iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Larry Hirsch

GET UPDATES FROM Larry Hirsch
 

Assault Weapons Ban: It's Common Sense

Posted: 07/29/2012 11:31 pm

With all of the important issues dominating the political debate, the economy, health care, International Affairs to name a few it had slipped my mind that we did not have an assault weapons ban. Then a tragedy like the one in Aurora, Colo., reminds us of it. Maybe it had slipped my mind because banning assault weapons should be a no-brainer. No NRA lobbyist can argue that assault weapons are sold for any other purpose but to kill people. You can't use them for hunting or target shooting and they are not efficient for protecting your home and family. Therefore the only reason a person would buy one is to aggressively go out and kill people. The NRA wants to argue that any attack on guns is an attack on freedom. However no one should have the freedom to buy a weapon that is just intended to kill others.

Thanks to President Clinton, we had an assault weapons ban until 2004. For the safety of innocent Americans I hope a new one will be enacted soon. If there ever was an issue to put aside partisan bickering, this is it. Let's honor the dead of Aurora by banning the type of weapon that killed many of them.

 
FOLLOW CRIME
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:05 PM on 09/27/2012
It's common sense? No it is NOT common sense. Your article LACKS common sense. More people die from alcohol, cars, pools, and tabacco than firearms. So should we ban all those too? California has the TOUGHEST gun laws in the U.S. and is 12th in violent crimes. Utah is one of the loosest and it is 47th in crimes per capita. Facts do NOT favor you, and hiding from the facts to force your poorly thought out gun politics says so much about you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob S
TSgt, USAF (Ret)
11:09 AM on 09/21/2012
I hate to say how far off you are here...
but an assault weapons ban did not lower homicides. Very few homicides are comitted with military style carbines. Most homicides are comitted with handguns.
The Clinton assault weapons ban hurt the Democratic Party for 20 years.
Get over it. The American people do not want it. They do not like it. It is a political loser.
All you will do is produce a piece of legislation that will have huge holes in it like Clinton's and the NRA/GOP machine will get back to 60% support and roll Democrats coast to coast.

Give it up. It isn't the 1970s. The days of gun control are over.
It is an electoral dead end.
It only benefits the GOP and makes noone safer.
05:06 PM on 09/20/2012
168 people were killed in Oklahoma and 680 injured, so shouldn't we ban fertilizer too.
SharpForceTrauma
Patience: I can't tipe, or spell well- grammer...f
02:18 PM on 09/14/2012
Yeah, it will be like Libya soon, when someone gets a little upset, they'll take out their weapon and shoot up the place.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chamise to my friends
01:20 AM on 09/22/2012
Those people are lucky to have guns to raise up against their government. IF you read the federalist papers, the Constitution, the private diaries of Jefferson, Adams, John Jay and the like, you will see that its exactly the reason founding fathers wanted us to have guns. I believe it was Jefferson who said a man who does not have a gun to defend his family is not even a man. Are you a man?
SharpForceTrauma
Patience: I can't tipe, or spell well- grammer...f
02:46 AM on 09/22/2012
I voluntarily took up arms to fight Russia, and I would turn them on you, if you were to attack my Country, my Government!I'm an expert marksman with iron sights, and I can hit a moving target!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zitoameriki2
Obama = Epic Fail
09:01 PM on 09/13/2012
"You can't use them for hunting or target shooting and they are not efficient for protecting your home and family. Therefore the only reason a person would buy one is to aggressively go out and kill people. "

Gee, thanks for that insightful comment.... a weapon is used to kill people. And here I thought weapons were just for decoration on your wall.

That is the whole point of a weapon... to be able to kill people. That is why we HAVE weapons and Constitutionally protected... to protect against tyranny. For you to claim that guns are no good for hunting proves you lack an education and know NOTHING about the 2nd Amendment... it has NOTHING to do with huntin, its about protecting American citizens from tyranny.. foreign and domestic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thecross719
03:09 AM on 09/22/2012
Wish I could double fave your comment!
12:10 AM on 09/13/2012
This is another irresponsible writer. So-called "assault rifles" are because they are more flexible in usage. 5.56 is not a killer round it is too light. It is very good for getting rid of small pests that infest many areas. All weapons can kill.
04:08 AM on 09/11/2012
"Therefore the only reason a person would buy one is to aggressively go out and kill people."

Is this guy serious? It's unconscionable that Hirsch would even remotely consider himself as a responsible journalist. First of all, why don't you check some stats? You have 150 million privately-owned firearms in the U.S. Given this number and by your insane logic, all of America should be an absolute anarchy or Mad Max-type environment.

Secondly, stating that assault weapons have no practical value for hunting or target shooting is again, utter nonsense. I have a privately-owned, civilian-purchased MILITARY STYLE RIFLE (not an "assault rifle", which is a cruel misnomer because my rifle has never assaulted anybody) and I use mine solely for target practice. Yes, I've never harmed anybody, nor do I intend to.

Oh, and by the way: I also happen to be a federal law enforcement officer for the past 14 years, yet here I am, advocating for the rights of RESPONSIBLE gun owners.

Last question for Mr. Hirsch, and this one deals with firearms as a whole and not military-style rifles in particular: if you were to happen to get that late-night knock on the door, followed by the sound of one of your windows being broken, which would you rather have to defend yourself: a gun...or your telephone?

NRA AND PROUD!
04:03 AM on 09/11/2012
Here's a thought .. when these sick people that have committed unthinkable acts of mass murder ..they plan their actions..a person that is proficient with a bow and arrow.can exact just as much or even more devestation .. and if you think not ..I can fire an arrow every 4 - 5 seconds on target at any distance between 5 to 45 yards.. the point being it's not the "particular weapon".. it's anything you can use well ..a person could just walk down the aisle slashing people with a knife ..The.." I don't have a real life and I'm not very uninformed" and " my life experiences are limited more than an animal in a zoo" .."Closed mined , you'd die if the store closed and you could get your soybean burger" people..are trying to put the blame on an inanimate object..instead of the person..the weapon didn't load itself nor did it fire by itself..I use a Colt M4 5.56 rifle on a weekly basis to rid my land of skunks , ground hogs ( that's a woodchuck to you city folks) and other pest ..It collaspes to a size I can carry on my Gator or 4 wheeler ..it's very accurate and yes you can and a large number of people do ,hunt large game with one of these. take off your rose colored glasses and wake the FK up..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
04:56 PM on 09/11/2012
How many years did it take you to get that proficient with a bow?

The sole reason that firearms replaced longbows and crossbows is that they required less strength and far, far less training.

And it's pretty hard to slash with a knife people who are on the other side of the room.
12:06 AM on 09/13/2012
Actually it does not take too long to become proficient. One could use repeating crossbows for faster response. Knives can be quite damaging. There was a deranged person in China who maimed and murdered a number of people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
swatcapt
12:22 AM on 09/06/2012
"No NRA lobbyist can argue that assault weapons are sold for any other purpose but to kill people."
Mine has never killed anyone must be broken then should i return it

You can't use them for hunting or target shooting

yes you can I like many others do

and they are not efficient for protecting your home and family.

Try to break into my house and tell me how you feel when looking down the barrel
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Schwartz2012
Liberal, because someone has to think
01:49 PM on 09/14/2012
Better off with a pump 12
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
swatcapt
07:56 PM on 09/14/2012
yeah i got a few of those too
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
badman400
Legalize the Constitution!
12:21 AM on 09/06/2012
So what if they're used for killing? That doesn't negate the 2nd Amendment right that allows us to keep and bear arms, or that this right is NOT to be infringed! It doesn't say what type of arms. And there's the rub, what it the arbitrary definition of the illusive "assault weapon"? One could argue that ANY weapon could be described as an "assault" weapon. A baseball bat that is used to assault someone, could be categorized as such. Bottom line, is that any kind of weapon can be misused or can be used in a safe manner, depending solely upon the user. "Those who would give up freedom for safety or security, deserves neither." -Benjamin Franklin
03:56 PM on 09/02/2012
Exactly why can't you use them for hunting or target practice. I guarantee that they are very efficient at protecting. Although this is a valid debate, this is an ignorant article.
11:29 PM on 08/30/2012
Larry let me share my thoughts with you. My right to arms isn't determined by your "opinion". How about we ban politicians they seem to cause more problems in our country than any gun. You live in a fantasy world if you think American gun owners will ever surrender their guns.
12:17 AM on 09/11/2012
phuckin right.
04:39 PM on 08/30/2012
This is what Mitt Romney said when he was my Governor:
Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts, Romney said, at a bill signing ceremony on July 1 with legislators, sportsmen's groups and gun safety advocates. These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people.
10:56 PM on 09/10/2012
Yeah, but I guarantee Mitt the Flip has flip-flopped on that as well. Let's give everyone an AK!!
01:46 PM on 08/30/2012
The Clinton Assault Weapon ban was a LIE. Not one gun on that list was a real assault weapon. If your piano was on that list it would be a legal assault weapon, but not a real one. What was on that list was our target rifles. Two weeks ago we finished shooting our National Matches at Camp Perry. That was five full weeks and thousands of shooters shooting guns on the Clinton Assault Weapons list. Where are the real assault weapons? They are machineguns and are regulated under the 1934 National Firearms Act and must be registered. Shooters and the NRA have no problem with registering 'these' guns, but the antigun politicans cut off the registration of real assault weapons. It is estimated that there are over 20 million unregistered.
10:58 PM on 09/10/2012
Why doesn't the NRA have a problem with banning machine guns? Isn't that a clear infringement on the Second Amendment?
12:37 AM on 09/11/2012
Registration is not banning. Since 1934, there's never been a crime committed with a registered machinegun. Here's what happens to a unregistered gun of this type, 99.999% are owned by honest citizens. Their wives are frightened of the penalities if their husbands are caught with one, so they get him to throw it away. It's thrown away and now falls into criminal hands. It would be better to register all of them, but the anti-gun politicans won't allow it. Honest shooters don't want to see these guns fall into criminal hands. By the way, the Swiss issue a machine gun to all qualified adult men, with ammunition. They have no problems. Plus there are shooting matches in this country with these weapons. The vast majority will never be fired,they cost too much 'to feed'. So let's register them, so we know where they are.
07:38 PM on 08/29/2012
that's like taking away cars more people are killed by cars then guns but do we take those away we sure don't stupid communist larry