iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

It's California's Time to Make History in the Fight to End Cancer

Posted: 03/ 2/11 02:08 PM ET

This week in California, we began a new and potentially historic effort to end cancer.

On Monday in Los Angeles, with the support of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, leading cancer researchers and organizations dedicated to finding a cure, we kicked off our California Cancer Research Act campaign.

The California Cancer Research Act will make California stronger by saving lives, stopping kids from smoking, and investing more money than any other state in the country to find solutions for cancer. The initiative, which would raise $780 million annually through a $1 per pack tax on cigarettes, would provide an ongoing source of funds to allow California's leading medical researchers to pursue new ways to detect, treat, prevent and cure cancer and other tobacco-related illnesses.

The money raised from tobacco sales would be administered by scientists, researchers and universities -- not by politicians.

We are honored to be co-chairing this campaign on behalf of all of the incredible people dedicated to ending cancer. The American Cancer Society. The American Lung Association. The American Heart Association. Stand Up to Cancer. We can go on and on.

We hate cancer. We have both been personally touched by the disease, as has everyone else in America, either directly or indirectly. It is estimated that more than 500,000 Americans will die of cancer this year. More than 1,500 people a day. Cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide and the second highest cause of death in the U.S., accounting for nearly one of every four lives lost.

The successful passage of the California Cancer Research Act would help reduce these numbers -- and make California stronger along the way. A report by Tobacco Free Kids estimates that this initiative will

  • save 104,000 lives.
  • stop 228,000 kids from smoking in the first place.
  • generate nearly600 million annually for cancer research.
  • create thousands of new jobs related to cancer research.
  • save billions of dollars in health care costs.

We are excited to see that California is already mobilizing to make history in the fight against cancer.

Institutions including schools in the UC system, Stanford, City of Hope and world-renowned Cedars-Sinai would benefit from millions of dollars in annual funding for cancer research -- and that is what is motivating people to get involved in supporting this measure.

We all know that as California goes, so goes the rest of the nation and that is what makes this initiative so important. If the people of California are successful in setting a new record for cancer research funding, it will only be a matter of time before the entire country makes fighting cancer a top priority.

 
This week in California, we began a new and potentially historic effort to end cancer. On Monday in Los Angeles, with the support of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, leading cancer researchers and orga...
This week in California, we began a new and potentially historic effort to end cancer. On Monday in Los Angeles, with the support of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, leading cancer researchers and orga...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 186
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
01:02 AM on 04/01/2011
http://mindfulnesswalks.wordpress.com/2011/02/16/mindfulness-is-non-attachment-using-radiation -- I wrote this article with the intent of helping everyone who first hears those words "I think radiation therapy is a good treatment option for you". Here is my experience and my shift of perspective. At first those words were so frightening to me. We are always warned that radiation is very hazardous to are health and now we are told it is life saving. For me mindfulness helped shift my perspective and helped me get through the process. I wrote this article to help cancer patients and providers alike. My hope is that one day cancer will be eradicated from the planet and we won't have to hear those words any more. I wish you good health, great joy and peace. Cindi Silva @zendi4peace
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:51 PM on 03/06/2011
You want to end cancer?

Then I suggest you both see the documentar­y, "Gasland."

Especially Lance, since he's a Texas boy.

As long as the oil and gas corporatio­ns are allowed to pollute our air and water with POISONS that are proven and known carcinogen­s, you will be fighting corporations that we only can guess at the power of..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:41 PM on 03/06/2011
If these men want to stop smoking make sure the California state sponsored smoking cessation program isnt cut!
I know it was instrumental to me quitting smoking.
testing on animals has just produced torment. i cant support any program that hasn't evolved to computer models. animal testing is torture.
10:34 PM on 03/06/2011
There is way to much riding on not finding a cure for cancer. These fools that pretend to want to find a cure for this disease that effects each and every one of us in one way or another, have way to much to lose if a cure is indeed found. We will always get little sniffs of rumors that some cure is close to happening but yet the rumors will always remain just that. There is legitamite research being done, but when this research even gets close to coming to fruition it's snuffed out, or redirected. Once again the fools at the top have way to much to lose for a cure to happen.
10:25 PM on 03/06/2011
$70 a carton in California with this tax. How is this going to impact the poor?

People might say that things like this will cause the poor to give up cigarrettes, but that's easier said than done. Cigarettes are often the only thing that keeps these people going through their tough days. You might not understand it, but this is just one of those things--like coffee and booze--that allow people to function adequately to do those things society imposes on us. It's kind of like the things that world-class athletes have to do to get through their occupations...and they are demonized for them too.


So now, the person in California is probably saying to himself (if he's a 2 carton a week smoker) "$20-$25 extra dollars a week, $100-$150 a month, where is it going to come from?"

My guess is he'll start skipping lunches (if he hasn't already) or breakfasts. Perhaps he'll dump the gym membership or some other health related activity. Perhaps he'll not fill the medications he has to take or skip going to the doctor altogether.

Some good might come from all this, but a lot of pain too. It's too bad that if any good does come out of this, the ones who break their backs raising the funds--the smokers--won't get any thanks, appreciation, or accomodation. You all are in the majority, and all the smokers are going to submit to whatever you all decide.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:42 PM on 03/06/2011
x2
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Boehringer
Dona nobis pacem
10:17 PM on 03/06/2011
As long as we're going down this road, how about a $1 tax on twinkies, doritos, and all the foods that obese people eat. They could pay for the funding for obestiy research. And how about an additional dollar on liquor and beer to do research on substance abuse. And why not a 1$ tax on candy to do diabetes research. Why not a $5 tax on bike helmets for head injury research, and a $1 on peanuts for nut allergy research. Indeed, you can make a case that smokers should pay the freight (and I don't smoke) but this is a poor method of funding research, and if people are addicted to cigarettes, how ethical is it to further exploit them?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bellestarrr#1
she done him wrong
09:42 PM on 03/06/2011
Cancer has been around since the time of the ancient egyptians..there were no food additives, plastics and other environmental contaminents like there are today yet people still got cancer(consumption) in those days also..its genes that get out of whack and cause rapid cell division..its pretty hard to cure that...a strong immune system can keep it in check....and your right the aids industry, cerebral palsy industry , cancer cure industry are enormous and provide wonderful salaries for people working in those industries..we have some wonderful new drugs to fight cancer and there are some cures(long lasting remissions)..lets hope someday we can treat these defective genes and wipe out this terrible disease as well as aids, alheizmers and live forever like the gods ....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Watt
Not ready for 2012
08:07 PM on 03/06/2011
The act may be a good thing for California and people who suffer from various cancers. But I think Armstrong should disclose any personal financial interest he has in the deal; will he profit from it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VJSleight
Tobacco Treatment Specialist
08:42 PM on 03/06/2011
No, he doesn't profit from passing this act. Only 2% of funds raised will go towards administration costs, the balance to research, prevention, and cessation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Watt
Not ready for 2012
09:27 PM on 03/06/2011
Thanks VJSleight. It'll go a long way toward passing the bill if any and all disclosure is made up front.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gail Zawacki
07:35 PM on 03/06/2011
Speaking as the mother of a child diagnosed with cancer, it's about time that the focus moves to the CAUSE, not the cure (important though that is). There is a huge industry making gigantic profits from treating cancer, and researching a cure. But little incentive to determine the causes.

What we need to to is stop the precursor. Plastics, chemicals, and air pollution.

The really scary thing is that vegetation is even more sensitive to air pollution than people. Rising levels of background tropospheric ozone are toxic to plants, and cause enormous reductions in annual crop yields and quality.

Worse still, trees that are exposed to ozone season after season are dying at a rapidly accelerating rate. It is as though we have subjected them to decades of smoking and now they all have cancer!

Plants are the base of the food chain - and the source of much of the oxygen we need to breathe. We have to stop emitting dirty fuel emissions and switch to clean energy before famine results.

photos of damage to foliage form ozone, and links to scientific research at http://www.witsendnj.blogspot.com/
07:15 PM on 03/06/2011
What about preventing cancer by banning cancer causing chemicals in personal and household products? prevention = victory
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wendy Davis
Banned!
06:40 PM on 03/06/2011
Hormones are in the food and water suppy, estrogen from HRT and birth control pills, hormones administered to livestock which ends up in ground water to irrigate crops. Estrogen positive cancers should be studied in this regard. I worry about the food supply.
07:16 PM on 03/06/2011
totally -- we should focus on prevention. cancer causing chemicals are still in the majority of personal care and household products, and it affects both our bodies and the environment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bombadillo22
Not all who wander are lost...
07:28 PM on 03/06/2011
Alas, your perfect solution will be mighty difficult, what with the current GOP effort to defund the EPA and FDA. Notice how it all goes along with fighting so earnestly against no-fault medical treatment and guaranteed health care for consumers and US citizens. Sigh!
photo
Lorianne
ama vitam
05:45 PM on 03/06/2011
Pulling together in cancer fightIn new $211 M facility
MIT and philanthro­pist unite diverse specialist­s in common quest
http://www­.boston.co­m/lifestyl­e/health/a­rticles/20­11/03/04/p­ulling_tog­ether_in_c­ancer_figh­t/?p1=Well­_MostPop_E­mailed6
photo
Lorianne
ama vitam
05:31 PM on 03/06/2011
I hate smoking more than anyone, but smoking is not the only thing that causes cancer.
This campaign seems a bit lopsided (at least as presented here) which gives the impression that stopping smoking will end cancer.
 
However, I applaud efforts to keep kids from starting smoking ... so it's a good thing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VJSleight
Tobacco Treatment Specialist
08:44 PM on 03/06/2011
30% of all cancers are related to smoking, so it makes sense to have a tax on cigarettes, however, as more is learned about the causes of cancer, everyone wins.
11:18 PM on 03/06/2011
Addicts are undeterrred by higher prices of drugs though. It doesn't deter teens from taking up smoking to begin with. Leaders in govt obviously believe they will collect plenty of revenue from the sales of cigarettes, which means that it is not deterring anyone from smoking.
However, I agree that any comprehensive instruction against the dangers of smoking from their contributons to cancer, or as a gateway drug etc is a good thing. Parents need to take an active role, which includes setting a good example by not smoking themselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tresco
Sistagirl Laughin' Thingy Award Winner!
04:32 PM on 03/06/2011
I don't think giving the state of California more money is going to help anything. The state government is screwed up the cost of collecting the taxes and administrating the revenue is a loosing proposition. I would not be suprised to find out that the anticipated revenue from this tax increase has already been borrowed against and spent. The "it's for a good cause" line just does not cut it anymore.
07:17 PM on 03/06/2011
Money can mean more regulation of pollution which means jobs and a better personal and global environment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VJSleight
Tobacco Treatment Specialist
08:49 PM on 03/06/2011
The money doesn't go to the state govt. and only 2% is spent on administration. The funds for cancer research will be awarded by a 9 member oversight committee that consists of cancer center directors, University of Cal. chancellors and representatives of disease advocacy organizations.
California has been a leader in cancer research including several winners of the Nobel prize for medicine.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
03:08 PM on 03/06/2011
This will not make The Rockefeller Syndicate happy at either their Rockefeller University or their operational base camp at The Pratt House for CANCER is an important plank in their National and International programs of POPULATION control methods.

That being said, it would do both of your well to read two books before you start this campaign.

The first book is "World Without Cancer" by G. Edward Griffin which gives important background on cancer being used by the elites as a method of population control in the United States.

That book will also point you to the anti-cancer Vitamin B-17 which is deliberately held out of mainstream society.

The other books are by German Doctor Johanna Budwig, now deceased. He remarkable career saw her name nominated for a Nobel Prize a record 6 times for her work in simply using diet to recover the health of advanced cancer patients that other doctors had given up on. But since Nobel appointments are controlled by the elites that are well protected by the Corporate Media, which they also control, Dr. Budwig was never awarded the Nobel Prize from which she could relate her cancer diet recovery program from a world podium.

Her two books were (1) Flax Oil as true aid against Arthritis, Heart Infarction, Cancer and other Diseases and (2) The Oil Protein Diet Cookbook.

Then there is that 30,000 Hunza Tribe living isolated 1/2 up a Himalayan Mountain that use natural Vitamin B-17and have no cancer.