iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Josh Sugarmann

GET UPDATES FROM Josh Sugarmann
 

NRA Receives Millions from Gun Industry "Corporate Partners"

Posted: 04/13/11 03:02 PM ET

The National Rifle Association (NRA) receives millions of dollars directly from domestic and foreign gun manufacturers and other members of the firearms industry through an organized corporate outreach program, according to a new report issued today by my organization, the Violence Policy Center.

2011-04-13-blood_money_2b_red.jpg

The report, Blood Money: How the Gun Industry Bankrolls the NRA, reveals that since 2005 contributions from gun industry "corporate partners" to the NRA total between $14.7 million and $38.9 million.

Total donations to the NRA from all "corporate partners" -- both gun industry and non-gun industry -- for the same time period total between $19.8 million and $52.6 million. The vast majority of funds -- 74 percent -- contributed to the NRA from "corporate partners" come from members of the firearms industry: companies involved in the manufacture or sale of firearms or shooting-related products.

There's also a companion YouTube video with the report.

Despite the NRA's historical claims that it is not financially allied with the gun industry, including the current disclaimer on its website that it "is not affiliated with any firearm or ammunition manufacturers or with any businesses that deal in guns and ammunition," NRA "corporate partners" include many of the world's best known gunmakers as well as such companies as Xe, the new name of the now infamous Blackwater Worldwide -- known for its abuses in the Iraq war -- which alone contributed between $500,000 and $999,999 to the NRA since 2005.

In a recent promotional brochure, NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre promises that the "National Rifle Association's newly expanded Corporate Partners Program is an opportunity for corporations to partner with the NRA... This program is geared toward your company's corporate interests."

2011-04-13-FinalHuffPoringoffreedom.JPG

One of those companies is Brownells, headed by NRA board member Pete Brownell. The company describes itself as the "world's largest supplier of firearms accessories and gunsmithing tools." It sells a wide-range of high-capacity ammunition magazines for pistols and assault weapons, including the same capacity Glock magazine as the 33-round magazine allegedly used by Jared Loughner in his January 2011 attack in Tucson, Arizona, that left six dead and 13 wounded, including Representative Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ). Brownells is also a manufacturer of high-capacity ammunition magazines. On his website supporting his campaign to join the NRA's board, Brownell offered his vision for strengthening the bond between the NRA and the gun industry and making sure that industry members are part of the NRA's mission:

Having directors who intimately understand and work in leadership positions within the firearms industry ensures the NRA's focus is honed on the overall mission of the organization. These individuals bring a keen sense of the industry and of the bigger fight to the table.

Among the NRA's "corporate partners" who gave $25,000 or more to the organization are 22 that manufacture firearms, including such well-known gunmakers as: Arsenal, Inc.; Benelli; Beretta USA Corporation; Browning; DPMS Panther Arms; FNH USA; Glock, Inc.; H&R 1871, LLC; Marlin Firearms; Remington Arms Co., Inc.; SIGARMS, Inc.; Smith & Wesson Corporation; Springfield Armory; and, Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.

Of the 22 gunmakers, 12 manufacture assault weapons. Also among the NRA's "corporate partners" are numerous high-capacity ammunition magazine manufacturers or vendors.

One manufacturer, Beretta, donated one million dollars to the NRA to work to overturn gun control laws in the wake of the 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller (which for the first time ever recognized an individual right to possess a handgun in the home for self-defense).

The NRA's top corporate benefactor, however, is MidwayUSA, which sells ammunition, high-capacity ammunition magazines, and other shooting accessories and has contributed between five and 10 million dollars to the NRA via its NRA Round-Up Program (which rounds up customer purchases to the nearest dollar with the difference going to the NRA) and other contributions. MidwayUSA founder Larry Potterfield credits part of his company's success to NRA-backed federal legislation, the Firearms Owners' Protection Act, commonly known as McClure-Volkmer (but called Volkmer-McClure by Potterfield):

By 1987, we were doing about $5 million in business, selling mostly to dealers. The product lines were bulk components and cartridge boxes. The Volkmer-McClure law was enacted in October 1987, which removed the restriction of shipping brass and bullets to FFL holders only. Midway immediately began selling directly to consumers, in addition to selling to dealers.
In January 2011 the company announced that for "a second consecutive year" it was serving as "the Official Sponsor of the NRA Annual Meeting and Exhibits..." being held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania later this month.


2011-04-13-NRAPittsburgh.jpg


One Pittsburgh resident who apparently took part in the NRA's Round-Up Program through MidwayUSA was concealed carry permit holder George Sodini, who in August 2009 opened fire at an LA Fitness Center in Collier, PA, killing three women and wounding nine others before turning the gun on himself and taking his own life. A copy of the e-mail receipt sent to Sodini from MidwayUSA for his purchase of 9mm and .45 ammunition that was shipped to him courtesy of McClure-Volker includes a donation of 74 cents from the mass shooter to the NRA via the Round-Up Program.

The NRA claims that its positions are driven solely by a concern for the interests of gun owners, never mentioning its own financial stake in protecting the profits of its gun industry patrons. The mutually dependent nature of the National Rifle Association and the gun industry presents a new context -- dollars and cents -- in understanding the NRA's unwillingness to compromise on even the most limited controls over firearms or related products (such as restrictions on high-capacity ammunition magazines).

At the 2009 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre told a cheering crowd that "the guys with the guns make the rules." The information contained in the VPC's new report raises the question as to what degree it is the guys who make the guns who make the rules.

 

Follow Josh Sugarmann on Twitter: www.twitter.com/VPCinfo

 
 
  • Comments
  • 510
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bonnie Larkin
Oathkeeper AND NRA member
11:35 PM on 04/20/2011
The NRA throws some of the best banquets and fund raisers - I take my g/daughters with me and we have a GREAT time - I always donate money and always pay my membership dues - proudly display my bumperstickers - and add as many firearms and ammo as I want - to my collection.
The NRA helps with our personal and national defense.
photo
JerseyCity
I Like Pancakes......yum yum
10:10 PM on 04/19/2011
Ya know, I was gonna purchase five hi cap mags, but then Joshie reminded me of the round up program, so instead I purchased four, and rounded up with the money that I alotted for the fifth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:12 PM on 04/19/2011
These contributions are used for local fund raising banquets, and let me tell you, they are a great time!!!

I bet if an anti-gunner went to one of these banquets it might actually shock them to the core at how polite and friendly people along with the lack of the gang element that attends.

http://www.friendsofnra.org/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
02:47 PM on 04/19/2011
The commonly-demonized "assault weapons" lack the key characteristic of an assault rifle. Adding "assault" to any type of weapon does not make it more dangerous.
photo
JerseyCity
I Like Pancakes......yum yum
04:27 PM on 04/19/2011
I used *assault* soap this morning, and it bothered my eyes.
photo
JerseyCity
I Like Pancakes......yum yum
02:47 PM on 04/19/2011
Yawn.

and.

FAIL.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
02:21 PM on 04/19/2011
"No free man shall ever bee debarred the use of arms."
-Thomas Jefferson
photo
rikilii
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
05:11 PM on 04/19/2011
Countdown until someone argues that in 16th and 17th century English, "debarred" actually meant "allowed".....10...9...8...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:04 PM on 04/19/2011
debarred in legalese: doing something bad which gets one kicked out of the legal fraternity.

de Bard by a Chicago literature buff: a reference to William Shakespeare.

debarred to a real estate developer: converting a prison into a upscale condo project.

debarred to a history buff: what happened to America because of Prohibition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
02:20 PM on 04/19/2011
The people who say that the 2A doesn't apply because it specifies the "militia" show ignorance of federal law.

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DaveNYC
07:08 PM on 04/18/2011
This is a very one-sided and incomplete assessment.

First, the article suggests that corporate donors are a dominant form of fundraising for the NRA. Conveniently, neither the article nor the linked report include any discussion of the amount of total revenue generated by the NRA during the same period. There are over $3 million NRA members paying $35/year dues...that is over $100 million right there per year, or over $600 million from 2005 through 2010. Also, that doesn't include non-dues contributions. In this light, the high end of Mr. Sugarman's ESTIMATE ($38.9 million) is somewhat less significant in the grand scheme of things.

Then there is the fact that the "estimate" is really just a guess -- at best an extrapolation. Ergo the high end of the range ($38.9 million) is 250% of the low end ($14.7 million). One wonders why Mr. Sugarmann stops at $38.9 million -- as long as we're guessing, why not go with $100 bajillion?

And finally -- it is well known that the Violence Policy Center receives a majority of its funding from the Soros Foundation. I'm OK with that -- Soros can advocate whatever views he would like. I mean, BP gets to spend millions telling people it cleaned up the oil spill, right? But doesn't this make the tacit argument set forth by the author -- that funding from big corporate sources indicates an interest group is unreliable -- a little hypocritical?
photo
rikilii
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
03:52 PM on 04/18/2011
the most limited controls over firearms or related products (such as restrictions on high-capacity ammunition magazines)
This comment made me laugh.  Let's get one thing straight:  a total ban on the manufacture or sale of anything is not a "most limited control".
04:48 PM on 04/18/2011
When millions of those "anythings" are allowed to remain in circulation, a "total ban" most certainly is "limited control".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
05:02 PM on 04/18/2011
"Allowed"? Our rights are not ours because they are allowed by government. Government is allowed to exist because the people conditionally lend it a portion of their personal sovereignty. We can also revoke that conditional loan of authority if the contract is not honored.
photo
rikilii
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
05:32 PM on 04/18/2011
And consequently completely useless, even ignoring for the moment that the entire idea of limiting magazine size is conceptually bankrupt.
photo
rikilii
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
02:50 PM on 04/18/2011
Yet another example of the VPC debunking a statement the NRA never made, based on a misguided or hyper-technical reading of a statement the NRA actually did make.
01:14 PM on 04/18/2011
NRA membership: over 4 million (hard to know, the list is secret)
2nd Amendment Foundation membership: 650,000

Brady Campaign membership: 50,581 (we can know exactly because the Brady Campaign is so hard-up for cash that they're selling their membership list)

It's probably easy to neglect the impact that millions of dues-paying members can have on funding when the cause you champion has no one willing to contribute money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RevJimIII
Grin and Barret...
05:47 PM on 04/18/2011
The open carry group has around 25,000 members, and its just a small subset of firearms owners.. and its growing..  
09:15 PM on 04/18/2011
I believe that the North Dakota Shih Tzu Fanciers' Association claims similar membership.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HisXLNC
No.
11:19 PM on 04/18/2011
Keep in mind, that 50,581 isn't even wholly comprised of people who support the Brady Campaign. Anyone who signs up for their mailing list (many pro-gun advocates included) is included in that 50,581.
01:06 PM on 04/18/2011
If this is all a ploy for the gun makers to be able to sell products, doesn't that imply that the market is out there, the people are willing to buy these products, and they are willing to do so in such numbers that it's worth it for the industry to campaign to be allowed to continue? That sort of suggests that the will of the people says they want access to these products.

But then again, as we've already demonstrated, the industry's contributions making up a paltry portion of NRA funds. So I suppose it's a moot point, since we can directly see that the general population directly funds the NRA and wants them to continue safeguarding 2A rights.
photo
rikilii
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
10:33 AM on 04/18/2011
So basically, a whopping 1-3% of the NRA's annual budget comes from the gun industry. 

Oh.  My.  God.  Call the president!
photo
rikilii
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
10:49 AM on 04/18/2011
By the way, that video was the most infantile, substance-free piece of garbage to come out of the anti-gun industry yet.
10:58 AM on 04/18/2011
According to your calculation, the NRA's "annual budget" is in the vicinity of $650 million. Perhaps the President could connect us to the IRS.
12:30 PM on 04/18/2011
In 2009, it was $307 million. Your math sucks.
01:01 PM on 04/18/2011
Did you notice (by reading) that Sugarmann cites the industry NRA contributions over a span of 5 years, not 1 year? Or did you gloss right over that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
06:14 PM on 04/17/2011
My wife and I will be attending the annual NRA convention, technically known as "NRA Annual Meeting & Exhibits" at the David Lawrence Center in Pittsburgh, PA April 29 - May 1. Hope as many of you here at this site can be there too!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RevJimIII
Grin and Barret...
06:22 PM on 04/17/2011
Too far to trip this year, enjoy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
06:52 PM on 04/17/2011
Orlando works best for me!  About 40 miles round trip.  But Pittsburgh is doable and wifey has a sister and B.I.L. in Philly.  BTW, all the historic sites in Philly have "No Guns" signs outside. I suppose it could be that those signs really mean "Semi-automatic pistols are not permitted inside but revolvers are just fine."
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and retired military combat vet
02:43 PM on 04/17/2011
I wonder if we should complain that the VPC, which is purely a lobby group and does nothing else, gets money via the federal government's Combined Federal Campaign, which leverages federal employees, especially the US military, for donations.
04:03 PM on 04/17/2011
Really, what's up with our government, anyway, giving money to somebody like the "Violence Policy Center", whose evil, subversive agenda includes reducing gun proliferation in America? Everybody knows that the key to a healthier society is more guns, not less! If those "VPC"ers had their way, thanks in no small part to those aforementioned handouts, Yemen might overtake us as the most gun-glutted country in the world. How would we deal with that shame, I ask you? It boggles the mind!
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and retired military combat vet
04:28 PM on 04/17/2011
Which completely fails to address the issue.
01:01 PM on 04/18/2011
"Weapons ownership may be correlated with rising levels of wealth, and that means we need to think about future demand in parts of the world where economic growth is giving people larger disposable income," he told a Geneva news conference.

The report, which relied on government data, surveys and media reports to estimate the size of world arsenals, estimated there were 650 million civilian firearms worldwide, and 225 million held by law enforcement and military forces.