iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Judge H. Lee Sarokin

Judge H. Lee Sarokin

Posted: November 8, 2010 11:32 AM

The answer all too often is coercion, intimidation, deceit and trickery. All of those techniques were employed to obtain the conviction of four innocent sailors for the rape and murder of a woman in Norfolk, Virginia. Danial Williams after only 11 days of marriage was arrested and charged with the crime. After relentless questioning and threats for 11 hours, he confessed. When the confession did not fit the actual facts, he was again questioned and convinced to alter his confession to jibe with those facts.

Because Williams' DNA failed to match any at the crime scene, the police next interrogated his roommate, Joe Dick. Subjected to the same harassment, Dick likewise confessed. For reasons too complicated to recount here, a total of eight men were charged with the gang rape and murder of Michelle Bosko, including two other sailors, Eric Wilson and Derek Tice.

Although one of the eight, Omar Ballard confessed to the crime as the sole perpetrator and that his was the only DNA that matched that at the crime scene, the prosecution of the others proceeded. All four sailors were convicted. Three received life sentences without parole and one was sentenced to eight and half years, and he has since been released. The other three received conditional pardons from Governor Tim Kaine after serving 11 years in prison. Various court proceedings are now underway regarding the convictions and claims of prosecutorial and constitutional abuses. Those, of course, could be obviated by the state confessing error and consenting to vacating the convictions. Doing justice may require conceding wrongdoing rather than clinging to convictions so fraught with injustice.

The detective who obtained the confessions has been convicted of corruption and lying to the FBI. He was indicted and convicted for extorting money from defendants in exchange for getting them favorable treatment. Despite the conditional pardons granted to them, because they were not exonerated as felons or sex offenders, the sailors face varying impediments, such as reporting monthly to a probation officer, drug and alcohol tests, curfews, sex offender registration, limits on job opportunities and the stigma which necessarily follows them. The plight of these individuals and the dedication of their pro bono lawyers will be recounted by Frontline on PBS on Nov. 9, 2010 entitled The Confessions.

In the 261 exonerations based upon DNA evidence, clear evidence of innocence, approximately 20 percent of the convictions set aside were based upon false confessions. There is no more powerful evidence in a criminal trial than a confession by the defendant himself. There is no greater injustice than when those confessions are obtained through threats and intimidation and result in the conviction of innocent persons.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 85
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:51 AM on 11/11/2010
Look at individual motivations of many who erred here. The detective's motivations: Obvious. The prosecutor had to fight to the end or else be viewed by his peers/office as the idiot who couldn't get convictions even with 4 gruesome confessions. Look at Gov Tim Kaine who could have fixed much of this but instead gave just a conditional pardon even though he knows the Four are innocent. His predecessor wanted no part of this. If Kaine gave a full pardon and ever ran for office again, someone on his opponent's side would bring up his pardon of four confessed rapist murderers (mainly for headline value, knowing very few know the full story). Look at the posts here with some who still think the Four are guilty (how?). I would bet that none of the rational people who posted here would vote for Kaine based on him doing the right thing if he had given the full pardon. But, many who think the Four are guilty would vote against Kaine if he had given the full pardon. Ever since Giuliani rose to power, the DA office has become a stepping stone for politicsPERIOD Look at Cuomo now. Would he have given up (or change his mind) on this case, especially when the victim's mom still think the Four are guilty? Do you think that Obama or Boehner could have done the right thing and forever given up 2-5% of female voters?
12:11 PM on 11/09/2010
About 40% of Americans have NO confidence in the US judicial system, according to the Legume Institute, a London based research firm.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
02:37 PM on 11/09/2010
greyhound2 - Despite the type of incident referred to in my post, that would be a shame. Of course, confidence and independence are not being promoted by money being poured into judicial elections and judges being removed for unpopular decisions.
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
08:59 AM on 11/09/2010
Thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
02:38 PM on 11/09/2010
OliverTwist - Thanks
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JM817
02:55 AM on 11/09/2010
People will be horrified when they see the show, but they will totally not get the connection between these kinds of events and the fact that voters routinely reward "get tough on crime" prosecutors, some of whom are all to willing to jail the innocent in order to look good to the voters. We need to start thinking about justice in this country, which is not equal to punishment.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
10:52 PM on 11/08/2010
He forgot to mention waterboarding.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
denicci1977
35 yrs, female Georgia early voted 4 Obama2012!
10:11 PM on 11/08/2010
But isn't it a judge's job to be able to see through this especially if evidence doesn't match?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
10:53 PM on 11/08/2010
I don't think so.  I think the judge judges whether the trial was fair not the verdict.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
02:43 PM on 11/09/2010
denicci1977 - Fair question. But frequently the presiding judge does not know what has gone on during the interrogation process. Sometimes there are pre-trial hearings to determine the voluntariness of a confession, and in those instances, a judge may declare the confession inadmissible if improperly obtained.
photo
Ragnar Danneskjold
Defender of Liberty
09:05 PM on 11/08/2010
Some confess for the attention.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
02:44 PM on 11/09/2010
Ragnar - True, there are those who confess for the attention or publicity but are not guilty. However, charges are rarely pursued because it is readily apparent that the publicity seeker does not have sufficient knowledge of the crime.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BLGould
Webcams are a perfect excuse for guerilla theatre!
07:39 PM on 11/08/2010
This is a sensitive subject, Judge Sarokin, since we live in a substantively different world since the 9/11 attacks. I mention this only because there are some within our federal government who don't like the "criminal investigation" approach and like to point to instances like this as examples of where our criminal justice system gets it terribly wrong.

Obviously, instances where our criminal justice system gets it right don't further their meme so they focus on the bad actors and ask if we want our nation's safety dependent upon the flawed procedures of the VERY few they cherry-pick for their arguments.

That said, I think it encumbent upon our criminal justice system to put some automatic triggers in place (not unlike the automatic appeals in death-penalty cases), to compel prosecutors AND judges at all levels to justify prosecutions based SOLELY on confessions (no physical evidence; no witness identification). We don't want to overburden our Justices and prosecutors with red tape. Neither do we want to allow innocent people to serve a single day for crimes they did not commit.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
08:03 PM on 11/08/2010
BLGould -However, I suspect that the objection to trying alleged terrorists in civil rather than military courts is not the fear of convicting the innocent, but rather the fear of the guilty being acquitted.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BLGould
Webcams are a perfect excuse for guerilla theatre!
08:23 PM on 11/08/2010
Oh, that's a given. The point I was making is that if ANYONE can point to our criminal justice system as a flawed and capricious enterprise, they can then propose "alternatives" to that flawed and capricious system which are SO MUCH more flawed and capricious! Better that we clean up our own house, than allow the spooks and creeps to dismiss our criminal justice system altogether and replace it with WATERBOARDING and other ineffective inerrogation techniques.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
10:55 PM on 11/08/2010
Isn't it better to let a guilty man go free than to convict an innocent one?  Is that not the basis of fair and just laws and procedures or is it just the hopes of silly individuals who believe justice is actually just.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:15 PM on 11/08/2010
Because they have nothing better to do?
Javalation
Laughing in a Daydream
06:03 PM on 11/08/2010
If you caught the 60 Minutes program when they interviewed Supreme Court justice Scalia, you may remember that he made the observation that the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution spells out no "cruel and unusual punishment", but is mute on the question of tactics used by authorities to garner information. What that means is that in the opinion of at least one of our Supreme Court Justices, we have no constitutional protection against torture for confessions.

Since the far right four tend to opine as a group, this mean that we may be one court case away from torture for confessions becoming the law of the land, if Kennedy would go along.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
07:58 PM on 11/08/2010
Javalation - I remember it well, and I was dumbfounded by the logic. Justice Scalia said that the Constitution did not prohibit torture because the 8th Amendment referred to "cruel and unusual punishment" and because "punishment" followed conviction, it did not apply to interrogation prior to conviction!
Javalation
Laughing in a Daydream
08:15 PM on 11/08/2010
Do you think my fear that the other three Justices who tend to agree with Scalia might agree on this issue is justified?

I know you probably don't know the answer to this second hypothetical question, but with the founders knowing the history of the inquisition as well as the Salem "witch trials", how could they have failed to not include language to protect against torture to extract confessions?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Appleblossom
08:35 PM on 11/08/2010
Please the man said “There is no basis in text, tradition, or even in contemporary practice (if that were enough), for finding in the Constitution a right to demand judicial consideration of newly discovered evidence of innocence brought forward after conviction."

Justice Scalia may be a bright guy but he certainly has an odd view of the law sometimes.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
05:17 PM on 11/08/2010
We should be, and I am, furious at misuse of police power. There is another point to this, however--the police and community need to work together. Officers who feel unprotected are less likely to turn in corrupt fellow officers; every corruption that goes unpunished further isolate the honest officers, makes it easier for the good ones to go bad, and alienates the community. If we do not find a way to work together, things will get much, much worse.

A good place to start would be reforming traffic fines! When cities turn to these to help bolster the budget--and many are--officers do have a quota, no matter how loudly this gets denied, and corruption is guaranteed.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
03:05 PM on 11/09/2010
been2there - Yes---police loyalty to one another is understandable and even laudable, except when it serves to cover up corruption or rights violations. Changing that tradition is difficult. I am not certain that reforming traffic fines is the answer.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
09:17 PM on 11/09/2010
Reform traffic fines to be a percentage of income instead of a flat fine. The pain is then spread equally, the city makes more money and the wealthy, who pay more may decide to change the system, hopefully for the better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
04:58 PM on 11/08/2010
And this is why I fight the police of my current town so strenuously, in spite of being brought up to respect police and my dad's best friend being a deputy sherrif in the county I grew up in!

I'm DESPERATELY hoping that one of these days they'll break the law regarding my kids when I'm around, cause I'll have the corrupt ones fired SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO fast!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:01 AM on 11/09/2010
Take it down a few notches.

You want to fight the good fight, but I wonder what kind of parent would hope that his or her own child endure the trauma such an event would inflict. I've handled juvenile defense, and kids who are mistreated by the police are often haunted by the encounter long afterward.
photo
robadeaux
Your labels have expired....
11:22 AM on 11/09/2010
Often? Always.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
12:22 PM on 11/09/2010
Notice that I said I hope that I'm AROUND, because I know the laws and our rights, and so it WON'T be the trauma that it's been time and again when the police break the law with my kids when I'm not around!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:24 PM on 11/08/2010
Maybe getting "lawyered up" is not such a bad idea. Some call it being "lawyered up," some call it exercising your constitutional rights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
09:28 PM on 11/08/2010
I know that I'd do it in a heartbeat with the cops around me! And I'm a white male veteran, meaning that I'm the least likely group to be pulled in and least likely to be tortured if something DOES cause me to get pulled in!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
10:57 PM on 11/08/2010
As a member of the group that is likely to be pulled over, by the time the lawyers get involved you have already lost blood and dignity. It is your word against theirs and some groups get more respect than others.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deezworld83
Free thinker
03:55 PM on 11/08/2010
It is a system that is so flawed that most people will just refuse to believe that it's possible. So they turn their backs to the problem and pretend it doesn't matter until it happens to them or someone they care about. Then if you don't have the money or friends who do and are willing believe in you, you stand a chance of losing everything to a system that is overcrowded, mismanaged, and in some instances, just flat out corrupt.

We are lured into thinking that we are all so much more safe because the police are out there finding and convicting all the bad guys and never gets anything wrong. Think of how many times we've read or heard stories just like or similar to this one, where people of color, or the poor and uneducated, are tried and convicted on flimsy evidence, and then 10 or 20 years down the line, DNA shows and proves that they where framed. All those years of freedom gone because someone did a bad job or even worse, someone just made up the evidence.

If it happens so many times that we hear about, just think about all the times that we don't. Or we can turn our backs and believe that we are all so much more safe because the police are out there finding and convicting all the bad guys and never gets anything wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
04:44 PM on 11/08/2010
deezworld83 - It is frightening to think of the number of these instances that go undiscovered or fail to be pursued because of the lacks of funds, or as you point out, someone who cares enough to pursue the matter.. On the other hand, I think it would be a mistake and unfair to condemn all law enforcement for the few (but too many) who abuse their authority and violate their duty. It is difficult to imagine what it must be like to be imprisoned for a crime that you have not committed. I mentioned in an earlier post that rarely, if ever, is anyone punished or disciplined for these miscarriages of justice.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
10:59 PM on 11/08/2010
I've almost been there. I was arrested, put in a lineup and identified as the perpetrator of another crime.  The only thing that allowed my lawyer to successfully argue in my behalf was the fact that I was arrested hours before the other crime was committed.  I was lucky, very lucky.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
A radical leftist with a JS Woodsworth avatar.
06:23 PM on 11/08/2010
Consider the Omar Khadr case.
Javalation
Laughing in a Daydream
03:31 PM on 11/08/2010
I've read of cases when the authorities have the person, sometimes a minor, that they are convinced is guilty, and will badger until they get a confession, sometimes requiring more than 24 hours at a time without allowing sleep. Then, either DNA evidence, or some other irrefutable evidence shows that someone else had committed the crime, and they don't even apologize for what they had done.

Since most of us have never been put through this kind of torture, we imagine that we would never confess to something that we never did. But the reality is that most of us would, especially when we don't have an attorney sitting in on the interrogation.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
04:47 PM on 11/08/2010
Javalation - Not only is there a failure to apologize, but often a resistance to freeing the person despite evidence of innocence.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
11:00 PM on 11/08/2010
Can you give insight into why that happens?  It seems like the opposite would be true.