iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kamran Pasha

Kamran Pasha

Posted: August 1, 2010 03:56 AM

The ADL Defames its Jewish Heritage

What's Your Reaction:

People often ask me what it is like being one of the first Muslims to succeed in Hollywood. There is always a hint of surprise in their tone, as if they never expected to meet a Muslim who has made strides in the entertainment industry. Because the real question they are asking is a more uncomfortable one: "How have you managed to succeed in a town filled with Jews?"

My response is one that usually takes them aback. I tell them that the only people who have helped me to succeed in Hollywood are Jews. It was Jewish studio executives who gave me my first writing breaks, and Jewish writers, directors and producers have served as my mentors and allies over the past decade. Without the help of Jews, this Muslim would still be writing scripts in a café somewhere, desperately hoping to find a way to break into Hollywood.

Others are surprised when I say that, but I am not. I grew up in Borough Park, a primarily Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn, and most of my close friends over the course of my life have been Jews. Despite our often passionate disagreements about Middle Eastern politics, my Jewish friends and I always find common ground in our shared experience of being a religious minority in a predominantly Christian country.

Both American Jews and American Muslims know what it is like to feel out of place, to long for inclusion in a mainstream society that is often filled with ignorance and hate for our faiths. We know what it is like going to elementary school and being reviled by our classmates for not believing that Jesus is the Son of God. We know what it is like being mocked for having different customs at home, for celebrating holidays that our Christian neighbors have never heard of (and often can't pronounce). We know what it is like to be preached to every day by neighbors trying to convert us and "save our souls." We know what it is like to be told that our religion is inferior to Christianity by people who do not understand even the most basic tenets of our faiths (as well as their own).

Despite the real political differences that exist over Middle East policy between members of our communities, we have a common bond of being outsiders, of being the misunderstood "other" in a Christian world. And that common bond has always allowed me to transcend political differences with my Jewish friends and meet them on the field of shared loneliness that is the lot of those who are different.

And that is why it breaks my heart to watch a respected Jewish organization like the Anti-Defamation League fall into the abyss of anti-Muslim bigotry over the past several years. Many Americans, including many Jews, have expressed shock at the ADL's recent announcement that it sides with bigots and fear-mongers who oppose the building of the Cordoba House Islamic center in lower Manhattan.

Regrettably, I am not surprised. The ADL, which was founded in 1913 as a powerful voice against religious discrimination in America, has over the past decade become increasingly xenophobic toward the Muslim community, which its leaders seem to view as a threat to Jews due to its lack of support for Israel. As a Christian friend who works in the Obama Administration lamented to me recently, the ADL has in essence become the "Pro-Defamation League" when it comes to Islam and Muslims.

The recent comments by Abraham Foxman, National Director of the ADL, against the proposed Muslim community center in New York are the latest in a long line of incidents where members of the ADL have promoted bigotry and discrimination against Arabs and Muslims. In 1993, the ADL illegally spied on American citizens who had spoken out in sympathy with Palestinians, generating a watch list of 10,000 names of private citizens and over 600 groups, and then selling the list to South African intelligence agents.

The ADL was sued for violating privacy rights and settled out of court. But the organization did not learn its lesson. Through the past decade, it has regularly organized smear campaigns around Muslim leaders and conferences, falsely imputing terrorist sympathies to some of the most moderate and respected leaders of the community.

In one of its ugliest campaigns, the ADL protested the right of Muslim college students at UC Irvine to wear graduation stoles that carried the Shahada, the basic testimony of Islamic faith: "There is no god but God and Muhammad is his Messenger." The ADL claimed that the Muslim students were supporting terrorist groups like Hamas by wearing a common symbol of their religion. As a Muslim, I was left absolutely stunned at the stupidity of this argument. It was the equivalent of trying to bar Christian students from wearing crosses because the cross is a symbol that has been used by Christian extremists like the Crusaders and the Ku Klux Klan! The ADL was forced to apologize and retract its statements that the Shahada was "an expression of hate."

To be fair, the ADL has in a few instances spoken up in defense of Muslim civil rights, notably when the topic of Israel is not involved. The ADL publicly denounced the ethnic cleansing of Muslims in Bosnia and criticized the Swiss government for amending the constitution in 2009 to prevent the building of mosque minarets.

But the preponderance of its actions over the past decade have made it clear that when Muslim grievances against Israel are raised, the ADL will firmly side with its co-religionists rather than adhere to its underlying mission of standing for justice and equality for all humanity. On some level, perhaps that is understandable, if not excusable. But what is particularly shocking about the recent statements against the Cordoba House is that the ADL appears to have moved from a knee-jerk defense of Israel to an aggressive stance attacking American Muslims even when there is no criticism of Israel involved.

I have written at length on the Huffington Post about the founders of the Cordoba House and how they represent progressive Islam and embrace people of all religions, including Jews. I know Daisy Khan personally, and she is a gracious and gentle woman who espouses love and wisdom, not hate. The writings of Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf continue to inspire me and countless mainstream Muslims to improve our communities and defeat the extremists that threaten to corrupt Islam from within.

The opponents of the Islamic Center have gone out of their way to vilify and defame these honorable people, who are leaders of the moderate Islam that the media is always claiming doesn't exist. Muslim leaders like Daisy Khan and Imam Abdul Rauf have endured with great dignity the double-pronged attack from their enemies. First, the media spreads the lie that Muslim leaders like them do not speak out against terrorism. And when they do speak out, they are either ignored or lumped in with the very extremists they are fighting. The Cordoba House is exactly the voice of moderate Islam that needs to be highlighted at a time when Muslim extremists and anti-Muslim bigots both want Islam, a spiritual path of great beauty, to be seen as a religion of hate and death.

But what is particularly painful for me as a Muslim is to watch how a group like the ADL, born out of the horrible experience of anti-Semitism and bigotry in America, can so easily turn its back on its heritage in order to join forces with the voices of hate and division. If any community knows what it is like to be branded with false stereotypes, to have the innocent condemned as guilty, it is the long-suffering Jewish people. To have its leaders now embrace the mindless, drunken crowd in its march of hate against a fellow religious minority's right of worship, it is beyond obscene. And it is a fundamental rejection of everything that Judaism stands for.

In my latest novel, Shadow of the Swords, I delve deeply into the character of Maimonides, the great Jewish rabbi, who was friend and advisor to the Muslim sultan Saladin during the Crusades. In examining the experience of Maimonides, a Jew living as a minority among Muslims, I sought to demonstrate the ancient sympathy and understanding that Jews and Muslims had for each other at a time when both were being targeted by Christian persecutors. And I sought to share with my readers that the tenets of Judaism have always stood for social justice, mercy and wisdom, and that this ethical commitment served as a link of common understanding between Judaism and Islam at a time when Christianity stood for ignorance, murder and barbarism.

People who have read my book have expressed wonder at how two communities that were once intimate friends have become so estranged in the past century. The reasons for these modern divisions are long and complex, and are mainly linked to the trauma of Western colonization of the Muslim world, and the suffering of the Palestinians when Israel was created as the byproduct of that colonial history. Despite efforts by some Christians and Jews (as well as extremists among Muslims) to portray the current tensions between these communities as rooted in theological and cultural foundations, the reality is that Jews and Muslims historically got along much better than either group did with European Christians. When the Spanish Inquisition expelled Jews from Spain, where they had thrived under Muslim rule for 800 years, Spanish Jews found refuge in the Muslim Ottoman Empire and rose to positions of great economic and political power.

What the current leadership of the ADL does not understand is that there is no ancient enmity between Jews and Muslims. If many Muslims have problems with Israel today, that arises from real grievances about the treatment of Palestinians, not inherent hatred for Judaism in Islamic culture. What the ADL appears to fear is that as Muslims become part of the American fabric of life, that their critiques of Israel will lead one day to United States abandoning its long-term ally. This fear is, frankly, insane.

There is a place for dialogue, debate and disagreement about Middle Eastern politics among American citizens, and that discussion will not threaten Israel's existence. As President Obama made abundantly clear in his speech to the Islamic world in Cairo last year, the bond between the United States and Israel is "unbreakable." So Abraham Foxman should relax and take a breath. Muslim empowerment in the United States will not lead to a second Holocaust. Muslims praying at a mosque in New York City will not lead to death camps and mass extermination of the Jewish community.

Muslim voices joining the public forum will not add to anti-Semitism in America. But if the Jewish community is seen as willing to join in discrimination against innocent Americans to promote its own agenda, that perception will fulfill every anti-Semite's ugly and false perception of the Jewish community as a self-serving and hypocritical group that only cares about its own pain and not the pain of others.

That ugly vision is not the Judaism I studied in college, the Judaism of Maimonides and Martin Buber, nor does it reflect the Judaism that I have experienced in my relationships with Jews all my life. But it appears to be the cheap and unworthy vision of the ADL leadership, and as such dishonors the Jewish legacy to this world.

The Judaism that I admire, that I write about in my novel, is the true Judaism of love for mankind, of humility before God, of service and compassion. It is the Judaism that stands for the rights of the weak and the oppressed against the arrogance of those in power. It is the Judaism of Moses standing in defiance of the Pharaoh on behalf of a group of powerless slaves.

It is the Judaism of Rabbi Hillel, one of the greatest religious visionaries of all time. Decades before Jesus Christ proclaimed the Golden Rule, Rabbi Hillel is famed for his response to a questioner who wanted to know the essence of Judaism, of the Torah, in the time it took him to stand on one foot. Hillel responded that the whole of the Torah could be summarized in one sentence.

"Do not do unto others what you would not have others do unto you."

To Mr. Foxman and the rest of the ADL leadership, I ask if in your hearts you would want people to accuse innocent Jews of being enemies of the state? Would you want Jews to accept vilification of their entire religion if a handful of Jews ever did something wrong? Would you want Jews to tacitly accept the lies that bigots had projected on to them? And finally, would you want Jews to be forced to shut down their synagogues because of the misguided passions of a mob?

Would you want this done to Jews?

If the answer is no, then I ask as your Muslim brother that you follow the wisdom of Rabbi Hillel and the sages of Judaism.

Do not do the same hateful thing to my people.

Kamran Pasha is a Hollywood filmmaker and the author of Shadow of the Swords, a novel on Crusades (Simon & Schuster; June 2010). For more information please visit: http://www.kamranpasha.com

 

Follow Kamran Pasha on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kamranpasha

People often ask me what it is like being one of the first Muslims to succeed in Hollywood. There is always a hint of surprise in their tone, as if they never expected to meet a Muslim who has made s...
People often ask me what it is like being one of the first Muslims to succeed in Hollywood. There is always a hint of surprise in their tone, as if they never expected to meet a Muslim who has made s...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 59
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guy DeWhitney
Non-Partisan Pro-Liberal, Anti-theocracy Moderate
08:37 PM on 08/09/2010
"A true Holy Man[or woman] is known in spite of their religion, not because of it."

This means that the thoughts, and feelings, and actions of the truly holy can be recognized across the lines of dogma and doctrine and other man-made fantasies meant to bolster ego more than help people to grow closer to God. In this day and age no where is this more evident than in the realms of Televangelism, Creationism, radically militant Hassidic Jews and mainstream Islam...

Much, much more to say about this article over at http://hereticscrusade.com
08:47 AM on 08/07/2010
Brilliantly written, a million thanks
12:13 AM on 08/06/2010
what i am seeing so far is a deep confrontation between muslims and christians, christians and jews, jews and muslims... only buddists are kind of quietly standing on the side of the road. religions separate, no unite. "religion is the opiate of the people" - sounds right even though that's said by some historic figure who isn't respected much. nevertheless, there would be much less wars and conflicts in the modern world if only there were no religions. more and more people become atheists... they have civil, moral, humane values without any religious attributes, what difference does it make that they don't follow any religious rituals and do not care much about prophets... learning different religions as part of the history of human kind, why not... worshiping and believing? for what? if kids are taught humanity and moral values from early ages, what else is needed? forget all religious that causes nothing but wars. atheism is the road to peace... i am writing this and thinking that many peaceful, religious people would skin me alive for what i am saying, and that's what it is - religions teach peace but cause hostility towards non-believers or those of "other" faith...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Muslimhumanist
Liberty for the wolves is death for the lambs
12:26 PM on 08/03/2010
Mr. Pasha. Thanks for a great article. And thanks for the way in "Sleeper Cell" --which could have been completely inflammatory--you wrote Muslim characters with authentic voices that captured the diversity of our community. Kudos. Most of the Muslims in America reject terrorism unequivocally. I have been to at least three major meetings of Muslims this summer who have given strong statements rejecting violence and affirming their American identity. Unfortunately these voices are seldom heard. Thanks for using your position to speak out in such an eloquent manner.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
12:32 AM on 08/03/2010
beautiful article...
08:53 AM on 08/03/2010
Agreed
12:34 PM on 08/02/2010
We would all be better off with a better understanding of what has happened in history. We had a Christian regime that persecuted Jews and was replaced by a Muslim regime which treated Jews as equals and put some of them in positions of power over many Muslims. The Muslim capital was Cordoba and that period was a Golden Age where Jewish civilization flourished. Now it seems many people have forgotten about all of that. Some Christian bigots with some Jewish help have gotten the name changed because to them any Muslim regime replacing any Christian regime is the manifest work of the devil. So we have people crying out that Islam is evil and mosques are symbols of evil while they also claim that is not a bigoted position.

The Imam who is deemed to be evil by some is well respected by leaders of the NYC Jewish community.
06:33 PM on 08/03/2010
Jews were not equal in Muslim Spain. They did well, but they were not equals.
12:22 AM on 08/02/2010
"And finally, would you want Jews to be forced to shut down their synagogues because of the misguided passions of a mob?"

Considering how hundreds of thousands of Jews were forced out of Muslim countries by angry mobs in the not so distant past, I don't think the ADL or the State of Israel would find your historical background and perspective to be particularly impressive. Oh, and the Jews of Malmö, Sweden, would also find your rhetorical question to be less than amusing, considering their synagogue is under armed guard for fear of bombings. Why? The large Arab Muslim community in Malmö is increasingly violent to the Jewish minority there.

As for the "lack of historical enmity between Islam and Judaism," I think your understanding of that history to be facile. Islam was fine with Judaism, as long as Jews were second-class non-citizens who would always be subject to the whims of the Muslim majority. That is not religious tolerance or acceptance. That is abuse of a religious minority. The fact that the Muslims did not commit a Holocaust against the Jews does not mean that Muslims had any more love for Jews than did the Christians. Muslims quite simply felt less threatened by Jews than did Christians. Notice that, when Jews declared their equality to the other nations of the world by establishing the State of Israel, the Muslim countries responded to this display of Jewish sovereignty by ethnically cleansing themselves of Jews.
08:37 AM on 08/03/2010
Does America want to be like these people? That is the wrong way to look.

"Islam was fine with Judaism, as long as Jews were second-class non-citizens who would always be subject to the whims of the Muslim majority. That is not religious tolerance or acceptance. That is abuse of a religious minority. "

Not true. Islam doesn't promote that at all.
05:52 PM on 08/03/2010
Firstly, I don't want America to be like that. That's not what I was saying. I was pointing out how you asked whether Jews would want to have their synagogues forcibly shuttered because of mob rule as if such a thing were a ridiculous hypothetical, but that situation has been a reality for Jews for years.

Secondly, do you have any proof for your assertion that Islam does not promote the subjugation of Jews? Because Jews (among others) were given the "dhimmi" status in Muslim lands, which, while it mostly protected them from violent persecution, put them in a state of legal inferiority to Muslims and the jizya was a payment for the privilege of this inferiority. This was endemic, systematic discrimination.

Thirdly, even if Islam doesn't promote that, Muslim societies certainly do, and undeniably this was the situation for Jews under Muslim rule for 1300 years.
12:04 AM on 08/05/2010
please read faithfreedom.org before making such statements and with such a conviction. What you talking man?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
derived
10:04 AM on 08/03/2010
"Notice that, when Jews declared their equality to the other nations of the world by establishing the State of Israel, the Muslim countries responded to this display of Jewish sovereignty by ethnically cleansing themselves of Jews."

I'm sure that had absolutely nothing to do with the fact that the Israelis were stealing Palestinian land and oppressing the Palestinian by establishing Israel.

My Arabic teacher is Palestinian, and he related a story from his grandfather about the Jews living in Palestine. Their Jewish neighbors told his grandfather that they would take all the Palestinian land and their houses. His grandfather laughed because he thought they were joking.

Of course, they weren't joking, and his family lost their home and land.

Oh and FYI -- his family are Christians, not Muslims. Keep that in mind when formulating your response. I'm tired of the whole Israel-Palestine conflict being termed a Jewish-Muslim situation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:00 PM on 08/01/2010
" Muslim empowerment in the United States will not lead to a second Holocaust. Muslims praying at a mosque in New York City will not lead to death camps and mass extermination of the Jewish community."

How comforting.


http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/2555.htm
08:41 AM on 08/03/2010
For some reason, that doesn't seem extermist to you. Do I say that? No. Neither do most. There are people like you who don't want to, as you would ignorantly put it, "liberate" Muslims from Islam; it would be better to kill them all since the "stain of Islam" will never live them. Since a few feel that way, should I assume you do the same.

Everything you say is looking at individual cases and then stereotyping all Muslims. That is a dumb idea.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:55 AM on 08/03/2010
The reality is that you consistently say "If I, a Muslim, do not do what these extremists do, then Islam agrees with my personal opinion.

You are not Islam. Your saying something is un-Islamic does not make it so. Get over yourself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:35 PM on 08/01/2010
"The Cordoba House is exactly the voice of moderate Islam that needs to be highlighted at a time when Muslim extremists and anti-Muslim bigots both want Islam, a spiritual path of great beauty, to be seen as a religion of hate and death."

Promoters of sharia law such as Imam Rauf are not the sort of Muslims any of us should support in America. One can support unreformed sharia law or American law, but not both--too many conflicts, starting with conflicting notions of justice, virtue and the nature of the good society.

Umdat al-salik, o9.0:
"Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and it is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad,
“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.”
The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:
(1) “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);
(2) “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89);
(3) “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

The spiritual beauty of the path of Islam is marred by sharia law such as the above. When Muslims move to reform such passages, relationships between Muslims and others will improve. Not before.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kamran Pasha
Filmmaker. Author.
04:09 PM on 08/01/2010
Mr McDaniel, I have seen your posts on my articles before. It appears that your understanding of Islam is as narrow as the fundamentalists. If you have ever absorbed anything I have written, you would know that I, like most Muslims, do not share the fundamentalist interpretation of Islam. In the very passage you refer to, you appear to ignore the reference to the "greater jihad" which is moral self-restraint. The fact that this is the "greater" jihad does not appear to have any meaning for you. If you study the Bible, the writings of Augustine and the Talmud, you will find many passages that refer to military action in the name of God. Only foolish Christians and Jews take the ugliest possible interpretations of their scripture, juts like only foolish Muslims interpret jihad as a war of aggression and terror. Perhaps you should focus your energies on critiquing the Book of Joshua in the Old Testatment, which glorifies genocide and the murder of enemy children. Some rabbis in Israel quoted Joshua to justify killing civilians in Gaza, so it is very much a living issue, There is nothing like that in the Holy Qur'an, which has many verses that restrict the verses you take out of context here, such as 2:190, which says "fight those who fight you BUT DO NOT COMMIT AGGRESSION. God does not love aggressors." I wish you peace in your spiritual journey.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:06 AM on 08/03/2010
Mr. Pasha, you proudly posted a link to the recent video of nine Imams denouncing terrorism.

The New York Times and major blog sites covered the video, but none of them actually explained who the Imams are and where their beliefs fit on the spectrum of tolerance found in Islam for non-Muslims.

Would you care to do that, or should we uncritically accept your assurances that these men are all on the side of equality between Muslim and non and the acceptance of all religions as equal to Islam?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:42 AM on 08/01/2010
The ADL is taking a JDL stance, and I don't like it. Their argument that a synagogue can't be built in Mecca is tit-for-tat ridiculousness, and completely disregards the tenets of the United States of America.
photo
Vlady
Better Late
09:54 PM on 08/01/2010
"tit-for-tat ridiculousness"

but tit-for-tit is better
02:05 AM on 08/03/2010
Nonsense. They didn't say that a synagogue can't be built in Mecca is tit for tat. That was some dumb demonstrator. All they said is that while it's ok for the cultural center to be built from a moral and legal perspective, the symbolism is problematic and it would be better to compromise and build it elsewhere.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bklynsparrow
creating reality from unreal things
05:10 PM on 08/03/2010
S Fbege- My response was to TruGal. I was agreeing with you. sometimes it gets confusing keeping track-
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
derived
09:44 AM on 08/01/2010
I'm so happy Shadow of the Swords is complete and you are writing more articles here on huffingtonpost. It's nice to hear a voice of reason in this sea of accusations which is threatening to drown us all.

khuda hafiz.
09:14 AM on 08/01/2010
beautiful article
08:33 AM on 08/01/2010
Thank you so much for a balanced, well-reasoned article that calls on the spirit of unity.
08:30 AM on 08/01/2010
If not the ADL, then who?
See http://www.deciminyan.org/2010/07/if-not-adl-then-who.html
08:13 AM on 08/01/2010
It is indeed sad that the ADL has lent its reputation to the forces of ignorance, fear and intolerance. Yet those who have followed this organization of late are not surprised that ADL could now very well stand for the Abe Foxman Defamation League. The organization is in desperate need of new leadership.