EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Lee Stranahan

Lee Stranahan

Posted: August 6, 2008 02:15 PM

John Edwards Needs To Stop Taking The Fall!


?>

Crossposted at My Left Wing

I've been looking into the John Edwards affair scandal for a couple of weeks now since I wrote my initial piece about it - Say It Ain't So, John. The well known blog Daily Kos brilliantly answered charges that there's liberal bias on the Edwards affair by banning me for discussing it.

I've tried to weigh evidence on this subject. There isn't much thats one hundred percent certain in this case. I tried to restrict myself to ONLY what we know for sure, I've come to one clear and inarguable conclusion.

John Edwards needs to stop being victimized by his former employees Andrew Young and Rielle Hunter.

Let's take the Edwards camp at their word on this scandal and see where that takes us.

One of the few things beyond dispute is that Hunter and Young both claim that they are the parents of young Francis Quinn Hunter, born this past February. Young is a former assistant to Edwards and Hunter was hired by the Edwards campaign to produce some short films about John Edwards. Andrew Young is married and has children. Along the way -- and during the campaign - it seems that they began having an affair that resulted in Ms. Hunter's pregnancy. Around the same time, a horrible rumor surfaced that it was Senator Edwards who was having the affair.

Obviously, it was the affair between Young and Hunter that caused this entire mess. If this is all true, then their affair set off a chain reaction that ended with an innocent man being accused falsely.

Yes, they are private citizens. Please note I'm not judging their affair or wanting to peer into their private lives. My concern is practical -- the unintended consequence of their romance was to cause a kerfluffle that smeared their boss, John Edwards. Their affair created the rumors of the scandal and it's their responsibility to clear up the mess they made.

John Edwards has taken the fall for these two for far too long. It speaks volumes about Senator Edwards' character that he has suffered the slings and arrows of suspicion while Young and Hunter frolic safely behind the walls of a gated community in North Carolina or flaunt their illicit relationship in front of the good people of Santa Barbara. Now John Edwards is forced to flee press events and duck reporters. Beyond all that, there are reports (now with photos) that Senator Edwards took the time out of his busy schedule to meet with Ms. Hunter recently -- only to be thanked with MORE rumors. They say no good deed goes unpunished and once again Rielle Hunter did nothing to help clear up the confusion.

I say, "Enough, John! Hunter and Young don't deserve a friend like you and your family and supporters deserve better! So there!"

It's obvious they have no sympathy for the much-admired Elizabeth Edwards. How does they sleep at night knowing the pain that he must be subjecting the Edwards family to? Andrew Young could have been man enough to put his name on the birth certificate and they could certainly end this embarrassment by simply taking a DNA test to end all the silly speculation. Yet, they make cryptic statements through their lawyers while the brave Senator Edwards must face the press and public.

Do Hunter and Young not care about Edward's agenda, either? These selfish people seem to feel no qualms about creating a diversion from Senator Edward's important work.

When asked, Edwards dismissed this story as 'tabloid trash.' Wrong answer. The poor reporters at the National Enquirer were another of Hunter and Young's victims.

What I suggest Senator Edwards SHOULD have done is state, "You're confused. It wasn't me who had the affair with Ms. Hunter; it was Andrew Young. Both of them have already admitted it publicly. As the son of a mill worker, I tell you that if I had known that Mr. Young and Ms. Hunter would leave me hanging out to dry, I would have cut off our relationship with a eight and half inch compound miter saw. Instead, I have tried to shield them even at the expense of my own reputation. I have allowed these rumors about me to continue even though I knew the truth out of a misguided sense of loyalty to these people. So, with deep regret I must both renounce and reject my former friends and employees."

I await such statement from John Edwards. After all, he has nothing to hide.

Follow Lee Stranahan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Stranahan

Crossposted at My Left Wing I've been looking into the John Edwards affair scandal for a couple of weeks now since I wrote my initial piece about it - Say It Ain't So, John. The well known blog Dai...
Crossposted at My Left Wing I've been looking into the John Edwards affair scandal for a couple of weeks now since I wrote my initial piece about it - Say It Ain't So, John. The well known blog Dai...
 
  • Comments
  • 242
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
10:57 AM on 08/09/2008
As a progressiv­e Obama supporter I am concerned that this whole mess might remind regular American voters that our icons are thin.

We had the youngest, best looking batch of primary candidates­, great signs and slogans, and a strong anti-Repub­lican tide going for us.

Now our guy is vacationin­g, Hillary and Bill have hijacked the convention­, and Russia is taking over another country.

I say we send Barack over to talk with Putin. Putin will never resist the charm!
09:42 PM on 08/08/2008
Whoops.
06:05 PM on 08/08/2008
Good job, Lee.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TeriMcCarthy
05:58 PM on 08/08/2008
How depressing­. Well at least he isn't the nominee!
05:39 PM on 08/08/2008
Don't you just hate being right?
05:12 PM on 08/08/2008
Just popped by to see the flood of apologies for the abuse delivered upon Mr. Stranahan for his nerve in being right, & for pointing out the bleeding obvious in relation to this situation.

No, it's not as important as the Iraq War, or gas prices - but it was a perfectly reasonable story.

I fully expect to read slightly altered denials & 'it isn't important anyway,' & 'it's his private life,' all ignoring Edwards' own comments on the subject - but anyway - well done, Mr. Stranahan. You've been vindicated nicely, whether people want to admit it or not. (and as much as it pains me to add this, the Enquirer should get a bit of a nod, too.)
photo
RealityBaseCamp
My micro-bio did not meet someone's guidelines!
04:40 PM on 08/08/2008
Now that he's admitting the affair, but not paternity . . . Same thing I said about Bill C: His affairs are between the parties concerned, BUT they cast doubt on his judgment, especially when he was running for the highest office in the land. (I say this as somebody who backed Edward s until he dropped out, so yeah, I'm disappoint­ed in the guy to say the least)
04:03 PM on 08/08/2008
Apparently­, Ms. Hunter knew her way around the campaign trailer... errr ... trail.

Good job JE for owning up... First stand up thing I've seen from your camp in quite a while. I'm sure the public will forget as soon as the next politician slips... or by the end of the week... which ever comes first.
02:23 PM on 08/08/2008
Edwards is a lawyer and a good one. He knows how to use the media. The best response is no response and zero comments. No matter how many legs the story has it will be buried by more interestin­g events within days. Being defensive is like red meat to the carnivore press.
01:58 PM on 08/08/2008
All of this rumor endo! God don't any of y'all have anything else better to do. Leave the Senator alone, he is innocent until proven otherwise!
09:38 AM on 08/09/2008
Well I guess John Edwards is guilty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jacksonian
12:38 AM on 08/08/2008
Tha National Enquirer identifies the child here as a girl named, "Frances Quinn Hunter." You identify the child as a boy named, "Francis Quinn Hunter." Which is it?
08:31 PM on 08/07/2008
Edwards' answer simply smearing the National Enquirer wasn't just the wrong answer, Lee. It was a telling answer. Why would Edwards avoid the sad but exoneratin­g truth, when that supposed truth could also be used to show how the NE got the story wrong?

Could Edwards' anger at the NE for exposing his alleged infidelity have clouded his judgement- deluding him that he could avoid the issue entirely by simply smearing the source as not credible?
07:27 PM on 08/07/2008
Lee. What is your take since the NE has forced this into court where Johnny may have to testify under oath? I suspect you will indeed have the last laugh.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lee Stranahan
Filmmakers, Writer, Dessert Topping
11:17 AM on 08/08/2008
Well, it's not really a laugh. It's a situation that's going to remain difficult long after it fades from the headlines.

But I don't think we'll see Edwards testify; I think it will be resolved before that.
12:04 PM on 08/08/2008
I agree.

I think he will finally fess-up, ask forgivenes­s, seek counseling and drift away with hopes of coming back in the future....­he is young enough. ...the last thing he would want would another "Clinton" moment where he does the "It depends on what the meaning of is, is."
04:28 PM on 08/08/2008
say 'bingo', buddy...bu­t at least he didn't love her...
04:05 PM on 08/07/2008
"This is between Mr. Edwards and his family"

-Larry Craig's tapping foot.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
philinmedford
03:06 PM on 08/07/2008
just saw a breaking news story that Edwards might not speak at the convention because he won't address this issue.....­.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ohmercy
08:37 PM on 08/07/2008
you are kidding me!
If Obama and or the DNC throw Edwards under the bus over this pathetic piece of tabloid trash... EVEN if it were true I am done.
That is it.
Who are these people.
I;'m so sick of this mealy mouthed pretense of being "above sin"

Hellooooo

human beings here and none of our fricking buiness!

I will right Edwards in, seems he has more integrity and b alls than all the rest put together.
Screw em.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ohmercy
08:39 PM on 08/07/2008
OOPS.
I meant Write.

write edwards name in.