"I'M LUCKY Horace. I've always been lucky. I'll be lucky again." So declared Lillian Hellman's ruthless anti-heroine Regina Giddons in The Little Foxes. She announces this to her critically ill husband, after he has foiled her crooked plans to become wealthy.
Moments later, Regina does indeed become "lucky" once again.
- RECENTLY I interviewed veteran actor Dennis Christopher, who has a juicy role in the current Quentin Tarantino Oscar-nominated hit, Django Unchained. (He plays Leonide Moguy.) But way back in 1981, Dennis, who had, as he put it, "a kind of 'happening' film career," put it on hold to join the Broadway-bound production of The Little Foxes.
That revival of Lillian Hellman's condemnation of all-American capitalist greed was to star Elizabeth Taylor in her stage debut, as the unsatisfied, avaricious, downright fatal Regina.
The star of stars had had quite enough of sitting at home in Washington, D.C. or Virginia, while the man she helped elect to the Senate, John Warner, worked at the Senate. (Taylor had never been married to somebody whose profession and interests were entirely foreign to her. Even hotel heir Nicky Hilton knew all about show-biz.) Elizabeth lost weight for Foxes, cut back on the Jack Daniels, and put her mind to this latest challenge -- which nobody thought she could actually accomplish.
Dennis, though impressed that he'd be working with the legendary movie queen, was really more excited about the prospect of being onstage with fabled character actress Maureen Stapleton. (Stapleton played the pathetic "Birdie" in The Little Foxes and she was magnificent.)
Dennis says: "I thought Elizabeth would be, well -- Elizabeth Taylor. I was looking forward to her, but I did not expect a certain degree of professionalism from her -- not theater professionalism, anyway. I was wrong. She was shockingly open to every suggestion, never pulled rank, never ran off in a fit, was perfectly willing to run lines, sit on the floor to mark and highlight the script. There was nothing to suggest she had ever been a pampered movie star, with people falling over themselves to please her. It turned out, she was a theater professional! And, she was superb in the role.
"Elizabeth was just a doll, and great in the show for months. But then, one day I came to the theater, early as usual -- who wanted to sit at home? Even an empty theater is exciting to me! I heard somebody crying. I followed the sound and there was Elizabeth in her dressing room, weeping as if her heart were broken. I was shocked, we'd become close. I said, 'My God, what is the matter?' And she looked at me and said, 'I just saw my friend murdered on television.' I didn't know what she meant at first, and then I realized she was talking about Anwar Sadat, who'd been assassinated that day. I had no idea they'd even known each other. She was absolutely grief-stricken.
- "BUT THAT event, for whatever reason, triggered something. Elizabeth was never really the same again. Certain habits resurfaced. This was before she went to Betty Ford and I suppose she had no coping mechanism at that point. If it hadn't been Sadat it would have been something else.
"She was never unpleasant, ever, but things changed and we all the saw that the show was suffering, although it remained a huge hit. Most of the cast didn't follow
Foxes
to London the next year." (In London, Elizabeth -- by then separated from John Warner -- reunited with Richard Burton on the occasion of her 50th birthday. The next day he boasted to the tabloids of having slept with her. She was shocked and dismayed, but still undeterred to have him back. This eventually led to the debacle of
Private Lives
and the end of Taylor's promising stage career.)
- DENNIS concludes: "I was unhappy because Elizabeth became unhappy, but I never regretted saying yes to The Little Foxes. She was a revelation in so many ways. Oh, and working with Maureen Stapleton was just as inspiring as I'd hoped. And Maureen was quite the character too!"
Dennis Christopher has a million stories to tell of his long and varied career. I hope he does write that autobiography he hinted at, during our conversation.
- A FEW fast thoughts on Thursday's Oscar nominations.
Extremely surprised that Ben Affleck or Jamie Foxx were not nominated for Best Actor. Would have preferred either of them over Daniel Day-Lewis in Lincoln or Joaquin Phoenix in the disastrous The Master. (For my money, Lincoln is boring, overrated, and Day-Lewis comes off more robotic than charismatic.) Downright shocked that Affleck was overlooked for his masterful directing of Argo. Ditto Argo's seamless screenplay. Well, at least it received a Best Picture nod.
Everybody says Anne Hathaway's weeping cameo has a lock on "Best Supporting Actress" for Les Miserables but don't count out Sally Field, who campaigned tirelessly for the role of Mary Todd Lincoln (I still say Mary Tyler Moore was the best Mrs. Lincoln ever, in the 1988 TV mini-series)... my money's on Jennifer Lawrence as Best Actress for Silver Linings Playbook... torn between Alan Arkin for Argo and Christoph Waltz for Django Unchained in the male Best Supporting category... As for Best Picture, for me it's a toss between Argo and Django UnChained, though a surprise Life of Pi win wouldn't make me unhappy.
On February 24th, we'll know all. But remember, we still have the Golden Globes to look forward to this Sunday. I hope Ben Affleck parties hearty. He deserves to.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.