iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Leo W. Gerard

GET UPDATES FROM Leo W. Gerard
 

End the Delays Deadly to Workers

Posted: 04/23/2012 7:59 am

Wear black on Saturday. It is Workers' Memorial Day, a time devoted to commemorating those killed on the job.

A month later, on soldiers' Memorial Day, the nation will recognize those who sacrificed their lives for American ideals, for a nation's freedom. That ultimate gift is given in most cases valiantly and voluntarily. No one, however, volunteers to sacrifice their life for corporate profit. Every day in workplaces across this country, the lives of 12 workers are taken, not given.

The shield Congress erected in 1970 to protect workers -- the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) -- is mutilated from relentless attacks by corporations and their battering ram -- the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The delays in OSHA rule-making that corporate carping achieves cost workers their lives. Congress must intervene to restore OSHA's power to act swiftly.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) detailed the delays in a report issued last week titled, "Multiple Challenges Lengthen OSHA's Standard Setting." The GAO found it takes OSHA longer than seven years to issue a new standard. In one case, it was 19 years. And it's getting worse. It took 70 percent longer to finalize standards in the 1990s than it did in the 1980s, and another 30 percent longer in the 2000s.

The GAO determined that this was a result of increasing demands on OSHA. These occurred as corporations sued to stop enforcement and new mandates for review of proposed rules were stacked on top of existing ones. The GAO said defenders of the delays argue that the layers of obligations balance worker protections with employer costs.

So the very corporations and Chamber of Commerce that constantly deride government red tape demand it for this special case -- to delay implementation of rules to protect workers. And this is their justification: Corporate profits trump worker lives.

There's no doubt that the rules OSHA implements actually save lives. Members of my union, the United Steelworkers (USW), are alive today because of OSHA's lockout/tagout rule. The GAO noted this in its report.

The lockout/tagout standard, established in 1989, requires corporations to install devices and adopt procedures that prevent workers from accidently switching on big machines while co-workers are cleaning or repairing them. The GAO wrote about this rule:

"In a 2000 review, OSHA attributed a 55 percent reduction in machinery-related fatalities at 10 steel-producing companies between 1990 and 1997 to the provisions in this standard."

The quicker such a regulation is implemented, the more worker lives saved. But now, for OSHA, "quick" is anything less than seven years and nine months. For standards limiting exposure to some highly-toxic substances, including silica and beryllium, exposed workers have waited much longer than seven years. OSHA has been working on a silica standard for 15 years and a new beryllium standard for 12.

Beryllium is so dangerous that no safe level has ever been established. It causes a devastating lung disorder called chronic beryllium disease (CBD). It is so hazardous that office workers in factories where it's used and family members of workers who handle it can be struck down by tiny particles carried on shoes or pant cuffs. This year, my union and Materion Brush, the only U.S. producer of pure beryllium metal, recommended a new standard that is 90 percent lower than the current limit.

That, however, followed years of obstruction by industry officials. This is typical of corporations fighting standards that will save lives but cost money. They strangle proposed standards by suing and by entangling them in red tape. The lawsuits, the GAO report says, mean OSHA must provide extraordinary levels of proof. And the suits have restrained OSHA from using its full powers to protect workers.

For example, theoretically, OSHA has authority to issue emergency temporary standards. OSHA hasn't done that in 29 years, despite 23 requests from workers or health officials. That's because of industry lawsuits. In the 13 years from the agency's creation until 1984, OSHA used the authority nine times, but five of those orders were invalidated or frozen by industry lawsuits.

One of the nine was for asbestos. In 1983, OSHA issued an emergency temporary standard lowering the exposure limit for this cancer-causing material. Using mathematical projections from long-term epidemiological studies, OSHA estimated that the six-month-long emergency rule would prevent at least 80 eventual asbestos-related deaths.

The industry sued to stop implementation of the emergency standard, and a judge killed the OSHA effort. The court contended the agency's projection was inadequate to establish grave risk. And it said if OSHA intended to use such estimates, then a new standard based on them should not be enforced until after public notice and comment.

That would delay implementation of a lower exposure standard, which, when dealing with toxic substances like asbestos and beryllium, costs lives. But industry won. And who knows how many workers suffered early deaths across the country.

Last Workers' Memorial Day, Robert Stubblefield, 66, a member of my union, was killed on the job at Republic Special Metals in Ohio.

Over the next 12 months, 34 more Steelworkers died, one every 10 days. They made glass, tires, cement, aluminum and steel. They refined oil and mined potash, platinum and palladium. They logged forests and constructed earthmovers.

They produced the products that build North America. They should not die for that. No worker should die for a job.

Traditionally, Memorial Day is the first day of the season when women wear white -- white shoes, white purses, white hats.

On Workers Memorial Day, Saturday, April 28, wear black for the workers who perished on the job last year. Hold loved ones close and hope that the delays imposed on OSHA won't cause for another worker's family the suffering endured by Robert Stubblefield's widow, five children and nine grandchildren.

 

Follow Leo W. Gerard on Twitter: www.twitter.com/uswblogger

FOLLOW BUSINESS
Wear black on Saturday. It is Workers' Memorial Day, a time devoted to commemorating those killed on the job. A month later, on soldiers' Memorial Day, the nation will recognize those who sacrificed ...
Wear black on Saturday. It is Workers' Memorial Day, a time devoted to commemorating those killed on the job. A month later, on soldiers' Memorial Day, the nation will recognize those who sacrificed ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:35 PM on 04/24/2012
i work for a company 17years as a member of united steel work as a dues pay member local 842,1001.I became ill with colon cancer. call the usw benefit fund about pension benefits.the fund told me union dues a pension funds was missing so the was not going to pay.they call international fred norris ask him who was i working for.for five years the ask fred everytime he answer different.then the rep.fred norris sent a letter to the fund stating i was termnated 7.1.2001 but the letter was dated may 9, 2002 five month after the plant close/then he sent another letter dated oct .2004 three years after the plant close saying something different .he went an got a letter from a manager that was no longer work laimbeer pkg.sent it to the benefit fund staying a work for another company.my name is leon cole my store true all paper in black an white. The international should get all email an text between fred norris and the pension fund tomorrow i will be putting letter dates and time.
10:01 AM on 04/24/2012
I worked for OSHA, and I'm still in the safety business, and I don't see much value in letting OSHA loose to write more rules. The typical OSHA inspector just wants to meet his four nitpicky violations per inspection quota and move on to the next inspection without really looking at the real accident causes. There are plenty of up-to-date industry standards like NFPA and ANSI that they could use in enforcement, but OSHA inspectors are too lazy to do the extra paperwork, so they ignore many accepted industry safety requirements. OSHA should start citing everything "general duty clause" using industry standards as references and get rid of their whole rule book.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Briteleaf
03:55 PM on 04/23/2012
As long as corporate campaign donations rule the professional politicians we have in congress, the only people who care about working people are WORKING PEOPLE.! The only lobbying power working people have are the unions that corporate lobbyists have worked so hard to get congress to destroy. It's both less expensive and more profitable for corporations to manipulate congress with money and delay repairs/reparations with law suits than it is to meet our nations standards for our environment.
01:14 PM on 04/23/2012
Robert Stubblefield had a heart attack - hard to do an OSHA rule on that one. Look it up.
12:29 PM on 04/23/2012
Money is more important than lives to corporations who intentionally, knowingly, negligently and willfully kill their workers, and they are guilty of homicide. The relationship between corporations and their regulators is corrupt. CEOs and inspectors are not prosecuted for their homicides, but just cited and/or fined. Nothing has changed as of this writing.

Why probably has something to do with the responsible legislators being irresponsible, abdicating their obligations because of the money they receive. Jack Abramoff, the former Washington, D.C. lobbyist, once boasted, “I owned one hundred members of Congress.” Who owns them now?

Former United States Secretary of Energy, Bill Richardson, said in 2000, “Priority one was production of nuclear weapons . . . [the] last priority was the safety and health of the workers that build these weapons.” Bracket is mine.

The following were all workplace explosions. Seven workers died at the Tesoro refinery in Washington, Twenty-nine in Upper Big Branch coal mine owned by Massey Energy in West Virginia, and BP killed eleven on the Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico, all of these within eighteen days.

Regarding the workplace explosions and industrial homicides, Jane F. Barrett, an associate professor of law at the University of Maryland School of Law, said, “In all of these cases, safety procedures were bypassed or standard operating procedures were ignored due to pressures on plant personnel to save time and/;or money.” Nothing has changed as of this writing — why?
01:29 PM on 04/23/2012
Why would a corporation want to kill its employees? It costs $$$ to hire and train these people. Your argument lacks logic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftsideRebelYell
The wrench in social media
03:17 PM on 04/23/2012
Really? Show me where a non union house requires training! You should really get out and stop watching faux.
05:47 PM on 04/23/2012
If you have been living in a vacuum in a cave or did not read the article, you would know the reason is money. It costs more money to implement the safety requirements than it does to hire new workers.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
stack
USW Blogger
11:22 AM on 04/23/2012
Another way industry delays rules and harms workers: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/23/opinion/do-you-know-your-rights.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20120423
11:20 AM on 04/23/2012
American workers - I take that back - workers not only in America, but also everywhere else in the world, have one basic right: to put in a honest day's work and to get an honest day's pay - without getting murdered on the job.

The Chamber of Commerce and the GOP wants to deny American workers that basic human right. And to think, these guys call themselves patriotic Americans.

American workers, whether unionized or not, need to understand that this election is about them. If they vote GOP, they are giving their employers a license to kill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rbelmonte
always grateful
08:49 AM on 04/24/2012
Point well made...all workers need protection from corporation unwilling to adhere to safety regulations for profits sake. See link for the water pollution in China.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/23/china-water-pollution-fashion-textile-factories_n_1445766.html?ref=topbar
photo
BigBearcatBill
This is the real Bearcat - a Binturong
10:32 AM on 04/23/2012
We hear the rhetoric from the far right and rich conservatives all the time complaining that we have too much safety regulation and it keeps them from bringing business back into America. I think they should appreciate two things. One is the new group of young safety professionals are ones that have been raised in and appreciate the tecnology age, they like their computers and videos and stereos and cars, they are not hoping to be so tough they regulate business out of America and put us in a caveman era. The other is to look at other similar countries that regulate safety similar like Canada, Japan, Britain, Germany, etc. and determine if our OSHA and other agencies are significantly tougher than those are on their industries. I think we will find we are similar to those in effort and laws. Next is to look at the big business CEOs and republicans and ask - Do you want us to have a safety system setup like these countries or to lower it to standards of China, Mexico, and the third world countries you keep moving factories to?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Earl Gray
Lighting up straw men everywhere
12:22 PM on 04/23/2012
The way to stabilize American manufacturing isn't, as the GOP would have you believe, to lower our standards to those of the third world, it's to demand that anything SOLD in this country must be made to OUR standards for environmental and worker safety.

No more 16 hour days to earn enough to feed oneself. No more standing ankle deep in pools of mercury or benzine or whatever. No more treating workers like consumable drill bits to be dulled or broken and cast aside for the next one.

If we do that one thing - enforce our standards of manufacture for all goods sold here - we will level the plating field and significantly improve our nation's strength and prosperity.
photo
BigBearcatBill
This is the real Bearcat - a Binturong
01:19 PM on 04/23/2012
I agree it is either Tariff time to jack up the prices of those foreign goods to prices that they would charge if they treated their people and environment decent in China, etc. then we will have real "competition" at least FAIR competition to see which country can deliver the best for the least and the most "green" and humane. Time for Government to have Showdown with big business and expose that we have become addicted to other countries polluting and injuring their workers so we can get a bunch Toys and now necessaties that we don't make here anymore. I guess to put it an old fashioned term - our Big Businesses /owners/CEOs have becom International Carpetbaggers making a quick buck by taking advantage of other populations and destroying ours at the same time to make themselves richer quicker as they make us get in more debt giving 20% interest credit cards to workers who had good jobs and now flip burgers, etc. at minimum wage.
04:32 PM on 04/24/2012
Actually I think our regulation is much lighter than the rest of the civilized world. I think OSHA could do a much better job than they are now doing, but the system OSHA uses is a bit of a mess, and so they cause a lot of grief. OSHA's management encourages nitpicking by the book, and the book has nothing to do with the things that get people hurt or killed on the job.

What are the top workplace injuries? Back strains and repetitive motion. OSHA inspectors could write citations when they observe exposures to these hazards (like I did back in the early 1990's), but the inspectors mostly refuse to do the extra paperwork to go outside the rule book.

What are the top fatalities? Vehicle accidents and workplace violence. Again, OSHA has no rules on either area, so OSHA inspectors would rather check your fire extinguishers for inspection tags. And what's the subject OSHA officials keep bringing up in their speeches? Do you think it's vehicle accidents, back strains and workplace violence? NOPE. They like to talk about safety incentive programs and how they encourage workers to not report their injuries. Never mind that safety incentive programs are quickly becoming extinct because everybody knows they don't work. But that's our OSHA.
09:21 AM on 04/23/2012
You can thank President Nixon for implementing OSHA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawTalkingGuy
Rational human male.
10:55 AM on 04/23/2012
It doesn't matter who did it.

What matters is that it's important and we need to support it.

If you earn a wage, join a union.
01:31 PM on 04/23/2012
Unions belong back in the Medieval Age....
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
stack
USW Blogger
11:23 AM on 04/23/2012
Yes, Nixon would never get elected by Republicans today. Too liberal.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
stack
USW Blogger
09:16 AM on 04/23/2012
OSHA delays kill.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kdraper
Extremely happy
09:07 AM on 04/23/2012
Because of the unemployment problem, safety factors in a job are being removed so companies can better compete they say. These safety rules stand in the way of their profit margin. My neighbor just lost all the fingers on his right hand in an industrial accident. How does that even happen today? I'm thankful that my occupation was Union and we made safety our major concern. Today, if you complain about safety, you go down the road kicking cans. No one is there to help against an unsafe employer anymore. Damn those union bosses, right!