iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Joshua Spivak

GET UPDATES FROM Joshua Spivak
 

The Brokered Convention Nightmare: Can the GOP Match the Democrats' Historic Ineptitude in Choosing Presidential Candidates‏?

Posted: 02/15/2012 11:14 am

Mitt Romney's inability to close the deal on the nomination has led to the potential for an elongated primary process. After strong showings in different states, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul all have reasons to not drop out of the race. With each passing primary, there's actually a chance the Republican nominee will have to deal with the fallout from the first brokered convention since primaries and caucuses became the critical method of choosing nominees.

While nearly every four years, there is some talk about a convention fight, it is usually on the other side of the aisle. Throughout the 20th century, Democrats had a lock on embarrassing presidential nominations fights. While the Republicans have had a few memorably bad nomination fights, they have generally been able to quickly and efficiently, and with a minimum of rhetorical bloodshed, settle on their nominee.

The Democrats are famed for botching the selection process. From their earliest days in the Jacksonian era, when they adopted a requirement (since repealed) that a candidate must receive two-thirds of the delegates to win the nomination, the party has caused itself no end of grief. The famed blown conventions are almost all on the Democratic side of the aisle -- whether it was 1968 in Chicago, Ted Kennedy's doomed run in 1980 or the 103 ballots needed to nominate a candidate in 1924.

Even in the best of years for the party, where victory in the general election was almost assured, disaster loomed. Franklin Roosevelt's nomination in 1932 came perilously close to falling apart. In 2008, the party almost entered an embarrassing and potentially devastating convention fight before Hillary Clinton conceded to Barack Obama.

However, rather than being a salve for Republicans, the Obama/Clinton battle may hint at the serious problem the Republicans face. Both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were young enough and popular enough to see that losing the nomination would not preclude a run in 2012 or 2016. In fact, if she runs in 2016, Clinton could very well be the prohibitive favorite for the nomination. The Republican contenders have a much different picture. All but one of the Republican candidates has no such hope. This election is clearly the last shot for Romney or Gingrich, not to mention the 74-year-old Paul.

While the 53-year-old Rick Santorum may have resurrected his political career with his victory in Iowa, and may have a good reason to be seen as a magnanimous loser, the same can't be said for the other candidates. Romney would be a two-time loser who blew a big lead, setting himself up to be a political punchline; Gingrich, who has been out of elected office for over a decade, will likewise have no future hope to get a presidential nomination. Paul, who is thought not to have a real shot at winning, could have a different motivation. After finally migrating from gadfly to center stage, he may want to use a nomination fight to put his ideological stamp on the party's political positions.

Despite these facts, a brokered convention remains a long shot. Once a clear delegate leader emerges from the pack, the campaign donations flow just to that candidate. The other candidates suddenly lack money, have to deal with bad press and have a heavy party push to get out. Additionally, a number of the later, delegate-rich states are winner-take-all, allowing one candidate to rack up big totals even in close victories.

There hasn't even been a second ballot at a political convention since the Democrats in 1952. The Republicans have a better track record -- they haven't had a second ballot since 1948, and have only had four conventions go past the first ballot since the nineteenth century ended. Even if it does go to a convention without any candidate having a majority, the Republicans would have an unusual advantage over the Democrats -- they need to convince fewer supporters to switch sides. The Republicans have less than half the delegates at their convention than the Democrats -- 2,286 versus 5,555 for the Democrats. In case it is brokered, it should make a deal easier to obtain, as fewer votes have to be switched.

But unlikely doesn't mean impossible. This isn't just a West Wing writer's fantasy -- it is clearly in the realm of the possible. If the delegate count is as close as the Democrats' was in 2008 -- when the party did not even count the Michigan and Florida delegates -- the Republicans might have two or three candidates who have every reason to try and fight to the last. And then, finally, the Republicans will be able to make an equal claim to that mantle of nomination incompetence owned for so long by the Democrats.

Joshua Spivak is a senior fellow at the Hugh L. Carey Institute for Government Reform at Wagner College and blogs at http://recallelections.blogspot.com

 
FOLLOW POLITICS
Mitt Romney's inability to close the deal on the nomination has led to the potential for an elongated primary process. After strong showings in different states, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Ron P...
Mitt Romney's inability to close the deal on the nomination has led to the potential for an elongated primary process. After strong showings in different states, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Ron P...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
sanevoter
Still never missed a vote since 1965
05:27 PM on 02/16/2012
Have you died?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CSKAP
Morlock or Eloi?
03:45 PM on 02/16/2012
I think the idea of a Palin/Paul ticket at the end of a brokered convention would be just too great for words.
Of course with a Gingrich/Santorum third party ticket
It’s possible President Obama would be elected Emperor for life in that case.
RealistBC
Micro-bios must pass muster.
01:20 PM on 02/16/2012
The Convention is the last gasp of the current Party leaders to install as the candidate someone who can beat Obama, whose weakness as president with a bare 50% approval makes such a victory possible. The short span between the end of the convention and the election is the only advantage they will have to exploit.
01:15 PM on 02/16/2012
The Republicans nominated George W. Bush. Now who is notoriously poor at choosing candidates?

Together with his neocon cabal, he trashed the entire world economy while bankrupting the US and destroying our position as leader of the western world. Now who is incompetent to choose a candidate?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrJykell
Truth hunter
11:17 AM on 02/16/2012
It's definitely going to make it hard making it snow in Florida----

Whens the last time in history the Iowa primary was lost--completely--?
Whens the last time vote counts come up missing in any primary?
Whens has it ever been so obvious the media is helping block a front runner in an American election?


It's appears to be one of them elections we read about in some foriegn dictatorships or pretend democracies------Is this really happening in America?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Walter Z
11:01 AM on 02/16/2012
I find this article confusing, and the reasoning somewhat backward -- as though the object of a convention were the quick and easy selection of a candidate, without in-fighting or rhetorical battles that show up in any arena where differences of opinion are both necessary and important. I suggest that, the Republican system being set up as it is, with fewer pledged delegates required for an assured nomination, there's a greater resemblance to trying to do a meaningful, muscle-building work out in a gym equipped with a few 5 lb. weights. When so much is at stake, a messy struggle is not a bad thing. Does the apparent clarity of hindsight erase the possibility that, had there been a more pitched contest, things might not have turned out differently -- and perhaps, better -- for both a party and a nation?
10:01 AM on 02/16/2012
The sad truth is that brokered conventions probably produce bettter candidates than the primary process does. Men and women who don't want to be battered on the campaign trail just for a chance to be president shun the process. Those same people may make excellent presidents and may be effective campaigners when their opponent is a known commodity.
RealistBC
Micro-bios must pass muster.
01:46 PM on 02/16/2012
You cannot make the case that those who avoid primary battering make better candidates. The fact that they would get battered in a primary run indicates that there is a reason they would be battered. They also rob the voters of an opportunity to see them exposed, warts and all, so that they can make more of an informed choice. We've had too many presidents since Nixon who weren't the candidate who ran and won.
09:13 AM on 02/16/2012
The stage appears to be set for a momentous moment of unparalleled ennui,
When Trump & Palin will announce their joint candidacy as POTUS & VPOTUS.......
photo
yeah-isaidit
Does not fear the funk
09:05 AM on 02/16/2012
Iowa: Mitt won! No, after reviewing returns - Rick wins!
Maine: Mitt won! No - it seems that an entire district went uncounted. Talk about incompetence.
I don't think that a brokered convention is as much of a long shot as the pundits would have us believe.
Either way, it is certainly entertaining.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Zombeaver
Wooooooooooooood . . .
08:51 AM on 02/16/2012
I wouldn't be surprised to see the nominee be someone who had not campaigned, like Jeb Bush. The convention is in Florida.
RealistBC
Micro-bios must pass muster.
01:54 PM on 02/16/2012
This is the scenario I expect as well, especially since it is known from a comment made by Dana Perino that both previous Bush presidents have been pushing Jeb out into the limelight as much as possible to keep him ready for the role.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sue McFarland
04:33 AM on 02/16/2012
Republicans keep saying a long, protracted battle makes their candidate (whoever it might be) better like the protracted Democratic primary battle made Mr. Obama a better general election candidate. I beg to differ: During that epic primary battle, two things were happening at once and one was absolutely compelling: 1)history was going to be made regardless of whom won the election: we'd have either our first realistic female candidate or our first legitimate African-American candidate, AND there was no basic philosophical difference between Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama: they were quibbling over the details of a basic agreement about the role/purpose of government.

The Republican party, on the other hand, is having an identity crisis: the Reagan coalition between the religious right wing and the fiscal hawks is falling apart. This is not historically unusual: the anomaly in American history is just how long the FDR coalition actually lasted--40 years or so when the usual lifespan of coalitions on either side of the isle is usually somewhere around 20 years or so. It's a fascinating process, albeit not pretty, to watch.
05:53 AM on 02/16/2012
One important difference is at the end of the Obama/Clinton contest it was conceivable they may have run on the same ticket. There is no way the interpersonal conflict/mudslinging/nasty/vicious struggle between the GOP nominies could end like that. The GOP protracted battle is deeply harming all the possible nominies and the GOP itself. Good.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brunettiii
07:33 AM on 02/16/2012
Retro is cool! Lol Good.
photo
DoubleYellowLines
Left of the Right, and Right of the Left
10:25 AM on 02/16/2012
I could see Romney offering Santorum the VP role, That would legitimize Romey with the religious right AND set up Santorum for a future run.

But much like 2008, the backup may deter a lot of independents.
photo
Snerdgronk
co(R)po(R)atoc(R)acy plutoc(R)acy
04:17 AM on 02/16/2012
Say ... Where did the term 'broke-(R) convention', come from ... ?

Snerd
04:08 AM on 02/16/2012
It is a delicious irony: because of the virtually unlimited corporate dollars being thrown at the GOP candidates several of them have been able to remain in the race well past the time they would have otherwise dropped out. This is damaging the front runner so badly he may never recover. This is damaging the GOP so badly it may never recover, or at least not for years. Can the Citizens United decision of the SCOTUS end up being a case of give them enough rope and they'll h**g themselves?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
08:30 AM on 02/16/2012
Interesting. Kind of like: "watch out for what you want, because you might get it."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scurvydog74
01:03 AM on 02/16/2012
Brokered = bought and sold for a commission...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greytunes
99% of GOP/TPers make the rest look bad
12:59 AM on 02/16/2012
So, a brokered convention plays out even better. The average GOP/TPer can't be left to select a candidate, so the big money boys(including the Koch Bros.) get to select their vision of America. Bush, Christie, Ryan,Palin,no telling what or who we would get. But you can bet that once the big boys make their choice, no restraint will be allowed. Hopefully we'll see through the GOP/TP charade and vote Obama/Biden, along with both Houses of Congress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lou on Vancouver Island
Allin, Lou: Mystery Author
10:41 AM on 02/16/2012
Thus alienating the very few Republicans who got to the polls and voted in the primaries. Love it.