iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kingsley Dennis, Ph.D.

GET UPDATES FROM Kingsley Dennis, Ph.D.
 

Quantum Consciousness: The Way to Reconcile Science and Spirituality

Posted: 07/17/10 11:30 AM ET

Human thought in the twenty-first century needs to work towards a new model that immerses the human being within a vibrant energetic universe. However, this need not demand that we throw away what we already have; rather, we can expand upon the tools that have brought us to our present position. There is an eastern proverb that roughly translates as: "You may ride your donkey up to your front door, but would you ride it into your house?" In other words, when we have arrived at a particular destination we are often required to make a transition in order to continue the journey. In this sense we can be grateful to a vast knowledge base of scientific and religious thought for helping us arrive at the point where we presently stand. Yet it is now imperative that we move forward. As Deepak Chopra wrote his post "Consciousness and the End of the War Between Science and Religion," how we move forward is likely to be centered in our understanding of consciousness.

Our physical apparatus is spectacular; consider that each of us carries around a 100-billion-cell bioelectric quantum computer that creates our realities, with almost all its neurons established the day we were born. Still, this phenomenal "reality shaper" has undergone monumental perceptual change over our evolutionary history. What is required, at this significant juncture, is again another catalyst of consciousness change. This may come about through discoveries in the field of quantum biology, and the idea, emphasized by Ervin Laszlo in his previous blogs, that the form of consciousness we possess is likely to be the result of quantum coherence.

The human body is a constant flux of thousands of inter-reactions and processes connecting molecules, cells, organs and fluids throughout the brain, body and nervous system. Up until recently it was thought that all these countless interactions operated in a linear sequence, passing on information much like a runner passing the baton to the next runner. However, the latest findings in quantum biology and biophysics have discovered that there is in fact a tremendous degree of coherence within all living systems. It has been found through extensive scientific investigation that a form of quantum coherence operates within living biological systems through what is known as biological excitations and biophoton emission. What this means is that metabolic energy is stored as a form of electromechanical and electromagnetic excitations. It is these coherent excitations that are considered responsible for generating and maintaining long-range order via the transformation of energy and very weak electromagnetic signals.

After nearly 20 years of experimental research, Fritz-Albert Popp put forward the hypothesis that biophotons are emitted from a coherent electrodynamic field within the living system. What this effectively means is that each living cell is giving off, and resonating with, a biophoton field of coherent energy. If each cell is emitting this field, then the whole living system is, in effect, a resonating field -- a ubiquitous non-local field. And since it is by the means of biophotons that the living system communicates, then there is near instantaneous intercommunication throughout. And this, claims Popp, is the basis for coherent biological organization -- referred to as quantum coherence.

Biophysicist Mae-Wan Ho has described how the living organism, including the human body, is "coherent beyond our wildest dreams" in that our bodies are constituted by a form of liquid crystal, which is an ideal transmitter of communication, resonance, and coherence. All living biological organisms continuously emit radiations of light that form a field of coherence and communication.

Moreover, biophysicists have discovered that living organisms are permeated by quantum wave forms. In her 1998 book The Rainbow and the Worm: The Physics of Organisms, Ho informs us that

the visible body just happens to be where the wave function of the organism is most dense. Invisible quantum waves are spreading out from each of us and permeating into all other organisms. At the same time, each of us has the waves of every other organism entangled within our own make-up ...

This incredible new discovery actually positions each living being within a non-local quantum field consisting of wave interferences (where bodies meet). Each person is thus not only in an emphatic relationship with each other but is also entangled with one another.

Neuroscience, quantum biology, and quantum physics are now beginning to converge to reveal that our bodies are not only biochemical systems but also sophisticated resonating quantum systems. These new discoveries show that a form of nonlocal connected consciousness has a physical-scientific basis. Further, it demonstrates that certain spiritual or transcendental states of collective Oneness have a valid basis within the new scientific paradigm.

If we are willing to step down from the donkey, we will find that our new path ahead has a place for reconciling science and spirituality. We should focus on the best of both worlds: engage in cooperation, not in conflict and competition.

An invited contribution to the Ervin Laszlo Forum on Science and Spirituality.

 
 
 

Follow Kingsley Dennis, Ph.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@kingsleydennis

Human thought in the twenty-first century needs to work towards a new model that immerses the human being within a vibrant energetic universe. However, this need not demand that we throw away what we ...
Human thought in the twenty-first century needs to work towards a new model that immerses the human being within a vibrant energetic universe. However, this need not demand that we throw away what we ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 828
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Judson Wallace
01:30 PM on 08/22/2010
This is a nice article... but as someone with a BS in physics and a mater's in theology.... I hate Chopra.

His musings are little more than wishy washy feel good ideas with little theological or scientific signfigance.

Several schools of Indian Philosophy have already dealt with these issues.

You might try the Charvaka school (materialist in origin), Madhyamuka Buddhism, or Perhaps Cittimatra Buddhism.

These philosophical structures have been dealing with these issues for centuries.

It IS ONLY WESTERN HUBRIS THAT BELIEVES WE ARE THE FIRST TO CONCEIVE OF THESE THINGS>
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GabeSmall
04:53 PM on 08/19/2010
The difference between science and pseudoscience is that scientists have meaningful definitions for their big words.
03:33 PM on 07/28/2010
This article confuses terms and elevates negligible phenomena to primacy.

Using big words like quantum coherence and biophotons (which are just photons realesed by biomolecules in the normal fashion of energy relaxation) allows the author to misconstrue the meaning of these actual observable phenomena. Quantum coherence, as in a laser or superconductor, has never been shown to be occurring in the human body. An entity for which no one has even attempted to write down a wave function which would be necessary for understanding or establishing that quantum coherence was occurring.

Additionally, biological systems are highly localized. Although there exist interactions and entanglements between different organisms, the article seems to drastically over emphasize their relative importance. By comparison, a human standing in the sunlight is far more entangled with those photons than with anything emanating from another person. Yes, biological systems use signaling, such as quorum sensing, but that is very different from suggesting that we "emit radiations of light that form a field of coherence and communication." In what way are they coherent? What are the communicating?

Most importantly. While signaling has been shown to affect gene expression, it has never been shown to affect consciousness. This article claims that, "These new discoveries show that a form of nonlocal connected consciousness has a physical-scientific basis." No. They really don't. Because no one has provided any evidence that the consciousness of one human is affected by anything discussed in this article.
03:56 PM on 07/24/2010
Quantum consciousness is for small minds. Think big, think gravitational consciousness.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:34 AM on 07/22/2010
When Satan, Zeus, Jehovah, Vishnu, Anubis, and Quetzalcoatl issue a joint statement of harmonious intent; then spirituality will be ready to reconcile with science.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KrautMan
Carpe jugulum
09:02 PM on 08/16/2010
Wow, the other 4.000 gods will not be happy about that!
11:30 PM on 07/20/2010
It's extremely amusing to me to observe the human ego striving ever so desperately to trash-talk new ideas which threaten their precious dualism.

Taking pot-shots at Deepak Chopra is easy enough. Clearly possessing both a medical degree, as well as decades of experience and study of spirituality and nondualism renders him completely unworthy of the slightest modicum of respect.

But now, even when "hardcore" scientists like biophysicists come forward and produce actual hard evidence of nondualistic dimensions of existence, can we even get a "hmmm...." from these ignorant pinheads? No dice. The human ego's survival is fully dependent upon perpetuating belief in Duality, and ONLY Duality. No Subjectivity allowed. If it ain't OBJECTIVE, it must be "magic."

They are like the "flat-worlders" of the 15th Century, so certain because of their college degrees that they know everything there is to know, and yet probably never had an original, creative thought in their lives. Intellect can only take one so far. At some point, it becomes necessary to put one's RIGHT BRAIN into gear, and then it becomes possible to break the Ignorance Barrier. :^P
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DakkonA
www.DisentangledReality.com
11:34 AM on 07/21/2010
Firstly, the whole right/left brain thing was disproved years ago.

Secondly, what "hardcore" biophysicists do you mean? Certainly none were mentioned here, unless you count Dr. Ho who was primarily a geneticist. Even if you did count her, its not based on any studies, its based on a book she wrote.

And Chopra isn't a physicist. End of story.
04:43 PM on 07/24/2010
Well kind of. There is lateral specialization in the brain. What was disproved was all of the loony, new-age nonsense that spawned from a misundrstanding of the extent and implications of the lateralization.
04:41 PM on 07/26/2010
It's not "who" that's important. It's the fact that credentialed and respected scientists have proven the existence of nondualistic dimensions (thanks to the dual-slit experiment), and yet so many of you will so easily discount nonduality when you don't even have a fraction of their intelligence or education. This is the human EGO hard at work, frightened to death, literally, at the very idea that the root state of Existence may very well be Nonduality. Why? It's obvious. The ego ceases to exist when Consciousness awakens to this core state of Reality. The ego depends on belief in "otherness" for its very existence, and constantly struggles to convince the mind that Duality is "real," and Oneness/Nonduality is "woo-woo."

Your own behavior is strong evidence of this, as those of you who disagree with these concepts almost always take a condescending position of arrogance which is, in itself, strongly rooted in dualism -- "I'm smart; you're an idiot. We are NOT the same. We are NOT one."

Ask yourself why you feel the need to belittle those you disagree with. (speaking to naysayers in general; not specifically your post). Why can you not simply disagree and counter with respectful argument? If this is nothing more than philisophical debate, why is so much anger and fear being generated in the "objectivity camp?" Clearly, there is more to this than meets the eye.
10:42 AM on 07/23/2010
Spirituality is believing that the fantastical could happen. I could be considered an atheist but I become spiritual when confronted with hardships, like when I used to live paycheck to paycheck. It could also be called wishful thinking. There is no real study of spirituality per se but the study of why people believe in the fantastic.
04:45 PM on 07/26/2010
Incorrect. Spirituality is an intuitive and subjective "knowing" that Consciousness is NOT an emergent property of a complex brain, but rather the core state of being-ness, the existence of which is Eternal in nature.
06:16 PM on 07/20/2010
One of my favorite scientists. The section "thought as a system" might be something to consider before putting all hope for humanity in the word science.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bohm
04:46 PM on 08/19/2010
YES!!
05:59 PM on 07/20/2010
For all the people who are so passionate about all these woo woo thinkers and supposed bad science, would you at least agree that #1) we have major problems on this earth that are all caused by humans (including all systems of life except human being in decline) and #2) that absolutely none of the problems we have are caused by the people or their ideas writing these books and articles. I would even say that some of the "woo woo" ideas could help solve our other problems but I know that would be too much for most to consider.

It easy to see that you have some deep personal problem with these ideas but really what is the harm? It just makes you so mad that they are making money?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Doctor Donna
I walk in eternity
07:04 PM on 07/20/2010
Faved and Faned.
04:47 PM on 08/19/2010
Me too!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DakkonA
www.DisentangledReality.com
02:22 PM on 07/21/2010
The harm is that they popularize twisted misconceptions of real science and claim that their extremely speculative extrapolations of misunderstood experiments are the Truth of the universe and that we should listen to them.

Supporting them is to support the same level of scientific rigor used by (anthropomorphic) global warming deniers and intelligent design advocates.
09:40 AM on 07/20/2010
It's the entanglement that is the key here. The system is coherent BECAUSE it's entangled, mostly within itself. Which is then seated within the 'background noise' of the largely random but loosely ordered fields of the wider world. For most people, it's only detectable when, through repeated close exposure, they are entangled with another individual or even group. Some examples of that include: Close friends thinking of the same thing and calling each other about it at the same time. Knowing when something has happened to someone you're close to, and even whether or not they live.

I've long held the belief that ghosts, if they exist, are little more than echos or artifacts within the local quantum fields. Or even quantum fuzziness 'bleed-through' from a nearby, nearly identical time-line. There wouldn't necessarily be much of anything for a camera to see, even though it's there, simply because the witnesses mind is detecting and interpreting a quantum field, and not visible light. So they sense a presence, or they see an 'outline' or 'impression' of a human body or face. It would also explain why these ghosts are 'confused about being dead'. In their time-line, they're very much alive, and probably thinking our witness is the ghost! So they're hostile, and they tell the witness to 'get out of their house' or some such. Just as victims of 'hauntings' here are encouraged to do. Then one spooks the other to the point of leaving, and it stops.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DakkonA
www.DisentangledReality.com
01:35 PM on 07/20/2010
No. And even if your conception of entanglement had any relation to what quantum theory shows, There is zero reason to suppose that has anything to do with thinking the same thing at the same time. Quantum = small.
09:56 PM on 07/22/2010
You clearly have no idea what quantum entanglement means. You're only fooling fools.
04:13 PM on 07/27/2010
quan·tum: adjective
–noun
1. quantity or amount: the least quantum of evidence.
2. a particular amount.
3. a share or portion.
4. a large quantity; bulk.
5. Physics .
a. the smallest quantity of radiant energy, equal to Planck's constant times the frequency of the associated radiation.
b. the fundamental unit of a quantized physical magnitude, as angular momentum.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edude
07:41 AM on 07/20/2010
For all those who continue with the canard of, Dennis is well beyond his discipline and shouldn't prattle on about a subject he can't possibly know anything relevant about, you can take any field or discipline, and find a cross section of personalities who are to varying degrees worthy of listening to. Autistic geniuses who's focus and ability to process information uncanny. Nerdy fact bombers who can't navigate ambiguity worth a damn while other can. Contrarian killjoys who see nothing but problems and constrict every brainstorming session, yet save the company's a$$ when their caution saves a business from going long on a bad economy. One-dimensional, monomaniacal go-to people on the one vertical column of knowledge that they possess, but try eeking out any valuable insights when you need to think outside that tube. There are even those within a specialty who, expert as they may be, still treat their territorial planet as if it's flat in terms of what's relevant and worth discussing.

Instead of spending so much time (and ENERGY) trying to turn the Religion section into a punching bag of contemptible
photo
HeevenSteven
20 Minutes into the future.
10:26 AM on 07/20/2010
Anyone who cites Chopra and Lazlo on quantum mechanics isn't thinking outside the box; they're inside a well known group-think fad..
A-Superstitionist
Keep thy superstitions to thyself and out of laws
05:35 PM on 07/19/2010
For those who think that people like Kingsley Dennis and Deepak Chopra with a PhD in a field miles and miles removed from any knowledge of quantum physics are on to something real when they babel about "quantum consciousness", I highly recommend watching:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-FaXD_igv4

in which Chopra near the end claims that scientists have hijacked the word "quantum".

This should make you run for cover and firmly close your wallet every time someone utters this "quantum consciousness" nonsense.
A-Superstitionist
Keep thy superstitions to thyself and out of laws
08:37 PM on 07/19/2010
"miles and miles" should be replaced by "light years" because that is how illiterate they are about anything related to quantum physics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Meditating
01:21 AM on 07/21/2010
Sounds like your point is that a reasonably smart and/or educated person is incapable of properly thinking about (much less challenging) conventional quantum physics.

Yet the only support you offer for your opinion is the fallacy of ad hominem attacks. Is that what passes as an informed and/or intelligent response in your discipline?
10:09 AM on 07/20/2010
I am unfamiliar with Chopra or his work, but there have indeed been recent legitimate scientific discoveries concerning this matter, though of course, at a much more conservative level. For instance it's been recently discovered that plants use high-temperature, dynamic quantum entanglement to achieve their nearly 100% efficiency in photon energy transfer.

More importantly, we know a LOT more about computing and neurology than we did even 10 years ago. Artificial intelligence guys will tell you that in order to even approximate or mimic human thought in a machine, they would really need a quantum computer. Which means that the mind being modeled and mimicked must also be a quantum computer, or at least some kind of analog.

Once you establish that, and with knowledge of quantum physics, you may further extrapolate that unshielded, such a dynamic quantum system would be very sensitive to quantum differentials and electro-magnetic fields in particular. Which is corroborated by research into the influence of electro-magnetic fields on brain activity.

It's not such a far cry from the truth as you would seem to believe, I think.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
moutonnoir
iconoclastic demagoguery
12:42 PM on 07/20/2010
"Which means that the mind being modeled and mimicked must also be a quantum computer, or at least some kind of analog."

This is wrong. There is no reason to think the brain is 'quantum' just because you do not understand science.

This is like saying 'the brain is silicone' because the simulations of it are run on silicone processors.

With that said, perhaps you would like to purchase my pamphlet, "The silicone Mind: Spiritual Transistor' - And, if you happen to be sick, I have some software I wrote for your silicone mind.. To run it, you just have to watch an informative video I created - the software is coded. You just watch it, the ads in it, and then you are healthy.

Note: These are not meant to be medical claims. For novelty purposes only.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DakkonA
www.DisentangledReality.com
01:39 PM on 07/20/2010
"For instance it's been recently discovered that plants use high-temperature, dynamic quantum entanglement to achieve their nearly 100% efficiency in photon energy transfer."

I don't know if that's true. But if it is, that's because those things happen at the level where quantum effects matter.

You realize that "quantum" isn't at thing, right? Everything at the smallest scales behaves "quantumly"-- it isn't unique to biology or to us, and there's no reason to suppose it has anything to do with consciousness or the things people like you ascribe to it.
04:22 PM on 07/19/2010
"It has been found through extensive scientific investigation that a form of quantum coherence operates within living biological systems..."

As a neurophysiologist (studying the auditory and oculomotor systems), I hope that this article is some sort of big hoax in the spirit of Alan Sokal. If this Dennis guy's right, clearly I've been missing out on an important body of scientific literature.
10:21 AM on 07/20/2010
You have been, but that's ok. Start here:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=shining-a-light-on-plants-quantum-secret

Or go to the Scientific American website and do a search for 'quantum plants' and several related articles will also appear. Prepare to have your mind blown, and enjoy the ride!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DakkonA
www.DisentangledReality.com
01:42 PM on 07/20/2010
Those aren't nerves, fyi.

Sure there is probably some role for quantum effects. Doesn't mean its the key to everything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DakkonA
www.DisentangledReality.com
05:34 PM on 07/20/2010
A notable point is that this most recent article about this subject, http://www.pnas.org/content/107/29/12766.abstract?etoc, defines "long lived" as 300 femtoseconds. A femtosecond is 1/1,000,000 of a nanosecond.
02:25 PM on 07/19/2010
Step 1) Find a word that sounds sciencey

Step 2) Ask people what said word is.

Step 3) If said word elicited consistent responses go to step 3, else continue to step 4.

Step 4) Write big claim articles/books about sciencey word as if you know what you're talking about. Throwing in PhD in unrelated fields helps to establish perceived authority.
02:31 PM on 07/19/2010
Hey, when you have Leftists like Wendy Doniger an anti Hindu Secularist fundementalists at Univ of Chicago passing off as an authority on Hinduism and Sanskrit....this is nothing.
02:55 PM on 07/19/2010
Why are you so obsessed about hinduism? As much as you'd like its text are not scientifically accurate. They are wrong, just as you'd expect other books to be that are thousands of years old to be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Candide33
I heart Bernie Sanders
08:48 PM on 07/19/2010
Lol, well at least hey found a real word that sounded sciencey instead of making one up like a certain pseudo-politician who shall remain nameless.

F&F
photo
Semprini
Stamp out and abolish redundancy
02:10 PM on 07/19/2010
I am getting mixed messages from my quantum subconscious...
01:42 PM on 07/19/2010
Some apparently would rather spend 40 years wandering in a quantum desert than take a 7-day trip
to God.
10:27 AM on 07/20/2010
Yes. Yes, some of us would rather.
10:55 AM on 07/20/2010
For although they knew God, they neither honored nor gave thanks to him, and their thinking became futile ...Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
Romans 1:21-22