iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Keep your eye on Toledo, the metropolitan area with the highest college enrollment rate in the nation.

As a new class of students begins their first days in higher education, the northwest Ohio city on the Maumee River will be an important test of whether cash-strapped higher education can translate soaring college enrollments into the new generation of highly skilled, college-educated workers needed to promote prosperity and civic engagement.

Will the almost doubled number of students in just ten years make it to graduation day? According to the new Brookings Institution report, The State of Metropolitan America, a stunning 60 percent of 18- to 24-year-old Toledo residents were enrolled in higher education in 2008. However, we know that nearly half of first-time, full-time students nationwide drop out. This represents lost time and money for both colleges and students.

The United States is a leader in higher education spending, but ranks only 10th among developed nations in its proportion of younger adults ages 25 to 34 with college degrees. The U.S. is simply not getting enough value out of the money it spends. Ever-rising tuition and fees are not yielding enough degree holders, and graduating insufficient numbers of people will drastically impair the nation's ability to maintain a strong economy.

The Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce reports that the U.S. economy will create 22 million new jobs by 2018 for workers with a college education, but the nation is projected to fall 3 million workers short of people with at least an associate's degree and an additional 4.7 million workers short when demand for people with some kind of meaningful credential beyond a high school diploma is factored in. "This shortfall will mean lost economic opportunity for millions of American workers," according to the center, which is run by well-known labor economist Tony Carnevale.

The challenge of increasing the percentage of college graduates is made more difficult by severe state budget cuts. While Ohio's leaders have prioritized higher education funding in recent years, current budget limitations require that the University of Toledo impose a hiring freeze. Meanwhile, The Toledo Blade reports, there are hundreds of applications for every available slot. Graduating more students in such turbulent conditions requires that higher education reinvent itself and become more efficient and cost effective.

Ohio knows that responding with tuition increases and enrollment caps is irresponsible and not sustainable; statewide, for two years tuition for in-state undergraduates did not rise, and it increased at lower rates than the national average for the last two years.

Ohio is among states working to boost the productivity of higher education by graduating more students without significant funding increases or cutting corners on quality. As one of seven Lumina Foundation-supported states receiving "productivity grants," Ohio is getting help restructuring purchasing and other business operations. Colleges are working to streamline educational pathways and shorten the time required to earn a degree, increase the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of academic and business operations, and launch and sustain funding systems that reward colleges not just for enrolling students but also for helping them graduate. In addition to adopting a strong performance funding system, Ohio has:

1. Established an Affordability and Efficiency Council and launched dozens of statewide cost-savings initiatives; and,


2. Started to systematically connect students enrolled in adult literacy and workforce education programs to community colleges to ensure that more adults obtain training and credentials they will need to succeed in the workforce; and

3. Showcased many campus efforts to save money, such as the University of Cincinnati's efforts to reduce energy consumption by at least 13%, avoiding roughly $13 million in energy related costs, and promoted the "Rx Ohio Collaborative," housed at the Ohio State University, which reported savings of $216 million in FY 2009 through the use of generic drugs and drug manufacturers bulk discount.

Ohio and other states with productivity grants - Arizona, Indiana, Maryland, Montana, Tennessee and Texas - are national models for how campuses and legislators can work together to make the best use of scarce public funding in an effort to ensure we have the educated population we will need.

Toledo's enrollment spike couldn't come at a better time. There is an acute sense of urgency to achieving a higher education system that can deliver graduates prepared for success. Only about a quarter of adults older than 24 in Toledo has earned bachelor's degrees, ranking Toledo just 88th among the top-100 metropolitan areas. Not surprisingly, between 2000 and 2008, median annual household income in Toledo dropped from $51,998 to $44,548. This 14.3 percent decline was the third-largest among the top metro areas.

The simultaneous crumbling of lower-skilled manufacturing and the automotive industry convinced many unemployed Ohioans and young adults that college is a smart investment. It's our responsibility to prove they were right and reverse a disturbing trend: For the first time, a generation of younger adults is on its way to being less educated than its parents' generation.

Toledo's success in leveraging the surge in college enrollments could become a positive economic example for Ohio and the rest of the nation. But success will depend on making wise choices about how we invest in higher education, which can no longer do business as usual.

USA Today recently named Toledo a 'Solar City,' because of its growing solar energy production sector. This is just one area where the surge in enrollment could translate into thousands of new good-paying jobs. More college graduates create greater economic mobility and a higher standard of living for all. These are just a few reasons to keep an eye on Toledo.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:50 PM on 09/14/2010
Great article!

It's always refreshing to see positive change taking place in the education system. Our newly created company, The OXE Group (acronym for The Oxford Education Group) is working on a series of campaigns to raise awareness, and aide for, qualifying literacy organizations throughout the state of Mississippi.

We know it's a big goal, a BHAG according to Author Jim Collins, but we endeavor to change Mississippi's current "bottom-of-the-barrel" illiteracy dilemma into a world-class education destination. Southern Hospitality included at no charge!

Way to go Ohio!

Regards,
Benjamin Wade Inman
The OXE Group
http://twitter.com/theoxegroup
http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-OXE-Group/114902805231745?ref=sgm
01:52 PM on 09/09/2010
Ohio has many problems. The state has been in decline for at least two decades. Many of Ohio's educational problems come from the way their educational system is organized. As a product of Ohio's schools and universities, then attending graduate school in Maryland I gained insight into this situation. In Maryland all income tax paying residents of the state support the educational system. A portion of the revenue goes to education and the State Board of Ed disperses the money to all school systems based on enrollment and other factors. All universities within the state of Maryland enjoy reciprocity with one another and their curriculum is monitored to reduce overlap to avoid unnecessary competition.

Contrast Ohio where all communities from the tiniest village to the larger cities must support their school system through levies, which are voted on by citizens. The disparity between schools systems in Ohio is great. This is also true for all public services, police,fire etc.

Maryland by organizing on a larger county level to supply public services reduces a large amount of this financial stress by drawing from a larger tax base. Each county has a board of education and police department, the larger cities have their own force such as Baltimore.

When I lived in Ohio we used to say many residents came out to vote down the school levy and keep their taxes from rising. Education should not be a choice/privilege, our obligation to our youth does not end once we finish school.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam1jere
Open-minded, sports lover, Red
04:16 AM on 09/09/2010
A good starting point would be to establish why the US leads in higher education spending, but ranks only 10th among developed nations in its proportion of younger adults ages 25 to 34 with college degrees. Who benefits from this spending and why are there such poor returns? The article no doubt sets out to highlight such issues but they remain crucial for the taxpayer.

Higher education's main funds result in research but why then doesn't research lead the frontline of helping figuring this out? Even this crucial aspect of academia must be oriented towards figuring out this and other educational challenges. Without such an educated workforce the US will continue to struggle.

I noticed that there's likely to be a shortfall of some three million college graduates. Why not further open the country's borders to educated and experienced foreigners to help out in the short to middle term. Some of these people can also make very good citizens who will contribute greatly to the country's growth and development. The world is now global and no country is immune from any of what's being discussed here.
11:55 PM on 09/08/2010
Engineering Colleges Forums:
I agree with the article.Today schools and colleges are just increasing there financial status not the education provided by them.Today schools are just machines of money making.True education has disappeared,every child is trained to just earn money without teaching them the real aspects of life.
http://www.studentforumhub.com/category/engineering-colleges/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donnie4488
10:45 PM on 09/08/2010
As a Toledo resident and having graduated from one of the colleges in the area,I have seen the recent results of higher education enrollment in the area which,not surprisingly,shows a slight downturn in the current economic climate.However,what Toledo is grappling with,and it's an issue that's been dogging this city for a number of years,is the inevitable "brain drain" of graduates leaving the area in search of greener pasture elsewhere.The solar area is one place to start,but in a part of the country where manufacturing has been the mainstay of employment for generations,it's going to take a major paradigm shift in thinking to make this area,as one local politician puts it,the Silicon Valley of the midwest.
07:48 PM on 09/08/2010
The only out I see is moving towards a more European setup, after middle school it's apprenticeships, tradeschools or college prep. This is how things used to be here years ago. You could leave highschool with certificates in welding, carpentry, auto repair, drafting, typing, accounting etc.
07:40 PM on 09/08/2010
It's a shame that in Ohio, part-time faculty are barred by law from collective bargaining, that most don't receive a living wage, and that even fewer receive employer sponsored health insurance. At The University of Akron, only 2.4% of the university's $400 million budget is spent compensating part-time faculty--who number over 1,000 and constitute over 60% of the teaching faculty. UA's President Proenza and his 35 vice presidents earn in excess of half of what the 1,000+ part-time faculty earn as a group. Part-time faculty at The University of Akron earn in the bottom 5% of all other employees on campus--including those who care for President Proenza's 30,000 new trees (more than one per student enrolled this fall).

Higher education in Ohio is McMansion of cards, and the only thing supporting the structure are the part-time faculty who are abused and neglected by their administrations, the state legislature, and the governor.

Learn more at http://www.newfacultymajority.info and http://www.unemploymentforadjuncts.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raphi
12:25 AM on 09/09/2010
An ugly and unfair situation. A lesson in reality as well. The elite, so comfortable with their own sense of superiority, accrue benefits to themselves. Everyone else? Losers in this neo Social Darwinistm race to the bottom, deserving nothing.

Nice example of that so-called "at will" system. Notice whose will prevails. The part-timers are nothing more than domestics with diplomas. Of course collective bargaining would mean admitting faculty are de facto working people.

And it would mean something else. Employees in unions are covered by contract law. All other US employees come under a provision inherited from English common law. Called a Master-Servant relationship. Exactly what the econopath elite wants for us all.

Also notice how even this well-meaning article dodges that elephant in the living room of America. The big issue of class prejudice. As a blue collar worker, I can testify how aggravating it is to be so invisible to the educational and economic elites.

Quality of education is directly related to income and neighborhood. In addition, no one asks: education for what? In a "service" economy, even a PhD won't help. Furthermore, only about 26% even of genY have 4-year degrees-- and that's in anything from anywhere. In effect, by concentrating on this end, we're saying we don't care about 80% of the population.

But some of us were the beneficiaries of good public schools. We can read, write, and think. We say NO to Third World America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bayard Waterbury
social philosopher
07:06 PM on 09/08/2010
Sorry, I meant "read"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bayard Waterbury
social philosopher
07:06 PM on 09/08/2010
Anyone who is considering one of the "for profit" schools for their continued education needs to real this:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/38541939/GAO_Finds_For_Profit_Schools_Encouraged_Fraud
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bayard Waterbury
social philosopher
07:01 PM on 09/08/2010
Thanks for you thoughts. I too feel strongly about what is not happening in American education, at every level. Students do better in college if they are prepared for it properly. Students do better in school if they go to learn and not to worry about their future earnings. It's like I told both of my children, do what makes you happy, don't do what will make you rich if it does not make you happy. We spend about 40% of all of our time curing our working years working, and 50% if you include things that contribute to our work (communting being a major component). If that much of our lives is dedicated to work, we should really love what we do, whether it is investing other people's money, or painting works of art. When we spend most of our time doing things we really love, we don't care so much about money and what it can buy (having a lot of it doesn't buy happiness, but makes unhappiness easier to bear). I think that we should follow an old European model. Instead of student loans and Pell Grants, we should not charge students for their first semester of college. After that, if they pass, we continue free attendence, provided that their grades always improve or stay about 3.0 on a 4 point scale. Most Europeans don't pay for college, but those who attend generally graduate in a far higher percentage than ours.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Laitres
06:30 PM on 09/08/2010
As long as the only value of education is viewed only as learning skills to do a job, with little or no effort to understand the world in which we live, whatever resources and effort is expended will have only short-term benefits. That tack was taken at the very beginning of this country and is one that leads nowhere. All it does is create "fodder" for the economic engines; i.e. corporations and other economic enterprises and they are the only ones who interests are served. As that has been going on for generations, and in many cases led by some of our supposed "institutions of higher education", it would be too much to ask that they would now change their direction. After all, as that is how many now teaching and running those institutions were brought up, what they consider normal, and therefore what they consider education to be. Underlying it is the "core value" of materialism and instant self-gratification and the adulation of the "me."
05:47 PM on 09/08/2010
It would be useful to have a graphic representation of numbers in each of major areas of study and how they reconcile with envisioned future job demand.
photo
cyclone70
When one facepalm isn't enough
05:21 PM on 09/08/2010
Bettering oneself thru education is an admirable goal. but without demand for skilled and educated workers we are simply creating a situation with disaffected educated underemployed workers and suppressing wages for those still employed

It does not take a college degree to drive a cab, flip a hamburger or change bedsheets which are the only jobs available these day
04:44 PM on 09/08/2010
To me one of the biggest issues with degree completion amongst college students is that so many students attend colleges simply because they feel that they have to. These students are not motivated to do well in college and many of them would not even be there is they did not subscribe to the false belief that a 4 year degree guarantees one entry to the middle class. These students rarely find a major that suits them and often disappear from campuses after a year or two. Many of these students would be better off at trade schools and technical training programs that last 6 months-2 years. Such programs allow students to develop career skills in fields that are still hiring workers during the recession. Unfortunately, our society practically insists that children attend 4 year schools today. Many would be better off avoiding the massive student loan debts and classes that do not interest them and learning a trade.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Boodieugwumba
Crusader
04:12 PM on 09/08/2010
The United States will never go anywhere with their education spending until the policies put in place to forever keep the people under-educated are removed. Besides, the money spent is not on education but goes into the pockets of the corrupt politicians and the thieves that put them in office. America is in the hands of corporations that are controlled by thieves whose one aim is to suck the land dry and put everything in their pockets. It's not just education but the whole economic system that is under attack by these people and education is just one area where they're killing on purpose in order to keep doing what they're doing. An uneducated polity is a very manipulable polity. Who do you think make up the GOP's base? http://ohaneze.blogspot.com/2010/05/undereducation-of-america-omission-or.html