iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Juliet Jeske

GET UPDATES FROM Juliet Jeske
 

Rush Limbaugh -- Sluts, Prostitutes or Just a Pack of Lies?

Posted: 03/12/2012 7:55 am

Rush Limbaugh decided to personally attack Sandra Fluke, a law student at Georgetown University who testified before the congressional committee on birth control. For sharing her personal story about the high cost of her birth control Mr. Limbaugh labeled her both a slut and a prostitute. I am not going to address the name calling or equating a woman using birth control to being a prostitute because it is pointless to even bother. But I am going to break down his arguments.

Hormonal birth control is prescribed to many woman for health related purposes that are not related to preventing pregnancy. Birth control pills are prescribed for many female reproductive health problems such as -- ovarian cysts, heavy, irregular or painful periods, hormone imbalances, light or infrequent periods, early onset menopause, or even cystic acne. In many cases, hormonal birth control is effective in reducing these symptoms; it is not exclusively taken to prevent pregnancy.

Comparing the cost of hormone-based birth control to condoms. Rush and his staff "crunch the numbers" to try to show that hormone based birth control pills are not cost-effective. But comparing condoms to birth control is like comparing a raincoat to an umbrella. According to AmericanPregnancy.com, hormone-based birth control pills have a 93-97 percent success rate when used in real life conditions. And according to the same site, condoms have a 14-15 percent failure rate. So solely basing birth control on condom use would result in more unplanned pregnancies. Also according to AmericanPregnancy.com, the cost of delivering a baby could reach as high as $6,000-8,000, which does not include prenatal care or the extensive costs of a complicated pregnancy, especially one requiring a Caesarian section.

The Tax Payer is on the hook for birth control Rush also claimed that the "tax payer" is somehow paying for Sandra Fluke's birth control. The subject being debated on congress had nothing to do with the federal government spending any tax dollars on anyone's insurance. The bill stipulates that either the employer or the health insurance company pays for birth control, it says absolutely nothing about the government paying for anything.

Rush claimed the women are having too much sex and that is why they need so much birth control -- The way hormonal birth control works, a woman has to take it for an entire month and stay on it for months whether she is having sex daily or once a year. The amount of sex is irrelevant.

Married couples should not have hormonal birth control as an option for helping them control the size of their families? Rush doesn't address this directly but the vast majority of women including Catholic women in the U.S. use some form of birth control. The Guttmacher Institute in a new report, "Countering Conventional Wisdom: New Evidence on Religion and Contraceptive Use" showed that, "among all women who have had sex, 99 percent have ever used a contraceptive method other than natural family planning" Are married women who use birth control sluts in Rush's world view? Most married women only have one sexual partner, not exactly a slut.

And, of course, his last ridiculous statement was simply made to get press more than anything else.

Since "WE" are paying for it, these women should videotape their sexual encounters. According to the proposed legislation, the health insurance providers or the employers would be paying for the birth control, NOT the taxpayer. And even with that insane logic, then Rush might as well start producing some of his own tapes; after all, a health insurance plan most likely helped pay for his Viagra. So everyone paying a premium to the same insurance company better start demanding videos of his erections, just because they helped pay for them.

And if he is going to make personal attacks -- Rush Limbaugh -- married four times, yet has no children, three of his wives were of childbearing age, so either he is sterile or someone was using birth control. No one knows this for sure, perhaps he successfully used the rhythm method with each wife and through some miracle no one got pregnant. Rush has had problems abusing prescription drugs himself and was caught entering the country with the erectile dysfunction drug Viagara. So is it acceptable for a health insurance company to pay for a drug that would increase the sexual capacity for a man, but not for birth control for a woman? That seems like ridiculous hypocrisy and most Americans would agree, in fact according to A Kaiser Family Foundation survey nearly 2/3 of American adults favored Obama's birth control policy.

Rush Limbaugh is a blowhard who says crazy things to get attention and press. He might have finally gone too far. Attacking half of the adult population directly is not always the best game plan for winning over converts to his cause. The more extreme he gets the smaller his audience will become and hopefully one day he will become completely irrelevant. Or maybe all of his "ditto heads" will forgo family planning and birth control. Something tells me they won't.

 

Follow Juliet Jeske on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JulietJeske

Rush Limbaugh decided to personally attack Sandra Fluke, a law student at Georgetown University who testified before the congressional committee on birth control. For sharing her personal story about...
Rush Limbaugh decided to personally attack Sandra Fluke, a law student at Georgetown University who testified before the congressional committee on birth control. For sharing her personal story about...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
everybody only
what fresh hell is this?
01:17 PM on 04/04/2012
Rush may well feel too big to fail, and he has continued to up the ante of his slurs to attract a following that thrive on sensationalized hatred. However, if Ms. Fluke files slander charges (she has up to two years to do this), in a civil case, she could not only be awarded the amount she is suing for, but the jury can allocate punitive damages as they see fit. Clear Channel is crumbling as we speak, no one would touch him right now, and a civil suit could definitely bring him back down to earth. I hope she pursues this through the court system, not only for herself, but to keep the comments in front of Americans. Let any GOP father explain to their daughter why this choice of language (slander) is acceptable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ohio Republican
Reg Repub because we need a 2 party system
02:14 AM on 03/13/2012
Rush's show had zero paid advertisers on Monday. If the Ad Council stands up and demands their ads not be run during his show, there would only be crickets. But I think its funny that his listeners are now being barraged with ads to donate to puppies, children and illnesses. Bet it tweeks their tight little butts to hear them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lady1genius
No se puede tapar el sol con un dedo
06:49 PM on 03/12/2012
I'll take "pack of lies" for $500, Alex.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bboyy
06:07 PM on 03/13/2012
This is the most honest article to date.
04:04 PM on 03/12/2012
The fact that he knows what he's saying is ignorant and says it anyway is the most annoying thing about him. He knows exactly what he's saying because he knows the exact responses that he will get and he loves that. I dont know how any individual could possibly love controversy so much. Anyone who follows that man and buys in to what he is saying has some serious issues. Clearly the one with the most issues is Limbaugh himself.
05:42 AM on 03/13/2012
Since he has been making millions per year . .that's why he loves the controversy. Well, and the ego-stroking . . .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
msblynne
doesn't hate or fear science
02:36 PM on 03/12/2012
Rush and Sarah Palin need to go off somewhere together, somewhere far, far away, where they can mouth their gibberish to each other, nodding and bobbing their heads in fierce agreement with each other, without repulsing the vast majority of Americans.
01:50 PM on 03/12/2012
"It's Up To All AMERICAN'S TO LEAD BY GOOD EXAMPLE"

All of us make choices everyday that have a Major Impact on Our Country on Our World on Ourselves,on Our Children & Their Children.

Our Children and Grandchildren, are always watching us to see how we treat each other when we have a disagreement.

"FIVE LOST WORDS IN AMERICA"

That, NEED TO BE FOUND AGAIN when disagreeing with each other Especially Publicly & Especially with anyone who is choosing to be "Part Of The Solution" by Using Common Sense, Ameri-Can-Do Attitude and Respect as their "Guideline To Follow At All Times"
These Five Words that need to found again and used when disagreeing with someone are;

"I RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH YOU"

Each of us can choose to be "Part of the Problem" or to be "Part of the Solution" this choice is up to each individual to make in our daily lives by the words we choose.

"PART OF THE PROBLEM"

Disrespectful Words & Attitudes that hurt Ourselves & Others, Lack of Team Work, Constant Criticism instead of offering Solutions.

"PART OF THE SOLUTION"

Mutual Respect, Ameri-Can Do Attitude, Team Work & Suggesting New Ideas That Solve Our Problems As A Respectful Nation, That Leads Our World, Our Next Generation By Good Example Not By Bad Example.

What ever Choices that each of us choose Impact "OUR CHILDREN, OUR GENERATION, THE NEXT GENERATION & OUR WORLD ! !

I choose to be "Part of the Solution" Respectfully, Michael V. Caldwell
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CSKAP
Morlock or Eloi?
10:48 AM on 03/12/2012
Yet, the Right will go on defending Rush with false equivalents.
Oh some comedian called Sarah Palin a name a year ago, so what Rush said is the same thing, ignoeing a 3 day tirade.
During this time they will refute the fact that Rush is the de facto head of the Republican Party and his impact is 100 times greater than any of these others.
Rush gives voice to the people of hate, ignorance and intolerance in this country and the most unfortunate thing is that he’s rolling in money doing it.
Not sure what that says about America.
12:13 AM on 03/13/2012
False equivalents?..... misogyny is OK if it is comedic? or simply not
misogyny if someone you agree says it.... If you have ever laughed at the
ugly Maher or Louis CK comments you are no better than Limbaugh...
photo
Waiting4Something
8 Years was Awesome & I was Famous & Powerful
10:24 AM on 03/12/2012
Based on the comments on many other Limbaugh stories, I have gotten the impression that the only ones who DON'T get your well-articulated points are those who believe anything the very small man says. Throughout this whole thing, everyone has dismissed the him as stupid, ignorant of the facts or worse. In fact, Limbaugh is extremely smart. He is quite familiar with the facts you presented. That's how he is able to twist facts into lies. And he does it with malice and forethought KNOWING that his ignorant listeners will lap it up.

As I have noted in other posts, there is too much focus on the name-calling. Sticks and stones, you know. The hateful lies he creates are the problem. He knows exactly how stupid his audience is and exactly how to motivate them to do his bidding. He knew very well that condoms were not the issue and "having so much sex" was not the testimony. I have no problem with someone who is so immature they have to call me names. I have a problem with anyone who knowingly lies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Psalm2323
10:17 AM on 03/12/2012
Let's say advertisers continue to flee Limbaugh. So much so, that he's a financial liability. And he gets fired. How sweet. How ironic. Capitalism would be the means by which is karma is paid back. The market will have corrected itself, and the world would be healthier for it. You go, bottom line!
photo
everybody only
what fresh hell is this?
01:18 PM on 04/04/2012
agreed, he is a $38 million dollar albatross cutting into shrinking revenues...
10:14 AM on 03/12/2012
Thank you for this article! So many people were getting what Sandra Fluke said wrong all because of Rush. The clear fact that he has no clue how birth control works and its other uses just makes him look like he pulls random information out of no where just to here his own voice.