More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Katie Molinaro
 

Vegan Living: No Joke - Letterman Knows Circuses Aren't for Animals

Posted: 03/27/09 06:45 PM ET

As the Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey circus marched into Manhattan this week, I was reminded that vegan living is not only about making animal-friendly decisions when it comes to food and clothing, but entertainment as well. And circuses with animal "performers" do not fit the vegan bill.

David Letterman showed that he gets it on Wednesday night when he referred to going to the circus as "watching animal abuse."

I went to the circus as a child and never once considered what the animal trainers had to do to coerce the elephants into standing in a conga line on small, un-elephant size platforms or how strange it was for tigers to be hopping on their back two feet toward a man in sequins. Most people who go to the circus are similar - they just don't think about it. But it's time to admit to ourselves that animals are suffering for our entertainment.

The animals used in circuses are forced to spend their lives traveling and living in cramped, barren cages. They perform unnatural and sometimes painful tricks, taught to them by trainers who use bullhooks and other objects to poke, prod, strike, shock, and hit them. PeTA's undercover team caught trainers at Carson and Barnes Circus teaching elephants new tricks with the help of electric prods, while one trainer encouraged the other trainers to "Sink that hook into 'em, when you hear that screaming, then you know you got their attention!"

When not performing, the animals stay in dirty enclosures or are chained in one position for hours and are isolated from other members of their species. An animal in a circus is completely removed from all that is familiar and comfortable to him, and his misery is all for the sake of entertaining humans. The stress of these abusive conditions is what causes animals to attack their trainers or escape, wandering the streets and creating a dangerous situation for both the animal and any people in the area.

You can take a stand against this cruelty and still see an exciting show. There are lots of circuses with high-flying acrobats, death-defying tightrope walkers, goofy clowns stuffed into a car and not a zebra or lion on the premises. Cirque du Soleil is probably the best known circus in this genre, but there are others that travel the country. And maybe you'll see David Letterman and his family in the audience.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:53 PM on 03/30/2009
Good for David Letterman.

I suppose you are right, the biggest problem with circuses is that the inspections are almost always expected. It would be nice to see more unexpected visits. Local animal groups will go out and take a look, but honestly, they really don't know what they are looking for in terms of abuse of elephants, tigers, and other exotics.

The argument that these circus animals are trained and controlled only with positive reinforcement is a farce in light of the recent testimony at the Ringling trial.

As for circuses meeting the standards of care, they only have to meet "minimal" standards. These standards, particularly at the federal level, are so outdated and have not kept up with what science now knows that these animals need.

Some day circuses with animals will be outlawed and it can't come soon enough for these animals.
10:08 PM on 03/30/2009
Mea culpa, timeforall, on my "expected" typo--I meant "unexpected." Since you chose to playfully pounce on my typo, let me bring up an example where circus animal inspections are indeed expected. That's when an anti-circus-animal organization routinely churns out a form letter to a mayor and fill-in-the blanks media releases in a community where a circus is about to appear. The organization "demands" that the city investigate the circus for its "abuse" of animals. So, the city or county dispatches its animal control officers (usually there are two) to the lot on the morning the circus set up--which the circus, of course, also attempts to publicize. The officers make their inspection of all animals (not just elephants). In the overwhelming number of cases, the resulting reports show that the animals are well fed, with no signs of abuse, no indications of stress. Not too unpredictably, it's a win/win situation for anti-animal protesters because they reap the publicity from their efforts; it's also a win/win situation for the circuses, which benefit from people becoming even more aware that "the circus is in town, honey; let's go." The media could care less about a follow-up notice because the circus has already left town and nobody remembers the bad info after all. Ultimately, it's all about credibility. People patronize merchants--and circuses--which have established reputations for giving good value and treat their employees--and animals--fairly.
05:03 PM on 03/30/2009
David Letterman is a wonderful entertainer. I am totally unaware of his knowledge or expertise in animal husbandry or training. I am, however, personally acquainted with and have observed circus and zoo trainers working with young animals to prepare them for performance. They accomplish the task by rewarding behaviors. If you accept the notion that a dog lover beats his or her pet in order to get him to shake hands or to stand on his hind legs, then I suppose you'll believe almost anything you read, or the dated (and much copied) anecdotal videos you'll see on anti-circus-animal web sites. If you're open to the opinions of experts, talk with the federal or SPEC inspectors who show up expectedly at circus sites to examine the animals (as WCBS-TV did last week). If, on the other hand, you do personally witness a trainer or handler beating an animal--especially a circus animal, report it immediately to the proper authorities. In the meantime, bear in mind that no elected body in any American state or major city has--or will--ban circuses with animals as long as the circuses meet their obligation to give their animals proper care inside and outside the performance ring.
10:33 AM on 03/28/2009
Thank you, Dave Letterman and HuffPost for pointing this out. And I agree with LMPE, "Not just circuses, but zoos should also be abolished. Animals are not supposed to be entertainment for humans."
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
09:33 AM on 03/28/2009
Not just circuses, but zoos should also be abolished. Animals are not supposed to be entertainment for humans.

In the past year, I've developed more respect for David Letterman than I ever previously had: first, he called out John McCain for welching on his appointment with the show and lying about the reason, and now this.
08:54 AM on 03/28/2009
Thanks for posting this- good for David Letterman! I hope and pray for a day when there are no circuses with animals.
07:27 PM on 03/27/2009
My respect for Dave just went up! In one short sentence, not only did he point out the cruel nature of circuses, but also the mainstream American (and human, I'd add) indifference towards, and enjoyment of, that cruelty....... I like how opinionated he's become lately, speaking up and ridiculing things other talk show hosts might just avoid and ignore. He's no John Stewart, but he seems to be a good guy, fighting the good fight in his own small way.
02:02 AM on 03/28/2009
I agree. A lot of people were listening though, so I hope he went on just a little to explain that the primary abuse takes place in the "training", which no one outside the circus sees. A little more of the mass audience might get it then.
05:55 PM on 03/27/2009
There should be a law banning all animals from circuses!