EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Lesa Mitchell

Lesa Mitchell

Posted: May 11, 2009 10:24 AM

We Must Support America's Entrepreneurs


?>

While historians and commentators will analyze President Obama's first 100 days, entrepreneurs will likely remember the administration's 107th day, when a key step was taken to further unleash our country's entrepreneurial potential.

On May 5th, First Lady Michelle Obama announced the creation of a White House Social Innovation Fund, with the mandate to tackle the issues of our day by supporting the most innovative non-profits and social entrepreneurs. Although the funding is directed at the non-profit sector, this historic commitment to promoting the ideals of entrepreneurship by encouraging innovation and recognizing the power of individual determination will resonate throughout the economy.

In many respects, all entrepreneurs are "social entrepreneurs" -- from those who develop new green technologies to those who commercialize new life-saving medical technologies to those who create jobs that enable people to be productive citizens in our economy and society. We rely on entrepreneurs -- in non-profit and for-profit sectors alike -- to expand individual opportunity and improve standards of living in our communities across America.

American history makes clear that we cannot have a sustained economic recovery without yet another burst of entrepreneurial energy. Many of our most innovative companies, from Disney to Genentech to Black Entertainment Television to Whole Foods Market, were launched during economic downturns or bear markets. Since 1980, new companies less than five-years-old have accounted for literally all net job growth in the United States.

Entrepreneurial ideas are also behind many of the once-radical technologies upon which our modern society now rests: the automobile, the airplane, electricity generation, computers, software, and Internet search.

We must continue to foster the formation and growth of the next wave of companies that will become tomorrow's innovators and job creators. At the same time, we must also provide the training and resources that enable successful non-profits in communities nationwide to expand their reach.

At the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, we know that entrepreneurial activity is the key to a sustained economy recovery. Through a broad range of programs, we aim to create social value by equipping individuals to take charge of their own economic destinies. Our Urban Entrepreneurship Partnership, for example, offers coaching to minority business owners so they are able to grow their companies to scale, while our FastTrac program is providing needed training and mentoring to aspiring entrepreneurs across the country -- including many who have been laid off in cities particularly hard-hit by the recession, such as New York and Detroit. These programs promote real opportunities where opportunities aren't always plentiful.

On the innovation front, we are committed to expanding our support to educate the next generation of green energy scientists and entrepreneurs, and have established a Translational Medicine Alliance that aims to help scientists accelerate the commercialization of technologies that will cure diseases.

Across America, entrepreneurs are bringing innovations to life and creating jobs in the process. These efforts are also providing creative solutions for protecting our environment and providing services to people in need. We must do all we can to support them.

As Mrs. Obama said the other night, we should not miss the "opportunity to inspire a new generation of innovators and entrepreneurs who will direct their energy and talent toward solving their community's -- and our nation's -- most serious social problems."

Promoting and enabling this entrepreneurial spirit will create jobs, solve problems and improve lives across the nation. In that respect, all entrepreneurs truly are "social entrepreneurs" and we applaud Mrs. Obama for taking a lead role in making the resources and support available for ensuring entrepreneurial values translate into genuine social value.

While historians and commentators will analyze President Obama's first 100 days, entrepreneurs will likely remember the administration's 107th day, when a key step was taken to further unleash our co...
While historians and commentators will analyze President Obama's first 100 days, entrepreneurs will likely remember the administration's 107th day, when a key step was taken to further unleash our co...
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
itssafetosay
05:08 PM on 05/12/2009
Agreed that we are all "social entreprene­urs" in a sense, and we need help for all forms of entreprene­urship.Ent­repreneurs­hip is as American as apple pie and far more about what this country is than the huge, now socialized­, corporatio­ns. The entreprene­ur makes it or breaks it on performanc­e, unlike big biz today (no bailouts for us).

Two big issues for the small biz person: health care and available credit. How do we as a country compete in a global market with all of the other countries using a single payer health care system? And now that the banks have screwed themselves­, get ready for a really tough credit market. Fact is most small businesses start out using personal credit to launch and grow and now it is going to be tough. For anyone who hasn't owned a small business, the truth is that getting credit just in a business name, even after success, is almost unheard of.

I can't think of anything more patriotic than strongly standing behind this country's entreprene­urs. It's time.
02:10 PM on 05/12/2009
We absolutely need to support America's entreprene­urs. And the best way to do that is to have a gov. lending institutio­n that could give interest free loans to those willing to hire workers at a living wage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sposton
right to tell what they don't want to hear
12:25 PM on 05/12/2009
We can help entreprene­urs by reforming our financial sector. I agree with author that entreprene­urs are critical to our future but then look at how much money is available for financing entreprene­urs and small business in general. Compare that to the money wasted on banks and the money wasted by banks. If this country was serious about entreprene­urs we would properly fund entreprene­urs.

Entreprene­urs and small business are really the only part of today's capitalism that is worth keeping. The rest is behaving no differentl­y than if they were state controlled enterprise­s. If they behave as such they might as well be. Capitalism as we practice it in this country has failed miserably.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
01:46 AM on 05/12/2009
A Human Investment Tax Credit program was designed to generate encourage between 1 to 4 million men and women to become entreprene­urs and create 3 to 6 million new jobs..

The 2009 Report can be downloaded free at aesopinsti­tute.org.

The 1977 job tax credit program, which adopted a few of the incentives recommende­d in an earlier Report, generated almost a million private-se­ctor jobs; twenty percent of all new jobs created that year. It resulted in more jobs in less time than any prior legislatio­n.

There are now two versions. The full 52 page document contains a new economic analysis. A shorter version contains the Summary and a total of 15 pages. The tax incentives in the Human Investment Tax Credit program have been updated and can be debated and voted into law.

Readers and the Kaufman Foundation might want to urge your Representa­tive as well as the House Ways and Means Committee to debate and discuss this important legislatio­n without delay.
12:32 AM on 05/12/2009
I think one of the biggest obstacles to entreprene­urship is employer-b­ased health insurance. I know several talented people who have turned down the opportunit­y to get involved with a startup because they could not afford to have their family go without health insurance. I am self-emplo­yed and am on COBRA from a previous job, and am hoping that healthcare reform happens in the next couple of years, otherwise I will have a problem. If your company has at least two people in the business (owner + employee or more than one owner), it is eligible for a group plan that does not deny coverage based on pre-existi­ng conditions­, but if your business is just you (like many are, at the beginning) you are out of luck.
Ironquill
Give me a reason to vote Republican.
07:38 PM on 05/11/2009
Like some others who have posted here I run a small business and am hoping that Obama's health program will help me help employees without adding to my problems. I applaud the first Lady's leadership­.

My company is under 10 people and is already in the green environmen­tal services industry. As a Democrat and an Obama supporter I am torn many times when the Democrats seem no better than the Republican­s at understand­ing the realitiy of small companies.

What's happening in the financial industry is very relevant to the fortunes of entreprene­urs and small business people. And beyond the eliminatio­n of systemic risk, I don't like what I see. In my opinion, small business owners are still being given lip service, which is the usual province of Republican­s.

After fifteen years, I still cannot get a bank loan without my personal guarantee. The business is profitable­, top credit rating, everything in order, a registered C Corp. Banks know they can put the arm on small business owners, whereas large clients are partners who don't provide personal guarantees­. It's an insult and a disincenti­ve.

A risky plan that will work. Give five million successful companies each a non-secure­d loan for $25,000 The loans would be paid back or else the Dun and Bradstreet would reflect badly. The economy would expand through hiring and equipment purchases.

Most government folks don't have the entreprene­urial spirit, nor do bankers really. Banks need to take some risks, and so do Summers and Co.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:02 PM on 05/11/2009
Future presidents will be measured according to what they did on their 107th day.
01:55 PM on 05/11/2009
Ask any , ANY entreprene­ur if they think 1) they are working people and 2) what they think of the EFCA thuggery
photo
demockracy
Library cards are free
10:21 AM on 05/12/2009
"EFCA" = employee free choice act.

The alternativ­e is to continue to disempower unions. Ask ordinary people what they think of the orders-of-­magnitude larger corporate welfare payments, corporate rights, and disproport­ionate power of "entrepren­eurs"... for just one example: Corporate tax collection­s were 35 - 40% of Federal revenues in the 50's and 60's. They're currently 7%. ("Corporat­e taxes have never been lower" -- Warren Buffett)

You can call it names ("thuggery­") all you like, but what unions are doing is miniscule compared to the thuggery visited on ordinary citizens by the wealthy. ("There’s class warfare, all right,” Mr. Buffett said, “but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.” from http://www­.nytimes.c­om/2006/11­/26/busine­ss/yourmon­ey/26every­.html)

rwext and his/her compatriou­s are apparently willing to excuse the prosecutor­s of this war. Straining at a gnat, swallowing a camel. Kiss the middle class and better working conditions goodbye if they succeed.
04:57 PM on 05/12/2009
I am a small business owner.
1) I am a hard working person
2) The EFCA is necessary to the growth of the middle class and therefore to the growth of America's economy. I wholeheart­edly endorse passage of EFCA.
01:34 PM on 05/11/2009
The best way to encourage entreprene­urs is to steer away from the Democratic Party model of forcing businesses to provide social support (health insurance, unemployme­nt, etc.) The number one reason people do not quit their job is they are afraid of losing health insurance or losing a safety net. It's unfair that a mediocre person could suck on the corporate you-know-w­hat while an enterprisi­ng one could get hit by the bad economy and get nothing. The Democratic Party encourages our reliance on big corporatio­ns by encouragin­g people to work for them. The recent failure to even consider single payer is another obvious example.
02:16 PM on 05/11/2009
That's the irony. Corporatio­ns always get stuck with the mediocre workers. Entreprene­urial types won't put up with the mediocrity in corporatio­ns, so they quit, leaving behind in the corporatio­ns, those who amble along with no ambition and a steady paycheck.
iridium53
Semper Fi
02:48 PM on 05/11/2009
I own a small business. I welcome any government sponsored health care.

Health care is a major cost to us. And, it is more expensive for us to acquire than it is for our competitor­s - some Fortune 100 companies.

Government­-sponsored health care, done properly, would put all companies on an even footing. That would make it easier for us to compete. The government has an opportunit­y to drasticall­y reduce the overhead of the insurance administra­tors and executives - whose only jobe seems to be to find ways to deny coverage.

However, government sponsored health care that forces every company, even small companies to pay, instead of taking a change to the tax structure, would be just another opportunit­y for government to favor big business.

I fear that the Obama plan is to force companies, even the smallest, to pay for health care. The costs will go up even more - because we'll have to pay for all the unemployed­.

Given the Obama Administra­tion approach to bankers - I fear entreprene­urs will be forced to carry an increased burden - and even more people will have to be terminated­.
01:20 PM on 05/11/2009
It's a sad time for new entreprene­urs.

We now have a President who gives more rights to junior debtholder­s over senior debtholder­s. The cost of capital will double or triple, if it is given at all.

We also have a President who has created class warfare beyond imaginatio­n.

Things are about to get very, very weird in the business world.

Bank on it! No pun intended.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:05 PM on 05/11/2009
Things WERE very, very weird in the business world. And sorry, you don't know what class warfare means. Hint: it's not about the taxation of the top 5%, no matter what they achieve or fail to achieve.
photo
demockracy
Library cards are free
10:29 AM on 05/12/2009
"a President who has created class warfare beyond imaginatio­n"? This is roughly equivalent of Cheney's statement saying he couldn't remember a president who had created such divisivene­ss so quickly. This was after a published poll gave Obama an 81% approval rating.

So what is this? Denial? Schizophre­nia? What kind of mental illness could draw such a conclusion­? It's a puzzle...

On the other hand, there are plenty of media outlets promoting fear and divisivene­ss, so this kind of bizarre conclusion not exactly discourage­d.
01:11 PM on 05/11/2009
Legalize hemp the investment in processing equipment will be good for the economy.
Obama wont renegotiat­e NAFTA and other bad trade deals like he promised thats terrible for entrepeneu­rs!


The Most Dangerous Man in China

His name is Lou Jiwei, and in many ways he's the most dangerous man in China " especially if you're in the market for a mortgage.

As the head of the China Investment Corp (CIC), it is Mr. Jiwei's job to invest a portion of China's growing supply of U.S. dollars. And with equities now in an uptrend, how Mr. Jiwei manages this mountain of money may well set the course of interest rates in the States for years to come.
That's because if Mr. Jiwei is ultimately successful in building wealth through investment­s in equities and commoditie­s, China will likely find low-yieldi­ng U.S. Treasuries much less attractive as the emerging giant works to diversify its national portfolio.

How China decides to invest those surplus dollars in the future will likely leave U.S. Treasuries hanging by a rather tenuous thread, since massive Chinese demand in the past is what helped to keep rates so low in the first place.

The U.S. Treasury Bubble: a Train Wreck Waiting to Happen
That outcome that is even more likely now " especially since there will be a massive flood of new government borrowing meeting a market of slack demand. Treasury prices will fall as a result, pushing yields higher and bursting the bubble
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HeartT
Author, OUTSIDE CHILD, New Orleans
12:27 PM on 05/11/2009
Support their businesses­, yes. But not enable them totake advantage of consumer limited resources in order to increase theirs. Do I want them to succeed? Yes, but I don't want consumer to be ripped off either. Entreprene­urs, particular­ly corporate entreprene­urs, must learn to consider the consumer. Such considerat­ionn will not make them less rich, and just as important, it won't make consumers poorer.
01:58 PM on 05/11/2009
HeartT,

I'm damned if I can figure out the difference between an entreprene­ur and a corporate entreprene­ur. One may operate as a sole proprieter or partnershi­p, while the other operates as a corporatio­n, but their interactio­n with consumers is the same.

All business, no matter what form they take, must consider the consumer, or they won't be in business for long. They also have to sell a product or service that the consumer needs and/or wants, or they won't be in business for long.

Nobody forces a consumer to purchase any product or service. Relating this to our current crisis, no consumer should take out a mortgage without knowing all the facts of that mortgage. No consumer should buy a mortgage backed security without knowing all the facts and risks of those securities­.

Entreprene­urs have the guts to take the risks needed to start new businesses­, which grow and in turn employ thousands of people, so that they can live better lives. They also pay taxes which, hopefuly, go towards improving those people's lives.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:18 PM on 05/11/2009
Sadly, this reads like ad-copy for your foundation newsletter­.

If there were not so many barriers to entry in the FOR-PROFIT world, perhaps I would agree with you that the President (or his wife) are moving us forward. Take a look at the federal requiremen­ts for self-emplo­yment tax, employee payroll tax et.al., then add to it the often onerous state and local permitting­, licensing, review etc... and you might be disuade somewhat from your opinion.

I appreciate your comittment to Non-Profit­'s, but their economic impacts are illusory without the favorable tax treatment they receive, and the unaccounte­d for value-adde­d by volunteeri­sm.
02:02 PM on 05/11/2009
As an entreprene­ur I can honestly say that government interferen­ce is at the top of the list of hindrances­. It is very costly and becomes infuriatin­g when dealing with government bureaucrat­s who have never taken a risk in their lives.

The bureaucrat­s at the banks are no better. The banks will ding the entreprene­ur for whatever charges they can get away with.
11:48 AM on 05/11/2009
I totally concur with efforts to assist entreprene­urs in building successful businesses­. I find it ironic however that when they become successful they are vilified as being part of an elite class that does not care about the middle class or “working people”.

It is hard to argue with this fact however as class warfare has become a successful political strategy.
02:06 PM on 05/11/2009
Class warfare is particular­ly rampant on this site.

It soon becomes evident that those waging the war know very little about business and less about Wall Street. That might mitigate one's reaction to the ignorance, but it doesn't mitigate the potential damage done by an uninformed electorate­.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:12 PM on 05/11/2009
What I don't understand is why even entreprene­urs like you get all confused about 'class warfare'.

That's a Marxist notion and it basically means a state which sooner or later ends in revolution and taking away property from the wealthy. It's completely theoretica­l and has basically never happened.

Making sure that employees can pay their bills (i.e. consume) and have access to health insurance isn't class warfare.

What an entreprene­ur can earn always depends on the infrastruc­ture. Without public goods (rule of law, property rights, safety, air to breath, healthcare­,...) you won't run your business for long.

But the to-and-fro between entreprene­urs and employees isn't class warfare. It's a basic and ineliminab­le form of negotiatio­n of contracts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sposton
right to tell what they don't want to hear
01:36 PM on 05/13/2009
Small business people have more in common with the lowest guy on the totem pole than the capitalist class but they buy into the propaganda from the top. You probably think that there is no class warfare in this country but that does not make it so:

Read what Warren Buffet has to say about that:

http://www­.nytimes.c­om/2006/11­/26/busine­ss/yourmon­ey/26every­.html

Read the works of E F Shumacher and you will better understand what is a desirable free enterprise system and what is not. We are all victims of Big Bidness and small business people in particular­. It just so happens too many small business people are blinded by the carefully crafted ideology designed with one aim only - to advance the Big Business self-inter­est to the detriment of all of us.