The following is my open letter to Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon from the U.S. Public Interest Research Group endorsing his Health Care Free Choice Amendment, which contains proposals necessary for effective health care reform that guarantees an array of affordable insurance exchange options for all Americans.
Dear Senator Wyden,
U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG) and our affiliates, the State Public Interest Research Groups, have a thirty-five year history of standing up for consumers and taxpayers against powerful special interests. Throughout this year's health care reform debate, U.S. PIRG has advocated for policies that would offer consumers better choices and lower health care costs. Consistent with our history and priorities, I write to you today to express U.S. PIRG's support for your "Free Choice" proposal.
As you know, a central feature of the health reform legislation now before Congress is the creation of health insurance marketplaces called exchanges. By allowing enrollees to pool their bargaining power and purchase health insurance coverage in large, well-regulated markets, these exchanges will allow consumers to get their coverage at a lower cost than they would on their own. Also, by offering an array of high-quality choices too frequently absent from today's insurance marketplace, exchanges will help lower costs by fostering competition in health insurance coverage. Finally, the exchanges offer a strong mechanism for portability, since enrollees' coverage would not necessarily change when they leave their existing job or start a new one.
Unfortunately, the existing health reform bills confine participation in these exchanges to individuals, employees of small businesses that opt to provide coverage through an exchange, and those workers whose employer does not offer creditable, affordable coverage. Employees of small businesses that offer their own creditable health coverage plans and most employees at larger firms would continue to receive only the options offered by their employers.
By progressively opening up the exchanges and allowing employees to opt into their employers' plan or, alternatively, take their pick of any of the offerings on the exchanges, your Free Choice plan will greatly expand the coverage options available to Americans with employer-provided coverage. Your proposal will dramatically increase the number of Americans who are able to choose a plan that fits their needs. Allowing an employer's contribution to follow an employee via a voucher will ensure that employees' choices will not be overly constrained.
In addition to expanding choices for consumers, your Free Choice proposal would make other significant improvements to the effectiveness of the broader health reform legislation:
As your proposal acknowledges, opening up more choices does create a risk of adverse selection, if a disproportionate share of sick employees decided to opt either for exchange or employer coverage and thereby drove up premiums. Commendably, the Free Choice proposal mitigates against this risk by creating a reinsurance mechanism to protect businesses and insurers that may experience higher-cost risk pools. As you move forward with your proposal, we urge you to ensure that this important policy element remains adequate to its task.
On behalf of U.S. PIRG's members and affiliates, I thank you for your leadership on this important issue and look forward to working with you and your office to ensure that your Free Choice proposal takes its place in the final health reform legislation.
Sincerely,
Larry McNeely
Health Care Advocate
Follow Larry McNeely on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LarryPIRG
Zack Cooper: A Health Insurance Mandate and Corporate Monopoly
The only way to go from sickness care to health promotion is with both tougher regulation of insurance companies and a meaningful mandate for individuals to buy health insurance.
Bob Cesca: Punishing the Health Insurance Cartel for Extortion and Fraud
If there was any lingering doubt about the ethical bankruptcy of the health care cartel, we now have incontrovertible evidence in the form of a new report commissioned by the health insurance lobby.
Senator Ron Wyden | Standing Up for All of Oregon
Ezra Klein - The Idea That Could Save Health-Care Reform
Ezra Klein - The Free Choice Amendment Moves Forward
Op-Ed Contributor - Health Reform's Missing Ingredient - NYTimes.com
"In the 2007 ACS, median household income ranged from $68,080 for Maryland to $36,338 for Mississipp
http://www
Most working-cl
Too Big to fail? Too Bad.
The Monies we pay into this "Extortion Ring" Would be Freed up and Invested into plans that Actually Deliver Services When Needed!
People are tired of being forced to "Sleep with the Enemy".
No one seems to Really want Regulation and Even if they Did, Even If it Happened, It would be Mandated in such a way that it would Benefit The Ins. Industrial Complex Instead of the People who Pay for Services that Are Not There When Needed....
Seems the current System resembles Extortion.
Please compare this plan to anything being offerd by anyone.
We must have lower cost alternativ
If the President and legislator
Providing health care efficientl
Nobody can collect the money to pay for health care as cheaply as the government can through a national sales tax, and nobody can deliver high quality care and medication
Two choices should be offered to everyone to use either; free public health care, sales tax funded, from a new system of government owned and operated hospitals, using the VA format, that would deliver all government funded care, or alternativ
Employers or state and local government
Let’s compare this common sense dual system that would allow unlimited choices while saving taxpayers hundreds of billions annually, and always free public care would be available, to the reforms being proposed by Mr. Baucus’s legislatio
What we need is a functionin