iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Laurie David
GET UPDATES FROM Robyn O'Brien

Toxins in Our Kids' Foods: Where Is the FDA?

Posted: 04/01/11 01:13 PM ET

Yesterday, in the face of a just-released report by the National Cancer Institute that showed a 9.4% increase in childhood cancer between 1992 and 2007, the FDA let moms and dads all across America down. Instead of making the long overdue move to do something serious about getting rid of toxic food dyes so ubiquitous in our food supply, they instead fell back on those two simple words so often used to stall, delay and deny: "more research."

In kitchens across this country, eight dyes, currently being used by manufacturers, can be found in everything from packaged macaroni and cheese to breakfast cereal to practically every piece of candy your child has ever put in his or her mouth. Links are being found to hyperactivity in kids (ADHD), cancer and serious food allergies.

But here is the truly crazy thing. Kraft, Coca Cola and Wal-Mart have already removed these artificial food colors and dyes from the same products that they distribute in other countries. They did it in response to consumer demand and an extraordinary study called the Southampton Study.

The Southampton Study was unusual in that it tested children on a combination of two ingredients: tartrazine (yellow #5) and sodium benzoate. The study's designers knew that a child very rarely has occasion to ingest just a synthetic color or just a preservative; rather, a child who is gobbling up multicolored candies is probably taking in several colors and at least one preservative.

What's amazing is that in the U.K., the federal food safety agency actually funded the Southampton Study that led to even U.S. corporations eliminating synthetic colors and sodium benzoate from their U.K. products.

And in response, a whole host of companies, including the U.K. branches of Wal-Mart, Kraft, Coca Cola and the Mars candy company (who make M&Ms), have voluntarily removed artificial colors, the preservative sodium benzoate, and even aspartame from their products. Particularly those marketed to kids. Take a close look at the ingredient list for the product below.

2011-04-01-huffpostblog4.1.11.jpg


Our American companies had removed these harmful ingredients from their products overseas -- but not here!

Kraft, Coca Cola and Wal-Mart are living proof that it is possible for giant corporations to make and sell kid-friendly, family-friendly, and healthy processed food without necessarily exposing them to a chemical cocktail that might also give them allergic reactions, brain tumors, or leukemia, or the symptoms of ADHD, as the Center for Science in the Public Interest recently highlighted in their report Rainbow of Risks.

No need to go through all the numbers for increased health problems here. You've heard them all and it isn't pretty. For goodness sake, no more research necessary. Lets stop poisoning our own kids. Lets start assuming chemicals are dangerous until proven safe, not the other way around.

Is it too much to ask the FDA and the processed food companies for the same value to be placed on the lives of the American kids in their cost-benefit analyses that has been placed on the lives of kids in the UK?

Moms, we can create that same change here. And with 51 million moms waking up to the dangers that toxins present to the health of our kids, our numbers are equivalent to the entire population of Spain. Time to get down to business, level the playing field for our kids, and send a message to these companies. Vote with your pocketbook today, this weekend, next month as you grocery shop for your family. Because while the American children only represent 30% of our population, they are 100% of our future. So while the FDA may not value their lives accordingly, we can.

Laurie David is an environmentalist, producer and the author of The Family Dinner: Great Ways to Connect with Your Kids, One Meal at a Time. Robyn O'Brien is the founder of AllergyKidsFoundation.org and the author of The Unhealthy Truth: How Our Food Is Making Us Sick - And What We Can Do About It.

 
 
 

Follow Laurie David on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Laurie_David

 
 
  • Comments
  • 272
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
05:43 PM on 04/08/2011
Nowadays, the packaging of children’s food is becoming more and more pleasing to the consumers. However, the food itself is becoming more and more toxic. The snacks we eat now usually have very fancy appearance, they can preserve for at least one year, some can even preserve for two years too. Why food can be such beautiful? And why they can still remain edible one year after they produced? This is because those foods contain artificial colors and preservatives. Yet, those artificial colors and preservatives are made up of some toxic chemicals; those chemicals could bring very negative health effects to children. From the article, we know that one of the American companies had removed the harmful ingredients from their products overseas, which means that removing those toxic ingredients is possible for making packaged snacks. Hence, I think that the companies that produce snacks and packaged food should reduce the use of artificial colors and preservatives as much as they could. Otherwise, more and more people, especially kids would suffer from those serious diseases. Moreover, I also hope that people can understand this serious chemical issue in food, and adjust their living style, in order to maintain their healthy body. People should also stand up and vote to support the reduce of the use of chemicals in food.
07:11 PM on 04/07/2011
no offense but 25% of adhd kids aren't poisoned for havng food dyes.stop blamming bad parenting and plain old bad parenting skills and lack there of, on overactive children by now calling it food dye poison.

And the Internatio­nal Food Informatio­n Council, which is supported primarily by broad-base­d food, beverage and agricultur­al industries­, says the science isn’t there.

quote: http://the­chart.blog­s.cnn.com/­2011/03/31­/more-rese­arch-neede­d-on-food-­dyes-fda-p­anel-says/
“Without sufficient scientific evidence that a causal link truly exists between food colors and hyperactiv­ity in children, communicat­ions that suggest a link could have unintended consequenc­es, including unnecessar­ily frightenin­g consumers about safe ingredient­s that are consumed every day,” said David Schmidt, president and CEO of IFIC.

wtf??? it's not even proven that this is a cause... i mean really, what the hell do people think is in ice cream, cakes, icing on those friggin cupcakes, doritos, and del monte fruit preservita­ves?!?! lmao
i mean like i said before, unless we can all have a half acre and self sustain, then there would be nothing to worry about except mad cow disease in the meat and pesticides­...
i swear i wish i could get a yurt http://www­.spiritmou­ntainyurts­.com/fortr­ess.htm or
a zen 400 sq ft bamboo http://www­.bambooliv­ing.com/pr­efab-green­-homes-col­lection.ht­ml
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacquelinenh
HuffPo Addict
09:37 PM on 04/06/2011
Wow, I have never seen such a stark contrast as those two cereal bar boxes. Unbelievable.
03:43 PM on 04/05/2011
Hey, anyone want to comment on the fact that this doctor apparently doesn't know that toxin and toxic are two completely different things? Toxins refers to organic poisons, i.e. snake venom, and toxic refers to the point of which a substance is fatal (i.e. drowning is a toxic exposure to water.) This article is obviously written to instill fear and work people into hysterics. Sad, but not surprising entry by this doctor who clearly pushes the chemphobe agenda.
04:18 PM on 04/05/2011
I think you're right, Nathan. Having said that, I do believe this conversation is necessary--but this isn't the way to bring it to the table.
01:38 PM on 04/05/2011
Okay, so the way I see it is this: You can complain, express anger and horror and go on to complain to your friends and family. Or you can make an informed decision to not feed yourselves and your families processed food (don't we already know this?)--and you can support healthy-eating programs in low income neighborhoods and schools. You can make a difference by focusing on the good. Why are we always so quick to complain?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
purenergy
06:23 AM on 04/06/2011
Good point. That is why I buy local grass fed meats, raise my own backyard chickens for eggs, shop at farmers markets and tend an organic garden. The only vote you really have it your dollar. Peace
07:48 AM on 04/06/2011
Poor people don't have this vote. Processed foods are cheaper, and when you have to feed a family you are limited to your budget. Organic is not cheap.
01:31 PM on 04/05/2011
Our entire world is made of chemicals, lets not mistake that. Even our organic produce has been shown to harbor toxic substances. Why, our own bodies produce toxic chemicals all on their own. I bring these items up, because I know (first-hand) how easy it is to get carried away. We need, always, to remind ourselves to seek out perspective. That doesn't mean that I'm urging you to blindly trust the FDA--but it does mean that we can be informed, cautious and intelligent consumers without becoming alarmists. Thank you!
03:45 PM on 04/05/2011
Thank you. Great points. I am shocked at how so many can blindly trust any message delivered is such a clearly biased spirit as this article was written.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
harmonikasavingsbonds
Standard?Nonsense! I DEMAND an automatic poodle!
12:05 PM on 04/05/2011
You know what has been worrying me? All that oil contaminated seafood from the BP spill has to go somewhere. American greed being what it is, I am waiting to hear that the food has been sold to fast food companies with the "assurance" that the food is safe.

Just recently, Taco Bell introduced shrimp tacos. I would love to know WHERE they acquired the shrimp.


Mark my words; this soon will be revealed, and I for one will not be surprised.
07:55 AM on 04/05/2011
This is so interesting and I didn't hear about it. Do you or any commenter have any knowledge if these additives were also removed by the food companies for the same products sold in France? I am mom in SW France and would love to know this.
Although I try not to buy these types of foods with additives, (for the reasons of it being filled with artificial ingredients) it is still important to be educated consumers and parents.

Mary Brighton
www.brightonyourhealth.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
purenergy
06:52 AM on 04/05/2011
The FDA is run by the same people who run the chemical companies that supply these dyes and preservatives. Anyone expecting to get a straight answer form the government is fooling themselves. Grow your own food, if possible. Otherwise, buy locally and get organic grass fed meats from local farms. The only way they will change is if you take your money out of the system all together. The dollar is the only real vote we have.
03:44 PM on 04/05/2011
Denied. Please prove your statement with a cite.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
purenergy
06:29 AM on 04/06/2011
I have not quoted a study, I have given my opinion. I don't need to back it up with anything. And, who are you to be demanding anything form anyone? I don't follow the heard.

Anyway, do your own research I am not here to do it for you. It is commonly known that many if not all, FDA executives are former employees of big business corporations like Monsanto, Con Agra, Nestle, Kraft, it goes on and on, For god sake Obama appointed a former Monsanto executive to be out Agricultural secretary...wake up!
06:46 AM on 04/05/2011
I read an article with this same information about the changes in the UK some time ago. It makes me so angry! America USED to be on the cutting edge of health, now we are on the cutting edge of lining the pockets of big corporations at the cost of our children's health. And sadly, parents just turn their head and keep giving in to the demands of the children who want "yum" instead of seeing what it's doing to their health. Education should be enough for us, but we choose to look the other way and shoot our own children in the foot because of pretty, LYING, advertisement from the companies that produce these foods. UGH! This just makes me so sad for the kids who have to pay for OUR (parents, government, corporations) stupid decisions!!
02:20 PM on 04/05/2011
Kelly, America is on the cutting edge of health in terms of technology. However, all these guys, the FDA, the health care system and the big corps are all in bed together. What I mean in that food manufacturing companies (and packaging companies, etc.) use chemicals in their products that get us (and more so our kids) sick. The health care system steps in and says, "we'll fix it", but of course you have to pay first (with your health and with your hard earned money). Meanwhile, the FDA is there as a supposed mediator, but really they just receive lobby money to turn a blind eye. For all of them it's all about $$$ and nothing but.
03:24 PM on 04/06/2011
Well said Kelly! Living in Germany for almost a year and eating food that is not genetically altered or filled with chemicals to give it a ridiculous shelf-life makes me so angry about the food we practically have no choice but to eat in the USA. I am doubly committed to buying from more farmer's markets and organics from independent grocery stores. I'm sick of corporate America making my food unfit to eat.
03:03 PM on 04/04/2011
Yet another outrageous example of toxic products being dumped on Americans. Kraft, Coca-cola and Wal-Mart should be publicly shamed for selling foods with hazardous chemicals here in America that they wouldn't dare use in other countries. The FDA should be shamed for acting as a marketing arm for the food industry rather than a watchdog for the public.

We see the same sad examples with FDA and the cosmetics industry, such as the recent scandal with Brazilian Blowout, the expensive hair straightening product advertised as "formaldehyde-free" that was found to contain high levels of formaldehyde. Despite bans in several countries, warnings from state governments, and even the cosmetics industry itself calling on FDA to intervene, FDA is dragging it's feet, "studying the matter." It took less than two weeks for Health Canada to conduct its own study and pull Brazilian Blowout from the shelves, and that was more than six months ago.
http://notjustaprettyface.org/

Once upon a time, FDA was the world's gold standard agency for protecting the public from dangerous products. These days the agency acts more like an apologist working to protect corporations from their own dumb decisions. Nobody wins in this equation. Thanks to Laurie David and Robyn O'Brien for exposing this double standard that we don't have to stand for. Just say no to buying food from these irresponsible companies.

Stacy Malkan
Campaign for Safe Cosmetics
Author of "Not Just a Pretty Face: The Ugly Side of the Beauty Industry"
01:33 PM on 04/05/2011
You're not going to get anywhere with that kind of attitude. If you want change in the world, then live it--and be an example. Don't scare people into doing what you think they should be doing.
10:50 PM on 04/07/2011
Stacy Malkin doesn't know of any other approach but deceptive tactics and distortion of science she can't understand, or hopes those who don't understand simply won't know any better. I agree with you, Alzbeta, that this is an important conversation. Making food better and cessation of subsidies for food of little nutritious value is the tip of the iceberg. However, these ridiculous and hyperbolic articles by supposed specialists simply stoke fear, rather than provide solutions.
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
09:39 AM on 04/04/2011
We need to bring back the Delaney Clause and enforce it.
09:24 PM on 04/03/2011
On a related issue; OSHA only has enough inspectors to VISIT every business in America that needs inspection once every 140 years.

... and that's BEFORE the Republicans get their cleavers our and defund it 40%.

Now, this will actually cause more expense -- due to liability lawsuits, but if they can couple this with Torte reform, lopping an arm off at the chicken processing plant shouldn't cost a company any more than the $250 fine for a mining operation NOT to have an air mask available.
photo
Decorina
Hypocrisy means your karma ran over your dogma
08:33 PM on 04/03/2011
Oh please. The FDA has been deregulated like everything else. Their job is to maximize profits of Big Ag and nothing more. Please try to keep up. You are just going to have to do the job yourselves as parents without the big bad gummint.
09:21 PM on 04/03/2011
So the Capitalists, will be buying shares of home testing kits!

Led testing kits will rise to $200 a pop.

For everyone to be self-sufficient and not have "big gummit" involved, I think we all need bulldozers, enough tar for 3 miles of road, chicken wire, chickens, goats, nuclear generator (aren't they cheap and efficient -- without dang Greenpeace in the way -- safer and more powerful now), home schooling, home doctor kit (don't just PLAY Doctor -- become a pro) with 5 hamsters to practice your skill, home Tsunami warning, air raid siren, green house, distillation pond (for that safe water), air sealed dome (to keep your air fresh and not piggy-back on the clean air needed for industry), wood mill, computer training lab, smelter, iron-works shop, ... and I'm sure I'm leaving so many things out, because I've become a dependent worm who fell in love with Big Gummint'.
/sarcasm

>> The only thing we DON'T need is our own military force. Obviously, Big Gummit is NOT the military.
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
08:09 PM on 04/03/2011
The FDA serves to protect food and drug corporations. thats what that supply side stuff is all about.