iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Julie Stewart

GET UPDATES FROM Julie Stewart
 

Mandatory Minimum Gun Laws Ensure Nothing But Disparity

Posted: 04/19/2012 3:37 pm

If you were not already convinced that mandatory minimum sentencing laws are a colossal fraud, recent developments in New York City should convert you.

Three years ago, football star Plaxico Burress was indicted after accidentally shooting himself in the leg in a city nightclub. Though Burress was not a resident of New York State, carried the gun for personal protection, did not hurt anyone other than himself, and might not have been aware of the state's strict gun law, New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg pressed prosecutors to throw the book at him. To cut him any slack, Bloomberg said, would make "a sham, a mockery of the law." The mayor said the law must apply to everyone equally, regardless of status or circumstances. "Our children are getting killed with guns in the street. Our police are getting killed ... That's why the state legislature passed the automatic sentence if you get caught with an illegal gun," he said.

The state legislature passed the gun bill with the automatic sentence (aka mandatory minimum) in 2005, in part, because Bloomberg lobbied so hard for it. Though carrying a loaded illegal gun was already illegal, Bloomberg thought the existing law had "an exception in practice that you could drive a truck through," according to his Criminal Justice Coordinator John Fleinblatt. What was the loophole? "If the facts of the case suggested to the judge that there was some sympathetic reason why the defendant should not face time in jail, they could sentence them to anything they wanted, including just probation," Fleinblatt explained.

The Bloomberg-backed law required that every individual found guilty of illegal handgun possession serve at least 3½ years in state prison. No longer would judges be bothered to actually consider "the facts of the case" or to show mercy on "sympathetic" defendants. "Now, if you are convicted," a satisfied Bloomberg said, "you will serve a minimum of 3½ years behind bars -- no exceptions."

No exceptions -- unless your name is Ryan Jerome or Meredith Graves.

Over the past few weeks, Jerome and Graves, two out-of-state residents facing 3½-year mandatory minimums for carrying illegal guns in New York City, were given plea deals that allowed both to avoid spending a single day in jail. Jerome's case attracted the most attention because he was a former Marine who was "caught" after asking a security guard at the Empire State Building where he could store his gun while touring the popular site. Jerome was licensed to carry a gun in his home state of Indiana, but said he did now know he couldn't carry a gun in New York. In the end, he and Graves were happy to take deals that kept them out of prison.

Plaxico Burress was not so lucky. He was offered a deal by prosecutors, too, but it included substantial jail time. Rather than serve 3½ years, he could plead guilty and serve two. Because the law does not require prosecutors to prove criminal intent, Burress had no choice. He took the deal and served his time.

Mayor Bloomberg, who pressed for the "no exceptions" law and for vigorous prosecution of Burress, was inexplicably unbothered by the no-jail deals for Jerome and Graves. He told the Village Voice, "I think [sentencing] depends on the circumstances. I don't know...some of these out-of-towners come here and, in all fairness, they might not know about our gun laws...but that's why you don't have an automatic everything. You have a judge who makes intelligent decisions and makes decisions based on their experiences."

The mayor's response flatly contradicts his earlier statements in support of the mandatory gun law. Worse, it betrays a lack of understanding (or a double dose of deception) about how mandatory minimum sentences work. Surely the mayor knows that the very nature of mandatory minimums prevents judges from making "intelligent decisions ... based on their experiences." But to admit that New York's gun law, like other mandatory minimum sentencing laws, creates (rather than eliminates) sentencing disparities is to reveal it for what it is: a total fraud.

 
FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
11:52 AM on 04/24/2012
Mandatory minimums are never a good idea. The only mandatory limits should be maximums.
08:09 AM on 04/24/2012
It s a stupid law and being misapplied. ,intent does matter and so do circumstances
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markspence
09:05 PM on 04/24/2012
Not in all cases. General intent or strict liability laws require only a guilty act. Park in the handicap parking space w/o the sticker, get a ticket. Doesn't matter what your intent was.
05:25 PM on 04/22/2012
So called 'Zero Tolerance' and 'Mandatory Minimum' policies have been in place long enough for us to assess their efficacy. It turns out that they don't actually solve the problems which they were passed to solve, and they ruin lives left and right instead of helping society.

The for-profit prison industry supports these types of laws. We need to be able to re-evaluate laws every few years. Good intentions are not enough. Thank you for this article.
12:22 AM on 04/22/2012
If bloomberg runs for prez i doubt he will carry texas.
photo
wolflover3825
Hungry Like the Wolf.
08:21 PM on 04/22/2012
Or too many other states.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ConservativebyNature
Molon Labe ! !
11:22 PM on 04/22/2012
i love it when a man like Bloomberg, surrounded by armed body guards, speaks out against the evil of guns. What a great guy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gneep
if it wasn't always the same, it'd be different
11:28 AM on 04/21/2012
It is not the job of the police to find reasons to arrest you. It is their job to find reasons to protect you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ConservativebyNature
Molon Labe ! !
11:23 PM on 04/22/2012
it isn't the job of police to protect you and they are not obligated to do that. Sorry, but the SCOTUS has ruked that where the police are concerned, you're probably on your own.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gneep
if it wasn't always the same, it'd be different
12:03 PM on 04/23/2012
yes indeed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markspence
10:14 PM on 04/20/2012
Have to support the mandatory minimum for firearms violations. If you can't appreciate the sort of force they have, don't own one.
08:10 AM on 04/24/2012
I dont agree with this at all.
jhNY
Mercy.
01:26 PM on 04/20/2012
Mandatory anything precludes exceptions. Yet, for some, there are exceptions. Which makes 'mandatory' an exercise in unequal application, though its intent is to be unbending in the face of all circumstances, however mitigating. Which makes the entire notion of 'mandatory', like the notion of 'zero tolerance', a textbook illustration of overzealous rigidity, not justice.
05:46 PM on 04/22/2012
Thanks dude, that's a really great explanation on the unfairness and downright damage that Zero Tolerance policies cause.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Waveskiboy
08:42 AM on 04/20/2012
Bloomberg is on his way out, thank god.......l
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ConservativebyNature
Molon Labe ! !
11:24 PM on 04/22/2012
Not a day too soon either.
10:40 PM on 04/19/2012
Plaxico Burress most likely knew he was not allowed to carry a concealed weapon in NYC. He played for the city and had a residence in New Jersey, so odds are that he spend a lot of time in NYC. Also his agents, bodyguards, etc...must have told him about NYC law since he spent so much time there and had owned a number of firearms. Also Plaxico Burress' Florida license to carry a concealed weapon was expired at the time of his incident, while Jerome's license was not. I still dont understand why someone would bring a concealed weapon on vacation and I felt that Jerome should have been punished, ignorance of the law is not an excuse, also since he planend on bringing his gun he should have researched gun laws of NYC on the internet. But using Plaxico Burress' case is a horrible way to argue against mandatory minimums, there are a lot of better examples to use.
11:42 PM on 04/22/2012
Well once congress passes the concealed carry reciprocity act Bloomberg won't have any choice but to recognize other state issued concealed carry permits. FYI alot of women use concealed carry because the have restraining orders against Ex domestic partners for domestic violence. Unless you live in California where only Diane Feinstein can get one.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:15 PM on 04/19/2012
3-1/2 years just for carrying a defensive weapon? Rabbi Dovid Bendory has a few words for Bloomberg.
http://jpfo.org/rabbi/rabbi-bloomberg-letter.htm
photo
Grumpy Man
Disappointed idealist
08:32 PM on 04/19/2012
WOW! A common sense article on HuffPo that involves guns!

I am deeply impressed!

I think that's only the third one I've seen in the 15+ months that I've participated here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
11:47 AM on 04/24/2012
I know. If this isn't a sign that the antis are losing, I don't know what is.