|
||
James Bond Through The Ages
James Bond is in a word, timeless. He should be anyway. An enduring symbol of effortless cool, irresistible sex appeal, intelligence, style, sophistication and class, it's not surprising that the actors who've played him have had some chic shoes to fill. But when looking back at our cinematic Bonds (all six of them, from 1962 to 2008), one realizes that the famed double agent is also specifically linked to his era -- making him a little trickier to cast once the need arrives.
Our current Bond, Daniel Craig (who took over for Pierce Brosnan), learned this lesson the hard, but ultimately successful, way. When word of his casting was finalized in 2005, Bond fans and mean-spirited tabloids went ballistic. Attacking him over his appearance, his background, his hair and even his ability to handle an Aston Martin (apparently he couldn't drive stick), the anti-Bonds were proven wrong when the action packed and smart Casino Royale (directed by Martin Campbell) was unveiled to a doubting public. Not only was the picture a gritty good time but one of the best Bond films ever made. A Bond for his era, Craig will (hopefully) continue his accomplishment with his upcoming mouthful, Quantum of Solace. But here's my question: Were all of our Bonds, even the less popular super spies, quintessential of their era? Surveying them through time, I'm heartily saying, yes.
The Swinging '60s Gentleman Spy: Sean Connery (1962-1967; 1971 and 1983)
Scottish born, smooth operator Sean Connery is still considered the perfect representation of all things Bond. The best looking, the best speaking, the most charming, the most stylish -- you name it, Connery's got it. But when first cast in 1962's Dr. No, even he had his detractors, namely and most importantly, Ian Fleming -- the novelist who created Bond. But once audiences heard that iconic John Barry (or Monty Norman?) theme music and the curiously accented, arch eye-browed Connery state his name as "Bond, James Bond," they fell under his spell. During a strange cinematic era that gave us wholesome hits like My Fair Lady and Mary Poppins, and dark, challenging classics like Dr. Strangelove and The Manchurian Candidate -- James Bond movies were, for a while, a tasty tonic. Though England provided many quirky and gritty pictures during this era (those "angry young man" films), Bond's glossy fun and sexy '60s gals (notably goddesses like Ursula Andress and Honor Blackman), were acceptably violent, sexually active (no way is this Bond not going to sleep with Pussy Galore) and coolly good-natured. The pictures might veer towards silly at times, but they weren't square -- important as Bond moves towards the later 1960s. As such, Connery's Bond would have no problem navigating his way through one of Hugh Hefner's hep-cat, Playboy parties mingling with Sammy Davis Jr., Lenny Bruce and of course, bunnies, and a bell-bottomed love-in (though I'm thinking he'd find time to mock the long-haired hippies, while nabbing all of their girlfriends in the process). And, James Bond at Woodstock? I would have loved to have seen that.
The Art-House Bond: George Lazenby (1969)
It seems kind of perfect that just as cinema, especially American cinema, was experiencing such a strong cultural shift by 1969, so was James Bond. With more cynical, darker subject matter on screens (Midnight Cowboy, Easy Rider and Bonnie and Clyde are prime examples) and the peace and love of the 1960s growing more sinister (Altamont, in particular), the new Bond, Australian-born George Lazenby was especially brooding. Taking over for Connery, the star of On Her Majesty's Secret Service is perhaps the most controversial Bond in the history of the franchise and one who inspires extreme responses (some detest him, while others think he's the most interesting and true to Ian Fleming's source material). More stoic and haunted than Connery, newbie (and ex male model) Lazenby was a blend of art house sensibility (he'd fit into a French Policier quite well) and settled down romance. This is the Bond, after all, who gets married. It's as if the filmmakers wanted to ditch some of 007's monkey business and force him to actually think about his actions. But this much thinking wasn't in the cards, and in spite of more introspective movies released to the general public, audiences didn't necessarily want to ruminate during a Bond picture. This need for escape helped usher in our cheekiest Bond yet -- Roger Moore.
The Mid-Life Crisis Bond: Roger Moore (1973-1985)
O.K., so maybe it's a bit harsh to label Roger Moore (who I'm immensely fond) as a red sports car driving, mid-life crisis suffering, key party attending type but, there is something a little divorced about his older, sleazier Bond -- which is one of the reasons many of us like him so much. Making a decided distinction to not ape Connery, Moore smoked cigars, drank Bourbon and generally appeared a little more ruffled, a little more bemused, a little sweatier than the smooth operator of yore. Though clever and oldster sexy, Moore was for those who didn't experience the youth movement of the '60s. Representing men who may have felt they missed out on something and are now making up for lost time, Moore was perfectly, at times ridiculously the Ice Storm generation Bond. And he absolutely belongs to the '70s and early '80s -- from his puffier hair, to his turtleneck sweaters to his flared suits (with epaulets!). Though some of his pictures boast obnoxiously exorbitant action sequences, the kind that put Irwin Allen to shame, he did manage to snag one of most iconic, emotional Bond tunes every sung - Carly Simon's power ballad "Nobody Does it Better" (from The Spy Who Loved Me) .Which just makes me misty for Moore and...turtleneck sweaters.
The Politically Correct Bond: Timothy Dalton (1987-1989)
When Moore exited the now-stale, somewhat ridiculous (but still lovable, dammit) franchise, the Bond movies, very briefly, veered towards the serious -- again (didn't they learn anything from George Lazenby?). Enter classically trained Welsh-born Timothy Dalton, an impressive actor of stage and screen who made his film debut opposite Peter O'Toole and Katharine Hepburn in The Lion in Winter. Coming into the Bond scene after already turning down the role more than once, Dalton and company made 007 moody alright and more in line with Fleming's tough novels, but also a little more in touch with his sensitive side -- particularly regarding the ladies. Though the pictures were grittier, even a bit grim and Dalton is an intriguing class act (and certainly not spending his days watching Oprah), both pictures (The Living Daylights and License to Kill) reflected more of the late '80s sexual awareness, and perhaps a PC reliance on therapy and equality -- again, particularly towards women. Now this is admirable, but the good intentions failed to connect with audiences. People want a Bond continually bedding babes, not avenging their deaths.
The Re-Boot Bond: Pierce Brosnan (1995-2004)
We could probably take Timothy Dalton home to Mom, but what about Pierce Brosnan? Well, yes, we could. With the popular television show Remington Steele in mind, Mom would be mixing up the drinks and sporting her favorite pant-suit for the rare occasion. But would she be thinking the guy is marriage material?. Alas, no -- which is why James Bond remains so seductive -- no one can ever nab him! But let's forget our needs for a moment and return to the needs of the big screen -- it had been six years since we'd even seen a martini shaken, not stirred and we were definitely thirsty for a tall, cool glass of water. Brosnan (who had been approached in '84 but declined because of Remington Steele) was the perfect refresher Bond -- charming, sexy, smart, un-ruffled and carnal enough to recall our favorite Bonds - Connery and Moore - while re-igniting the franchise with his impish appeal. Intentionally or un-intentionally, this Bond was something of a hybrid of Connery and Moore, which worked perfectly for different generations of Bond fans. And the smiling Irishman carried a little more awareness of his iconography, combining almost Tarantino-like reference (think Halle Berry's ode to Ursula Andress' Dr. No bikini entrance in Die Another Day) with old fashioned, solid action movie-making. Essentially, Brosnan and company was saying, "If it ain't broke, don't' fix it." And he was absolutely right. Of course, this only made his replacement the risky, argumentative choice that he was.
The Bold New Blonde Bond: Daniel Craig (2006-?)
As mentioned earlier, Daniel Craig -- he of the ruddier complexion, gloomier demeanor, grittier disposition and blonder hair - was a major gamble for the brand of Bond. The star of more serious pictures like Sylvia and Munich could have potentially become another Lazenby or Dalton -- a fun-sucker to the series (though I wouldn't say that of Lazenby myself). But as witnessed in Casino Royale, Craig is the ideal Bond to take us through the 2000's (so far -- the new blood might already be wearing thin). Perhaps influenced by movies ranging from the popular Jason Statham Transporter series to the high adrenaline, yet thoughtful Bourne films, Craig's Bond is a notable mixture of true grit and exciting cool. And though we love our Connery's, Moore's and Brosnan's (and, for this writer anyway, our Lazenby's and Dalton's) the time was right for a so called real Bond. Now let's see how long our blonde, bonafide Bond will last. Will he (ahem) live more than twice?
Read more Kim Morgan at Sunset Gun All the Bonds, bonding (thanks Flickr). Tweaked from my Fandango
Loading comments…
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
To be honest i dont like the new bond sure hes really cool but i think bond should have black hair not blonde. I think they made a mistake when they let Pierce Brosnan go i think he was the best bond. Then deffinutly Sean Connery. They also left out bonds greattest details that made him great his accent, his aston martin. Well thats all comment me if you think that Daniel Craig is a better bond that any.
When "Casino Royale" was released I was immediately impressed by Daniel Craig and his take on the Bond character. I knew then my favorite Bond, Sean Connery, was in danger of losing his throne. Now I'm sure of it. Daniel Craig plays bond with a grit and flavor of simmering danger that defines him as the assassin that he should be.
I never took Roger Moore seriously in the role. Too much of a foppy smart-ass in a tux. And the comic evil villians and gadgetry were distractions for me. I don't care for films where the special effects are the star. Physically, I thought only Craig and Connery could take on the hand-to-hand combat. The rest were the guys most likely to get beat up after school.
"Quantum of Solice" solidified my choice. Daniel Craig is James Bond.
Daniel Craig is playing James Bond at the beginning of his spy career, so he has yet to become the super spy that audiences have grown to love in the other Bond films.
Rmember, Daniel Craig is supposed to be playing James Bond at the beginning of his spy career....the martini-loving, swave super spy is what he became over the years. There is no character arc if he is that person was day one.
Connery will always be the best
Dalton was vastly underrated
Lazenby, the movie was one of the best . He needed to do more to actually be evaluated
as Bond.
Craig, suprisingly great in Casino Royale. Almost as good as Connery
Brosnan, a little too "cheeky" at times.
I try hard to forget that Roger Moore ever was in any Bond films.
When I saw Quantum today, I thought, wow, exciting, but they could have added another five or ten minutes to fill out the story. It felt like there was something missing. It has a hollowness.
Then I realized that the hollowness is true to the stage of grief Bond would be in just a few hours after losing Vesper. If they added ten minutes of emoting and rounding out the action scenes, it would cheapen the emotion and turn it into a Bondian soap opera.
The movie is true to itself and true to Bond. I think that once people get used to it, the reviews will change.
Craig will top all the Bonds but Connery. Craig's charm is that he plays a cold blooded state-sponsored assassin. The charm in that, is that the viewer and fans see the development of the character from the very beginning of 007's career. Most of us grew up not knowing where Bond is from. The immediate Cold War generation understood the USSR (SPECTRE) vs. the West narrative better than today's movie audiences.
After seeing Quantum twice this weekend, it was not Casino Royale, but it was not inferior to it. It's just different. Audiencesmay have liked Casino a bit more because it had the common motifs found in other Bond films: a classy-ness feel, a tailored look, high end look of European cities; a train ride; limited gadgets (a la Connery Bond) and unlike Moore; a lot of card playing.
Quantum is more "inclusive" in that it is more global in the action and dialogue. It includes several strong female characters with more dialogue (M, Agent Fields, Camille) and some lesser but important players (Mathis and Felix) helpin Bond meet his mission; and it also has a strong support team for Bond (MI-6 and CIA) aiding him a long the way. In short, it's a global Bond. The action is stronger and more deliberate. It's Bond on a mission where much of the journey is one of missing pieces.
From Roger Ebert's review (this is the Bond I know, and why it's always been a debate between Moore and Connery. Otherwise, it's just a bunch of sometimes good, sometimes bad films, and we'd rather watch Jason Bourne....)
================================================================================
by Roger Ebert
OK, I'll say it. Never again. Don't ever let this happen again to James Bond. "Quantum of Solace" is his 22nd film and he will survive it, but for the 23rd it is necessary to go back to the drawing board and redesign from the ground up. Please understand: James Bond is not an action hero! He is too good for that. He is an attitude. Violence for him is an annoyance. He exists for the foreplay and the cigarette. He rarely encounters a truly evil villain. More often a comic opera buffoon with hired goons in matching jump suits.
Having seen every Bond movie at LEAST twice, except for the Craig versions, I rank my Bonds in the order of their believability of having the "license to kill". That said, my order is Connery, Dalton (I think he's fiercely under-rated), Brosnan and Moore dead-last. I think I've seen too many Moore roles where he played a charming, Niven-esque character going back to his appearances on the Maverick tv series....I just can't/couldn't see him as lethal. Lazenby was an interesting experiment but needed an extra outing in the role for me to rate him.
Lazenby very much yes! But then that was also my favorite Bond book.. What is sad is the movies never fully played out what Bond went though emotionally after his wife's murder.
You are all looking at the movies in isolation. They are based on the books, all of which are now terribly dated, as they were set in the context of the cold war. The James Bond in the books was a sophisticated public school thug, not unlike the way Daniel Craig played him in Casino Royale, hardly the suave Sean Connery or Roger Moore. Sean did have his moments when he captured the flavor of the books as in the fight in the train compartment with Nash in From Russia With Love. He also did some clunkers in Thunderball, Diamonds are Forever, and Never Say Never. Diamonds is my choice for the worst Bond movie, From Russia the best.
Connery, yes. Lazenby, yes yes! He was my favorite! Moore, yes. Dalton, yes yes mmmmm. Brosnin, no, thank you. Craig, yes, I like him. Let's see how he does.
My favorite was the Aston Martin in Goldfinger.
What a wonderful analysis... i wonder if it's dating either you or me that I so identified with your review!
Maybe because I grew up with all the Bonds, but...
I admired Connery (as if he was a superhero).
I wanted to be like Moore (because he was so cool and human).
The rest I enjoyed, but they made/make me feel like I was at the movies enjoying a good show instead of living through them (although when Halle Berry came through the water a la Ursula Andrews, I identified with Brosnan for that one moment!)...
Dont make the Swiss bloggers angry!
Her name is:
URSULA ANDRESS
She's a Swiss gal from Ostermundigen. The Swiss call her "Ursi National" probably 'cause her curves remind us of the Swiss Alps...and please do not compare Halle Berry with Andress, she's unsurpassed as Honey Rider in Dr. No!
Speranza, you are correct, and i apologize!! it was a typo not a moment of ignorance! Also, if you note what I said, I was diminishing Pierce, not Ursula! LOL...
Loved your analysis of Bond through the decades, Kim! One question, though..that last picture, the one compliments of Fandango - how DO I get a seat at THAT table? So many sexy Bonds, so little time to..'honor' them all properly..! ;) ...
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with
