The world has just witnessed yet another historic, lopsided prisoner exchange between Israel and a terrorist organization. When Hamas abducted Gilad Shalit back in June of 2006, it followed in the footsteps of Hezbollah and numerous Palestinian groups that had successfully kidnapped and traded Israelis, dead or alive, in return for the fulfillment of their own interests. The Shalit deal resulted in the release of over 1000 Palestinian Arabs, including hundreds with "blood on their hands" that were implicated in some of Israel's worst terrorist attacks. Despite Israeli, American, and other Western claims to the contrary, states regularly engage in negotiations with terrorists. They do so despite openly acknowledging the fact that the release will only result in more kidnapping attempts and violence in the future. So why do they do it, and what, if anything, can we learn from this?
To answer these questions, it's worth understanding what motivates organizations to carry out kidnappings in the first place: money and power. The FARC in Colombia, gangs in Mexico, and pirates in Somalia, are all examples of groups that use kidnapping to fill their coffers and fund their operations. When the Iranians traded US citizens for military hardware in the Iran-Contra Affair, and Hezbollah traded Israelis for the release of thousands of prisoners, they did so for forms of power. Both parties forced their enemies to publicly recognize a reality they were loath to admit: they were players that demanded attention.
Israel has been reluctant to recognize Hamas as a power for quite some time, as the organization's modus operandi is the destruction of the Jewish state, and their efforts to achieve that goal are through terrorism and other forms of violence. Yet despite Israeli efforts, it continuously finds itself forced to negotiate with Hamas. In the past this has meant low level negotiations through third parties such as the United Nations. In the negotiations over Gilad Shalit, this meant back and forth indirect talks in Egypt with Hamas deputy foreign minister Razi Hamed, and Ahmed Jaabari, head of Hamas' military wing.
Ultimately, Israel felt an obligation to negotiate the release of Gilad Shalit when it found terms it was willing to accept, even if it did not want to admit to them. In a small country where conscription in the military is required, too many came to recognize Shalit as someone who could easily be one of their own family members. If Israel had the opportunity to save his life, they had the obligation to bring him home. By all accounts, the Shin Bet and IDF regularly updated the prime minister on Gilad Shalit's status, and reported that they were unable to come up with a rescue mission that would possibly lead to a successful outcome. They also reported that the terrorists who would be released could either be successfuly monitored, or would be shipped far enough away to countries sympathetic to Hamas, like Qatar, Syria and Turkey, that their danger to Israel would be limited. Only time will tell what the effects of the prisoner release will be for the security of the Israeli people, but previous releases have led many to return to carry out further terrorist attacks.
The sad reality remains that those killed by terrorists are forgotten by media and the public-at-large must faster than those kidnapped and kept in the spotlight. While everyone in Israel knows the name Gilad Shalit, sadly few remember the names Lt. Hanan Barak and Sgt. Pavel Slutzker, who were killed by Hamas while attempting to kidnap Shalit. Even fewer can recall the names of the four soldiers who were seriously injured.
As long as kidnappings of Israelis continue, Israel will continue to negotiate with terrorists despite every intention and declaration to the contrary, while Hamas and other groups will continue to invoke the art of kidnapping to achieve status, power, and legitimacy. Few things can bring Hamas real results and front page headlines like a prisoner exchange. As long as the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians continues, and as long as Hamas continues to be applauded for its efforts by many in the Arab and Muslim worlds, terrorism and kidnappings will continue. As Israel struggles to remain united in the face of its enemies, so too will it continue to negotiate with terrorists.
Follow Joshua Gleis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/joshua_gleis
Rabbi Bradley Shavit Artson: The Morality of Redeeming Captives: Gilad Shalit and the Talmud
Gilad Shalit will be allowed time with his family before debriefing
Home for the holidays: Gilad Shalit celebrates Simchat Torah with family
FP Passport: 5 things Gilad Shalit missed while in captivity
For Palestinians released in Gilad Shalit prisoner swap, freedom is relative
Gilad Shalit's Release: A Heavy-Hearted Celebration
You cannot be parodied--any attempt would fall short of your own self-parody.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15407142
when will these Muslims ever learn
Why mention the FARC, Mexican gangs and Somali pirates (the obvious "others"), when the Zionists themselves regularly kidnapped British soldiers during the 1940's, threatening to kill them unless their "terrorist" compatriots in the Irgun and Stern Gang were released.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sergeants_affair
The leaders of these groups, Begin and Shamir, are revered today as "founding fathers" of Israel.
I'm not sure if Zionists are simply unaware of these facts, or whether they are deliberately trying to mislead.
Either way, in light of this past, this feigned puzzlement as to what motivates people to exchange "terrorists" for kidnapped soldiers is simply unbecoming.
The question is how to define/set a value . It cannot be set uniformly, right?.
So why if Hamas' overriding concern is slaughtering as many Jews as possible, have they clearly not slaughtered as many Jews as possible. For example, when Israel did its last incursion into Gaza, Hamas pulled out better rockets that were less effective because they were used while Hamas lacked freedom of movement. Had they used those rockets during a period of calm they certainly would have killed more Israelis.
Again I think that is the less interesting issue than the question of how the ransom dynamic works. But apparently it is less fun than "Palestinians evil/Israelis evil?" And I can't go further than Israel wrong on many things, so I am not the best for that debate.
In general one does not want to pay off kidnappers because the point is kidnapping is generally to get money. So if there was no money there would be no incentive to kidnap. But that clearly does not apply in the Shalit case. True, Hamas was able to get something they wanted for Shalit, the release of prisoners. But if that possibility was blocked, they still would have taken Shalit to show they could. They might have killed him rather than kept him as a prisoner, but the reason for taking him was not the trade value, so getting rid of the trade value would not prevent such incidents.
Give this up already. Israel stopped building settlements earlier this year, but even then the PA refused to negotiate.
#2 - there was a settlement freeze in the West Bank for months without any negotiations
#3 - terrorism is a real concern, even within the peace movement in Israel.
#4 - They stop being freedom fighters the second they took up actions solely against civilians.
As for names remembered, can you tell me the name of one gunned down by Baruch Goldstein, or murdered by Begin in the bombing of the King David hotel, or massacred in Deir Yassin, died in Qibya in Sharon'sbloodbath? As for negotiating with terrorist, the Palestinians did so with both Begin and Sharon.
What's your point?
Get my point?
Easy... The same way you negotiate with rabid dogs... You don't.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
When a so call culture is raising their children to become martyrs, there's something terribly wrong with said culture.
do u see ANYTHING remotely bad about the Muslim armies or is only Jewish armies u see bad
For Israelis, Shalit is not just "anyone's son or brother", it is also a moral imperative that Israelis and Jews in general have deeply engraved in their culture.
2000 years of persecution engraves deep within you care for your captured brothers.
There is a ever-present feeling of guilt for the unreleased prisoner Ron Arad, who languished in unknown cellars for 25 years until there remained no one to negotiate with.