iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kabir Helminski

Kabir Helminski

Posted: September 24, 2010 09:00 PM

Recently some prominent talk-show hosts, Sean Hannity among them, have been referring to certain verses in the Quran that appear to call for Muslims to kill non-Muslims. These verses have too often been quoted with what appears to be a willful disregard for the context in which they occur, thus inflaming the emotions of listeners, perpetuating grave misunderstandings, and contributing to the potential for violence on all sides.

Though we may not be able to influence those who are hell-bent on hatred, an explanation is owed to all reasonable people who are interested in the truth of the matter and are not looking to create enemies. The vast majority of Muslims deserve to be seen as allies in a common quest for social justice and human dignity -- assuming, of course, that we as Americans have the same goals in mind.

A careful and unbiased study of these and other verses, in their proper context, will reveal that the exhortations to fight "idolaters" and "unbelievers" are specific in nature and are not general injunctions for the murder of all those who refuse to accept Islam as their way of life.

Among the most often cited verses is this one: "Kill the idolaters wherever you find them, and capture them, and blockade them, and watch for them at every lookout..." (Quran 9:5).

According to Islamic belief, the Quran was "revealed" to Muhammad in a process of dialog with the Divine, and some parts of the Quran refer to specific situations, while other parts offer universal spiritual principles. To understand this passage, we must take into account the historical circumstances at the time of its revelation.

The "idolaters" (Arabic: mushrikeen) were those Meccan "pagans" who had declared war against Muhammad and his community. The Meccan oligarchs fought against the Prophet's message from the very beginning. When they realized that the flow of converts to Islam was increasing, they resorted to violent oppression and torture of the Prophet and his followers. The Prophet himself survived several assassination attempts, and it became so dangerous for the Muslims in Mecca that Muhammad sent some of his companions who lacked tribal protection to take asylum in the Christian kingdom of Abyssinia. After 13 years of violence, he himself was compelled to take refuge in the city of Medina, and even then the Meccans did not relent in their hostilities. Eventually, various hostile Arab tribes joined in the fight against the Muslims, culminating in the Battle of the Trench, when 10,000 soldiers from many Arab tribes gathered to wipe out the Muslim community once and for all. As we know, the Muslims survived these challenges and eventually went on to establish a vast civilization.

At the time Verse 9:5 was revealed, Muhammad and his followers had begun to establish themselves securely. They had returned triumphantly to Mecca without violence, most Meccans themselves had become Muslims, and many of the surrounding pagan Arab tribes had also accepted Islam and sent delegations to the Prophet pledging their allegiance to him. Those that did not establish peace with the Muslims were the bitterest of enemies, and it was against these remaining hostile forces that the verse commands the Prophet to fight.

The verses that come immediately before 9:5 state, "Those with whom you have treaties are immune from attack." It further states, "Fulfill your treaties with them to the end of their term, for God loves the conscientious." Now, in its proper context, verse 9:5 can be properly understood.

This was a guidance to the Prophet at that specific time to fight those idolaters who, as 9:4 mentions, violated their treaty obligations and helped others fight against the Muslims. It is not a general command to attack all non-Muslims, and it has never signified this to the overwhelming majority of Muslims throughout history. Had it been so, then every year, after the "sacred months are past," (The "sacred months" are four months out of the year during which fighting is not allowed) history would have witnessed Muslims attacking every non-Muslim in sight. This yearly slaughter never occurred. Though the present verse is only one example, none of the Quranic verses that mention fighting justify aggression nor propose attacking anyone because of their religious beliefs. Nor were forced conversions recognized as valid under Islamic law.

The fundamental Quranic principle is that fighting is allowed only in self-defense, and it is only against those who actively fight against you. Indeed, Islam is a religion that seeks to maximize peace and reconciliation. Yet, Islam is not a pacifist religion; it does accept the premise that, from time to time and as a last resort, arms must be taken up in a just war.

If the enemy inclines toward peace, however, Muslims must follow suit: "But if they stop, God is most forgiving, most merciful" (2:192). Also read: "Now if they incline toward peace, then incline to it, and place your trust in God, for God is the all-hearing, the all-knowing" (8:61).

How then do we explain the early spread of Islam through military conquest? In the two decades following the death of Muhammad, Muslim armies challenged and largely overcame the world's two greatest powers, the Persian and Byzantine empires. Were these conquests truly justifiable according to the Quranic principles outlined above? It is a complex question and not one to be readily answered within the limits of a blog post such as this.

It deserves to be understood, however, that the Muslims fought imperial armies, not civilians, and were forbidden to harm non-combatants or destroy property. Islam guaranteed religious freedom for Christians, Jews, and other minority sects, even while they obliged these "protected" minorities to pay a small tax in exchange for being absolved from military service.

Now 14 centuries have passed, and it needs to be recognized that the Quran does not have an inherent, built-in agenda for aggression or domination. The vast majority of Muslims are content to live and let live. In fact, that is part of their religion. Relations with other religious communities are based on acceptance and encouragement to follow the best of your own religion:

To each community among you has been prescribed a Law and a way of life. If God had so willed He would have made you a single people, but His plan is to test you in what He has given you: so strive as in a race in all virtues. The goal of you all is to God; it is He that will show you the truth of the matters in which you differ. (5:48)

And Muslims believe that the God of Islam is not other than the God of Abraham, Moses, and Jesus and that the diversity of religions is according to Divine plan: "Truly those who keep the faith, and the Jews, and the Christians, and the Sabaeans -- whoever believes in God and the Last Day and performs virtuous deeds -- surely their reward is with their Lord, and no fear shall come upon them, neither shall they grieve." (2:62)

Perhaps these verses help to explain why in the city of Jerusalem, which has been ruled by Muslims for most of the last 13 centuries, the sacred sites of Jews and Christians have been protected, and those communities themselves have for the most part been able to live in peace together with Muslims. The assertion that Islam or the Quran inherently call for a "war on unbelievers" is sheer fallacy and fantasy. Peace be with you.

Parts of this post first appeared in The BeliefNet Guide to Islam by Kabir Helminski & Hesham Hessaboula. For a more thorough discussion, read "Is Islam a 'Religion of the Sword'?"

 
 
 
Recently some prominent talk-show hosts, Sean Hannity among them, have been referring to certain verses in the Quran that appear to call for Muslims to kill non-Muslims. These verses have too often be...
Recently some prominent talk-show hosts, Sean Hannity among them, have been referring to certain verses in the Quran that appear to call for Muslims to kill non-Muslims. These verses have too often be...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,404
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
01:43 PM on 11/06/2010
Brilliant analysis.

Now if you could only get those 57 Islamic nations to agree with your interpretation of those verses as specific rather than general.

Bonne chance, la-bas.
08:00 PM on 11/07/2010
Shucks. Guess the twitter comments prove me wrong.
10:44 PM on 10/03/2010
"One man's privateer is another's pirate :"

But the religion must evolve over the period of time. Christianity has evolved; Islam remains the same as in 7th century.
07:33 PM on 10/02/2010
A WARNING FROM HISTORY! Lets not forget that religious fanaticism has governed the world throughout most of history.

Religious fanaticism practices violence against any divergence from its creeds. The areas it controls are run by fear, intimidation violent schisms and cruel punishment. These areas are expanding rapidly. It now looks like religious fanaticism will demolish the only real change that occurred for this short period of history which we now enjoy as the Enlightenment. To succeed religious fanaticism must abolish its greatest enemy the Enlightenment, and return all peoples of the planet to their past former misery, blind conformity and mass ignorance.
09:22 PM on 10/02/2010
In this way religious fanaticism resembles secular, political, national, and ethnic fanaticism
01:13 PM on 10/04/2010
manideli, I always enjoy your comments, yup, it is getting intellectually dark, at least in USA, but other countries are educating their kids better than we are. A slight contradiction, see Zimmer's, Philosophies of India. He has some good introductory chapters--TYRANTS have governed the world throughout most of history, especially the Middle East and India, in the old days. Yes, religion was one of the tools used to suppress the people. I was surprised to learn that networks of informers, torture, and assassination (usually poison), similar to that in the former USSR, were practiced on a very large scale.
photo
AbeMartin
The best person fer a job is never a candidate
08:03 AM on 10/01/2010
Mr. Helminski and Mr. Chopra offer well-reasoned and provocative articles today.  I just finished reading Mr. Chopra's.  I didn't especially like his previous article, but for me, the long thread of responses to today's are a strong indication that many people who read and think are ready for a real discussion.  Very few people have ever sat down and read the Quran.  And very few people have ever read a version of the Bible other than the King James, which is full of mistranslations of the original Hebrew and subsequent Greek translations of the O.T.

Mr. Hannity and Mr. Beck and Mr. Limbaugh and many of the other media trash talkers and hate fomenters are uneducated, unread men who inflame others like them to pad their own wallets.  Today's posts are a welcome respite from the "my religion is better than your cult" claptrap that the trolls regularly put on the board.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Diogenis
06:34 PM on 09/30/2010
SO then....who is considered an infidel....according to the Quran?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Santiago
03:50 AM on 10/02/2010
One who professes to believe in God, yet blasphemes His name. Be they Jewish, Christian or Islam. Like someone who would break a treaty and refuse mercy to their enemy.

All three have been taught in their own scriptures that one does not bear false witness, break your vow or deny mercy under any circumstance. Jews are taught to respect the stranger and treat him with dignity, freedom and respect. Christians were taught to love their neighbor and forgive as they have been forgiven. Islam is taught to make peace with whomever will do so and is specifically commanded to allow Jews and Christians alone to follow their own religions.

When it comes to reading the Quran, I must point out that Islam is where Christianity was before Martin Luther and the Reformation. Shortly after Mohammad died his advisors collected his writings/prophecies, included stories/accounts of his life not written by him and included several swaths of societal custom at the time which were very archaic and patriarchal. Something akin to the Law of Moses but was not commanded by Mohammad himself. In one book you have very obvious statements from Mohammad stating the equality of men and women - the next book how to smack her without leaving a mark.

The Quran was born after Mohammad died. His official writings/teachings were supplemented by other historical accounts and behavior opinions from a fracturing group that continues to fight for 'divine heir' status of Mohammed to this day.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Diogenis
11:18 AM on 10/02/2010
When it comes to reading the Quran, I must point out that Islam is where Christianity was before Martin Luther and the Reformation.

Do you even know your church history? I wish we could sit face to face and talk.
06:05 PM on 09/30/2010
All the logical discourse in the world won't stop an extremist from taking verses out of text and using them to justify acts of murder and destruction. This is true for Islam just as it is for every other major world religion.
09:06 AM on 10/01/2010
While I agree with your comment, I do believe certain texts are more easily used to justify aggression and inhumanity than others.
02:37 PM on 10/01/2010
Agreed.
photo
bigmacha
Truth through research.
04:35 PM on 10/02/2010
Food for thought (not from the Quran):

Death to Followers of Other Religions

Whoever sacrifices to any god, except the Lord alone, shall be doomed. (Exodus 22:19 NAB)

Kill Nonbelievers

They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman. (2 Chronicles 15:12-13 NAB)

Kill False Prophets

If a man still prophesies, his parents, father and mother, shall say to him, "You shall not live, because you have spoken a lie in the name of the Lord." When he prophesies, his parents, father and mother, shall thrust him through. (Zechariah 13:3 NAB)
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
cuardai
The beginning of knowledge is inquiry...
06:08 AM on 09/30/2010
Thank you I've been saying that for quite a while now.
10:09 PM on 09/29/2010
Muslims, and Proud American Atheists who see no reason to read Judeo-Christian scriptures, for unfamiliarity with those scriptures, might be unaware of a rather infamous little passage in them that says, "suffer not a witch to live". Some of the most cold-blooded, vicious and depraved mass-murderings the world has seen have been carried out by self-righteous Judeo-Christians, and justified with that little "Order given By God". The killings were, for the most part, legalistically done, which is the most cold-blooded means by which murdering is ever done. And, in order to obtain satisfactory "confessions" to justify the murderings some of, if not the, most vicious pre-murdering torturing and mutilating human beings have engaged in against other human beings was carried out, again, legalistically, and so most absolutely and viciously cold-bloodedly. There is even historical record left by the Judeo-Christian murderers of experiment with pushing victims into cauldrons of boiling water, and record that the practice was not continued because it nauseated spectators.

There really is no legitimate room for any religious pots to call any religious kettles black. And as for the Atheists, if they think to imagine themselves superior, they should read, without conviction-bias, some of the Atheists' comments against the religious here on HuffPost. Many show the viciousness and intolerance and tendency to paint all adherents to whatever religion is target with a single blackly smearing brush that is hallmark to religious warriors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, pros talk logistics
02:50 AM on 09/30/2010
I'd call atheism a religion in itself...

While atheism is the orthodox form, agnosticism can be the progressive form.

Fact of the matter is that religion is not the reason for the world's ills. Religions do not teach people to commit genocide or target civilians... The people who have committed these acts are not following their own religions.

The responsibility therefore lies with the people themselves and not on the teachings that they themselves are not following. These people use religion as an excuse.

You can find any number of excuses to justify killings. These justifications are both religious and secular in nature.

How do you explain the killings of Stalin (An atheist communist), or Mao Tse Tung's cultural revolution? Funny thing is that there are even hindus who profess in the sactity of all life, are vegetarians, but have no qualms about killing christians, muslims and sikhs whole scale.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Staines

I came across an idiot here who even justified this act. Killing of children 9 and 6 years of age.

The actual issue is the lack of empathy for people.

1.2 million iraqis are dead. Will George Bush ever be tried for war crimes?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scrogginsfarms
proud daughter of the american revolution
11:42 AM on 09/30/2010
well stated until the end.

of the 1.2 millioin alleged iraqi deaths, how many were at the hands of u.s. troops?
as opposed to an islamic radicalism (promoted by a large percentage of the islamic world) which can rationalize suicide bombings.

your position has no basis in fact. how can we ( or W) be at fault if we did not set off the bombs, that killed all of those people?

are we responsible for the collateral damage in the bombings of dresden, hiroshima, nagisaki?
do those who are at fault ever find condemnation in your mind, or is it just the oppressive americans forcing the poor people of iraq to choose their government, rather than have it dictated to them.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EmmaDarian
All in all, I'm loving every rise and fall (RHCP)
03:10 PM on 09/30/2010
Atheism is not a religion. It is only a lack of belief in god. No more, no less. Except for that one thing, Individual atheists have different beliefs, some of which are wrongly conflated with atheism, but all that makes one an atheist is a lack of belief in god (or gods).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scrogginsfarms
proud daughter of the american revolution
11:44 AM on 09/30/2010
severe

just wanted to correct a typo for you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinsldr2
Retired Army Officer
12:02 PM on 09/29/2010
In March 1785, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy to London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). Upon inquiring "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied:

It was written in their Qu'ran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every Muslim who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once. [2] [3]

Jefferson reported the conversation to Secretary of Foreign Affairs John Jay, who submitted the Ambassador's comments and offer to Congress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, pros talk logistics
03:33 PM on 09/29/2010
One man's privateer is another's pirate :)

Look up what the term means... Even the US had privateers. The brit privateers were called pirates by the spanish and vice versa...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Santiago
04:11 AM on 10/02/2010
And Pat Robertson blamed gays for 9/11, Mardi Gras lifestyle for Katrina and Satanic behavior for Haiti. Columbus and the Spaniards marched into the America's under the command of the Papal office whose official position at the time was that God had given the Earth to Christians and therefore taking land away from pagans was not only allowed but considered moral as they would 'bring the savages the salvation of Christ'.

The Council of Nicaea was formed to determine if Jesus was to be worshipped as God Himself or as an ultimate prophet/king, the earthly perfect son of God. The concept fo the Trinity was thus born.

A similar council discussed the question "do women have souls?"

One should not pass judgements upon things when all you have done is listen instead of research. Evil and corrupt men who use religion to kill and oppress are everywhere.
09:22 AM on 09/29/2010
Contrast unapologetic violence with the Tao te Ching
thirty-one:
Good weapons are instruments of fear; all creatures hate them.
Therefore followers of Tao never use them.
The wise man prefers the left.
The man of war prefers the right.
Weapons are instruments of fear; they are not a wise man's tools.
He uses them only when he has no choice.
Peace and quiet are dear to his heart,
And victory no cause for rejoicing.
If you rejoice in victory, then you delight in killing;
If you delight in killing, you cannot fulfill yourself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Candide33
I heart Bernie Sanders
09:07 PM on 09/28/2010
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/28/pew-forum-religious-knowledge-survey_n_741349.html

Atheists know more about religion than believers... no surprises here
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinsldr2
Retired Army Officer
11:47 AM on 09/29/2010
yes but that was a general knowledge test not a test about believers specific knowledge of their own religion. For Example it had questions on all religions, on US law and US history and a question about a Protestant Reformer of the 18th century.

Some of the questions were faith based, but many were either secular questions or questions involving tenants of other faiths.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GraniteSkyline
I wish you happiness!
12:24 PM on 09/28/2010
Thank you.
09:58 AM on 09/28/2010
While I agree with Mr. Helminski that the aforementioned passages from the Koran have been taken out of context, I cannot understand how it does not disturb the author that his God called for the "faithful" to wage war and destruction upon the "unbelievers". The Bible and the Koran portray this God as ordering prophets like Moses and Muhammad to slaughter innocents. Entire towns are to be laid to waste. Unbelievers are to be beheaded. How can any one look to such a God as any kind of moral authority? Perhaps the command to "kill the idolaters" was only issued for a specific instance 1,400 years ago. It is still morally repugnant. While I take comfort in the fact that such a God almost certainly does not exist, it still troubles me that the vast majority of humanity not only believes in but worships such a dreadful character.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chipchuck
Rethink that...
04:48 PM on 09/28/2010
Speaking from a Christian Bible POV, some have argued that the God of the Old Testament and the God of the New are different. I encountered the same in my study. The Old Testament has a lot of "do it or I'll spank you" flavor. The New Testament is more, "If you focus on loving each other, the rest is a piece of cake."

I like cake a lot more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, pros talk logistics
07:35 AM on 09/29/2010
Muslims worship the creator of the universe.

That is the same God of Abraham, of Moses, of Jesus...

Islam says that belief in God is not enough. You have to follow that up with good deeds. If you are a muslim and your bad deeds outweigh your good deeds; you will go to hell just like everyone else.

If you are not muslim, but believe in one God and do good deeds you will go to paradise.

There is no concept of the original sin in Islam. Every man will only bear the burden of his own deeds.

God did forgive both Adam and Eve for their transgression (Both were equally guilty; that is not so in Christianity).

Each child is born muslim. In Christianity, if a child dies without baptism, he will go to hell or perdition (Not sure which). That is not the case in Islam.

http://www.islamicity.com/mosque/quran/7.htm

Verses 6 through 33
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinsldr2
Retired Army Officer
11:57 AM on 09/29/2010
"The Old Testament has a lot of "do it or I'll spank you" flavor. "

Oh I don't know, The New testament has a decidedly big spanking as in if you do not Follow Christ you go to hell for all eternity flavor.

Now I happen to be a big fan of the Moral teaching of the Old and new testament. There is plenty of examples of teaching that exemplifies a good way to live your life in both.

As Hillel says: 'What is hateful to you, do not to your neighbour: that is the whole Torah (first 5 books of the OT), while the rest is the commentary thereof; go and learn it.'

And Jesus says the two greatest commandments are Love God and love your neighbor.

It just depends on what you are looking for in the bible. If you are looking for a guide for living to get closer to the creator and love God and your neighbor you find it. If you are looking for reasons to hate you can find it also.
12:56 AM on 09/29/2010
I could not agree with you more. The worlds religions do indeed have their more profound, ethical, and humane aspects... All too often though good people who recognize that beauty, think it is necessary to explain away or overlook the darker, less humane, and less dignified aspects of a religion or holy book.
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
09:31 AM on 09/28/2010
Interesting, now just get Muslims to understand this.
photo
Tolerant
See perfection in every situation
02:12 PM on 09/29/2010
They do! Thank you very much!
09:14 AM on 10/01/2010
Not enough. They are not unique though, it seems all types of people are guilty of atrocities and have sought to justify their actions through their race, religion, ethnicity, or political ideology. The sad truth is people are simply not morally developed enough for there to be any lasting peace in this world
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stcrispy
04:07 AM on 09/28/2010
I urge everyone to read Sam Harris's "End of Faith" for a synopsis on the killing of the infidel and apostate. It's pages of verses.

All religion is a tool of states and powers that be to control people. There is plenty of ammunition in any of the religions of the book. To say Islam is not a violent religion is to say any other religion is not violent either, which is proved false by everything from the crusades to witch burnings.

There is currently a pile of Muslims emphasizing the violent parts of the "religion of peace" as a rationale to kill people they percive as enemies, and that is a lot of Americans. A Pew Trust poll of 38,000 Muslims around the world in 2004(5?) had majorities of Muslims supporting the use of suicide bombing as a tactic sometimes. The numbers went down in the latest.

The deal for me is that I don't want anyone telling me or my wife what to wear - be they conservative xtian, Muslim or whatever. Sometime, somehow we're going to haver to come to terms with our cultural differences and figure out if and how we're going to live together. It's my hope that ALL religions will fade away. Til then, we'll argue about angels on pinheads and if the Flying Spaghetti Monster is real. What a waste!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, pros talk logistics
08:03 AM on 09/28/2010
Listen, honestly if you read books by ideologues they will find a way to translate the blandest of arguments into a genocidal tirade.

Thats what Bush did with the Iraq war and the WMD argument. Their objective was war and not a factual understanding of reality.

So they manufactured that reality.

If you have any specific verses please share and we can discuss the context. Could be that you're wrong.

It could be that I'm wrong. But dont generalize.
12:57 AM on 09/29/2010
Sam Harris really needs to take some classes on religion...