iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Ken Blackwell
 
GET UPDATES FROM Bob Morrison
 

Let Israel Be Israel

Posted: 03/ 3/2012 8:45 am

President Obama responded calmly and masterfully to a heckler at one of his New York fundraisers this week. "Hold on there, young lady, nobody's announced a war just yet," he said. The protester demanded the U.S. not take military action against the escalating threat of Iran's nuclear arms program.

No such action is in the offing. Mideast adviser Dennis Ross, who is forever counseling administrations of both parties on how to make nice with Israel's not-so-nice neighbors, assures us that Iran will not be able to "surprise" the West during any negotiations. He says Iran is not like Japan.

Really? How does he know that? Aggressive. Insular. Driven by a sense of the superiority of their own culture and religion. Willing to engage in suicide bombings. That's an apt description of the pre-Pearl Harbor Japan, or Iran under the Mullahs today.

The president tells his heckler not to "jump the gun" in assuming that he, Barack Obama, has decided on military action against Iran. "Nobody's announced a war just yet." That reminds us of the slogan of the anti-war Left in the 1970s: "Suppose they gave a war and nobody came?"

Mr. Obama's riposte makes about as much logical sense as that bumper sticker mentality from the Age of Aquarius. Suppose, Mr. President, Iran gave a war and you didn't notice? Starting in 1979 with the seizure of our embassy in Tehran and the 444 days of captivity for our 52 hostages, Iran has been engaged in acts of war against the United States. The murder of 241 Marines and Navy Corpsmen in Beirut in 1983 was an act of war against us by proxies widely assumed to be acting on instructions from Tehran.

What kind of reassurance can Israel take from the statements of Mr. Obama's Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff? Gen. Martin Dempsey said Iran is a "rational actor" on the world stage. If you assume that that means they have taken this president's measure and will act accordingly, the general may actually be right.

Recall President Obama's first act in foreign policy. He signed an Executive Order requiring closing within one year of the U.S. detention facility at Guantànamo Bay. That was more than three years ago.

Gitmo remains open. It should remain open. In one of its last acts, the Lame Duck 111th Congress -- one of the most liberal Congresses in history -- required by law that Gitmo remain open. Mr. Obama's flourishing left-handed signature of Executive Order Zero is proof that you don't need to take what this president says too seriously.

The Iranians obviously don't take him seriously. Neither should the Israelis. President Obama recently told an interviewer from The Atlantic magazine:

We, immediately upon taking over, mapped out a strategy that said we are going to mobilize the international community around this issue and isolate Iran to send a clear message to them that there is a path they can follow that allows them to rejoin the community of nations, but if they refused to follow that path, that there would be an escalating series of consequences.


"Mobilize the international community?" Would that include Russia and China? Sec. of State Hillary Clinton recently called their non-cooperation at the UN on the matter of sanctions against Syria "despicable." Syria is a client state of Iran. If we cannot rely on Russia and China to help us with a non-nuclear Syria, how can we ever expect genuine cooperation with them on Iran? So far, both of these permanent members of the UN Security Council have been busy pulling the teeth of every UN sanctions resolution they see.

Barack Obama may worry about rejoining "the community of nations." That was, ostensibly, the rationale for all his bowing with apologies tours of foreign capitals.

But the Iranian Mullahs have shown no concern about rejoining the community of nations. They are happy enough dealing with Castro Cuba and Venezuela's anti-American dictator Hugo Chavez.

Contrast the feckless Obama administration's handling of nuclear threats to Israel with that of Ronald Reagan in 1981. When the Israelis struck the Osirak reactor being built by Saddam Hussein, Israeli military leaders were invited to the Pentagon. Instead of being censured for their unilateral action, Reagan military chiefs wanted to know how they achieved such a stunning success.

Amos Yadlin, former chief of Israel's military intelligence, argues in this week's New York Times that now may be the Jewish state's "last chance" to stop Iran's nuclear bomb.

We should never have allowed it to come to this. As Charles Krauthammer says, "Israel was founded to prevent a second Holocaust, not invite one."

Now is the time: Let Israel be Israel.

 
 
 
President Obama responded calmly and masterfully to a heckler at one of his New York fundraisers this week. "Hold on there, young lady, nobody's announced a war just yet," he said. The protester deman...
President Obama responded calmly and masterfully to a heckler at one of his New York fundraisers this week. "Hold on there, young lady, nobody's announced a war just yet," he said. The protester deman...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 605
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
photo
shothot
same, same, but different
04:08 AM on 03/07/2012
Apparently the writers of this article have chosen a one sided view of Iranian/American history.
Needless to say, it is obvious their opinion is biased.
The US has been involved in Iranian affairs dating back to the overthrow of Mossadegh, a democratically elected Prime Minister. They fail to acknowledge the olive branch by Iran after 911, which we ignored. Should we also consider the killing and maiming of hundreds of US servicemen on the USS Liberty an act of war by Israel? Israel seems to be moving toward is an Iranian halocaust, when all intelligence points to no attempts by Iran to build nuclear weapons. More WMD's?
"Let Israel be Israel" has been the problem throughout. While the United Nations have passed resolutions condemning Israel, causing eternal friction in the Middle East by it's defiance of International laws, the Israeli High Court, past US presidents-Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Bush, and Obama.
04:10 AM on 03/06/2012
Just that*
04:10 AM on 03/06/2012
How ironic that the party of "civil liberties" and "gettin back to the constitution" is vehemently opposed to just after they realize what it actually entails.
photo
Fooly-Cooly
Those...eyebrows...
04:12 PM on 03/05/2012
Thank you Ken Blackwell for your opinion; however, you are in record in Ohio for being one of the single most absurd Republican "dittoheads" out there.

Give the keyboard a rest.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:08 PM on 03/05/2012
"Aggressive. Insular. Driven by a sense of the superiority of their own culture and religion."

oh.
for a minute there I thought you were talking about Amerika.
photo
Djay0252
America needs to Bless God
11:26 AM on 03/05/2012
Let Israel Be Israel and we might be looking at WW3
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lawrence of america
11:12 AM on 03/05/2012
"Aggressive. Insular. Driven by a sense of the superiority of their own culture and religion." i cant tell if he is talking about Israel or the US in that one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CapSen
Empathy. The faculty to feel what the other feels.
03:41 PM on 03/05/2012
f&f
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:32 PM on 03/05/2012
Really? You can't tell? learn to read

"or Iran under the Mullahs today."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lawrence of america
09:33 PM on 03/05/2012
so cute.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Synthmatrix
The modern GOP would have hated TR, Lincoln & Ike
09:27 AM on 03/05/2012
This reads like a 15 year old's essay who just selectively read a few articles on the middle east and suddenly thinks he knows what he's talking about. The sad part is it took two people to write the useless opinion piece. My advice is read Robert Baer's books and you'll 'get' the middle east. He thinks attacking Iran is insane. The time for supporting everything Israel does is at an end.
photo
shothot
same, same, but different
04:10 AM on 03/07/2012
yes!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:54 AM on 03/05/2012
I am surprised that huffpost would let itself be used as a sounding board for such a revolting propaganda,chickenhawk war pimping everyone knows that the us would ultimately be the one doing most of the work in any war. Wasn't one Iraq war enough?
08:32 AM on 03/05/2012
90000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 trillion xs fanned Henry S . . not for the authors of this piece of propaganda ,. . . .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:58 PM on 03/05/2012
Gotta fan this guy.

F/F
07:46 AM on 03/05/2012
you guys are stumping up a war for no purpose . . . dialogue diplomacy not more needless wars for the sake of your neo con buddies and bibi
06:53 AM on 03/05/2012
Because mercy knows our actions across the globe have only ever been nice and good and just. And everything we do is justified and right and everything that other nations do that don't like it are bad and blah blah blah. I'm sure this vapid reasoning plays well with the simpleminded viewers of Fox, but to anyone with a memory that spans more than six months it is just the same lame justifications to continue our military occupancy of the world by divine right. Every drool cup wearing infozomie in this country thinks Iran is the biggest threat in the middle east, and everybody in the middle east thinks the US and Israel is the biggest threat in the area.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:37 PM on 03/05/2012
"our actions"

So, loyal American, go join "everybody in the middle east"

My money says you're already there
08:07 PM on 03/06/2012
Already did as a proud member of the United States Army. What have you done for your country...aside from divisive mindless rhetoric?
photo
shothot
same, same, but different
04:22 AM on 03/07/2012
And how have you served your country recently? loyal Americans who speak against the
distrustful alliance ( CIA has one of the largest spying departments dedicated to the prevention of Israeli spying on the US) between the US and Israel should be applauded instead of "wishing" them off to the Middle East.
04:55 AM on 03/05/2012
"Baroness Jenny Tonge, a Liberal Democrat peer, has resigned from her position as the party whip after refusing to back down on comments criticizing Israel, according to U.K. media. “Beware Israel: Israel is not going to be there forever in its present performance. One day the United States of America will get sick of giving £70 billion [$109 billion] a year to Israel,” she said, addressing a group of students at Middlesex University in London last Thursday. Israel receives approximately $3 billion annually in grants from the U.S.
Tonge criticized the relationship between the United States and the Jewish state, describing Israel as “America’s aircraft carrier in the Middle East,” adding that there would come a day when the people in the United States would say “enough is enough.” “It will not go on forever, it will not go on forever and Israel will lose its support, then they will reap what they have sown,” Tonge, who has previously been sacked from the party for remarks similar on the Jewish state, said."

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2012/Mar-01/165150-british-politician-resigns-over-critical-comments-on-israel.ashx#ixzz1nrdbh48k
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:51 AM on 03/05/2012
Brave woman. Give her a medal.
07:28 AM on 03/05/2012
x2
12:40 PM on 03/05/2012
They are all s o b's over there. Why pick on Israel? They are by far the most reasonable and liberal of the lot. If that nation doesn't deserve a country - considering its language, culture, and deep history of unity and perseverence in the face of truly catastrophic oppression, than who does?

'Palestine' isn't a nationality or culture or language. They are arabs. They speak arabic. Oh, and they already have a country that is 80% of the Palestine mandate. Does anyone know its name?
02:45 AM on 03/06/2012
Well... most of them have been fighting to get out from under the post colonial instruments of oppression graced upon them by the world's obsession with oil, particularly the west's. The same nations that arm these tinpot dictators.... Guess who enables the spread of the $@ud| brand of puritanical lunacy with oil money?

As far as language and culture goes, |$rae|'s neighbors are just as rich in that regard. They may lack PR tools to be all over M$M and glossy magazines but just because you or i can't understand @rabic, doesn't mean there's any weight in that department.

P@|estine? Of course it's a nationality, it was a nation long before |$rae| was created on top of it, not that long ago...

As far as the culture goes, @r@bs share many aspects of customs and traditions that transcend boundaries and borders. Similar yet different enough...

Great... Defending |$rae|'s legitimacy comes down to pointing fingers at others who might in your opinion occupy 80% P@|3stine? So much for all that talk about it being a miracle.

And guess who sits at the helm in J0rd@n? Another "Friendly" strongman....
01:28 AM on 03/05/2012
A very selective view of history for sure. It is amazing what europeans, including those in Israel will do to seem like rational actors. The Mossad, CIA and MI5 have been aggreessors towards Iran since the overthrow of the Iranian Gov't before,"the Shah". If being a blow hard and spewwing disparraging remarks about another countries right to exist makes one worthy of military action, let's then look at some serious behavior that are actually acts of war, not by proxxies either
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
09:23 AM on 03/05/2012
Speaking of a selective view of history, Iran owes its very existence to the US. Look up the Iran Crisis of 1946. During WWII, both the UK and the USSR invaded and occupied Iran for security purposes. Both countries assured everyone that the occupation was temporary, but after the war, only the British withdrew. It quickly became clear that the Soviets intended to annex Iran as a soviet republic, just like they did with Kazahkstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and others. At that point, the US intervened and pushed the Soviet Union into backing down. Of course, the US did it for its own interests, but imagine Iran as part of the USSR until 1990.
01:19 AM on 03/05/2012
I agree,let them be. america doesnt want a war. If Israel wants war they can attack Iran themselves. they have enough war planes, drones and soliders.
pssdov
No act of kindness goes unnoticed
11:55 PM on 03/04/2012
Sure, Israel can be Israel. By themselves. Count us out and suspend all foreign aid until you agree to a separate Palestinian state on the reclaimed West Bank. Go ahead Israel, reap the wind and you will sow the whirlwind.
06:11 AM on 03/05/2012
f & f pssdov .. . .well said . . . bye bye israel . . .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:43 PM on 03/05/2012
That's the arrogant attitude that has your group spinning its wheels, going nowhere