iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Larry Diamond

Larry Diamond

GET UPDATES FROM Larry Diamond
 

Mubarak Must Go

Posted: 02/ 3/11 01:40 AM ET

Social scientists may succeed at explaining events retrospectively, but when they venture into the realm of forecasting, they are on shaky ground. It is very hard to get into the minds of individual actors and predict what they will do. Last Friday (January 28) I predicted that Hosni Mubarak would be gone from power within a week to ten days. By late last week it was obvious that the peaceful mobilization of the Egyptian people for democratic change had crossed a point of no return; it would not cease until Mubarak was gone and a credible path of transition was laid out. As corrupt and repressive as his thirty years of rule have been, I did not expect that Mubarak would choose to abandon every last shred of patriotism and simply brutalize his own people to hang on to power -- as nastily as he needs to.

No one can seriously doubt that the thuggery and brutal violence unleashed today on peaceful protesters in the streets of Cairo is being orchestrated by the Mubarak regime, on orders (explicit or implicit) of the president himself. Many of the goons who are beating up democratic protesters with abandon have been recognized as police officers in plain clothing. Others are the kind of lumpen proletariat that autocracies scoop up in a last-ditch effort to survive: convicted violent criminals, poorly educated young unemployed men, and no small number of sadists, sycophants, and psychopaths.

As Fouad Ajami, one of the keenest observers of the Arab world, observed tonight on CNN as the violent assaults were proceeding, this is now a bare-knuckles struggle between the forces of democracy and the forces of autocracy, with fateful consequences for the entire Arab world. If Egypt's peaceful mobilization for democracy fails, "then we return to the only other language we know in the Arab world, the language of blood."

The bloodbath that is now unfolding in Egypt is not only a tragedy for that country. It risks becoming a national security disaster for the United States, particularly if the Egyptian people (who are not immune to conspiracy theories) come to believe that the U.S. has tacitly encouraged the crackdown, despite its lofty appeals for prompt and peaceful political change. If the assault on innocent Egyptian civilians continues, it may buy Mubarak and his venal loyalists some time, but at the risk of radicalizing much of the population and propelling the country toward deepening chaos and even an Algerian-style civil war. Sustained bloody repression will inevitably radicalize many young Egyptians. Popular mobilization that was admirable in its pluralism, moderation and discipline will find it much harder to resist the impulse toward violence and extremism in response.

There is very little time left to prevent a disaster in Egypt. The stakes for the United States -- and its reputation throughout the Arab world -- are now so profound that the Obama administration can no longer wrap its appeals for restraint and democratic change in diplomatic politesse. President Obama must now decisively and publicly separate the United States from the Mubarak regime and identify squarely with the people protesting peacefully for democratic change. Egypt's army leadership -- ironically, the last hope for rescuing the course of peaceful political change -- should be quietly told that a complete suspension of U.S. military aid is imminent if the violence is not brought to a halt. If Mubarak survives in power and continues the bloody assault on his people, the Obama administration should suspend all economic and military assistance to Egypt and impose targeted sanctions on anyone in the regime associated with the repression.

This is how we have treated pariah regimes like Zimbabwe, Burma, and Sudan. And that is what Mubarak's rule is becoming in its final, ugly days.

 
Social scientists may succeed at explaining events retrospectively, but when they venture into the realm of forecasting, they are on shaky ground. It is very hard to get into the minds of individual ...
Social scientists may succeed at explaining events retrospectively, but when they venture into the realm of forecasting, they are on shaky ground. It is very hard to get into the minds of individual ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 99
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
10:16 PM on 02/03/2011
Isn't there some way this mess can be blamed on Bush.....

Come on now faithul Progressives... "THINK".
09:51 PM on 02/03/2011
Hawass like a politician is an opportunist, and in his position often relies on games of rhetoric. However, I think his claims of saving Egyptian antiquities during this time of civic unrest must first be confirmed as there have been many archaeologists, specifically those at Saqqara, who present a different story. Is Hawass a better politician than an archaeologist? Perhaps, according to his reports he obeyed the curfew last weekend rather than direct the safeguarding of the Cairo Museum, which was subsequently broken into.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:17 PM on 02/03/2011
President Obama should fire his Sect, of State Hillary Clinton at once, not just for the bad advice over Mubrak,but over her foreign policy advice in general.

You don't dump your ally in public.

You do it quietly but make it clear that stabilization comes before reform.


When you backstab your allies you make matters worse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
10:20 PM on 02/03/2011
Yes of course.. its Hillary's fault.. we can't blame Obama for anything... he is above reproach in all matters.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:58 AM on 02/04/2011
Obama should take responsibility for this fiasco as well.

However, since Bill Clinton repealed Glass-Steagall, leading to the bail outs, leading to Ben Bernanke implementing QE (quantative easing), causing a worldwide food crisis, the Clintons, who have advised this president to keep their failed and disastrous policy legacy in tact, should be removed from government. - PERIOD.


...then the President should follow them out the door.
03:36 PM on 02/03/2011
This is not a mess that Obama created. It was started over 50 years ago when France and Great Britain carved up the Middle East following World War II and installed pro-Western leaders which have been propped up by the West, the US included, ever since then. That there is no democracy or legitimate leadership in the Middle East is a result of these repressive regimes prohibiting any voice at all to be heard other than that of the government. It's about time that the Arabs sidestepped their leaders and spoke up for human dignity and self determination.
03:31 PM on 02/03/2011
I wonder what would happen if the Egyptians replaced Mubarak with a democratically elected president who immediately suspended the neoliberal economic "free trade" policies the IMF and the US have imposed on Egypt.

And replaced these policies, which have helped to create the mass poverty and concentration of wealth Egyptians have taken to the streets over, with economic policies much more responsive to the actual needs of the Egyptian people?

Just wondering....
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
02:52 PM on 02/03/2011
Yes he must, I sure hope Obama is applying maximum pressure and resources, behind the scenes, to get him to.
02:24 PM on 02/03/2011
An evaluation of violence should include taking into account that, if your wife should hit you in the arm ten times harder than your worst enemy, it may nevertheless not trigger as much serious concern. This is complicated, Egypt is going through birth pains, the marriage between Mubarek and the Egyptian people is ending. There are rites of passage elements here as well, which tend to be different (and involve greater feats of macho) in a slightly more primitive country. Sorry if that sounds derisive, and certainly there are plenty of primitive macho types in the U.S. as well, but as a whole I believe we see ourselves as a more modern nation.
02:42 PM on 02/03/2011
You're telling me this all just domestic violence?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kathismom
@saracsit , Boulderite
02:09 PM on 02/03/2011
Agreed, and once again Obama is being Obama. Talking loud and saying nothing. Or, not even talking. Release the BIDEN! or at the very least Hilary.
jerseyjoe99982002
less government means more in my pocket
01:04 PM on 02/03/2011
No guts Obama will try to soft talk the issue. Again, he will make us appear weak, because he is weak.
Where is a true leader and President now that we need one. I would even take back Bill Clinton before I let this Obama bozoo mess things up more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mishal Zeera
12:50 PM on 02/03/2011
Brilliant. Yes. Exactly!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
01:22 PM on 02/03/2011
Obama let the people of Iran hanging out to dry.. why do you expect anything different now??

Community organizing does not prepare you for things like this...
12:45 PM on 02/03/2011
I get that I, not being an expert on diplomacy do not understand the ins and outs of this profession. However, from the sidelines, having watched big corporations being served by our military, currently and in the past, have a somewhat jaded view of the real intent of diplomatic officers' mandate now. I am willing to accept that we have the best intentions in our direct communications with the Egyptian Government, however it is being played out publicly, but now is the time for clear language that all nations, including ours, understand to be inarguable. It is time to "cut to the chase", eliminating the use of euphemisms that can later be construed in a different manner. We are in a position now, but not for much longer, to speak softly but carry our big stick to the negotiating tables. The people of the United States deserve to be represented to the peaceful marchers as sympathetic and outraged at what is going on now. Please do not allow our dependance on oil, which is our own fault for buckling under our past and current fear of lost production/mobility, fueled by the oil barons around the world. We could have been preparing for decades, thus neutralizing the intensity of the current threat.

We have allowed our emotions to rule our pragmatic side. We can see clearly now where this has brought us. The voices of corporate spinners are still shouting, impersonating "persons". We the people speak different words.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cassie reinara
12:44 PM on 02/03/2011
The foot dragging and back room support of the Egyptian dictatorship will do more to harm democratic efforts and a possible peaceful transition of power. As usual American diplomatic power is not living up to the hype that always precedes it. We're always a day late and a dollar short when it comes to doing the right thing and supporting the right side. So much for believing in Democratic reform. It's all good when we have cozy relationship with the whomever as long as that person is acceptable to us. We seem to hold no regard to what the people of the actual country want. In the end, they may not choose a leader who is friendly to us or a form of government which we would prefer, but again is that our decision to make? Apparently, to some, it is!
photo
wom122
Primum non nocere
12:08 PM on 02/03/2011
"Fouad Ajami, one of the keenest observers of the Arab world"

Mr. Ajami is a very bright man indeed. He is, however, much better at post-mortem analysis than predicting the future. He was after all the one who opined to Mr. Cheney that the "streets of Baghdad would erupt in joy" once our troops rid them of Saddam Hussein.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William50
11:54 AM on 02/03/2011
First, and this may surprise you, how would you feel in China demanded the government in the USA be thrown out because three percent of the population rioted. The fact is the USA can make statements and suggestions but the President of Egypt if he has the backing of the military and the quiet man in the street, or not in the street can use force to protect what is now the legal government, until the next election or a few killings take place.
The mobs in the streets, are they the voice of the nation or now the voice of radical dangerous extremism! They are demanding the President shut down the government or just that he leaves. The President, while a powerful man is not the government and his removal does not mean any thing will change.
To go back to democratic demands the mob in the street now needs to demand free open elections run by out of country administration that allows all parties to put individuals into government. They could demand the elections take place in 90 days, but from what I am seeing is both sides in the riots are afraid of democracy and what the new government may look like.
11:46 AM on 02/03/2011
Yes, one thing we know is that the thugs who attacked must be plain-clothes secret police or outside agitators. They could not possible be ordinary Eqyptians who support the government and resent their streets being taken over.
Western pundits like Mr Diamond have assured us that, since the elections were unfair and unfree, that only about 1/2 percent of Egyptians support the government and want their streets and their normal daily lives back.