iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kristian Ramos

GET UPDATES FROM Kristian Ramos
 

Arizona Governor Wants It Both Ways on Border, States Economy Suffers For It

Posted: 02/21/2012 6:28 am

Governor Brewer wants it both ways on the border. On one hand her administration has an office devoted to increasing commerce and tourism with Mexico, on the other she pushes legislation which would fund $1.4 million of tax payer money to create a militia to tour the southwest border, ultimately hurting commerce and tourism from our southern neighbor. She can't have it both ways.

In a speech from 2009 Gov. Brewer noted: "Our exports to Mexico from Arizona reached nearly $6 billion in 2008, with total bilateral trade through our ports of entry in excess of $20 billion. And we must not forget our visitors from Mexico that come and spend money in our malls, hotels and restaurants, generating over $2.6 billion in sales in Arizona. That's an increase of more than 200% since 2001, a remarkable level of growth that indicates just how important Mexican visitors are to the Arizona economy."

Since Governor Brewer has been in office the number of tourists coming into Arizona from Mexico has declined hurting the states economy. The numbers cited above have actually come down from where they were in 2007 -2008, when Mexican visitors to Arizona supported over 30,000 jobs in the state with total sales of $3.61 billion giving the state a much needed economic boost which are surely missing today as Arizona is facing unparalleled economic woes.

Governor Brewer is right about one thing: the Ports of Entry along our Southwest Border are critically important to Arizona and the rest of the country. If the Governor feels impelled to talk about security she should be talking about economic security for Arizona, which would include finding ways to enhance their ports of entry. In a recent Congressional field hearing, Nogales customs broker Terry Shannon Jr. noted that despite the importance of the economic activity along the border, a lack of proper staffing at the ports of entry has led to long wait times that discourage cross-border transit. He noted that while 34 million people crossed through Arizona's ports in 2005, the number fell to 23 million in 2010. That is a lot of money to be turning away at a time when the states economy could use the influx of cash.

Which begs a greater question, if the Governor is concerned about the states economy, shouldn't she be focused on increasing revenue and not expending limited resources on pointless political ploys? In this economic environment why on earth would the state legislature put forth any money, let alone $1.4 million for a militia which will only hurt the economy of those along the southwest border? Shouldn't they be focused on enhancing commerce and tourism along the border instead? A recent report noted that violence along the Arizona border is at an all time low, and undocumented entry into the United States is actually at a net zero, the only people Gov. Brewer is keeping out is tourists and businesses looking to invest in the state.

If Governor Brewer was actually looking to help Arizona's economy she would find a way to take that $1.4 million and invest it in the Ports of Entry. At the end of the day in the economy the state is facing, promoting more public private partnerships only enhance trade and tourism which would make sense for Arizona, if not for the Governors political calculations.

 

Follow Kristian Ramos on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kramos1841

 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:20 PM on 02/21/2012
This aritcle is funny! I fail to see how putting citizens on the border will impede tourism since very few tourists come here illegally. Most of them have border crossing cards and go back and forth many times. The tourists have visas which they use at the port of entry and is no problem. I seriously doubt the citizen militia will be manning the border checkpoints. Instead, they will be halting the "tourists" who come here who dodge the checkpoints. Of course, those who do not wish to come here legally will have a problem, which is the whole point.

I have never run into a Mexican tourist who snuck across the border, They usually have nice cars and drive like decent folks and are more than welcome to all Americans I LOVE seeing Mexican tourists and want more of them, but it is absurd to think that making sure that they do things legally will impede that..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markspence
03:15 PM on 02/21/2012
Do tourists cross the border at places other than designated ports of entry?
photo
Karissa36
Saving lost boys and fighting pirates.
07:20 PM on 02/21/2012
Apparently, the author believes that Mexican tourists pay thousands of dollars each to coyotes to smuggle them across the border, hike for miles in the desert dropping a trail of trash behind them, are picked up and stuffed into crowded vehicles, and then transported to Arizona malls to do a little shopping. Since they are tourists, then the entire process would have to be reversed.

In light of this, perhaps the best move on Arizona's part to increase Mexican tourism, would be to mandate that stores give out sturdier shopping bags. Those cheap plastic bags that tear must be a real annoyance when hiking ten miles through the desert to re-cross the border.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
03:03 PM on 02/21/2012
My state not a border state but still with hoards of illegals hasn't even tied to do anything about it and we are even worse off than AZ economy wise. So why is it that one blames AZs economy on attempting to do something about its border, but fails to compare the situation with other states. This is disshonosty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blogging Patriot
Facts instead of Faux
01:50 PM on 02/21/2012
Conservatives owned congress for 12 years and the White House for 8. Republicans grew the intelligence community to more than 1,200 government organizations and more than 1,900 private companies working on counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence in some 10,000 locations across the U.S. And in all that spending left the borders open.

In fiscal 2010 the removal pace of criminal aliens was fully 60% higher than in the last year of the Bush administration. In 2011 the Obama administration set a new record for deportations. Under Bush the majority of removals were people who had not been convicted of any crime, a trend reversed by Obama. The only other time deportations came close to the levels of the Obama administration was in the early 1930s. The pace of company audits has roughly quadrupled since President Bush's final year in office.

Secure Communities, which relies on fingerprints from arrests, has played a critical role in the record-breaking deportations of criminal immigrants. Secure Communities was launched in October 2008 and plans are to implement it in every jail by 2013. The Republicans provided no such comprehensive immigration effort. The number of illegal immigrants skyrocketed in the first half of the decade, rising from 8.4 million in 2000 to a high of 12 million in 2007.

And it is Obama's immigration policy that conservatives condem.
photo
Snake1994
Snakebite!
12:54 PM on 02/21/2012
What is it with these open boarder Advocates! The boarder needs to be secured for numerous reasons. End of story!
02:15 PM on 02/21/2012
impressive well reasoned argument?
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
03:22 PM on 02/21/2012
Commerce requires open borders, Blinky.  The Commies really loved having closed borders.
11:37 AM on 02/21/2012
We already have hundreds of Border Guards, we have a National Guard, A militia that is responsible to who?

BREWER IS WASTING MONEY YET AGAIN.

A million plus would be better spent in education.

Of course, Education and safety is not on her agenda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
12:51 PM on 02/21/2012
"A militia that is responsible to whom"?

Probably to the SAME person the Blue State California militia (California State Military Reserve) is responsible to....The governor.

What is your point?
04:34 PM on 02/21/2012
I made it - more wasteful spending by the Right in PHX
10:38 AM on 02/21/2012
Once again we seem to have a liitle problem with legal and illegal activity. Sudefed legal, making sudefed into meth no. porn legal, child porn no, driving 60 on free legal, driving 100 no. It clear that their are people who don't think the laws should appley do them
photo
robadeaux
Your labels have expired....
02:20 PM on 02/21/2012
Including the laws of spelling and grammar and punctuation?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
02:50 PM on 02/21/2012
You got he point didn't you? Nothing of substance to post so turn to the spell and grammer checker mantra.
10:33 AM on 02/21/2012
Legitimate tourists are one thing, but illegals that is another. One question Mr. Ramos- what is the Mexican Government's stance on their economic failings forcing 12-20 million of their citizens to sneak into the US illegally to find work. There is about 112 million in Mexico according to Wiki. Is Calderon or Vicente Fox ever called to the carpet for their failings for such a large % of their people?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
10:31 AM on 02/21/2012
The author has cherry-picked tourism statistics from 2007 and 2008 because they were peak years just before the worst part of the recession kicked in.The recession has slowed Arizona tourism just as it has tourism in other states. In 2010, the most recent year for which data is available, tourist spending increased 7.9% to $17.9 billion. This was lower than the peaks of $19.1 and $18.5 peaks in 2007 and 2008. but is up significantly from $14.2 in 2000. The number of border crossings are down at all ports of entry on the Mexican border, but this is primarily because fewer U.S. citizens are crossing into Mexico due to the escalating drug violence. It also more difficult for U.S. tourists to return to the United States after spending part of the day in Mexico. U.S. citizens now have to show a visa rather than just a driver's license to reenter the United States and the lines move much slower. As a result, many Americans decided to stop visiting Mexico rather than applying for and paying for the visas. However, the tightened security at the ports of entry has nothing to do with Arizona's crackdown on immigration. The federal government runs the ports of entry. IN 2010, 70% of Arizona's overnight tourisrts were from Mexico.

http://www.azot.gov/system/files/524/original/2010%20AOT%20Tourism%20Facts%20Final%20102711.pdf?1320360891.
02:18 PM on 02/21/2012
passport, not visa
George Picard
Send lawyers, guns and money
10:30 AM on 02/21/2012
Lets see, on one side she is for LEGAL trade and LEGAL tourism.

On the other she is agaisnt ILLEGAL aliens.

See the difference?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
big dubya
12:18 PM on 02/21/2012
Papers please.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:29 PM on 02/21/2012
Try crossing into and staying in Mexico without those papers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
03:05 PM on 02/21/2012
Nothing wrong with that.
10:27 AM on 02/21/2012
Did the headline writer mean that Brewer stated the economy suffered or that the state of Arizona's economy suffered. Surely some of the Comp Lit majors doing this work have a knowledge of punctuation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:30 PM on 02/21/2012
Yes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Y Woodman Brown
live & let live
10:22 AM on 02/21/2012
Ok:

1) July, 2011, the NY Times reports:
a) At 'Mexican emigration hubs', the flow into America has stopped, i.e., zero traffic, and;
b) Total illegal immigration has dropped from 500,000 to just 100,000 (presumably at non-hubs).

2) Crime rates in Arizona border towns are at a ten year low and no higher than non-border towns.

These highly suggests that current U.S. border security ought certainly be sufficient. Thus spending $1.4 million to create a militia which patrols the open border isn't necessary. Perhaps politicians such as Brewer, Shadegg and McCain aren't properly aware of this recent turn of events.

3) During Brewer's tenure:
a) Mexican tourist numbers have dropped from 34 to 23 million;
b) Mexican spending in Arizona has dropped from $2.6 to $1.6 billion.

No reason is given for this better than 1/3 drop. Perhaps it's the fabulously deadly drug wars Mexico side of the border. Perhaps it's the perceptually anti-Mexican legislation and attitudes put in place in various jurisdictions during Jan Brewer's tenure.

Either way, this is hurting AZ economy $1 billion and 30,000 jobs worth.

It has been noted that ports of entry are understaffed. Day-to-day current legal traffic flow between the two countries is slow. This could be speeded-up with proper staffing.

Thus, that $1.4 million would be better spent on security staffing at ports of entry...and not on a roving militia not required by current border patrol.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Watkins
À Rebours
10:13 AM on 02/21/2012
Contrary to the lies, many illegals do take many jobs that are not in agriculture. They take high paying construction jobs, they take landscaping jobs, they take food jobs, journalism jobs and even mid level jobs.

In addition to the lasting affects of the lost jobs there is also the fact that illegals send billions of remittances back to their homes every year, thereby taking the money out of the local economy where they have made it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DingoDango
10:57 AM on 02/21/2012
Well, don't expect the liberal media to report any actual FACTS. That would not further their ideological agenda, now would it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
11:35 AM on 02/21/2012
Only a small percent of undocumented workers are farm workers. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the United States have only about one million farm workers, about 60% of who are illegals. There are far more grocery store clerks than farm workers. Because the number of farm workers is so small, increasing wages high enough to attract U.S. workers would have little impact on prices at the supermarket. According to the New York times, "For a typical household, a 40 percent increase in farm labor costs translates into a 3.6 percent increase in retail prices. If farm wages rose 40 percent, and this wage increase were passed on to consumers, average spending on fresh fruits and vegetables would rise about $15 a year, the cost of two movie tickets. However, for a typical seasonal farm worker, a 40 percent wage increase could raise earnings from $10,000 for 1,000 hours of work to $14,000 — lifting the wage above the federal poverty line." American farmers can legally hire migrant workers from Mexico through the federal government's H-2A Temporary Agriculture Workers program. The is underused because farmers have to pay the H-2A workers fair wages. However, many farmers in states like Alabama that are cracking down on illegals are planning to hire more H-2A workers.
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/08/17/could-farms-survive-without-illegal-labor/the-costs-and-benefits-of-a-raise-for-field-workers
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Watkins
À Rebours
12:26 PM on 02/21/2012
Thank you for a concise reply based upon facts, something that the pro amnesty crowd is devoid of.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:50 AM on 02/21/2012
Dont' see "the other hand" in Ramos' argument. The "militias" probably wouldn't encounter much legitimate commerce in the remote desert. Official border crossings would not be their posting. It's not surprising that this "Policy Director" would compose a flimsy smoke screen for illegal immigration, drug trafficking, and violent crime. He might be satisfied with the defacto Mexican state of Arizona but most in the US would still prefer secure borders and legal entry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
suburbanmom
Liberal Midwest Mom and RN
08:46 AM on 02/21/2012
She should also consider the rest of the country's tourism to Arizona. Her policies have left our family feeling that we don't want to support her state in any way.

Last summer, our family drove across the country (Midwest to California) for a family vacation. We purposefully drove 2 extra hours in order to not spend the night or any of our money in Arizona. We purchased gas before and after entering and leaving the state, and re-scheduled our Grand Canyon tour. Instead, we visited the National Parks in Utah (Bryce, Zion, and Arches). Our family had a blast, and we didn't miss Arizona one bit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
12:52 PM on 02/21/2012
Arizona did not miss you one bit either.