More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kristin Wartman

Kristin Wartman

Posted: March 15, 2011 04:37 PM

Breakfast Is Not So Gr-r-reat When Your Only Option Is Frosted Flakes


One in four children goes without breakfast each morning, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. A tragedy to be sure -- but are Kellogg's breakfast products the solution?

Last week Kellogg announced its new project called Share Your Breakfast, part of a national advertising campaign. The project asks Americans to upload their breakfast photos to the Web site shareyourbreakfast.com, and for each breakfast photo shared, Kellogg Company will donate a school breakfast to a child in need -- up to $200,000 worth of (or one million) breakfasts.

Feeding hungry children sure sounds nice, but filling hungry bellies with highly-processed junk foods is hardly the answer. Let's take a look at some of the products Kellogg is promoting as part of this endeavor.

Frosted Flakes -- one of the products represented by Tony the Tiger at a National Breakfast Day event in New York last Tuesday -- contains 11 grams of sugar per three-fourths cup serving. After the first ingredient of milled corn, the next three read: Sugar, malt flavoring, and high-fructose-corn-syrup -- three forms of sugar by different names.

Nutri-Grain bars -- a product promoted as healthy -- contain more than 30 ingredients (minus the synthetic vitamins) and include high-fructose-corn syrup, artificial flavors, red #40, TBHQ, and host of other chemicals. Meanwhile, the front of the package reads: "More of the whole grains your body needs," "Good source of fiber," and "Made with real fruit." The only "real fruit" I could find is "strawberry puree concentrate" and it's listed after high-fructose-corn syrup and corn syrup. Each bar contains 11 grams of sugar and 3 grams of fiber.

Even Corn Flakes contain sugar, malt flavoring, and high-fructose-corn-syrup, listed as its second, third, and fourth ingredients. Kellogg is also offering promotions on Rice Krispies, Mini-Wheats, and Eggo Waffles -- the waffles contain partially-hydrogenated oils in addition to high-fructose-corn syrup.

But Kellogg Company knows that people are concerned about feeding their kids sugar and chemicals for breakfast every morning, so it has dedicated whole sections of its Web site to "correcting" false nutrition information. In one section, Kellogg refers to sugar as the "misunderstood nutrient." According to the Web site, "Sugar does not cause obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart disease or hyperactivity." This statement flies in the face of the most recent research and a host of mainstream studies that say the exact opposite.

One of the most recent studies, reported in TIME Magazine last year, found that consuming added sugars raises the risk for heart disease by raising cholesterol and triglycerides. The American Heart Association's (AHA) Web site states, "High intake of added sugars is implicated in numerous poor health conditions, including obesity, high blood pressure and other risk factors for heart disease and stroke." The AHA is so concerned about the amount of added sugars in the American diet that in 2009 it established upper limits for adults (none exist yet for children, oddly enough). The AHA says that women should get no more than six teaspoons a day and men no more than nine.

Most of the Kellogg's products I researched contained an average of 11 grams of sugar per serving, which is close to three teaspoons of sugar. If we assume that the average child weighs about half what the average woman weighs, then three teaspoons is the upper limit of how much a child should safely consume in one day, according to the AHA. That means the child couldn't eat any other added sugars for the rest of the day (not likely) and that he or she could only eat the single three-fourths cup serving (also, not likely). The AHA says the average American eats an alarming 22 teaspoons of added sugar a day.

According to research by the Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, children will eat cereal with less sugar if the option is made available. The report found that the industry strives to reinforce the myth that children will not eat low-sugar cereals. "The industry has funded a number of studies that find that highly-sweetened cereal is good for children, especially when compared to having no breakfast at all," the report noted. Nutrition information based on these studies is exactly what Kellogg has laced throughout its Web site. In the section on sugar, you'll find, "Keep in mind that a little sugar in foods can help the nutrition go down. For instance, picky kids might be more likely to eat presweetened cereal or drink chocolate milk. They'll love the taste and you'll love the nutrients they get from these foods." This may well be true, but a "little sugar" is a lot different than the 11 grams found in a three-fourths cup serving of Frosted Flakes.

The Rudd Center's 2009 report also found that some rather insidious advertising techniques appeared to be on the horizon. "What was once a simple marketing landscape -- television advertising during cartoons -- has morphed into a complex web of persuasive messages even adults may not perceive as marketing. Internet games and marketing through social media such as Facebook are just the beginning and do not capture digital advances that will occur in the future," it stated. With this new Kellogg campaign it appears that day has arrived.

Make no mistake, Share Your Breakfast is an advertising campaign above all else. According to a New York Times article, the campaign is the largest integrated marketing effort, with ads in broadcast, print, digital, print, and social media. The campaign asks users to upload pictures to Twitter and Facebook, in addition to posting them on Kellogg's Web site. And while Kellogg has agreed to donate up to $200,000 towards feeding hungry school children, this pales in comparison to the amount the company spends on advertising overall. The Times reports that Kellogg spent $464.9 million on advertising from January through September 2010 and $454 million from January 2009 through September 2009.

Meanwhile, the company is painting a rather rosy picture as to its motivations. "We find there's a lot of people who don't have access to breakfast," Doug VanDeVelde, Senior Vice President for marketing and innovation at Kellogg told the Times. "We just felt like as the breakfast leader, we should do something about that."

He's right, Kellogg and every other food industry giant certainly should do something about the hunger problem, but they shouldn't be filling already undernourished children with food products that are nutritionally void at best.

How about providing funds to feed kids real food for breakfast? Eggs, plain yogurt with fresh fruit, oatmeal, a fresh fruit smoothie with yogurt, milk, or nut milk, a slice of real, whole-grain bread with almond or peanut butter (skip the Skippy!). All of these breakfasts can be made in five to 10 minutes without the added sugar or hype.

Or better yet, why not apply some of that creative talent along with that large advertising budget and produce breakfasts that are nutritious enough to qualify as real foods? Then we could believe them when they say, "The best to you each morning."


This post originally appeared on Civil Eats


 

Follow Kristin Wartman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kristinwartman

One in four children goes without breakfast each morning, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. A tragedy to be sure -- but are Kellogg's breakfast products the solution? Last week Kellog...
One in four children goes without breakfast each morning, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. A tragedy to be sure -- but are Kellogg's breakfast products the solution? Last week Kellog...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 250
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Endotoxin
Blast Corps
09:06 PM on 03/26/2011
Big Pharma (The Diabetic Section) pays Kellogs to keep it's sugar levels high to nurture it's future patients...

Pre-diabetes is at 20% and will only continue to rise exponentially...

The clock is ticking!
08:47 PM on 03/24/2011
I couldn't comment enough on this, so I wrote a whole blog post about it. Sorry, folks, but as much as I may not want my kids to eat these products (and don't buy them), there are a lot of issues here that aren't being considered. Like, for example, the fact that all the options she suggests would have to be prepared at the schools -- and there may not be staff or kitchens for that. Read what I've got to say, then blast me if you must. http://redroundorgreen.wordpress.com/2011/03/25/defending-a-food-industry-giant-i-cant-believe-im-doing-this/
03:01 PM on 03/21/2011
Not all breakfast cereal is as bad as the ones they're giving these kids. Sure some food is better than none, but the difference is a box of healthier cereal versus the junk ones is minimal, and sometimes nothing at all. So why not give these kids healthier options? I have a list of the top 10 boxed cereals and they're pretty dang good!

http://www.angrytrainerfitness.com/2011/01/top-10-breakfast-cereals/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rita Kothbauer
11:55 PM on 03/20/2011
Kids will eat things that are good for them if they are led by their parents example when they are very young. My daughters would talk their dad into buying sugary cereals, after a few bowls the box would get pushed to the back of the cupboard and they would go back to the good stuff. I threw out a lot of sweetened cereal! At Halloween I did not restrict the candy, after a couple of days they were out in the kitchen asking for apples, carrots and celery. I knew I did something right when as teen-agers one day they split a can of spinach for lunch.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
10:43 PM on 03/19/2011
" Even Corn Flakes contain sugar, malt flavoring, and high-fructose-corn-syrup, listed as its second, third, and fourth ingredients." But at less than 3 grams per serving it has a lot less than "Most of the Kellogg's products I researched contained an average of 11 grams of sugar per serving".
01:50 PM on 03/17/2011
What is it you expect them to do? 1. Most children don't eat breakfast, nor do most adults. I don't eat it, the smell of food in the morning actually makes me ill. 2. If they do eat it they have to be able to afford it 3. If they want to eat it, they have to like it. The eggs you suggest are unaffordable, no child I know will touch plain yogurt (my son used to call it vomit in a can), and the other things you suggest are prohibitively expensive or just plain nasty. I wouldn't eat them! At least if they get a bowl of Cheerios they get something!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Endotoxin
Blast Corps
09:11 PM on 03/26/2011
12 Healthy Eggs (grass fed, free range chicken with Omega-3s) are $3.00 maximum daily. How is this cost prohibitive? If it lasts you even as short as a week that's $3.00 a week for a whole protein source in the morning. On top of that it's easy to digest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Endotoxin
Blast Corps
09:11 PM on 03/26/2011
Whoops I meant $3.00 maximum weekly
08:59 PM on 03/16/2011
Can I help it? I like a heaping bowlful of creamy malted chocolate sugar butter bombs with half & half.
THEN I go smoke a cigarette.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donnyraindog
Hi Mom!
05:58 PM on 03/16/2011
I understand that a big part of our job on the left is to question everything and attack sacred cows but please lay off tony the tiger!
01:01 AM on 03/17/2011
There's nothing sacred about puffed cereal drenched in sugar.
photo
abaybay
it is what it is
05:47 PM on 03/16/2011
I get it, but it's still nice that these kids are getting something in their stomachs. Eating habits will only change when healthier options become more accessible. If you are a family of four living off a small budget heading down the grocery aisle which are you going to choose? The $5-6 kashi cereal that is smaller or the $3 box of Frosted Flakes that is significantly larger? Ideally you would choose the healthier cereal, but not all can afford to buy these products.

I don't make a lot of money, but I choose to buy healthy and organic foods anyway because it truly is worth it in the long run. With the prices the way they are, it's just too unrealistic for a food revolution.
01:02 AM on 03/17/2011
Healthy foods don't have to be expensive, whole grain oatmeal is better than any processed garbage and cheaper too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eleanor of Aquitaine
01:14 AM on 03/17/2011
That's true, but unless it's palatable to kids they won't eat it and they need to eat. So oatmeal with fruit and brown sugar, and that's where the costs go up and school districts balk. It's sad.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Capn Scott
the 'moderated' me
05:43 PM on 03/16/2011
While it would be nice to provide eggs, yogurt and fruit to starving children, the reality is that that probably isn't going to happen.
The reality is that cereal manufacturers probably have excess product on hand (likely near or past the expiration date) and rather than throw it away they are providing it as 'aid' to hungry children.
Now, given the circumstances, wouldn't you rather have a bowl full of Frosted Flakes for breakfast as opposed to nothing ....were you that starving child, or their parent? I believe I would.
09:08 PM on 03/16/2011
Possibly, but not when a multinational mega-corporation is spending millions to dress up dog shit and call it nutrition. This is the cigarette marketing equivalent of our generation.

Also, doesn't anyone shopping notice that Kellogs cereals are EXPENSIVE! Hence there's plenty of privileged children eating cap'n crunch peanut butter cereal with hershey's chocolate milk for breakfast. Store brand oatmeal + cinnamon + diced apple + plain yogurt is cheaper and might spare the dental bills and health issues later in life.
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
05:38 PM on 03/16/2011
You can make a good breakfast for kids for less than frosted flakes. I don't get the "convenience" issues with food.
Don't take your kids shopping -- a grocery store has more cartoon characters than saturday morning tv. They aren't on steel cut oats and bananas because its assumed a smart shopper doesn't look for cartoons to endorse nutrition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eleanor of Aquitaine
10:32 PM on 03/16/2011
I don't know if you watched last season of Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution. The cafeteria ladies didn't want to do the work of preparing fresh, healthy meals. They wanted to just microwave tater tots, corn dogs, hamburgers, and pizza. No skills or real work required. It was an uphill battle, but once the ladies got used to preparing fresh food and the kids finally ate it, they felt a sense of accomplishment in actually preparing food instead of microwaving garbage. This is what it is like at most schools.

People come complacent at doing the least amount of work for as much pay as they can get. Until schools districts start getting fresh food and demanding their caf workers put in the effort, kids will get crap to eat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eleanor of Aquitaine
01:23 AM on 03/17/2011
What happened to your response? I saw it in the comments activity section and read it, but it's not here. I hope you didn't take it down, because no, you didn't sound like a raving liberal (maybe because I'm liberal, too). You are right, France does it better and the lunch ladies had bosses who have bosses who have bosses. But changes for the better rarely starts at the top when it comes to schools in our country. It's grassroots efforts: Teacher, parents, lunch ladies, custodians, kids. I can't believe there is no way to get more than just $200,000 in food donated from Kelloggs. Where is General Foods on this? Why won't they donate food each year through a charity, which will make it tax deductible so all needy kids can eat nutritious breakfasts and not just whatever sugar cereal is thrown their way if they're lucky enough to be in a school getting a little of the $200,000?

Culinary schools are a great way to do it, but we do need new approved menus that have a balance of foods. Tate tots are fine as long as they are limited and on a plate with protein and veggies.

A school here in LA was completely taken over by parents (not just the caf, but the whole school) when the parents and kids got sick of the bureaucracy getting in the way of education. They can do that here. More should.
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
02:12 AM on 03/17/2011
I am not the most pc person in these parts, I didn't take my post down.
Tater tots are great -- if they are made out of potatoes. The more you know about what is in processed food the more you won't eat it.
The Jamie Oliver experiment really just emphasized something that food corporations know and I got the feeling that he missed the fact that corporations are smarter than Jamie Oliver. Kids like things they can depend on -- something that looks like a chicken nugget is food. The food industry spends millions to psychoanalyze kids on the best way to get them to beg for corporate food. Cartoons! Familiar shapes! Win! Win! Win!
I think its great people are empowering themselves. I live in Atlanta we fully expect our mayor to take the schools back from the state, a lot of us librul cities are doing it. I have a few degrees in stuff like history, economics and geography and in my less than humble opinion the only way we are going to get things turned around is by taking them back. Here in the South politics are local, its how Atlanta stays strong, and rumor has it our mayor has been schooling Mr President, lets hope.
Until then viva LA! We have to stop being so pc and send the devils back to their exurbs. If you want to wear teabags instead of finding practical uses for them you gotta go outside the city..
03:22 PM on 03/16/2011
As a Michigander I am sad to see a local company exemplify everything that's wrong with our food industry: prioritizing low production costs over quality, and then misleading consumers about the potential health effects of their over-processed products.

I used to eat Kellogg's (unsweetened - I thought that was still safe) cereal every morning until I realized what was in it (shudder). Now I don't bother with the regular cereal aisle at all. Lucky for me I can afford to shop in the natural foods section, where I don't have to waste time reading products' ingredient labels only to find they are chemical amalgams parading as food.

In the long run Kellogg Co. will regret their unwillingness to adapt to mounting scientific evidence that processed food products are bad for our health while real, natural foods are good, as well as the increased market demand for the latter.

It's just a shame that in the meantime this corporate recalcitrance is disproportionately affecting lower income families who are less equipped to deal with the consequences. Shame.
03:00 PM on 03/16/2011
Context and transparency. Note: SBC = sugary breakfast cereal. SBC can be a useful temporary solution to hunger in places where access to food is limited and the population is not dying of diseases of affluence. SBC can have a neutral presence as an occasional breakfast option for individuals without health or weight issues. SBC is a less than ideal daily staple in individuals with obesity, grain intolerances/allergies or diabetes. I rather like the transparency Kristin Wartman shares in her article and would love for cereal manufacturers to respond by offering healthy whole food ingredient options at a comparable price point to SBC with transparency in labeling. At least that would level the playing field a bit so that price is not the primary driver of the choices people are making. I hope I live to see a day in which food manufacturers are held accountable with their use of ingredients as well as the allowable amounts and I like to think John Kellogg, the healthier brother, would agree.

Lori Reamer, RD
Author of The Food That Fits
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crom14
02:57 PM on 03/16/2011
Great article, Oatmeal cost almost nothing and is great with a bit of Maple Syrup.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eleanor of Aquitaine
02:37 AM on 03/17/2011
True, but real maple syrup or the fake crap, because the fake crap is awfully bad for you and real maple syrup costs a lot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ythri
11:36 AM on 03/17/2011
I use a bit of brown sugar and cinnamon. It tastes great and has a lot more fiber and you don't need that much sugar.
02:49 PM on 03/16/2011
There is NO ONE, I repeat NO ONE, from any of the cereal companies with a gun to the head of the parents forcing them to purchase these products! In fact there are many "good for YOU" cereals that are cheaper than Frosted Flakes. You have presented a non sequitor as the basis of your attack on cereal companies and your proof is.... wait for it..... NOTHING! The fact that they make a cereal you find somehow offensive to your sensibilities is well frivolous at best. But to say that they [the companies] are responsible for feeding already undernourished child nothing but sugar and no essntials is the typical underhanded attack on "Corporations" when the finger should be pointed and the blame be place right on the shoulders of the parents and or caretakers who buy it and feed it to the children. I am not proud of it but I use EBT here in Arizona, I could buy whatever I want to buy as long as it is a food product and is not already prepared. I look for nutrition and have to do so on a very small stipend per month ($200) if I can do it then so can the parents of these "undernouri­shed children" you have decided have been slighted. GROW UP!
04:24 PM on 03/16/2011
Really? Tons of healthier products are cheaper? I beg to differ as a price conscious shopper who grew up with a mother who clipped coupons before she shopped ANYWHERE. Frosted Flakes were in my house every other month because they were 1) always on sale, 2) had a coupon in the Sunday paper, or 3) given to us by the food bank. Furthermore, the cheaper cereals are the store brand cereals that imitate the sugary brand name cereals. For TRULY healthy fare (like a Kashi, or even the "healthier brands" of the name brand cereals like shredded wheat or oats and honey), you are likely to spend anywhere from 2$ to $4 dollars more on a SMALLER box.
Even Kix costs more than Frosted Flakes on average.
Then again, I don't think sugary cereals are bad, but should be eaten in moderation. There's a reason that you can go through a box of cereal in a week, but your only meal should not be those types of cereal.
(And let's be real, many kids end of eating cereal for breakfast, lunch, & dinner because that's all they have...)
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
05:49 PM on 03/16/2011
try cooking a pot of steel cut oatmeal. throw in some dried fruit and nuts and your kids will be just fine.
parents that can't cook raise kids that don't eat well. cooking isn't an art. with a little practice you can master it. I argue until I am blue -- you can cook a pot au feu and have a bottle of wine with it for a lot less than it costs to go to mcdonalds. i fully realize cooking might cut into tv time, oh the horror.
sugary cereals are what I like to call a carb bomb. Most nutritionists, even the conservative ones suggest you reduce your processed carb intake. Sugary cereals are 100% processed carbs. Do the math.
09:16 PM on 03/16/2011
Are you seriously telling me a big box (cylinder actually) of good old fashioned Quaker oatmeal or Cream of Wheat isn't cheaper than Frosted Flakes?........You can cook those for a couple of cents a bowl, throw on a teaspoon of sugar (or better yet honey) & you have the whole health food fun pack------Cheap, nutritious, low fat, high fiber, filling------& pretty good to. Don't blame the corporations, they just respond to demand. Those foods sit right next to the dreaded Frosted Flakes etc & the info is right in front of the parent.
(My mother was famously tight herself------I learned a bunch of tricks & habits that serve me well to this day, I'm pushing 60.)
I agree on the moderation thing tho-------we got 1 soda pop per week, no exceptions.
09:15 PM on 03/16/2011
Sounds like the same as could be said about cigarette marketing in the 50's. Too bad our public health system absorbs the consequences later in the lives of the victims. We are trading tobacco subsidies traded for corn subsidies and lung cancer for obesity and diabetes while still blaming the victims.