More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Kirk Stambler
 

Tax the Bonuses

Posted: 03/18/09 03:06 PM ET

Amid all the hand-wringing about whether or not the government has the power to stop AIG from paying bonuses to the very people who helped precipitate the current financial crisis, there is a way for the government to get the bonus money back: impose a surtax on the recipients to recover their ill-gotten gains. Think of it as a new kind of "sin" tax. Surely, in this time of severe economic emergency, the extraction of "performance bonuses" from a company being kept out of bankruptcy by massive infusions of taxpayer money because the stability of the world financial system depends on it, amounts to a form of institutionalized looting. The government bailout should not permit AIG executives to escape the sacrifices being made by other working men and women to save their jobs and businesses, especially as the employees of AIG, at least those of its financial unit, would seem to bear a greater degree of responsibility for this mess than, say, the auto workers being laid off or asked to modify their union contracts in return for government support. Of course, it would be preferable if the intended recipients were to forego their payments voluntarily out of some recently recovered sense of propriety or responsibility or patriotic duty, but we are told that these people respond only when properly incentivized. Perhaps the threat of a "recovery" tax will at last get their attention.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:02 PM on 03/20/2009
"Common law is pretty clear about the impermissibility of ex post facto legislation and bills of attainder. They also happen to be specifically prohibited by the Constitution." - Charles Krauthamer

Are we really going to overturn these laws for $165 Million dollars? Basically the amount of money the Yankees are paying CC Sabathia for his left arm?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:39 PM on 03/20/2009
Restore the top_marginal_tax_rate to what it was before Reagan started destroying the United States' economy, and create a new $1 million and above tax bracket, so the highest rate only applies to those with more than $1 million of annual income.
08:40 PM on 03/19/2009
As I understand it, most of the people who received the bonuses are in the LONDON office. Last time I checked, this was not in the United States and these people probably do not pay any US taxes on their income. So what good is it to tax the bonuses if they don't even pay taxes.
I agree with some of the other comments that the people who are at fault are our very own congressmen and women. We need to throw all of them out and get a batch of people who are responsbile to us and not to their party or any special interests.
01:13 PM on 03/19/2009
Having just gotten back from tax court, I laughed at an MSNBC commenter today saying we have to be sure we don't use the IRS as a threat against our citizens... ROFL is putting it mildly.

No we can't tax the bonuses as CStanford pointed out. We need to punish every representative who voted for this ridiculous bailout WITHOUT EVEN READING IT. Those are the criminals, those are the bad guys. Now they are all running around asking "how did this happen?" Vote them all out.

We are getting this treatment because we've allowed it to happen. We let them know we weren't paying attention and they could basically do whatever they want if they word it right on TV.

Go to www.congress.org and write your reps everyday, just take five minutes every morning. See how they voted on the most recent bills (right there to see) and thank them or reprimand them... LET THEM KNOW YOU ARE WATCHING.

Sorry to shout. I'm all riled up. Taking a break now...
03:25 PM on 03/20/2009
The whole "nobody read it" thing is over, move on. They knew the provisions, they knew the text, and it is not uncommon for the final polish/draft to not be a huge priority. The lack of oversight was not a secret, but there was a lot of pressure to get the bailout for AIG through quickly, and quibbling over details was extremely unpopular. This is legislation passed under Bush, for Paulson, so don't try to blame this on Obama or Geitner. "Those are the criminals" - no, those are the elected officials scared silly about being mean to the people who were treated like deities in our society for the last decade or so. Take a deep breath.
11:23 AM on 03/19/2009
Why not just tax everyone at 125%. That would solve a whole world of problems.

This is all fake outrage by folks who got a cost of living raise when it is their job to keep the cost of living down. I called my Rep & told her to vote NO on this outrage of trying to use taxes to retroactivly punish.
09:27 PM on 03/18/2009
The Founding Fathers placed a simple process within the Bill of Rights called EX-POST-FACTO which meant that no laws can be created to penalize a specific person or persons after the fact. This means that the AIG contracts that allow employees, not just the executives, to receive their bonuses should not be taxed and that the resulting "tax it back" attitude violates the promise of the EX POST FACTO protection. It amazes me that so many legal minds and protectors of our way of life fail to remember these things. These same vigilante populists in Congress just accepted an increase in their salaries with no qualms or sense that they were taking something from the taxpayers. Last year their approval ratings were below those of George Bush so it seems that they had not earned nor deserved a bonus of any kind. Lastly, over 90Billion dollars that the Government gave to AIG was transferred to foreign banks and Barney Frank and Chris Dodd did not demand that this money be returned to the tax payers. Clearly these people ar phonies and not looking out for anyone but themselves.
06:15 PM on 03/18/2009
We can freeze the assets of people we can't even find (Al Qaeda), so why can't we just freeze the assets of these domestic terrorists (who have damaged our nation far more than bin Laden ever could) until they cough up names and amounts? That'd break down the stonewall pretty fast.
05:57 PM on 03/18/2009
Why only AIG? And why only one year? Why not at least 90% for the last 5 years?