Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Laura Barrett

GET UPDATES FROM Laura Barrett
 

The United States of Transportation Inequity

Posted: 06/23/10 03:27 PM ET

In a few days, New York City is going to lose two subway lines and dozens of bus routes. With the city's transit agency facing a $400 million budget deficit, there are more cuts to come.

Nobody likes transit cuts. In fact, the overwhelming majority of Americans want more public transportation, not less. In a poll by our partners Transportation for America, 82 percent of voters said "the United States would benefit from an expanded and improved transportation system, such as rail and buses." Seventy-nine percent of rural voters said the same.

But if cuts are an inconvenience for Americans who have transportation options, they can be a disaster for Americans who don't: low-income people, people of color, older Americans, and Americans with disabilities who rely on public transportation to get to work, school, church, and access medical care.

To get a sense of just how unequal the impacts of the current transit cuts are, listen to Dr. Robert Bullard, the father of the environmental justice movement:

Nationally, only seven percent of white households do not own a car, compared to 24 percent of African American households, 17 percent of Latino households, and 13 percent of Asian American households. African Americans are almost six times as likely as whites to use transit to get around. In urban areas, African Americans and Latinos comprise over 54 percent of transit users (62 percent of bus riders, 35 percent of subway riders, and 29 percent of commuter rail riders).


And just so New York doesn't get all the attention, here are a few snapshots of how transportation inequity works around the country--and what TEN and its allies are doing about it:

Washington, DC
Twenty-five percent of train riders are people of color, versus 50% of bus riders. Only one in 50 rail riders does not own a car, versus one in five for bus riders. The income for rail riders is also about 40% higher than bus riders. In spite of all this, bus riders are facing fare hikes twice that of rail riders. TEN member PRISCM's fight against this inequity made the front page of the Washington Post.

Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN
The original plan for a new light rail train on the Twin Cities' Central Corridor line would have skipped over minority communities -- in fact, TEN member ISAIAH argued that they would have been worse off after construction. This inequity sparked three lawsuits and two federal civil-rights complaints, including by ISAIAH. Federal Transit Administrator Peter Rogoff took action, and now three extra stops will be added to the line in low-income and minority communities.

Chicago
The Chicago Transit Authority (more than 60% Black and Latino ridership) is wrestling with one of the worst budget crises in the nation, constantly facing cuts, layoffs, and fare hikes, while the suburban Metra train (more than 70% white ridership) has flourished. Civil rights leaders filed a federal Title VI lawsuit in January alleging this was the result of systematic inequities in state and regional funding practices.

San Francisco Bay Area
Eighty percent of the bus riders on the local AC Transit line are people of color, while local train riders are disproportionately white (46% of BART riders and 60% of Caltrain riders). Yet bus passengers receive a subsidy of public funds of $2.78 per trip, while BART riders receive more than double that --$6.14--and Caltrain passengers receive an incredible $13.79. On the bright side, a civil rights complaint by TEN member GENESIS and others recently halted stimulus funding for a boondoggle airport train project, and will result in $70M being redirected to transit operations and other projects to preserve jobs and transit service.

Los Angeles
The Claremont Progressive breaks it down: "Bus riders are 58% Latino, 22% black, 8% Asian American/Pacific Islander, and 12% white, while the largely suburban Metrolink rail riders are about 50% white. More than 75% of bus riders in Los Angeles have annual incomes of $12,000-$20,000 a year, while Metrolink riders surveyed in 2000 had averaged $61,100. Adjusted for inflation, this figure jumps to $77,000." In an already brutal climate, bus riders are facing 400,000 hours of service cuts, as well as fare hikes. TEN member LA Bus Riders Union has fought both fiercely, most recently with a hunger strike.

We know that 84% of U.S. transit agencies are facing service cuts, fare hikes, or both. We're fighting them around the country. What's happening in your community?

 

Follow Laura Barrett on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TransportEquity

 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:13 AM on 07/06/2010
The St. Louis community, home to the Transportation Equity Network and it's ally, Metropolitan Communities United, was not immune to vast cuts of its mass transit system. In 2009, 2300 transit lines were slashed. MCU organized a campaign urging voters to pass Proposition A which would create a half cent sales tax in St. Louis County. The passage of of this Proposition would trigger a collection of a quarter cent sales tax in St. Louis City. The funds generated by these taxes would restore the transit cuts and expand transit opportunities in the St. Louis community. Through the ground level efforts of MCU Proposition A was passed in April. This is just another example of how much a community depends on mass transit and mass transit depends on its community. Good job St. Louis!
03:55 PM on 06/29/2010
As a woman of color living transit dependent in Los Angeles, I can confirm that the fare increase and service cuts beginning on July 1 will cause a great deal of hardship. There are plans by the mayor and MTA to expand rail service into the San Fernando Valley and the "Subway to the Sea" proposal will expand rail service through the Beverly Hills, Westwood (UCLA), Brentwood and Santa Monica, while the poorer urban areas will suffer massive cuts in service on the bus. These come in spite of the MTA identifying the majority of bus riders as "profoundly poor".
03:21 PM on 06/24/2010
Yeah, mom. But you didn't even mention the 314!
11:07 AM on 06/24/2010
"However, it is bus, not Metrolink, fares that are being increased to raise funds for rail expansion.""

This is untrue. Bus fares could not fund rail expansion even if they wanted it to. The fare in Los Angeles pays for about 20-25% of what it actually costs to operate a bus. The rest is subsidized by taxpayers.

In Los Angeles, fares are not going up for senior citizens, the disabled or students.

To fund rail expansion, Los Angeles County voters passed Measure R, a half-cent sales tax measure that required 2/3rds of the vote to pass. Even voters in poor areas voted yes on it. Rail expansion was the focal point of Measure R, not some hidden agenda. Voters overwhelmingly approve of rail expansion in LA.

A provision of Measure R froze fares for all riders for a year. It will also freeze fares for the disabled, senior citizens and students for five years. Sounds like a great deal to me.

Also, Metrolink fares are going up on July 1st.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PrometheanSalvation
Bringing fire to cleanse the land.
09:56 AM on 06/24/2010
It's not a 'War on Poverty', it's a war on those in poverty.
11:31 PM on 06/23/2010
sad, but we are in a recession. we must all share in the burden. HCR is going to make this problem worse. transit's slice of the pie is smaller now