iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Leo W. Gerard

GET UPDATES FROM Leo W. Gerard
 

Killing Democracy One Vote at a Time

Posted: 04/30/2012 8:22 am

Corporations, 1 percenters and Republicans want to take America back. And by that, they mean all the way to the 1780s when wealthy white men controlled the nation.

Because only they could vote.

In the intervening 230 or so years, America became increasingly democratic, eventually awarding the vote to white landless males; Quakers, Jews and Catholics; black men; women; Native Americans, and 18-year-olds.

The wealthy are nostalgic for the power they enjoyed when most states limited voting to landed gentry. Republicans are helping them return America to those plutocratic days by passing voter identification laws constraining suffrage by the 99 percent. Country club conservatives are converting voting from a universal right of citizenship to a privilege exclusive to select society members.

Voter identification laws require citizens to provide specific documents before exercising their franchise. Depending on the state, these include a photo driver's license, a passport or a permit to carry a concealed handgun. The Brennan Center for Justice and others have calculated that 11 percent of eligible voters do not have government-issued photo identification. That's 21 million citizens.

A survey by the Brennan Center showed that many Americans, primarily women, do not have proof of citizenship under their current name and certain groups, primarily the poor, elderly and minorities are less likely to possess the documents the new voter ID laws require.

The U.S. Department of Justice barred implementation of voter ID laws in Texas and South Carolina after determining that the restrictions would disproportionately limit minority citizens' access to the polls. Texas and South Carolina are among 16 states with records of discrimination, including voter intimidation and poll taxes. As a result, they are required by the 1965 Voting Rights Act to secure federal approval before changing voting laws.

In March, a court in Wisconsin declared the Badger State's voter ID law unconstitutional. And the American Civil Liberties Union plans to ask a Pennsylvania court this week to do the same in the Keystone State.

But not all such suits are successful. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Indiana's restrictive voter ID law in 2008. And last year a nearly unanimous Georgia Supreme Court endorsed its voter limitations. Every judge except the first African-American to sit on the Georgia Supreme Court bench approved restricting access to the polls. Thirty states will require voters to show identification in November, unless their laws are overturned.

Limiting voter access to the polls is a Republican cause. In 2011 and so far in 2012, nine states passed new or stiffened old voter ID laws. Republican governors preside over all nine states. And in all but one, Republicans completely control the legislatures. Five other states with Republican-controlled legislatures passed voter ID bills last year. These will not take effect, however, because five Democratic governors vetoed them.

Behind every voter-restricting Republican is corporate-sponsored ALEC. ALEC is the American Legislative Exchange Council, a right-wing group that sends conservative lawmakers on all-expenses-paid junkets where they are wined and dined on ALEC corporate sponsors' dime while they develop "model" legislation, like the kill-at-will laws that the slaying of Trayvon Martin made infamous.

ALEC gives corporations veto power over proposed "model" legislation, a fact that clearly illustrates who is in charge -- the corporations that provide 98 percent of ALEC's $7 million annual budget.

Corporations embrace voter ID because democracy is downright annoying to them. The Supreme Court has deemed corporations to be people, which allows them to secretly spend unlimited money on political campaigns. But that doesn't assure victory for candidates that corporations choose because corporations don't have the right to actually make the choice -- to vote.

The best corporations can do is limit balloting by those likely to vote against corporate-sponsored candidates. That would be voters who historically have favored Democrats.

Voter ID laws disproportionately disenfranchise those voters ­-- the poor, minorities and those who actually recall the progressive, popular and successful administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt. The Republican backers of voter ID are completely unconcerned that the laws subjugate these citizens.

Too bad, they say, for grandma, who has voted in every election for the past 65 years but doesn't have a driver's license anymore and because she was born at home does not have a birth certificate necessary to get a government-issued photo ID.

Too bad, Republicans say, for the student whose driver's license address differs from his university address and whose college photo ID does not have an expiration date.

Too bad, the GOP says, for the urban single mother who does not have a driver's license or the time or money to apply for a birth certificate with a raised seal required to apply at another office for a state identification card.

Voter ID restrictions work for the rich. They've got birth certificates and photo driver's licenses and passports. Or they can send a servant or secretary to apply for the documents. And the more rabble removed from the polls, the more weighty the votes of the wealthy.

In the Halcyon Days of democracy, the unwashed masses were actually urged to vote with slogans like: "If you don't vote, you don't count."

Now corporations, 1 percenters and Republicans are working to ensure you don't vote because they honestly believe you don't count.

 

Follow Leo W. Gerard on Twitter: www.twitter.com/uswblogger

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 910
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:36 PM on 05/27/2012
Republicans are waging war on democracy itself.
08:46 PM on 05/07/2012
The only reason Democrats don't want voter ID is to make it easier to falsify voting - period. It has nothing to do with the poor, immigrants, etc. It's simply to make it easier to cheat, which is the only way Dems can win.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amy Pappalardo
Peddle lies somewhere else. We are full up here
08:04 PM on 05/13/2012
Pr we could do what the repugs did-get the corrupt Supreme Court to appoint who we want despite the vote totals.

Yeah-we havent forgot that.

Get a grip.
overcat
My micro-bio is so full, it's bursting at the seam
12:15 AM on 05/15/2012
Well that's a neat little opinion you have there. Please, cite some recent examples of Democrats being elected to office as a result of proven voter fraud. The key word being "proven" - as in the election was nullified due to fraud.
11:10 PM on 05/03/2012
I detect a strong note of cynacism in the writing of Leo W.Gerard.
There are, and there will be at the time of the election in November, multiple ways in which a citizen can obtain a voter's I. D. They can even be driven to the site for free and be helped by members of either party to assist them in all the necessary docs needed to vote. No need to be high class, rich, or even middle-class. We'll get you there, and we'll make sure that you have proper voter's I. D. All you do is VOTE.
11:19 AM on 05/02/2012
Don't you need I.D. to cash checks, get a job, buy tabacco and alcohol? Every job I have had in this country I have had to show some form of I.D. I am not one to get involved in politics but I am not quite sure why requiring I.D, is such an issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sfsmurf
proud San Francisco progressive
10:37 PM on 05/02/2012
I haven't cashed a check in years (do all my banking at the ATM), and nobody asks me for I.D. when I buy alcohol (which I frequently do) or buy cigarettes (which I only do when someone asks me to pick them up for them). Do not make assumptions about other people's lives.
10:39 AM on 05/03/2012
I am not making assumptions about people's lives. But there are many things you need an I.D. for: to get a job, to rent or buy a house, to get car insurance, and even to get government benefits. I am just trying to figure out how people are living in this country without I.D.s. It really seems like some people are making a bigger issue about this I,D. thing than it deserves. But, yea, it is just my opinion.
03:46 AM on 05/02/2012
Wait a minute, Mr. Gerard. This statement in your diatribe is nonsense: "Or they can send a servant or secretary to apply for the documents." If they don't have a birth certificate, a passport or a drivers license, how can anyone but the prospective voter apply? One has to attest to certain facts about one's self in order to get the requisite document. A servant or a secretary can't do that. The statement that 11% of eligible voters do not have a driver's license, a passport or other acceptable documentation does not address, at all, the question of how many eligible voters could not qualify under the proposed laws. Very different issue, but really the important one. If in fact, there are 11% voting who cannot demonstrate that they have the "right" to vote by virtue of proving that they are citizens, this itself would be a strong demonstration of the need for voter ID, since the number of illegal immigrants is about that same % of the overall population. What Mr. Gerard seems to be saying that he would rather have any number of non-citizens voting than to require that those voting show their right to do so. What foolishness. Apply that same logic to driving or Social Security benefits.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
stack
USW Blogger
08:45 AM on 05/02/2012
DoubleDonn, In Pennsylvania over the past decade, there have been four allegations of voter fraud, of all sorts, not just in-person misrepresentation. Yesterday, the ACLU flied suit against the Pennsylvania voter ID law with 10 clients, all of whom are American citizens with the right to vote but who CANNOT obtain the documentation now required in Pennsylvania to vote. The ACLU gathered those ten clients within a month's time. How many more out there are there? How many people are you willing to disenfranchise, DoubleDonn, to "solve" a non-existent problem?
12:22 PM on 05/02/2012
What you seem to be saying is that these plaintiffs can prove that they are US citizens to ACLU but not to the state of Pennsylvania. What are the standards of proof of citizenship that Pennsylvania demands? Is it possible that the ACLU has a lower threshold of acceptable proof than a reasonable law requires? Just as I expect that an applicant for Social Security would be able to demonstrate eligibility for benefits, I also expect a voter to be able to demonstrate eligibility to vote. I don't know about Pennsylvania but I do know that in many states there is a need to show that, in addition to being a US citizen, one must demonstrate that they have lived in the state and voting district for a certain period of time. There are requirements beyond being a US citizen to provide eligibility in that particular state and precinct. I do not regard these as onerous requirements. My mother did not have a birth certificate but was able to establish her eligibility for voting and other citizenship requirements by way of affidavits from relatives and others. As a question for Pennsylvanians, were Quakers, per se, barred from voting? Mr. Gerard's blog seems to imply that. There were a number of Pennsylvanians in the Constitutional convention, were none Quakers?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
stack
USW Blogger
04:20 PM on 05/01/2012
Moving away from draconian voter ID laws: http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/01/between-voting-rights-and-voting-wrongs/
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
stack
USW Blogger
02:48 PM on 05/01/2012
The lead petitioner in the lawsuit challenging Pennsylvania's voter ID law is Viviette Applewhite, a 93-year-old African-American great-great grandmother and resident of Philadelphia who marched for civil rights with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., but cannot get an ID needed to vote under the law. Other petitioners include Philadelphia residents Wilola Shinholster Lee, Gloria Cuttino, and Dorothy Barksdale, all African-American women born in the Jim Crow South who, like so many of their generation, were never issued a birth certificate they now need to get an ID in order to vote under the law; Nadine Marsh, a Beaver County grandmother; and Grover Freeland, a Philadelphia-area retired veteran, whose veteran's ID card will not be acceptable to allow him to cast a ballot. If the voter photo ID law is not struck down, none of them will be able to vote in November - despite the fact that many of them have been voting for decades.
01:55 PM on 05/01/2012
The 21M people without IDs aren't participating in our society anyway. They don't drive, buy alcohol or cigarettes, cash checks, etc. or they are minors.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
stack
USW Blogger
08:46 AM on 05/02/2012
Buying cigarettes, alcohol and driving are not requisites of citizenship. Neither is cashing checks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sfsmurf
proud San Francisco progressive
10:42 PM on 05/02/2012
What a ridiculous statement. So if you don't drink, smoke, drive or cash checks you are not participating in society? Personally I haven't cashed a check in years thanks to my ATM card, and I only learned to drive at the ripe age of 45. Nor do I smoke. I guess the fact that I like my cocktails strong means I'm a member of society.
01:17 PM on 05/04/2012
Did you need an ID to open a bank account? How many times a month do you show your ID?
11:44 AM on 05/01/2012
Good government is the most essential thing for a properly functioning society. Free photo I.D.s should be provided when the voter properly signs up at the registration station. If one does not have enough interest in voting to go down and get it, they won't have the interest to read about the issues and vote intelligently. Let's face it, we really don't need every one to vote. We need every interested, informed citizen to vote. We don't need votes from the cemeteries, illegal aliens and we don't need multiple votes from people to get crooks into power. This should not be a power struggle where any kind of cheating to win is condoned by either side. That is wrecking this country. That is what causes democracies to slide into anarchy and end up with a dictator. Anyone who is for total control by "their" side is a fool and is dangerous.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
stack
USW Blogger
02:50 PM on 05/01/2012
There it is again: "we don't need everyone to vote." Just Edward Emory and his kind should vote, right?
Well, Edward, I got some news for you, the corporations and 1 percenters are coming to take your vote next.
And they'll say, "we don't need everyone to vote."
12:04 PM on 05/02/2012
There you go again cherry picking something out of context to vilify your perceived "enemy". I said everyone interested enough to go register properly should get a FREE photo I.D.. How do you perceive that to mean I want to exclude anybody? Everything I said would allow anyone of any race, creed or political persuasion to vote and screen out all the cheating from any side. This should not a "holy war" among sides. Both sides should be for clean elections.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:51 PM on 05/27/2012
A person who goes to the trouble to register and then goes to the trouble to vote is not "interested"?

And who are you to determine who is "informed" enough to vote? The right to vote does not depend on such a vague criteria.
11:42 PM on 05/31/2012
Please learn to read before you comment.
mijjy
Read, Be Aware, Prepare
11:21 AM on 05/01/2012
Thanks Mr. Gerard for bringing up more solid points regarding the slippery slope the GOTP would have the majority of us fall prey to. When you take a chronological look at the last 30 years, their 'small' steps have maneuvered, manipulated, and would look to be a large net cast on the American Citizen in order to shore up their own powers, wallets, and at the expense of the rest of us.

No bar low enough for them to lower? No civil right too sacred for them to demonize? No hero too big to make small by chicanery? I no longer see them as the party of compassion. OR values.

I'm no conspiracy theorist, but you can't see events from the last 30 years, or the GOTP side now, as 'mere coincidence.' There are TOOOOO many of these types of incidences, the direction is out in plain view. Worse: they are TOOOO comfortable in their position(s), too arrogant to be bothered by possibility of failure - which raises larger, and larger, concerns for the 'average' person.

As a problem analyzer, I see clearly: 100% power STILL wouldn't be enough. They'd monopolize capitalism: you do that by eroding rights. Like water dripping on stone - except the American citizen is no rock. And we use our brains - we resist. Rocks can be broken, but people stand up. They misunderestimate US. Thx again for the article. It's added to my own thought processes in this general election year.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
09:40 AM on 05/01/2012
11.2 million illegals, unauthorized to work in the USA ~ But ARE.

How do they obtain jobs in the USA as illegals?

With the very same identity theft I.D.s of Driver's Licenses & SSN Card that it takes to register to vote AND vote
11:16 AM on 05/01/2012
Good point! Insist on Photo Id voting!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:53 PM on 05/27/2012
Those people are busy hiding from authorities. How many of them do you think willingly put themselves in a public place where they know officials are checking paperwork of any kind?

These "fraud prevention" laws don't prevent those people from voting. They prevent valid voters from voting, with all the hassles.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nypapajoe
09:35 AM on 05/01/2012
What most disturbing about this whole charade is that everybody knows the reason behind these criminal proceedings!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jerdan25
09:11 AM on 05/01/2012
with the Supreme Court so messed up and the millions dollars spent on false advertising our country will not survive another 20 years. We will have more poverty then we have now. The rich will be even more out of touch with reality and the middle class will be the poor because they can't afford education on any level. Its very sad.
mijjy
Read, Be Aware, Prepare
11:22 AM on 05/01/2012
please help folks register if you know any who aren't and would like to vote!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
08:56 AM on 05/01/2012
2008 ~ United States Supreme Court upheld Indiana's Voter I.D. Law ~

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24351798/ns/politics/t/supreme-court-upholds-voter-id-law/

What were the Justices' opinions?

"The law "is amply justified by the valid interest in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process,'" Justice John Paul Stevens said in an opinion that was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy."

"We cannot conclude that the statute imposes 'excessively burdensome requirements' on any class of voters," Stevens said.
07:46 AM on 05/01/2012
We don't need voter ID laws to steal elections - that's what the Supreme Court and Diebold (TM) electronic voting machines are for!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amy Pappalardo
Peddle lies somewhere else. We are full up here
11:25 PM on 05/13/2012
Yep. Like a few illegals with fake IDS are the problem. They are the distraction from the REAL problem.

Our votes are not being counted. Our elections are rigged. THIS IS THE REAL ISSUE AND IT HAS BEEN IGNORED FOR A DECADE.