iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kurt Michael Friese

Kurt Michael Friese

Posted: November 27, 2010 11:10 AM

UPDATE: CHILD NUTRITION REAUTHORIZATION PASSES HOUSE. From CNN:

Among other things, the $4.5 billion measure provides more money to poor areas to subsidize free meals and requires schools to abide by health guidelines drafted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. To help offset the higher cost of including more fruits and vegetables, the bill increases the reimbursement rate for school lunches.

The bill, which passed 264-157 largely along party lines, has already been approved by the Senate and is a top priority for first lady Michelle Obama. It now advances to the president's desk to be signed into law.

Some Democrats had objected to the fact that the bill is funded in part by stripping $2.2 billion from the federal food stamp program. Congress also voted over the summer to take money from the program to fund legislation sending money to cash-strapped states to avoid teacher layoffs.


*******

This week Sarah Palin waded clumsily into the food and obesity issues this country faces while on a radio talk show, and chose the First Lady as her target. No, she did not call Michelle Obama "fat," though what she did say in an interview on the Laura Ingraham show was equally uniformed:

Take her anti-obesity thing that she is on. She is on this kick, right. What she is telling us is she cannot trust parents to make decisions for their own children, for their own families in what we should eat. And I know I'm going to be again criticized for bringing this up, but instead of a government thinking that they need to take over and make decisions for us according to some politician or politician's wife priorities, just leave us alone, get off our back, and allow us as individuals to exercise our own God-given rights to make our own decisions and then our country gets back on the right track.

First of all Mrs. Palin, I suspect you would not be telling Laura Bush eight years ago to let government keep our children illiterate. Her literacy program was a noble effort, as is Mrs. Obama's anti-obesity program.

More importantly, you should know that the government is already telling us what to eat, and most of it is crap. Through a subsidy system both parties have supported for decades they are seeing to it that our food system is awash in cheap food that is bad for us while healthy food is more expensive. That is one of the key reasons that we now live in a world with a billion people starving and a billion people overweight and undernourished. It is the reason we live in a country where one in three children born after 2000 will develop early-onset diabetes before they are old enough to vote. Among minority children that ratio rises to one in two.

Are these statistics because of bad decision by the parents? The kids? The government? Probably all three, but we do have a say - as a nation - about one of those three, and whatever our government says or does about our food it ought to be in favor of better, cleaner, healthier food. We can start by passing the Child Nutrition Reauthorization (and then improving it next time).

Then we can turn our attention to the 2012 Farm Bill, which ought to more properly be referred to as the Food Bill so that the other 98% of the population that it affects will pay attention to it and can have a say in it. While we're at it, we can move the school lunch program out from the auspices of the USDA and move it to a joint venture of the Dept. of Education and HHS, so that the health of the children takes precedence over the health of Tyson's bottom line. Follow that with moving lunch from the maintenance column to the curriculum column in our schools and use lunchtime as a teachable moment, so that our kids don't get one message in Health class and another in the cafeteria.

You see, Mrs. Palin, contrary to what President Reagan once said, government is not the problem, nor is it the solution. Government is a tool, like a hammer. And like a hammer it can be used by people to build things up or tear things down. I would choose the former, and you would choose to throw the hammer out the window.

 
 
 

Follow Kurt Michael Friese on Twitter: www.twitter.com/KurtMFriese

 
 
  • Comments
  • 426
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
09:32 AM on 12/03/2010
Put lid on it, Palin.
photo
Badger33
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
08:40 PM on 12/01/2010
On the other hand, if SP's appeals succeed, her fellow baggerswon't be able to wedge their way out of the doorways of their trailers to vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tmose
06:11 PM on 12/01/2010
Chef, I love you for that post!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
w84it
12:56 PM on 12/01/2010
Every year I write out a check to the state for property taxes. About 90% of that check goes to the local school district. I don't have children...but I would feel much better about the way my money is spent if I knew it was providing free meals or meals to be purchased that are healthy and nutritious!

Also, I believe junk food and soda vending machines should be banned from school property.
photo
BLACKCAT66
A realist with a rich inner life
10:21 PM on 12/02/2010
fanned. I agree. I really can't fathom what Palin or any of her brainless zombie followers has against making sure all children get at least one good nutritious meal. I really think her and her followers have lost their tiny little minds.
photo
EcnelisDoogod
B the change you want 2C
07:34 PM on 11/30/2010
I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them but to inform their discretion.

Thomas Jefferson
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:14 PM on 11/30/2010
Since you're an expert on Jefferson: What was thepopulation count, infant mortality rate and life expectancy at the time when Thomas Jefferson was President?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DavidMG
The Golden Rule rules
11:27 AM on 12/02/2010
The life expectancy was about 28 years. Your point, I imagine is that people are living much longer today, The reason is modern medicine - antibiotics and the like - not the modern food system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisalulu
I stand for Planned Parenthood.
05:22 PM on 11/30/2010
The FLOTUS knows and understands that wellness is necessary for a strong foundation. While there are many factors that impact ones' health and wellness (stress, genetic traits), it is undisputed that clean eating (simple food simply prepared) and movement are essential to achieving overall health and wellness.

What you put in your body is 70% of the game. Movement/Exercise can only go so far - nutrition has a much bigger impact.

Anyone who is criticizing FLOTUS public awareness should eat more brain food and lay off the bitter herbs. Oh - any remember to lock your doors so the salt police can't get in.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:16 PM on 11/30/2010
Hey Lisa...these people spouting nonsense have only one objective, to attack Obama through his wife making them the ultimate cowards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisalulu
I stand for Planned Parenthood.
10:26 AM on 12/01/2010
They are such cowards: same to Senate on UI, DADT, SALT and Tax Cuts. They sicken me and make me want to slap them on the forehead.
03:52 PM on 11/30/2010
Actually, the problem with Michelle Obama's new initiative to reduce childhood obesity isn't with her "Let's Move" campaign or the fact that she is voicing her opinion. It's the fact that she is publicly urging Congress to pass a bill that basically tells students what they can and cannot eat at school. That is the REAL problem. I'm sure Palin and others like her mainly agree with her stance to reduce obesity and commend her efforts. The problem is with her use of force (i.e. the federal government) to impose her beliefs. That type of officialdom should be tempered. It's controlling as its core and the fact that this writer couldn't see thats exactly what Palin was referencing should be embarrassing.

Michelle can talk and start up her own organization using her private dollars all she wants, and honestly, I'd most definitely support her efforts. But do NOT, do NOT urge to government to tell me what is good for me or my children. Parents should be parents, and thats not happening anymore. Parents must parent their child and not lazily ask the government to help them when they don't want to work. It's the wrong mentality. Period.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jericho the Red
moderate before it was called liberal.
04:32 PM on 11/30/2010
nope
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
07:35 PM on 12/02/2010
Doesn't Buerger realize that the government has been telling schools what they can and can't serve *already*? For years? And when a huge percentage of the school lunch budget comes from the government, then yes, they DO get to have a say in how it is used.

But go muck about in your fat and sugar all you want with your kids. See how well that works for ya.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisalulu
I stand for Planned Parenthood.
04:56 PM on 11/30/2010
Under the 10th Amendment, State Governments have the constitutional authority for the "health safety and welfare of its citizens." Governments create laws and regulations all the time to provide incentives for the benefit of Americans.

Its not force - no one would stand over you and see how much salt you put on your food - stop with the bullchit rhetoric. We have child welfare laws, health and safety laws, labor laws, laws prohibiting the sale of alcohol to minors, clean water standards, all laws that are "paternalistic" in nature but with good intentions and better results.

Without federal laws, the good giants would not have label the contents of the product - disclosure of information so we can make informed choices.

Vendors make a ton of money supplying school lunches. Uless addressed in a regulation - the vendors have no incentive to change the menu and offer nutritionally dense choices.

There is no force - don't buy the lunch - make you own - no gun to your head. Drama!
06:17 PM on 11/30/2010
Ummm...the 10th Amendment says nothing about health safety and "welfare for its citizens" lol...Wow, I really don't know what to say...
01:43 PM on 11/30/2010
What about Nancy Reagan's Just Say No campaign? Oooh, that's the government telling us what to say when someone asks us to do drugs. Government shouldn't control our words and actions. If we want to smoke crack, we should be able to.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
KurtMichaelFriese
Money is not speech - merely a megaphone
12:56 PM on 11/30/2010
"LOS ANGELES (KABC) -- People often turn to their faith to ease their minds. Now first lady Michelle Obama is hoping people will turn to churches, temples and synagogues to lose weight as well. The first lady launched a new addition to her Let's Move! campaign. Things might be changing at local services.

"Starting Monday, faith-based organizations of all kinds will begin a new crusade to end childhood obesity in a generation. It's called Let's Move: Faith and Communities, and the First AME Church of Los Angeles is leading the charge. "

http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/health/your_health&id=7815403&cmp=twi-kabc-article-7815403

Now I suppose Mrs. Palin and her supporters in all these comments here will call this "Government intrusion into religion," right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:17 AM on 12/01/2010
Of course they would...

There is a saying here on the net: IOKIARDI..."It's OK If A Republican Does It"..Shouldn't be that way..but it is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onwisconsin
Trust women; protect choice.
12:35 PM on 11/30/2010
I've taught in schools where the lunch choices were pizza, hamburgers, fried cheese sticks, large pretzels, and a pathetic salad bar. Kids drank sodas and ignored the juices, water, and milk. Even the juice drinks that kids drank were sugar filled.

I think it's high time we did something about it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:03 PM on 11/30/2010
I for one am really incensed at the freedoms taken away from me by the First Lady who ran the first "Just Say Stop" campaign and forced us all to have to put our brakes on for signs and red lights. I don't need anyone dictating to me whether or not I stop my car or whether I get into an accident or not! The nerve!
12:48 PM on 11/30/2010
May I use your red lights theory please?
Excellent post.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:38 PM on 11/30/2010
Sure. It's just to point out the absurdity being put out there by Palin and her followers. Truly this is more about attacking the Prez through his wife more than anything.
11:09 AM on 11/30/2010
Didn't Jamie Oliver just offer to help the Los Angeles School District clean up their free lunches to everyone and at least make them healthier? And didn't they turn him down flat?
Maybe it was the accent.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:11 PM on 11/30/2010
They did but maybe they felt their district was too large and dealing with too many budget shortfalls for Oliver to be effective.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:03 AM on 11/30/2010
We all know this silliness coming from Palin and those who support her is strictly about attacking Obama through his wife.

Michelle isn't forcing anyone to do anything. She's educating and advocating on an important issue, childhood nutrition and exercise.

How in the world anyone could think this is a bad thing is beyond me, but in reality I know it's just being used as another political football by the right wing to score points against the President.

If one mother decides to forgo the drive-thru for dinner and make something nutrition for her family instead because she saw Michelle speak on the topic or read an article about her advocacy...that is a good thing. If one kid decides to go outside and ride his/her bike instead of park themselves in front of a video game because they admire Michelle Obama. That is a good thing.

Stop using childrens' health as a political hammer against the President just because you don't like him. It's petty and destructive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisalulu
I stand for Planned Parenthood.
04:42 PM on 11/30/2010
Fanned. Talk about throwing out the baby with the bath water.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:30 PM on 11/30/2010
Wish I could fan you again Ms. Lisa...you are a force...totally admire you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:34 PM on 11/30/2010
Chef Friese...would you please fan this lady who has so eloquently defended your position...unlike me, she refrains from salty language.
10:00 AM on 11/30/2010
While Mrs. Obama's efforts sound good in principle, I am certain her guidelines will be wrong. Will she tell parents to avoid all the crap the government currently subsidizes? The government's food pyramid is upside down. Grains as the base? PLEASE! Grains are one of the leading causes of diabetes. Wheat especially.

If Mrs. O should attempt to demonize the sugary, fake salt, processed oil, refined everything industry, she would be smacked down faster than a 90 year old quarterback.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
KurtMichaelFriese
Money is not speech - merely a megaphone
11:00 AM on 11/30/2010
Well, rather than talking down that stuff, she is basically keeping it positive by talking UP local organic vegetables and good old fashioned exercise (Thus the title "Let's Move!" for her initiative.
leftcoastindy
Where did I put my MOJO
11:59 AM on 11/30/2010
feel free to explain how whole grain based food causes diabetes.

The average diebetic eates white bread sandwiches, potatoes (and even french fries), drinks sodas, and has eats horrible deserts like cake, pie, and ice cream.

Whole grains do not "cause diabetes", stupid food choces do.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:18 PM on 11/30/2010
"White food" aka non-whole grains, sugars et al have a higher glycemic index and produce sugars that are harder for the body to process. White potatoes have a higher glycemic index than sweet potatoes. So a diabetic would be much better off with sweet potato fries than regular white potato fries.

Coming from a family of diabetics (my late father and my brother who had to get a kidney/pancreas transplant at the age of 40), I can assure you those types of food contribute to diabetes.

The diabetics in my family ate whole grains, fruits, sweet potatoes and vegetables. They stay(ed) away from sugary foods like soda, cake, pie and ice cream because they drove their sugar levels way up and put them into a diabetic episode.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carol Gebert
09:53 AM on 11/30/2010
I will care zip about what others eat and smoke when I get the right to be in a healthy-people-only insurance pool.
12:07 PM on 11/30/2010
Won't work in our Utopia, have to drag everyone kicking and screaming into our perfect socialized world. And to have healthy people excluded from the rank and file, well what's next will they want the same medical coverage congress has????

What's good for everyone should be good enough for heathy people too right??

Kinda where everything starts breaking down don't your think, it does for me.

By the way I agree with you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gleitz05
Old people are allowed to be cranky.
02:04 PM on 11/30/2010
I hate to have to be the one to inform you, but living a healthy lifestyle doesn't gaurantee sustained good health. Factors like genetics, where you live, stress, etc. also come into play as well. Although a healthy lifestyle may make it more likely to fight off illness, or even lessen the degree of it, it doesn't mean that you won't become ill. So I don't know if a "healthy people only insurance pool" is actually feasible.