iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

A cynic may say this $30 billion fund to encourage small community banks to lend to small businesses is mid-term election politics. The Small Business and Credit Act of 2010 (H.R. 5297) passed both Congressional houses and is expected to soon be signed by President Obama. This bill, however, is a waste of tax-payer money and will have zero effect on stimulating our economy for the following three reasons:

1. Businesses Need Confidence
Washington is playing the dangerous game of vilifying large businesses and banks on one-hand, but saying small businesses and community banks are good. But business is business. Most small businesses start out thinking that they will one day be big businesses. When I start a small business, like I recently have with FindTheBest.com, my goal is to eventually become a big business. This belief that government can micro-manage the economy with complicated programs is misguided.

2. Good Businesses Borrow for Growth
If you have viable business, banks will offer their assistance -- that is the nature of the banking industry. If your business is stacked with risks, a loan will most likely be the wrong solution. Simple business 101 -- a growing company often needs loans for cash flow and these loans can be secured with receivables. Other reasons for borrowing money include funding inventory and assets, all of which can be used to collateralize the loan (i.e., something the bank can seize and re-sell if you don't pay back the loan). Banks make these types of loans because that is their business. If your company is growing, it will be a win-win situation; you don't need government assistance to encourage good investments.

3. Bad Businesses Borrow for Losses
When businesses live beyond their means (i.e., expenses exceed revenue), they can't print money or borrow from other countries like our government does. Banks will not fund loses because these are high risk loans -- the company is likely to fail -- and there's nothing to secure. A risky business should not be rewarded with a loan.

With this pending bill, Congress is encouraging banks to move up the "risk curve." In other words, helping banks make loans which, without the so-called stimulus program, they would never make because the loans don't make economic sense. A cynic might draw an analogy to the mortgage industry where Fannie and Freddie encouraged lending to unqualified borrowers to buy over-priced houses they couldn't afford.

What are your thoughts on the pending bill? Do you think it has the potential of jumpstarting the economy or do you think it will just encourage risky lending?

 
 
 

Follow Kevin O'Connor on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kjpoconnor

 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:36 PM on 09/29/2010
I wrote this yesterday in response to an article on politicsdaily.com. I guess I am a cynic. "This bill is all smoke and mirrors and it is so distressing to hear people praise its benefits. I have been in the finance industry for 22 years and I can tell you without a doubt that lack of available capital is not the problem for small to medium sized businesses right now. The banks are sitting on the largest amount of money in US history? It is not going out because these businesses do not qualify for the loans. Banks are in the business to make money and the way they do that is by lending money. If there are viable clients out there, they will lend them money. Therefore, if the governemnt is encouraging banks to loan to businesses (backed with a taxpayer guarantee) that shouldn't qualify, how can you not see this as another potential Fannie/Freddie mess? Hopefully this won't be as dangerous as I think, because word on the streets is that even with the taxpayer backing, the banks are not willing to take on any of the risk. In addition, the FDIC has so many regulations in place to make sure they don't lend the money that this can be nothing more than a political ploy. Don't ever forget that they depend on our ignorance."
10:59 AM on 09/29/2010
I built my small business to stay small. It is growing 40% a year but there is a cap on growth and I think there is a cap on 90% of legit businesses. This notion that all businesses aspire to be big is not supported by the evidence or the prevailing attitudes of small business owners. What is wrong with having a small business that you enjoy and that contributes to a small community. Transcend the ego and be content!

I think policy should reflect the reality of 90% of small businesses and not risk obsessed self absorbed entrepreneurs. Here is my built to stay small business - http://www.start-cleaning-business.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Mazzoni
11:10 PM on 09/28/2010
The article is on point, small banks are small for a reason they either do not have the needed assets or deposits to grow bigger, or they want to start on the bottom and work their way up. People always act if banks are always evil but lets not forget it was then a modest regional bank called Bank of America who backed for the funds for the Golden Gate Bridge project!

All business but nonprofits want make money it is the nature of the beast. As for lending many small business owners have gone to the new microloan market which is booming since there was a need not being met by credit unions, small banks, or the big 5 or 6 for short term business loans, or money needed to secure larger loans for expenses, debt, bridges, collateral, or big purchases.
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
02:40 PM on 09/29/2010
Yep Bank of America backed the bonds for the Golden Gate Bridge, and Look Where They Are NoW, one of the top 10 banks you would want to do business with if you could choose ( and you like lying down and enjoying the rape) (and I worked for Bank of America )
photo
mrpotatohead
auto micro-bio: OFF
07:06 PM on 09/28/2010
I would like more evidence that most small businesses are looking to become large businesses. Also, to suggest "business is business" is a gross oversimplification.

I don't know a lot of small businesses that have full-time lawyers on staff or representatives in Washington. They also rarely are able to work around state or local laws, receive tax breaks or other subsidies when opening their doors.

I don't know if this program will help or not, but this article seems to be a gross oversimplification either way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Mazzoni
11:23 PM on 09/28/2010
No business person wants to fail, sure the rate for that to happen is well over 50%, it might take a small business owner or groups 3 different starts before they will see success. Most small business can not afford lawyers that is where legal insurance comes into play and it is a very profitable to the few companies that provide these services.

A smart business owner will do everything legally to profit and that is why just between the states they fight for these business owners. NV & Del, FL and SD spend tens of millions a year to actively seek unhappy over taxed business owners in IL, NJ, NYC, Conn. Mass, MN, PA, and CA to move to their state to save themselves money. They know if it works these small business can grow and create jobs, low unemployment, and new methods of income to pad the states balance sheets.
05:45 PM on 09/28/2010
Financial manipulations don't solve fundamental problems. If Congress had instead allocated that 30B to universities we would see fewer changes in the next few months, but much greater returns over the next 5-10 years.
04:05 PM on 09/28/2010
Money doesn't create jobs - only innovation does. Jobs come from real "demand" for a product or service or new efficiencies. Printing money to make loans just delays our economic decline.

Here's an example: 2020b This group of entrepreneurs in San Francisco has solved 3 big problems: urban living, new schools and clean, renewable energy - enough to cut Green House Gas emissions in HALF within 10 years. All three are very valuable solution and therefore do not need government funding.

America should be thinking like they are - Innovate to renew and create jobs.

Catch their Intro video at http://www.2020b.com

It will make you feel good about America, again.
01:48 PM on 09/28/2010
Encouraging banks to lend to small businesses by increasing the guaranties on their losses is offset by the WH's moves to increase capital requirements on those same banks; until BOTH fed mechanisms are in sync, WH talk about banks having the green light to lend is strictly political posturing with no sincere intent.