Of course I believed in heaven as a child. Every weekend, driving up to our country house in Vermont, I'd gaze out the window from the backseat of the family car and see the shape of God in the clouds. But I am a skeptic, a rationalist, and over time my childish imaginings gave way to disbelief. Heaven -- the hallmark card version, with people floating on clouds wearing wings and halos, the dead living "up there" as they did in life -- made no sense to me.
Not long after 9/11 I wrote a cover story for Newsweek called "Visions of Heaven." The theological conundrum it posed was this one: all suicide bombers think they're going to heaven. They imagine that they are martyrs who will be rewarded in Paradise for their heroism and sacrifice. The victims' families insist that their beloved ones are martyrs who, too, ascend immediately to God. Yet this puzzle makes no sense. Are there multiple heavens -- some for assassinated innocents and some for suicide bombers? Is heaven a true fact? Or is it based in individualistic conceptions that evolve through history and culture?
Reporting this story helped me sketch out some of the basic questions about heaven, questions that have haunted believers for millennia. Is heaven a "real place" or is it an idea, a metaphor? If real, what does it look like? A city? A garden? A banquet? Do we keep our bodies in heaven? And if so, do we do the things that bodies do: eat, drink, make love? Are we recognizable as ourselves? Do we have identities? Or are we disembodied spirits who achieve some mysterious union with a universal spirit?
And so I decided to write a book, which came out last month: Heaven: Our Enduring Fascination with the Afterlife.
I had no idea, when I entered this project, how massive it would be: there are as many ideas about heaven as people who imagine it. Great scholarly overviews on the subject have been written, notably Heaven: A History, by Colleen McDannell and Bernhard Lang, and Life After Death: A History of the Afterlife in Western Religion by Alan F. Segal. Other scholars have broken off important parts of the heaven problem and written books about resurrection, the ancient world, salvation theory, utopian societies, spiritualism, the intersection of science and heaven, the Reformation, afterlife visions, cremation, and Muslim afterlife beliefs. Heaven has been painted, written, or sung about by Dante, Milton, Botticelli, Michelangelo, Tintoretto, Mark Twain, Seamus Heaney, Emily Dickinson, New Yorker cartoonists, David Byrne, Albert Brooks, Bruce Springsteen, the Winans and Alice Sebold. And then, of course, there are the visions given to us by Scripture and tradition. Our own individual visions are aggregations of all of these; sometimes our imaginings are ours alone.
The only way through all this material, I decided, was to get personal. And so I wrote a book with myself as the protagonist. Not a memoir, exactly, but a sorting and discussing of the main themes in the heaven conversation by someone -- me -- who wants to believe, a skeptical, observant Jew who happens to write and report about religion for a living. I spoke not just to dozens of scholars but to everyday believers and clerics, trying to find for myself visions of heaven that worked, inspired, provoked. This makes for an idiosyncratic book. It is not comprehensive (I don't include a section on Milton, for example); it is not definitive. I don't claim to know where heaven is or what it looks like. But it does, I hope, offer useful, complex images and ideas about heaven that people can chew on. For if 80 percent of Americans tell pollsters they believe in heaven, it might be useful for them to know a little bit about what they mean.
Click here for a conversation about heaven among leading clerics and scholars, from the Washington Post's "On Faith." And click here to view a Q&A between me and the Washington Post's Sally Quinn.
Lloyd I. Sederer, MD: A Trip To Heaven And Back
This is the tip of the endless list of questions that could be asked. Jesus arose to heaven on a cloud, are planes going through it each time they land and take off. Last one!
Suggestions:
Hope for the best regarding the afterlife and then do not waste another ounce wave or particle of energy worrying about what takes place after we die. Just love your neighbour as you love yourself and let's take each day as a miniature life.
If that question can't be proven false then it certainly can't be true.
In the very prayer he taught to his followers, the Kingdom and the will of God be done "on earth," not in heaven. Heaven's in good shape.
#2) Atheists have invented many things which are a boon to society. Since a large number of scientists are atheist, we can thank atheists for many of the medicines, advancements in robotics and prosthetics, engineering, food production, space travel......
and I'm not an atheist BTW.
supernatural agents of any kind.
no theme park in the sky.
In Heaven there is peace. Because God dwells there. God's spiritual character is all good. Peace dwells within all that God is. We, as humans are always at war within the ev1l of ourselves. When we learn to conquer the ev1l wars within our own spiritual character first, then we to, can give what is good. And peace will live among us. For one, cannot give, what one, does not have first himself. Greed feeds the ev1l, which destroys.
IF IGNORANCE OF NATURE GAVE BIRTH TO GODS, KNOWLEDGE OF NATURE IS MADE FOR THEIR DESTRUCTION.
-- Percy Bysshe Shelley, The Necessity of Atheism
Ninety nine percent of our best biologist reject the Delusion - but not 100%.
OUR LATEST SURVEY FINDS THAT, AMONG THE TOP NATURAL SCIENTISTS, DISBELIEF IS GREATER THAN EVER — ALMOST TOTAL.
We found the highest percentage of belief among NAS mathematicians (14.3% in God, 15.0% in immortality).
Biological scientists had the lowest rate of belief (5.5% in God, 7.1% in immortality), with physicists and astronomers slightly higher (7.5% in God, 7.5% in immortality).
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news/file002.html
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0_fs.html
http://ncseweb.org/rncse/18/2/do-scientists-really-reject-god
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/sci_relig.htm