iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Leo W. Gerard

Leo W. Gerard

Posted February 6, 2009 | 03:48 PM (EST)

TARP is Welfare; Control It


A decade or so ago, some states gave welfare recipients food stamp debit cards. Welfare mothers could use them to buy groceries with plastic, just like virtually everybody else in the check out line. Plastic made accounting easier for clerks because the debit cards failed to function for excluded items like cigarettes and alcohol.

That's what America needs for Wall Street. When bankers get money from the $700 billion bailout called Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), they should receive it on plastic. A TARP debit card would restrict bankers' spending. TARP plastic would fail to function if bankers tried to use it for excluded items like $18 billion in year-end bonuses, private French-manufactured jets and $35,000 inoperative toilets.

TARP debit cards are required because Wall Street's wizards of finance have shown repeatedly they can't or won't control their own spending.

These are the guys who bankrupted their own financial institutions with unrestrained risk-taking. Then they went bawling to Congress for a bailout that was supposed to free up credit for the rest of the country. Not true to their word, the bankers didn't extend credit, and businesses and municipal governments across the nation suffered the ugly consequences: that being, of course, unemployment. In the last quarter of 2008, more than 1.5 million Americans lost their jobs -- the highest number in more than a quarter century.

Still, after causing all that devastation, and asking those same Americans to clean it up, Wall Street's bankers don't understand that they are on the dole. They've behaved as if their banks made profits, as if they had a credit card, not a big fat IOU to the American public.

Let's start with the bonuses. The very financial institutions that already have taken $350 billion in taxpayer dollars to prevent their collapse turned around and gave away more than $18 billion in bonuses to employees. The average bonus was $112,000.

By contrast, the Social Security Administration reported that in 2006, the most recent year for which it has statistics, the average non-Wall Street American's wages for an entire year's work totaled $37,078.

Still, the Wall Streeters pouted about their bonuses. Of 900 surveyed by eFinancialCareers.com, a job search Web site, 46 percent said they thought they deserved more.

And no wonder. Look what their bosses get. The financial services industry pays its CEOs more than any other, an average of nearly $19 million in 2007, according to a study by Lawrence Mishel, president of the Economic Policy Institute. Think about 2007. That was one year before Wall Street crashed, taking the country down with it. And its CEOs were making $19 million while overseeing the bankrupting of the system.

The bankers are all claiming none of those bonus bucks they paid out at year's end came from their TARP funds. But let's look at it this way. Lehman Brothers didn't get a TARP bailout. It failed in September, and its workers left the building with their belongings in boxes. None got a year-end bonus. If the U.S. taxpayers had permitted any one of the institutions that got tens of billions in TARP money to go bankrupt, their workers would be in the same shape as Lehman's -- carrying cardboard boxes not big fat bonus checks.

Of course, there's also the in-your-face bonus behavior of John A. Thain, the former Merrill Lynch chief executive who spent $1.2 million renovating his personal office including that just-for-show toilet and a $1,400 trash can. Thain decided to hand out between $3 and $4 billion in bonuses while Bank of America was struggling to take over the failing Merrill with the help of billions in TARP welfare.

Thain tried to defend the bonuses by saying they are an essential tool banks use to keep their best people. Jon Stewart, host of "The Daily Show," provided the only reasonable response to this assertion: "You don't have 'best people!' You lost $27 billion! Do you live in Bizarro World?"

Yes. Yes, he does. This is a guy who asked the Bank of America board to give him a $10 million bonus in December after Merrill, the company he directed, lost $15 billion that quarter -- for a grand total of $27 billion in one the year.

Though Bank of America originally received $25 billion in TARP welfare, after Thane's third quarter losses, it had to return to the taxpayers of America for $118 billion in government loan guarantees and an additional $20 billion in TARP welfare to complete the purchase of Merrill.

Bizarro World is right.

John A. Thain and his ilk, who blithely spend more on decorative toilets for their offices than middle class families can scrape together for a year of college tuition, need a rude awakening.

More than just the debit card, these guys ought to experience the humiliation of standing in a welfare line.

For some reason, when bankers get in trouble, the treasury secretary and the chairman of the Security and Exchange Commission have been running up to New York to huddle in weekend-long secret meetings in those fancy Wall Street offices with decorative toilets to solve their problems by handing them billions in taxpayer money.

No wonder those bankers act so entitled.

Let them drag their sorry lack-of-assets down to Washington, D.C. and stand in line and beg for taxpayer bucks in tawdry public offices like other welfare recipients must do.

When and if they qualify, hand them TARP debit cards that forbid expenditures on bonuses and $1.2 million office renovations for CEOs. Go ahead with President Obama's plan to limit to $500,000 the salaries of CEOs who receive TARP welfare, but make sure that those wise guys can't find sneaky ways to circumvent those restrictions with bonuses that come in the form of restricted stock, for example. Otherwise, CEOs will just be buying cigarettes with their taxpayer-funded TARP debit cards.

And then taxpayers, who despise the notion of welfare queens, will demand Congress "discredit" and dethrone the kings of Wall Street.



A decade or so ago, some states gave welfare recipients food stamp debit cards. Welfare mothers could use them to buy groceries with plastic, just like virtually everybody else in the check out line. ...
A decade or so ago, some states gave welfare recipients food stamp debit cards. Welfare mothers could use them to buy groceries with plastic, just like virtually everybody else in the check out line. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:47 PM on 02/09/2009
TARP was accurately named.

TARP is a tarp thrown of a 600 Trillion dollar Derivative debt.

Don't look under that tarp,

The Banks cannot be saved with money.

Only regulation of the banks,

and Investment in Americans,

can save the Banks, Wall street, The economy, and the country.

Hoover bailed out the banks causing the depression, Japan too, causing a 10 year depression.

FDR closed the banks for an audit, reorganized the monetary system, and put in place strict regulation and oversight of Wall street.
09:32 AM on 02/09/2009
It most certainly is welfare when these people can run their businesses into the ground and then get to keep their jobs on top of getting sweetheart deals from the government with no oversight from the Bush admin. The finance minister of France demanded the resignation of senior officers of the bank they rescued as part of the deal to rescue it. Why did we not do this? Oh, maybe because these people pour millions of dollars into republican re-elections so they can continue to do business unregulated. If my small business gets driven into the ground simply because no one has money to spend on my goods and services, where's my bailout? Where's my sweetheart loan deal? NOWHERE to be found because the banks who are supposed to lend have now tightened requirements so much that even a well run otherwise profitable business at the mercy of the economy is not good enough for a loan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamie461
04:34 PM on 02/08/2009
I have to state for the record that TARP is NOT "welfare." TARP funds are not "free money." The banks that have received TARP funds have issued the federal government preferred stock in return. The banks also have to pay a 5% premium (interest) on that money as long as the loan (and that's what it is -- a LOAN) is outstanding. That 5% is for the first three years. If the money is not repaid in full within that time period, then interest rate rises to 9%. This is, believe it or not, a PROFITABLE deal for the taxpayers. Where can anyone in the private sector legally invest money and get a guaranteed 5% return these days?? And even in a worst case scenario -- a bank failure -- the bank still has assets, and the first to be paid out of those assets will be the federal government, ahead of common stockholders.

The banks who took TARP funds are additionally seeing downward pressure on their stock prices, which is hitting senior executives and other employees hard. So there is a great deal of incentive for the banks to repay the money as quickly as possible.

I am horrified by the excesses of Wall Street also. There were plenty of greedy people making money in very shady ways, particularly in the investment banks. More regulation is coming, and is necessary. But it's time to stop labeling TARP as "welfare" or "free money," when it most definitely is NOT.
02:56 PM on 02/09/2009
Agree with your assessment, however, I think a distinction should be made between troubled banks those acquiring troubled banks. Citi, AIG, Merrill, WAMU, etc. all failed to execute a sound business plan and needed to be bailed out or went bankrupt. These shareholders should get nothing until the government is paid back.

The institutions buying these troubled assets, such as BofA buying Merrill and Countrywide, JP Morgan Chase buying Bear Stearns and WAMU, Wells Fargo buying Wachovia, deserve a different look. If not for the acquisition by these institutions, all of the losses would be on the governments dime and would be significantly higher than the TARP monies provided for liquidity. The companies would fold, like Lehman, exasperating an already difficult economic environment.

Let's focus on the real issues and real solutions and stop the name calling and pettiness.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
breakingpoint
War is a Racket - Smedley Butler
03:06 PM on 02/08/2009
It has never been more clear how much corporations depend on We, the People for their very existence. Corporations are given the right to exist through a public charter. For public corporations, shareholders are bestowed with limited liability, and they benefit from a public system of securities regulation that gives investors confidence to invest. In the best of times, corporations benefit both from public goods (public roads and infrastructure, public investment in R&D) and targeted benefits (tax subsidies, loan guarantees, and much more). In the worst of times, as we now see, the largest corporations can expect massive public support. Bloomberg reports that the United States has already committed an amazing $7.76 trillion -- more than half of U.S. GDP -- in funds for bailouts, guarantees, share purchases, insurance programs, swaps and more.

Don't We, the People have the right to expect something in return?

How about starting with public release of the income tax returns of all corporations above a certain size (say, $10 million in assets)?

more...
12:53 PM on 02/08/2009
There’s something that’s been missing from all of these government programs to revive the financial system. All the while the polite talk has described the problems as “toxic securities”, “illiquid assets” or “troubled assets”. How about we call them what they are: securities containing fraudulently written mortgages, with fraudulently assigned bond ratings, misrepresented by financial institutions in a conspiracy to defraud their customers that they couldn’t unload.

Now that we have identified the problem we can deal with it in an organized fashion. Instead of “cash for trash” we should be talking about “indictments for felons”. Yes, every mortgage broker who wrote a liar loan, his manager, all the appraisers who worked with real estate agents to falsify home values, the institutions and those within them that knowingly bought these mortgages, bundled them into securities and coerced the ratings agencies to slap AAA ratings on these junk bonds and then sold them as the real deal instead of the c.rap that they were. How many thousands of indictments are going begging while the whole steaming pile is being glossed over by everyone from the Wall Street executives and Treasury Secretaries to Bush and now Obama?
09:47 AM on 02/09/2009
Excellent suggestions. I've yet to see Washington address any of the issues you outline.
11:54 AM on 02/09/2009
Bravo. We are still a long way from accountability--literally and figuratively.
10:28 AM on 02/08/2009
Jack Welch on his recent interview on CNN informed Americans who watched before & after Superbawl Extravaganza that what we perceive as a Lavish Lifestyle (even if you pay for it by your own money) ia actually Marketing, Business Promotion and Hard Work of Bankers to save us from Collapse!!!
Insanity of this people is still tolerated.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terramartom
Grapes of Wrath!
08:50 AM on 02/08/2009
Congress, the Senate and Bush are to blame for giving away $350 BILLION of taxpayers money so that we accumulate another Trillion in debt. Add $13 Billion each month for Iraq and Afghanistan. These politicians are cowards, traitors, and old fashioned, brown nosing, spineless maggets!
Globalization has ruined the USA, and taken us off the perverbial cliff. In order to sell products, Multi National companies have destroyed the quality of life for 10' s of millions of Americans for cheap labor in other countries!
03:31 PM on 02/08/2009
No.

Paulsen. Bush. Bernanke are to blame.

Paulsen promised to use the money for mortgage relief as Congress stipulated.

He. LIED>
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamie461
04:37 PM on 02/08/2009
They didn't "give it away." It is not "debt." It is a loan to be paid back, with interest. The media has done a HORRIBLE job of reporting on TARP, and people have been completely misled about the terms under which the banks received that money. The federal government has preferred stock in exchange for the TARP funds, AND the banks must pay 5% annual interest on the money for the first three years. The expectation is that the funds will be repaid in full during that time frame. If not, the interest rate rises to 9%. This is NOT "free money." Not by a long shot.
11:30 PM on 02/07/2009
Let the banks that gambled and lost fail. No bailout, no bonuses, no corporate welfare! I don't "bank" at Goldman, or Morgan or any of the other Wall Street Gambling houses, and the people who did for the most part can afford to take the loss.

Take the socalled bailout money and Loan it to the banks that didn't gamble, that are sound and well run. Demand to see their books, just like FDR did, and then Loan it at reasonable interest, with strict rules on how it should be repaid and used to stimulate the economy, and then make sure that money gets into the hands of Middle Class America which has always done all the heavy lifting when it comes to making this country powerful.

Let the rich eat each other. For once let's save ourselves.
12:04 AM on 02/08/2009
Amen. We Americans are becoming a nation of stupified cattle, LETTING Pelosi, Reid, Hoyer, Rockefeller, Schumer, Biden, Feinstein, Lieberman (and now Obama) hand OUR CASH over to these fraudsters - WITHOUT A LICK of oversight!

Hell, Bush and Cheney had to WORK HARD, FOR EIGHT long YEARS, to DEFRAUD Ameriacan taxpayers out of a few trillions of dollars.... Reid, Pelosi, & crew are HANDING THAT MUCH OUT, IN THE PAST THREE MONTHS, ALONE !!

Btw. the ROCKEFELLERS are SYNONYMOUS with CHASE-MANHATTEN bank, now JPMorgan-Chase.

If that doesn't indicate a teeny, tinny CONFLICT OF INTEREST........ well, duh
12:16 AM on 02/08/2009
Pelosi et al. did NOT hand over money - they set tight guidelines through Barney Frank and Chris Dodd - only to see Paulson TOTALLY IGNORE all the directives. That is why having them GONE was essential. This previous administration was the most lawless perhaps EVER, making even the WH plumbers under Nixon look like imps by comparison. John Dean has written several books on this - but the final chapter on Paulson's mind-boggling dismissal of Congressional directives has yet to be written. It may not be criminal per se, but it's the largest theft of public TRUST and therefore resources perhaps ever. Paulson makes Madoff look good.
photo
Kassandra
Your micro-bio is empty
03:00 PM on 02/07/2009
Come on1. I think it was an across the country, multi partisan shout out of "NO!" to the bank bailout and they did it anyway. They don't listen to US. And now the Obama admin is going to reap eat the pattern with the banks getting exactly what they want and the "stimulus" watered down with the Republicans' desire for tax cuts for their friends, the corporations.

So much for "hope".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
REinsider
01:56 AM on 02/09/2009
You are correct, WE THE PEOPLE called, wrote, emailed 400 to 1 "NO" on the bank and Wall Street "bailout". They didn't listened. They are bought and PAID FOR by the banks and Wall Street. The US Treasury Department is (and has been) run by Goldman Sachs. THIS should be headline news, but the MSN is bought and paid for as well. I call it the "CON" (Corporate Owned News). And so was the "bailout". Just Round One of the Grand CON.
12:53 PM on 02/07/2009
It's this simple:

Not only is controlling exec pay a matter of fairness, it's also a matter of motivation.

If the bank execs on the dole have their pay limited, they will be extremely motivated to get in the black, pay off the gov't debt, and move on.
outnow
Ban the bomb
10:43 AM on 02/07/2009
The elite waged class warfare against the rest of us. The profits were taken where possible and the losses were socialized. Getting rid of the Fed would represent a return to American principles as stated in our Constitution. Now realing from their own gambling losses the expect us to enslave our childrenh and grandchildren with their debts. The facts about their income levels compared to working people speaks volumes about their concept of democracy - he who has the gold rules.


Let's throw the money changers out of the Temple they created for themselves by a show of solidarity for the workers of the world. Following the money into political coffers will reveal who benefits from the product of think tanks and the titans of corporate finace and banking who helped create the fascist movement in the Thirties. These same interest are at work today to limit real wages for workers and control the panets resources. Their interests span the globe and their allegance is to themselves.
12:19 AM on 02/08/2009
Totally agree with the first paragraph. Problem with the second? They weren't IN the temple but out on the street.

Bottom line - all our corporate actions from finance to international trade, demand good regulation so that we can restore consideration for human beings who live in the US and the rest of the world and NOT just the bottom line. That requires not just good will but major law reform since, brick by brick, statute by statute, these evildoers have altered our federal codes in their own interests. David Cay Johnson's "Free Lunch" shows how they did it. NOW - we can change the law. Keep the pressure up on each and every Congress person and Senator. NOW.
tonybfine
fractional reserve lending is counterfeiting
03:40 AM on 02/07/2009
Liked your post. I think that's how most of us feel. I don't think any of this welfare program will even work. Use the money for a further job stimulus. Let the market take care of its own. Is anybody bailing out folks 401-Ks ? No, we don't really expect that. The stock market has risks and ups and downs. So do the credit markets. Why do they get bailed out, these fat cats in fairyland. If corporations and these CEO's paid fair amounts of taxes I might have more sympathy but something like 55% of corporations pay no taxes at all. And I agree with the Netflix CEO - tax the egregiously rich more. Right now the ordinary folks pay a disproportionate amount of taxes and here they are using the money for welfare for the guys who don't pay their share. The rich get richer, the poor get screwed every time.
01:12 AM on 02/07/2009
Food Stamps. The bankers just need some food stamps.

Anything more will make them lazy.
11:46 PM on 02/06/2009
FDR the Banks!

he shut em down for a week to force an audit.

It will be necessarily.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cavegal
The Revolution Will Not Be Privatized
06:49 PM on 02/06/2009
The best incentive for the American people is to pull their money out of all of these large banks and go for smaller local or state financial institutions. This fiscal slide will continue until the consumer decides he no longer would like to get ripped off. That and refusing to send a check come tax time if you owe. Let the top 10% carry the government debt, after all they are spending our tax money to lobby them.

Financial institutions that give out ridiculously high bonuses when they have lost money are more than proving they do not deserve to be in business. Americans who continue to place their money in these banks are idiots and have no right to complain because they are inadvertently condoning this entitlement and ripoff behavior.