More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Libby Mitchell

GET UPDATES FROM Libby Mitchell
 

In Defense of the Happy Meal: An Open Letter to San Francisco

Posted: 11/08/10 11:11 AM ET

Dear San Francisco,

Let the kids have their toys.

Yes, I know that America is in the middle of an obesity epidemic. Yes, I know letting a kid have a Happy Meal is worse than letting them eat a tub of frosting. However, I also know that, as a parent, I have a right to feed my kid shit. Oh, and I also know that the toy is never what influences the decision.

When I stop at McDonald's to buy a Happy Meal for my kid or any other kid who happens to be in my car it has nothing to do with the toy. It has to do with the fact food comes quickly, I know they will eat it, and there is often a playground on the premises. If any of the "slow food," "whole grain" restaurants met those criteria, and didn't look at children like they are vermin, we would go there. And the toys you claim are so tempting? Usually they end up in the recycling bin after sitting in my car for two weeks. Really, they suck.

Now, I am sure you are thinking I am a Tea Party joining, NRA card toting conservative. I'm not. I like big government. I like government that wants to take care of people. I just don't think it should mandate it. Making sure everyone has health insurance? Yes. Forcing everyone to get a colonoscopy? Nope. Offering help to the homeless? Yep. Forcing them to take it? Nope. It's kind of like feeding my kid. I offer her the best food possible. I can't make her eat it. You should have seen how she scraped butternut squash ravioli off her tongue. She also feels that way about chicken nuggets.

Further, do you know how jerky this whole thing makes you look? There are bigger issues to focus on right now -- like civil rights for everyone. Keep your eyes on the prize.

Thanks,

Libby

 

Follow Libby Mitchell on Twitter: www.twitter.com/logicallibby

 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:40 AM on 11/11/2010
This toy-ban was passed under the guise of childhood obesity legislation. Our kids will still be obese, just without toys. This sheepish legislation will do little to curb childhood obesity, it will only force fast-food chains to invent new marketing techniques. What we need are strict regulations regarding food, not rules about toys that accompany food.

It’s not the kids who choose to eat fast-food, it’s the parents, and they don’t care about the toys. Libby is right, parents choose fast-food because it’s fast, cheap, and convenient, not because their child gets a plastic choking-hazard souvenir. Honestly, the kids couldn’t care less. That smile on their face is not from the toy, it’s from the sugar in their food. Take away the toy and they still smile. Get it? IT’S THE FOOD.

You can read the rest of my article on my blog, http://thefoodrebel.wordpress.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Harrison
09:13 AM on 11/10/2010
The real reason I took my kids to McDonald's was because daddy wanted a couple of Big Mac's and a chocolate shake while running errands.

The rest of the time, I was serving the kids food I had canned myself and everything at home was brown rice, whole wheat flour, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jumbotron16
a slight improvement over jumbotron15
08:41 PM on 11/08/2010
I agree 100%.
08:40 PM on 11/08/2010
I'm glad even the big government people can see the ridiculousness. I just read this hilarious article about San Fran banning fortune cookies:

http://www.narf.tv/?p=1254
07:56 PM on 11/08/2010
I pretty much agree. This is a deicsion for parents. I doubt many parents sit down and say "Let go home and make a nice healthy dinner" then the kids say "But I want that McDonalds toy" and the parent says "OK lets go to McDonalds".

It is not the place of the government, where does this stop? Maybe the government won't sell you candy unless you also buy an apple.

I live in the DC suburbs and most people here at work think SF is crazy. We have always thought of the city as a little off kilter, but this is nuts. It seems very big brotherish.
09:08 PM on 11/08/2010
Angelus, does Washington DC have speed limits on your streets? Do they have laws about things like spitting on the sidewalk, public drunkenness, loitering? Do they have any laws regarding restaurants, such as health codes, codes about how many cockroaches can be served to customers (hopefully none) and others?

San Francisco hasn't banned the Happy Meal. Parents can order the same meal without the toy. Or, if they want to include the toy, San Francisco is encouraging MickeyD to serve demonstrably more healthy meals to kids.

I don't understand why you have a problem with that, if you obey street signs, understand that you may get ticketed if you jaywalk, or any number of other ordinances and laws that each city institutes, some of which exist only in that city. Are you saying that Washington DC has no right to set speed limits or smoking bans or any other limits on the behavior of their residents? If you're fine with that, why do you object to San Francisco having the same right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YeWight
10:25 PM on 11/08/2010
Using the same logic, why not penalize liquor stores for selling booze that eventually will make some people become alcoholics or kill someone while DUI? What's next? Banning M&M's, potato chips, thousands of different snacks, candies and sodas? The list may never end and will eventually include almost anything and everything we eat. And all of this just because some people cannot understand the concept of personal responsibility? It's a very simple concept - what you ingest must be equal to or less than what you burn. Otherwise, you WILL get fat.

If childhood obesity, however, is to be treated as child neglect or even child abuse, the parents would think twice before giving their kids a 2000 calories meal or other types and AMOUNTS of food that contribute to obesity.
02:49 AM on 11/09/2010
All of those laws you mention effect other people. If I speed, I would make the roads unsafe, if I loiter I could be effecting the safety of neighborhood or business, ect ect. San Francisco is telling a business, that they cannot sell a toy with a meal that is perfectly legal to get otherwise. I am not saying the law is unconstitutional or illegal, just stupid and pointless, and pretentious. It is San Francisco getting on their soap box and saying we are too good for happy meals. Parents get McDonalds for their kids for a variety of reasons, from cost, to time, to they enjoy the taste, this isn't going to stop them. While at the same time it will cost SF money, because someone has to inspect and make sure McDonalds isn't selling toys with meals.
05:37 PM on 11/08/2010
Ah, Libby, bless your heart. Have you ever been to San Francisco? We don't ostracize parents with well-behaved kids in restaurants. And of the few McDs that are here, I believe only one, on the outskirts of town, has a "PlayLand". San Francisco is the heart of the progressive nation. You'll eventually join our way of thinking and look back and wonder what all the fuss was about. We've banned most public smoking, styrofoam, and plastic bags. We persue wind, water, and solar power. We are your future, join us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HealthHabits
02:53 PM on 11/08/2010
But if they aren't telling us how to live our lives, what are politicians supposed to do?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Atchka
Fierce, Freethinking Fatties
02:04 PM on 11/08/2010
Libby,
You're absolutely right. This toy thing is just window dressing for the anti-obesity crowd. The true draw for McDonald's is convenience, not toys. And the playland is about the only place we can take our kids throughout the winter if they want to go on a playground.

The problem is our culture, not any single symptom of that culture.

Peace,
Shannon
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drumz
Those little red panties they pass the test
01:43 PM on 11/08/2010
It's hard to be a good parent. Don't feed them poison though, figure out a better way than stooping to getting food at McDonalds. Pack fruit, peanut butter, crackers, nuts, juice, it's not that hard once you get used to doing it.
05:58 PM on 11/09/2010
Sure, and bring along your own indoor playground. Easy as anything.
12:48 PM on 11/08/2010
I don't get it. If it's all about the food for you and not the toy then you should have no issue with this since the food is still available--just not the toy. And, if there are more important issues to deal with, then why are you bothering to write and complain. Methinks you both protest too much and aren't being honest with yourself.
02:53 PM on 11/08/2010
I was actually just about to say the same thing. I agree. The law only says that a meal sold with a toy needs to meet certain nutritional guidelines. Which effectively mean they either stop selling it with a toy or make healthier meals. The author still gets to feed her kids the crap she loves to feed them.
05:34 PM on 11/08/2010
First of all wildfireSOMA, "you both protest too much"? Libby and who else? Also, if you actually read the post, what Libby is commenting on is not whether or not she wants the Happy Meal toy, but that it is not the place of government to forbid the offering of said toy in the name of protecting the citizenry.

Oh, and one more thing drumz and captainspirou - while I'm a vegetarian and don't generally frequent fast food restaurants, I would prefer that my new daughter ingest the occasional processed meal rather than her parent's intolerance of other's choices.
photo
staysane
Patriotic American standing up 4 individual rights
12:46 PM on 11/08/2010
This is what you get when you like big government...

I am not a friend to a very energetic government. It is always oppressive.-Thomas Jefferson

Most bad government has grown out of too much government.-Thomas Jefferson

Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases. Thomas Jefferson
12:19 AM on 11/09/2010
Ok, so what can Thomas Jefferson tell us about how to combat the industrial food complex?
photo
staysane
Patriotic American standing up 4 individual rights
09:40 AM on 11/09/2010
Yeah, it's pretty clear, it's not the feds business as to how much salt one may consume.