- BIG NEWS:
- Afghanistan
- |
- The Pope
- |
- War Crimes
- |
- Iran
- |
As the global financial and economic crisis continues to throw countless numbers of people out of work, millions of refugee women and girls in developing countries continue to toil at a task that is not only arduous but extremely dangerous: collecting firewood to cook meals for their families.
For thousands of these impoverished women and girls, gathering firewood is more than a vital chore -- it is often a matter of life and death. By doing what many of us achieve by simply turning on a stove, refugee women and girls regularly fall victim to rape, assault, theft, exploitation, and even murder.
Although it is impossible to obtain hard figures on the overall number of sexual attacks, fact-finding missions to refugee camps in such places as Darfur and Nepal have documented their frequency and brutality. According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), a particularly egregious episode occurred in Kenya in 1993, when at least 101 women were raped outside of one camp in a single night, 87 of them as they gathered firewood.
Nor is sexual violence the only aspect of the problem. Firewood, burned indoors, produces toxic fumes that threaten the health of children. The need for firewood is frequently a rationale for keeping girls out of school. And its collection -- which often includes cutting down trees on agriculturally marginal land -- is a major factor in irreversible environmental degradation.
The many dangers of firewood gathering have been recognized for years by the United Nations and nongovernmental, international, and humanitarian organizations. Yet little has been done to promote effective protection strategies. Development aid to help these and other vulnerable people -- already at historic lows - could begin falling precipitously as the world's economic woes deepen.
It is time to get beyond firewood. The Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children - an organization that I helped found nearly 20 years ago -- has begun a worldwide drive to explore alternative fuels and cutting-edge energy technologies, such as clean-burning fuels, fuel-efficient stoves, and solar cookers. Working with UNHCR and the World Food Program, its goal is to reduce the violence by promoting the development of safe alternatives to firewood.
This week, just two weeks after the horrific attacks in Mumbai, the Women's Commission is hosting an international conference in New Delhi, India, that has brought together developers, users, and financial backers of new cooking technologies that can be provided to the people that need them the most.
All of this is in line with the ongoing work of the Women's Commission: to rally the world to action while giving voice to the millions of women, children, and adolescents in almost every region who have been uprooted from their homes by armed conflict and sexual violence. It is this kind of little-known crisis that first drew me to humanitarian work.
There will be no quick solutions to the perils of collecting firewood. Humanitarian aid helps, but is usually limited - and there are many competing priorities for funds already allocated. Moreover, cultural traditions are difficult to change, especially in countries where the status of women is low and gathering firewood is considered "women's work." Most men refuse to collect it, even if doing so would protect their wives, mothers, or daughters from potential assault. They say they will be killed if they venture too far afield, so the task is left to women, who will "only" be raped.
Despite such obstacles, the Women's Commission is confident that with the help of governments, international agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and diverse elements of civil society, we can liberate women and girls from their high-risk reliance on firewood, free to cook safely for themselves and their families. And we will succeed by showing the world that safe cooking fuel is as fundamental a necessity as food and water.
This piece was originally published in the Boston Globe
Actress and director Liv Ullmann is honorary chair of the Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Quote: "There will be no quick solutions to the perils of collecting firewood."
The perils are NOT in collecting firewood it is in the lawlessness and brashness of the society in which the need for firewood exists in the first place. That idiotic comment is no less stupid than if someone were to say:
"The main danger in Iraq to U.S. citizens is the explosion of cartridges in man made tools."
The concepts of RESPONSIBILITY and ACCOUNTABILITY are brazenly absent from the premise.
But this is the way of the times...to create a push-able mantra and run it into the ground.
I find it fascinating that actresses have become our greatest humanitarians, from Audrey Hepburn to Liv Ullman to Angelina Jolie. Hepburn contracted malaria in Africa and Ullman and Jolie surely have clearly exposed themselves to deadly diseases. It's almost as if they are saying, "We have seen how superficial and fleeting are money, fame and beauty and we want to devote ourselves to the more important things in life." These are women with big hearts who want to give back. Limbaugh and Hannity will mock them and, at the same time, worship the semi-delusional actor, Ronald Reagan.
I was with you and in support until the last paragraph, I don't see how this is a problem to be solved for the US government. If NGOs want to raise funds and awareness and seek innovative new ways to cook and heat without wood that is great and I support that. I do not support tax dollars being taken from Americans under the threat of force (try not paying your taxes and see what happens) to fund something that the Constitution does not grant the authority to the Congress for and is not even for Americans.
Hold on a minute there partner, where does it say in the last paragraph US government?
the first line "...with the help of governments..." There is only one government the US gov can act for.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with