The hospitalized old woman said, "Doctor, I don't understand a word you said, but you say it so nice." Hillary was clear and self-contained. Bernie was clear and uncontained. He brought to mind Fran Lebowitz who once said, "The opposite of talking isn't listening. The opposite of talking is waiting." She brought to mind an epigram I remember from junior high school, "Always be sincere whether you mean it or not."
Bernie raised his hand numerous times in order to be called on by the moderators. He almost jumped out of his seat when Hillary distorted his positions on health care or guns. It seemed like he was unable to listen at all to what was said - whether by Hillary, the moderators, or those YouTube questioners. She seemed to listen to everything, process information clearly, transforming attacks into thoughtful and forceful responses.
What does this mean about the relationship, if any, between style and substance? Bernie's style was that of an anxious school child bursting to be heard by the teacher. After all, he had the right answer to every question. He raised his hand politely but often.
Hillary absorbed Bernie's barbs by liquidizing his rage and frustration, building rejoinder after rejoinder. She wasn't as condescending as Reagan was with Mondale in 1984, but she was not that different. Her manner made Bernie seem like a sputtering country bumpkin constrained by the rules of engagement.
Overtly he was not a listener. Both had talking points, but Hillary reached hers in more artful ways than Bernie could ever hope for.
To me, Bernie seemed like he was giving a speech, rather than having a debate. His message was clear and consistent, but at times his delivery was clumsy. Her message was not so much in her content but in her style, her clear ability to convey confidence. He kept trying to take whatever she said one step further, even when they agreed.
So what are we left with, at least after that particular encounter?
We are left with several things to think about:
Bernie Sanders has strong and unwavering convictions about corporate greed and what it's doing to the American fabric. His views were always thus. And in that sense he is the opposite of Hillary Clinton, whose history is littered with shifting positions on health care, on the war in Iraq, on negotiating with enemy leaders, and on regulating Wall Street and big banks. Again, her motto should be, "Always be sincere whether you mean it or not."
Then there is style, and how it may affect substance. Secretary Clinton sounded presidential, forceful, and thoughtful. She also did something she hasn't done before - got under her opponent's skin. Her attacks on Senator Sanders unnerved him, contributed to his behaving more like a defensive schoolboy eager to be called on by the teacher.
What does this say about how either of them might govern as president? I worry that Sanders would not make a good listener, so convinced is he of what are the essential issues. His legislative history however, is one of willingness to reach across the aisle. Clinton looked forward to listening to others, saying that she would go anywhere in the US to find experts to help her govern.
Bernie presented a procrustean approach to political life, trying to fit every idea into his set of preconceptions. And while his convictions are not different from mine, they smack of a troublesome rigidity, especially after eight years of a thoughtful President Obama - who himself followed eight years of a reactive non-thinking George W Bush.
Are we left with clarity and consistency vs deception and inconsistency? Are we left with rigidity vs flexibility? Can one hold convictions and still listen to the ideas of others? Those are questions central to the upcoming primary elections.
We are left with two different people, often dovetailing, who would put different stamps on a presidency.
I feel the Bern message but have trouble with Bernie the messenger. I feel Hillary the messenger, but have trouble with inconsistent Hillary messages.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.