More

Kelly Nuxoll

Kelly Nuxoll

Posted: October 22, 2008 12:54 PM

PA Steel Town Undecideds Torn: Hardpressed But Wary of Government Assistance


JOHNSTOWN, PA-- Since a supporter at a Palin rally here waved a stuffed monkey with an Obama headband, and the county's own congressman declared "There is no question that western Pennsylvania is a racist area," Johnstown, PA has become a symbol for the simmering racism that is coming to a boil in the last days of the election and threatening to spill into the voting booth.

But when I asked residents about Johnstown, most begin not with the rally of October 11, but with May 31, 1889, when a dam broke and a wave six stories high crashed into the town.

The Johnstown Flood, which killed over 2,000 people, not only fixed the town in the American imagination, but also served as a morality tale. The dam sat on the private retreat of wealthy businessmen, including Andrew Carnegie and Henry Clay Fricke, who made their fortunes on the backs of many of the steel workers who lived in Johnstown. The steel magnates had neglected repairs on the dam, and the town residents had ignored the rising waters year after year. By the time the rain started to fall in the spring of 1889, the habits of the haves and have-nots were too well-established to avoid catastrophe.

For over a century, Johnstown, like much of Pennsylvania, was a center of manufacturing, flourishing under Bethlehem Steel. Generations worked side-by-side in the mills, and the laborers--predominantly German, Welch, Irish, Slovac, Croatian, and Czech--settled into multi-family Victorian homes.

The natural beauty of the valley only contributes to the sense of an American pastoral. Trees grow thick up the mountainside, and the trestles of the bridges are stuck firmly in the mud. Rachel Paul, 52, who has returned to her hometown from Boston to make calls for Obama, said, "Something about this place gets into your heart."

Yet, in the last twenty years, the population has dropped from over 100,000 to under 25,000 as young people have left for college or to find work. The five Catholic churches on the edge of town have had to close for lack of congregations and a shortage of priests. After years of laying off workers, Bethlehem Steel finally closed in 1992. In its place, the health care industry and defense contractors have moved in, bringing with them strangers and high-skill jobs that have edged out some long-time residents.

A surprising number of them are undecided. In an election where the candidates offer strikingly different policies, personalities, and approaches, it's hard to imagine that one could be too badly torn.

Race is often used to explain the high rate of undecideds--and residents admit there is some merit to the claim, although they object to characterizing all or even most people in the area that way.

Paul, the returned Bostoner, described the choice as something harder to put one's finger on than merely the color of a candidate's skin. Instead, she observed, it is a choice between self-sufficiency and collaboration.

In a town that had historically succeeded by digging in, making the most of its natural resources, and relying on family and close-knit communities, the interdependent worldview that Obama represents could be seen as a betrayal. Moreover, embracing a more porous society means creating relationships with a diverse set of people, whose values one may not share. Either way, one has to compromise something--which is worse, allegiance to a defunct past or confidence in an uncertain future?

Until November 4, undecided voters sit paralyzed at the bottom of the valley, able neither to change nor to stay the same.

JOHNSTOWN, PA-- Since a supporter at a Palin rally here waved a stuffed monkey with an Obama headband, and the county's own congressman declared "There is no question that western Pennsylvania is a ra...
JOHNSTOWN, PA-- Since a supporter at a Palin rally here waved a stuffed monkey with an Obama headband, and the county's own congressman declared "There is no question that western Pennsylvania is a ra...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:55 PM on 10/23/2008
While the author says she can't quite put a finger on the color of one's skin as being a deciding factor in choosing one candidate over the other, I see it as the most obvious reason.

This town is dying. There is no hope in casting allegiances in a past which has only let them down before.

While I understand where a lot of these ideas come from (isolated towns, and TV no doubt, with it's distorted reality), this community and the thousands like them can not afford the luxury of indulging in skin-color based decisions. The stakes are too high for them.. and the rest of the country.

Now is the time to stand up, be counted and move forward.
12:40 PM on 10/23/2008
Come on folks.

Obama is going to REVERSE the BUSH tax cuts for the super wealth because they did not ask for them. These people were fine under Bill Clinton's tax policy. ASK Oprah!!

But what has these Bush tax cuts given us,

High unemployment,
Take over of Banks and Insurance companies.
Home Mortgage mess
High gas and food prices.
No health care
09:22 AM on 10/23/2008
I was not aware of that 1889 flood -- what a metaphor for haves vs. have-nots-- perfectly applicable to the present.
07:44 PM on 10/22/2008
oops..typo....325$ per yr from Gov ( McCain)......not 395$
07:41 PM on 10/22/2008
Just tell them all to go to The Tax Policy Center . com............. and compare McCain to Obama on taxes.................would they rather get 1118$ more a yr back from the gov.(Obama).or 395& a yr back from the gov.( McCain) ( people making 50,000$ or less)..............

I live 100 miles north of Johnstown,( north centralPA mountians) we are Obama country, we arent looking at color..we are looking at our wallets, and right now they are EMPTY!!!
04:42 PM on 10/22/2008
It appears that these people are no different than any of the others in this country who have voted and are continuing to vote against their own best interests, be it economic or otherwise. Much of the republican agenda over the past number of years has been to demean and undermine unions which worked for good paying jobs, in favor of outsourcing, demeaning and undermining public education in favor of vouchers, charter schools with the continuing collapse of the middle class. Three million manufacturing jobs were lost under Bush and the western PA region has been in recession/ depression for decades. The hopelessness here is now a part of the experience in other parts of the country with more to come with the current deterioration of the economy. The future for America appears to be foreboding.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:41 PM on 10/22/2008
I spent a great deal of time in Central and Western Pennsylvania doing union work. It's true most of the Whites are racist and would not ordinarily vote for a Black candidate. But the Whites in Western and Central Pennsylvania -- Reagan Democrats as opposed to Dixiecrats -- learned long ago that affirmative action did not cost them their jobs or cause them to get raises that were lower than inflation and contribute substantially for health care. They know all of their economic condition deteriorated directly because of Reaganomics, deregulation, globalization and know the Republicans are the architects and promoters of those policies. And although those Whites are patriotic and fought in Vietnam, the lesson they learned from Vietnam (as opposed to the Dixiecrats) was the war was useless, that their friends were killed and maimed for nothing and they don't want their kids fighting in such wars. They also know McCain is much more likely to get us into one of those wars than Obama is. And even with that, they still might have voted for McCain because of the POW thing and racism. But then McCain picked Crazy Secessionist Sarah, and that did it. Everyone knows it is just as likely that McCain will die or become incapacitated in his first term and that would make Crazy Sarah POTUS. And that is why these Reagan Democrats will vote for Obama despite being racist, as opposed to Dixiecrats who will always vote racist.
04:21 PM on 10/22/2008
Nice one Kelly. I'm reminded of the recent "What makes people vote Republican" by Jonathan Haidt

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/haidt08/haidt08_index.html

where he discusses Progressive misunderstanding of the "triggers" that keep conservatives wary of "outsiders" as they define them, and liberals bewildered by the behavior.

At one point Haidt argues that loyalty to the group as brought forward from tribal times is one of the five pillars of conservative decision making. As a liberal motorcycly enthusiast, I constantly see this reluctance to expand the definition of "tribe" beyond the old boundaries.

This time, though, there is a countervailing interest in "harm" and "fairness" and a growing understanding that the flag waving politicos that have led them recently are revealed as shills for ----wait for it---the actual elite moneyed interests who are running the entire world down the tubes.
04:15 PM on 10/22/2008
When your children eat food, they don't ask if it is social...