On Feb 19, in the heart of Black History Month, I am heading off to Chicago to join Dr. Cathy J. Cohen, author of Democracy Remixed: Black Youth and the Future of American Politics, others from the Black youth Project, and national and local spokespeople to participate in an ongoing public conversation about the Creation of a Black Youth Political Agenda.
One thing I know is that economic justice has got to be high on that agenda.
At the close of 2010 President Obama signed the repeal of the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy, which in theory will allow gay and lesbian members of the military to serve without being in the closet. I've met so many people both in and outside of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender movements who have said that repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell is an economic justice victory. After all, so many people of color and poor and working-class LGBT people join the military to access better jobs, better education. Now they can do it without hesitation. They suggest that because the military is the nation's largest employer organization, groups I am associated with like Queers for Economic Justice, and the Black Youth Project should be joining in the victory dance.
Yes, the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell is a victory -- of sorts -- significant when it comes to moving towards eliminating discrimination and advancing equality for LGBT individuals. But military service is not economic justice, and it is immoral that the military is the nation's de facto jobs program for young, poor, Black and working-class people.
Even while we may applaud the repeal of a discriminatory policy, we have to be clear: militarism and war profiteering do not serve the interests of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender people, or poor people, or people of color.
This is not just a progressive "chestnut" or sloganeering -- it is hard fact. Consider a few facts:
Wouldn't more social safety net spending and a real jobs program help the millions of young people who can barely make ends meet?
In short, military service is not economic justice.
Furthermore there are poor people as well as lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people beyond U.S. shores, who have been killed, traumatized, or disabled as a direct result of recent US-led wars or who have become vulnerable targets to backlashes to US policies and actions.
Yes "our gays" should have the "right" to serve openly in the military rather than labor under discriminatory rules -- but we stand in solidarity with lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people around the globe. We do not condone violence against them or their home countries. We support real economic justice.
We call for a real jobs program for young people -- white and black, men and women, gay and straight. President Obama, let's get past the military "jobs program" and on to a real jobs program -- one with productive work, a living wage and dignity, one that allows our youth to makes a positive contribution to building our country's future. We all deserve that.
Kenyon Farrow is an organizer, communications strategist, and writer on issues at the intersection of HIV/AIDS, prisons, and homophobia. Farrow was formerly the Executive Director of Queers for Economic Justice.
1 in 4 vets?-REPLY: The study? Name the study please? One in four? Does not add up, sorry, your "Study" is wrong via simple numbers when compared to the numbers of people in the Military as a whole and those who actually see combat. Try again.
Rape-REPLY: Again, the majority of all people are drawn from the workinng and middle class, the poor cannot get in due to low exams or other reasons, the rich do not go in. Lastly, assault in the military under the UCMJ is very different than that in the civilian world, a simple word or out of line comment at a bar can be cited as assualt and the punishment far more severe in the Military world. You are also assuming that all claims are true or not embelished over anything else, thought we were a country of "innocent until proven guilty", guess not if your in the Military.
Budget-REPLY: The DoD budget is half of the discretionary budget and as part of the overall budget is actually very small, the majority,60% via the CBO, going to entitlements. To say that it is more than Social Security is just a lie, not something I would expect of a "journalist".
Until someone comes up with something specific, the military will continue to be the "jobs program" for the poor and undereducated. Where else will they get "3 hots and a cot", $800/mo spending money, and free travel in this economy?
I think we should track kids in HS. One track for college prep, the other for training in a trade, just as they do in Europe. It's absurd to believe everyone is college material; equally absurd is the way we turn kids out into the world with no job training. The military trains people for a trade, and until the schools do the training, it's about the only option many of our youth have.