What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients. Hence a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention, and a need to allocate that attention efficiently among the overabundance of information sources that might consume it. --Herbert Simon, Economist, Nobel laureate (1916-2001)
A few years ago, I was teaching a workshop on the Heart Sutra. We had just finished that long list of negations and everyone was a bit off balance, having had the rug pulled out from under them four or five different ways. The next lines were, "Because for bodhisattvas there is no attainment, they rest, trusting the perfection of wisdom."
"When he reaches the perfection of wisdom, can a bodhisattva choose to do whatever he wants?" a young man asked.
"The illusion of choice is an indication of a lack of freedom," I replied. He looked at me stunned, then turned around and gently banged his head against the wall as he said, "Now my head really hurts."
Most people equate choice and freedom. It seems so reasonable. Freedom means you are free to choose, right? It means you are free from restrictions. If you can't choose, then you are not free. And it would seem to follow that the more choice you have, the more freedom you have.
But it doesn't work out that way.
The more options you have, the more energy you have to invest in making decisions. Which shampoo? Which car? Which dress? Which restaurant? Which movie? Your energy and attention are consumed by these decisions and you have less left with which to live your life. I recently met a young entrepreneur who had reduced the number of items he owned to 15 (including clothes, just one pair of jeans). His aim? To reduce choice in his daily routine so that he could focus his attention on his business. It reminded me that in the three-year retreat, I had only two sets of clothes. The aim was the same: to reduce choice so that I could focus attention on meditation practice.
Many people deliberately eliminate choice and the need for decisions by adopting set schedules. They conserve energy for important rather than routine decisions as John Tierney describes this article in the NY Times. Research into consumer behavior shows that people are more likely to buy devices with more options, but they are less likely to use them because it takes too long to figure out how to do even the simplest task. Part of the key to Apple's success, for instance, is precisely in reducing choice, making their devices easy and intuitive to use.
What does choice give you? One answer is that choice makes it possible for you to shape your world according to your preferences. All this does is to enable you to fashion a world that is an extension of your own patterns. With modern technology, you can weave a cocoon of your preferences and rarely run into anything that contradicts them. Google now keys its searches to fit your online behavior, further cocooning you in your own world. In other words, too much choice is a trap. You end up isolated from the richness and complexity of life. (See "The Paradox of Choice" by Barry Schwarz.)
Choice is a dubious blessing when it comes to spiritual practice, in fact, when it comes to any creative endeavor. Great art is often the result of restriction, in form, in materials, in themes, etc. The restrictions concentrate attention and spur creativity. It is the same in practice. How do you increase your capacity in attention? By eliminating all choice. One posture. One object. Rest right there. No choice. And, as all of us know, it's not easy.
The lack of choice brings you directly into contact with the way you habitually ignore, shut down, manipulate or control your experience. When you have no choice, you have to learn how to relate to what life brings you. You can't weave a comfortable cocoon. On the other hand, by restricting your choice of actions, you can develop an internal discipline of not reacting. This is why moral discipline was traditionally seen as the basis for meditation practice.
When I look at my own path, once I started to study with Kalu Rinpoche, I didn't have much choice. Tradition and instruction took over. Learn Tibetan, do these practices, then this practice, etc. The three-year retreat was the same, one practice after another. No choice. Because of those restrictions, I couldn't avoid my own emotional material. It came out in quite brutal ways.
By the time I left retreat, all doors to practice were closed for me in the tradition in which I had trained. Yet something else had formed -- a firm way-seeking mind, to use Suzuki Roshi's phrase. In the years since, I have come to appreciate that a firm way-seeking mind is the most important quality to cultivate. With it, you are able to work through any obstacle. I simply don't see how you can develop that if you can choose just what fits with you.
One of the functions of monasteries, retreats, ethical codes and other structures associated with spiritual practice is to eliminate choice. When people attend the relatively strict discipline at Tassajara Zen Center, for instance, they come away feeling rejuvenated, refreshed, etc., precisely because they have had no choice for a few days. They feel free, alive, awake in a way that they don't in their regular lives. Prisoners who take up a meditation practice, have reported that, by restricting their range of actions even beyond the limitations of prison and just sitting in meditation, they find a freedom they never suspected was possible.
What is freedom? It is the moment-by-moment experience of not being run by one's own reactive mechanisms. Does that give you more choice? Usually not. When you aren't run by reactions, you see things more clearly, and there is usually only one, possibly two courses of action that are actually viable. Freedom from the tyranny of reaction leads to a way of experiencing life that leaves you with little else to do but take the direction that life offers you in each moment. Hence, the illusion of choice is an indication of a lack of freedom.
Follow Ken McLeod on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kenmcleod
Lewis Richmond: Western Buddhism: The 50 Year Lessons (Part II)
What would he desire? After tracing wants to their core and witnessing their dissolution what else would such a person desire? Then all choices fall away. He or she will choose. Such a person is bound to decide on things fore that is part of being alive. One is not free to avoid choice. And the decision not to choose is also a choice. But that has nothing to do with freedom as it is understood here (ontological freedom and not that granted to us through law or within the exigencies of life).
Some will respond and call this a melange of words or a salad whose selection is scattered off the plate with spilled dressing soaking into the tablecloth. You would be right in that when one skims the surface sound of abstract speech there is only noise.
What then is this freedom but a freshet after a long rain or a the stream greeting the sea?
In a translated poem the narrator describes a bird flying across a clear blue sky leaving not a trace.
Basho recounts the frog leaping into the sound of water. Then there is a still lake reflecting so perfectly the sky that it disappears into that very reflection. And so these words skate along the narrow edge of freedom. How close and yet so far. Word salad? Perhaps.
Don't make "freedom".
But the other side:
People in Tibet need to have the freedom so that they can choose a path. Ignorance can be caused by a gun aimed at your loved one's head. Sometimes, bindings simply enslave people and need to be broken. The Boddhisatva knows also which bonds to break.
hariaum
but you make a good point as ultimate freedom is not choices. choices prepare us to find a path to freedom.
all paths all choices sooner or later lead to the freedom of ignorance. ignorance being our unawareness of our reality.
if that freedom is not attained in this life than another or another and even in other dimensions.
See: http://revolutionofreason.com and http://www.youtube.com/RobertLBlackburn
the mind is not like a computer. a computer is an effect of the mind. the vitality and intelligence that creates the computer is not material but the underlying reality of the material.
those "proper choices" are almost always within the paradigms and cherished beliefs of the person making a choice.
reason and logic almost always are within the beliefs of the person that claims to have reason and logic.
a materialist uses reason and logic to see only a material world.
a buddhist uses reason and logic to see a world of suffering and the way out is enlightenment,
a christian uses reason and logic to believe that jesus died for their sins so they can get to heaven, etc.
never met a person that did not believe that they used reason and logic that supports their beliefs. ok some admit to gut feelings.
the paradigm effect is much more powerful almost always than reason and logic. the paradigm effect is hidden from our view so we go through all that reason and logic and in the end both just support our hidden paradigm be it religious or materialism.
But I wonder if we can't find freedom even in or among our choices. Why must choice block or even influence our freedom?.
Again see: http://revolutionofreason.com and http://www.youtube.com/RobertLBlackburn”