Hutus to "exterminate the cockroaches," a mandate that makes Colonel Quarritch's one-liner about insects seem not so outlandish after all.

Such evil-speak is not the stuff of Hollywood fancy. It is the true life vocabulary of people who do unimaginable things. The real reason we find one-liners like this so laughable in movies is not always that they are cheesy, it's that most of us -- in a post-modern and somewhat self-aware world -- cannot even conceive of a mentality that would utter such bile. Sadly, such bilious people are not only still out there, they are thriving.

In one of Avatar's climactic battle scenes, a massive robot-driven machine chews up and spits out forest while helpless natives fire upon it with puny bows and arrows. Such is the exact fate of the Penan, who, as this is being written, are blockading roads with fallen trees and firing blowguns at Caterpillars in order to stave off the same destruction faced by Cameron's fictional Na'Vi. The indigenous tribes of Peru's Amarakaeri Communal Reserve face a similar fate. And less than a month before Avatar's release, two Salvadorans, including a woman who was 8 months pregnant, were assassinated for protesting the El Dorado Gold Mine. The instances in which Cameron's film mirror reality are far too many.

Avatar certainly has a few low points. But for those critics who wished for fewer one-liners and evil caricatures in the film: Maybe we should wish for fewer of them in the world first. Because they're still out there, and they're still speaking the language they've always spoken. If James Cameron -- and the rest of us -- want to do something about it, lets start today.

 

Follow Josh Schrei on Twitter: www.twitter.com/brooklynjosh

While critics have unanimously agreed that the visual spectacle that is James Cameron's Avatar is beyond compare, there has been less enthusiasm for the plot line, which has been called out as flat an...
While critics have unanimously agreed that the visual spectacle that is James Cameron's Avatar is beyond compare, there has been less enthusiasm for the plot line, which has been called out as flat an...
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:43 PM on 01/12/2010
The destructio­n of Amazonia, the Congo basin and the Indonesian rainforest is a direct analogy of what's portrayed in Avatar. Why do we have to depict indigenous people as living on another planet and having physical attributes that distinguis­h themselves from our own species in order to respond empathical­ly? Can we translate our feelings for Pandora and the Na' vi to our own planet and the indigenous people who are being destroyed here and now on a daily basis? By projecting our empathy onto a virtual world with fictional beings, do we absolve ourselves of the guilt that we all share as earthly sky people? Think, think, think of what we as individual­s can do to stop the destructio­n of our own planet and its native people.
09:13 PM on 01/12/2010
Sir, I salute you for this article!
04:51 PM on 01/12/2010
Isn't it obvious that the plot of Avatar is the sci-fi version of the story of Pocahontas­. Down to the last detail. The author of this article would do well to realize this because the article's analysis is missing the fact that the movie is not similar to the history of colonizati­on but is actually a specific story from actual colonial history. Of course the real story of Pocahontas (or however you spell it) had Europeans that viewed the natives as animals, absolutely­. In fact, the whole of world history since the European Renaissanc­e is one of European expansion and colonizati­on like the Pocahontas story. I think some might find this article enlighteni­ng but it is certainly not written for those who have read anything about modern history. It is an amateur analysis in my opinion.
03:43 PM on 01/12/2010
Sir, I salute you. Thanks for the education.
03:25 PM on 01/12/2010
What an excellent article - one of the best I've read on Huffington­.

Very enlighteni­ng.
01:45 PM on 01/12/2010
This is the best post I've ever read on this site.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MrWebster
Moderate this.
11:37 AM on 01/12/2010
Went I went to see the movie this weekend. Lotsa young people, and kids with their parents--t­heatre almost full on a Sunday evening , what 6 weeks after the movie opened.

And what did those kids and young people see? A visually dazzling movie pushing some simple messages. Imperialis­m and militarism is bad, raping the earth is bad, diversity is good, earn your way with courage and honor.

Great literate criticism of the plot that means nothing, and goes nowhere. A speciality reading of the movie. Not to the point.

Bring on more Avatars.
gulopartisan
My micro-bio is empty.
03:49 PM on 01/07/2010
>>Finally:
Secondly, as a plot, Avatar avoids all the tough issues. At least the Earthlings represent a diversity of personal and ethical types; there are no bad guys among the Na-vi. If Pandora is a godlike intelligen­ce, it would be nice if "it" thought through dealing with Earthlings a bit better. We merely glance over the notion that Earth is dying, and this mineral will somehow save us. Perhaps that's because the whole "We are trying to save the Earth!" claim is complete hogwash. But if so, how strangely innocent the final image of the film, with the implicatio­n that the fight is over. As I said somewhere else, are we really supposed to believe that the Earth dwellers won't be back in a few years with an arsenal that can't be countered with a few hammerhead elephants and an LSD-laced tiger?

I am curious enough about Avatar that I'll try to see it again, in IMAX 3D this time, before its run is over. And like Obama, Avatar gets my support; whatever it's failings, it's a huge step in the right direction.
>> Sorry about the three parts. It's not that I think what I have to say is all that important,
>> but I'm tired of being told that AFTER I take the trouble to say it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Josh Schrei
producer, writer, athlete, humanitarian, teacher
01:51 AM on 01/08/2010
of course the fight isn't over. he's already planning two sequels ;)
gulopartisan
My micro-bio is empty.
03:47 PM on 01/07/2010
>>Part 2:
My complaints about the script are a bit different. First, it is tediously unoriginal­. Basically, Cameron updated and glitzed Ursula Le Guin's The Word for the World Is Forest (1976), just as he "borrowed" the essential science-fi­ction of the Terminator series from Fred Saberhagen­'s Berserker novels. What's troubling about that is the Le Guin and Saberhagen have not made in their two lifetimes combined a tenth of what Cameron will for this film. It would have been nice if he'd had the courtesy to at least tip his hat to them (Yeah, I know, legal yadayada intellectu­al property yadayada admission of guilt blahblah). On the other hand, Avatar will carry Le Guin's message (however homogenize­d) to a thousand times more people.
>>cont.
03:02 PM on 01/26/2010
I had the same reaction about the similariti­es to LeGuin's Word for the World is Forest. Interestin­gly, Le Guin also discusses the notion of a sentient planet developed by interactio­ns among it's vegetation in her short story "Vaster than Empires and More Slow." Cameron seems to owe Le Guin several rounds of thanks.
gulopartisan
My micro-bio is empty.
03:46 PM on 01/07/2010
I've been puzzled by the "It's too black and white" complaint about Avatar. I guess there really are people in this country who don't know there really are people like Selfridge and Quadritch.­.. in this country. It was not so long ago that they were openly running it.
>> Man, I wish HuffPo would come up with a more sophistica­ted interface than announcing­,
>> AFTER you write something, that it's too long to post.
05:10 PM on 01/12/2010
I'm more surprised by the fact that people seem to think Cameron owed them more than a terrific popcorn movie. Did anyone complain that Spiderman had the same story as practicall­y every superhero movie ever made? Did people complain that Raiders of the Lost Ark is simply a fun movie about a magical McGuffin? Did people complain that Pixar's a Bug's Life is a retelling of The Three Amigos? Itself a parody of the Magnificen­t Seven, itself a remake of the Seven Samurai? No they didn't.

Of course it is a familiar story. That's practicall­y all we've gotten since they have been making movies with stories. All we can ask for is a familiar story told in an interestin­g way. We get that with Avatar.

Avatar is a movie to be watched and enjoyed. Its first responsibi­lity is to be a rousing adventure. It succeeds in those regards. If you got anything more out of it, great. If not, what did you expect?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrumpyGrandpa
A '60's liberal who didn't sell out
10:25 AM on 01/07/2010
I really wish that someone with the resources to accomplish it would conduct an investigat­ive report into Canada and Canadian mining corporatio­ns. 61% of all mining companies in the world are incorporat­ed in Canada. Then they go wandering around the world destroying other people's land, poisoning or stealing their water (http://www­.hollow-hi­ll.com/sab­ina/2010/0­1/barrick_­gold_shame­s_canada_i­n.html) and assassinat­ing anyone who objects (http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=PNKj6j-sw­nQ). When anyone thinks that Avatar is a piece of fiction, all they have to do is look to Latin America and Canadian mining companies.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Josh Schrei
producer, writer, athlete, humanitarian, teacher
11:00 AM on 01/07/2010
http://www­.miningwat­ch.ca/

these guys do some good work....
01:37 AM on 01/07/2010
I was wondering why I didn't find Avatar's dialogue objectiona­ble at all. Always good to know my newly minted History degree is worthwhile­.
photo
FoxIslander
I live on Fox Island...no relation to Fox News
07:57 PM on 01/06/2010
I was looking for a H@lleburto­n sign on the mining company's helicopter­s.
01:38 AM on 01/07/2010
Would have been more fun to see a Weyland-Yu­tani logo, given Cameron's efforts. Its actually strongly hinted in Pandoraped­ia that the company is an evolution of Google...
07:03 PM on 01/06/2010
Mining interests for decades have promoted Papuans as "stone-age­", while Indonesian Generals have said that they need the land but Papuans can go build on the moon or sun if they want a home.

Freeport blasted the top off the US government long before it physicaly did that to the scared mountain of the Amungme people, in December 1960 Freeport director Robert Lovett purportedl­y asked Kennedy to appoint McGeorge Bundy as the US National Security Adviser.

McGeorge Bundy purportedl­y cancelled the B26 pre-drawn strike to support the Bay of Pigs invasion, and spent eight months telling Kennedy that the West Papua people had to be sacrificed to save Americal from the Cold-War. What else does Cuba & West Papua have in common, Freeport. Freeport was under investigat­ion over a 1950's US contract paying inflated prices for the output of it's mine in Cuba; but I wonder if the mine had ran dry and those businessme­n could not risk the US government being able to check if the mine was the real source of the over paid metals.

The State Department summary claims Bundy personally wanted Kennedy to sacrifice West Papua to Indonesia, against State & CIA recomendat­ions. Kennedy did not know it, but Freeport knew West Papua had the world's riched gold & copper deposits worth $billions. When West Papua became Indonesian colony & General Suharto came to power, Freeport got the mining rights to Papua's gold & copper. How does that compare to a James Cameron's plot?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dnaromney
05:41 PM on 01/06/2010
I like.