iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Ken Blackwell
GET UPDATES FROM Ken Klukowski
 

Constitutional Conservatism Ready for Prime Time

Posted: 07/06/11 02:42 PM ET

Liberal pundits are panicking over constitutional conservatism. They shouldn't, because every child -- whether the parents are liberal or conservative -- will benefit from constitutional conservatism's ascendency. If America elects a constitutional conservative president and Congress in 2012, we'll move forward as a freedom-loving nation.

Several outlets on the Left -- such as The New Republic -- are raising an alarm about this disturbing new term, saying that it's secret code for "absolutists" and "zealots" on economic issues, overturning Roe v. Wade, and implying that constitutional conservatives are segregationists bent on creating a theocracy.

As two constitutional conservatives who wrote a new book on the issue, we'll correct the record on defining constitutional conservatism, how it now dominates Republican politics, and why America needs it so desperately.

Constitutional conservatism is the system of government the Founders gave to this country. They set out a series of principles on the rights of man and the role of government in the Declaration of Independence, including that God creates us equal and gives us rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit (not guarantee) of happiness, that government exists to secure these rights, and that the people either consent to this government or have the right to change it.

After years of trial and error, the country then adopted the Framers' proposed Constitution to be the Supreme Law of the Land to fulfill the Declaration's purpose. This Constitution strictly defines the federal government as one of enumerated powers, giving it authority over specific areas of our national life, splitting its powers between three branches that check each other, and leaves the states sovereign on all other matters. They also declared certain individual rights. Knowing that they were fallible human beings, the Framers also included an amendment process so that when the Constitution was found lacking, a complex supermajority could change it (and have, twenty-seven times).

The Far Left wrongly suggests that constitutional conservatism is retrospective. Instead it recognizes that in less than two centuries constitutional conservatism made the United States the most powerful, prosperous, successful, and free nation in world history. This was no accident. Constitutional conservatism is what allows us to achieve such heights, and will reinvigorate America and brighten our future to the extent that we return to those principles.

Constitutional conservatism is a unified governmental philosophy. Despite attempts to fracture conservatism into economic, social, and national security factions, constitutional conservatism shows how each of these three builds on the other two in the context of limited government. Flourishing businesses and safe homes are vital to strong families. A vibrant economy and virtuous citizens are essential to fuel national security. And stable families and secure communities are necessary for long-term economic prosperity. This is part of the formula embodied in the Declaration and Constitution, and ubiquitous in the writings and speeches of our presidents and national leaders, from George Washington to Ronald Reagan.

Despite the Left's current obsession with Michele Bachmann, she's not the only Republican candidate claiming the mantle of constitutional conservatism. The same could be said of several presidential contenders, from Tim Pawlenty to Herman Cain, to others not even running (yet?), such as Rick Perry.

Constitutional conservatism is central to numerous campaigns this cycle, not just the presidential race. From Indiana's Mike Pence for governor, to Florida's Adam Hasner for Senate, to Texas' Ted Cruz for Senate, scores of candidates running for office embrace the U.S. Constitution as the blueprint for America's future happiness.

It's not backward-looking to survey the lessons of history to plot a course for the future. That's what the Founders did as devoted students of more than 3,000 years of philosophy, history, theology, and government when they wrote the Declaration and later proposed the Constitution. Our system of government is the culmination of millennia of human trial and error, and our recent troubles reinforce the reality that we must return to those principles.

No man-made government is perfect, and if it were no system run by fallible human beings can deliver perfect results. But the fact remains that our recent forays into government interventionism, social engineering, transnationalism, federal mandates, living in unprecedented debt, and looking to government to save us is only worsening our situation.

Technology advances and economies evolve, but human nature doesn't change, and so neither do the timeless principles for ideal government. Constitutional conservatism is the system of government for optimizing our freedom and happiness, and it's once again ready for prime time in America's national life.

Ken Blackwell and Ken Klukowski are on faculty at Liberty University and fellows with the Family Research Council, and authors of Resurgent: How Constitutional Conservatism Can Save America.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:41 PM on 07/06/2011
I, for one, would be excited to see someone who is a constitutional conservative. I am socially liberal or libertarian but think our politicians have got us in one heck of a mess fiscally with their huge government policies. Bush was big government. He passed medicare prescription drug coverage but no new taxes to support it. He created Homeland Security and gave out billions. He had us invade a country without provocation which to me is his gravest and most evil sin. Americans are not war mongers yet our politicians certainly are. Obama escalated the war in Afghanistan when he should have brought everyone home. Then, bombing Libya! What is wrong with these people? I am jaded. Romney, Huntsman, and possibly Pawlenty are basically big government, big regulations, type of politicians. Will one of them win? If so, we'll just have more of the same cowardly, stick with the same protocol, type of politicians that are helping to destroy this country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dzymzlzy
03:03 PM on 07/06/2011
First of all, you don't give a single concrete example of liberal pundits freaking out over so-called constitutional conservatives and since I have never seen a single example of such I must conclude that this is yet another right-wing attempt to rewrite the conversation in their own favor. And second, for a group that claims to revere the Constitution so much, they sure do want to change an awful lot of it. Just this year we have seen numerous right-wingers calling for rewriting the Constitution so that children born on US soil are no longer guaranteed citizenship. Several Republicans have also called for taking away states' rights to elect their own representatives.
03:52 PM on 07/06/2011
Chris Matthews calling the Republicans Wahhabis comes to mind. Rachel Maddow is always good for a zinger. Not many countries have automatic entry into the country by having a baby there. It can be discussed here - doesn't mean it's going to happen. Some think it's a law that is archaic. You seem to be looking at the right as if everyone is out to get you and take away your rights when constitutionalists want to uphold them. Chill, man.