More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lola Adesioye

Lola Adesioye

Posted: May 27, 2010 01:33 PM

Will Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill be Obama's Katrina?

What's Your Reaction:

34 days after the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, people are starting to wonder if this disaster - described by the White House today as the worst in US history - will be to President Obama what Hurricane Katrina was for George Bush.

Oil continues to spill, causing huge and unprecedented environmental damage and pollution. In the meantime, BP is only liable under current legislation for $75 million worth of compensation despite the cost for the spill currently being estimated at $14 billion. This is also despite the fact that BP's first quarter profits for 2010 were up 135% to $5,598 million, compared with $2,387 million a year ago. Who do you think will be the ones to bear the brunt of the cost for BP's negligence? Taxpayers.

Yet, the White House has been hesitant in coming forward to criticize BP, which quite frankly - along with other major oil companies like Royal Dutch Shell - spills oil pretty regularly in other parts of the world (Nigeria for example where major spills happen nearly every year) with little to no recourse.

The fact that such a major spill has now happened in the US provides an opportune moment for the US government to put an end to the damage and destruction that is being committed by oil companies everyday not just in the US, but around the world. But will they do that? Or is the government too beholden to such companies?

President Obama runs a political risk if he chooses not to take a hard stance against BP. He risks being seen as a president who is more concerned with corporate interests than the interests of the people which is clearly not the platform on which he was elected. Being seen to pander to Big Oil, along with Wall Street bailouts does not look good for this president, particularly one who has touted green jobs and new technology as the future of America's work force. Hopefully such jobs would not be as the result of cleaning up oil spills. Republicans are already using this oil spill against him.

This is bigger than politicking though, bigger than right versus left, or even Obama's reputation. This really is about the future of the world in which we live. This is about rampant profiteering with no regard for people. And surely the future of our earth is more important.

Listen to Dr Boyce Watkins and I discuss this issue.

 

Follow Lola Adesioye on Twitter: www.twitter.com/lolaadesioye

 
 
  • Comments
  • 70
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
02:28 PM on 05/28/2010
This is a false equivalence on just about every level!

1. Man made disaster.
2. BP purposely mislead the public about the severity of the spill.
3. The administration was involved from the 1st day.
4. The US government lacks equipment and expertize in oil well drilling.
5. BP continues to diminish the severity of the spill.
6. The US Government makes resources available to combat the spill.
7. The US Government lacks engineering expertise in deep water oil well drilling.
8. BP shines on the media and the public, while still trying to protect a profit stream.
9. $4000 per barrel fine will be levied against BP.
10. The US government does not have Supertankers.
11. BP assures everyone that they can contain and stop the leak.

There is no similarity other than location of the disaster.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Orly Holmes
01:18 PM on 05/28/2010
Yep,and not a minute too soon,we already have our Heckava Job Brownie moment.

''She is a strong leader and has done tremendous work''

Remarks. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar on MMS Director Liz Birnbaum. May 27,2010....

...right after The New York Times [May 26] splashes a report detailing booze,sex parties,and the acceptance of gifts by MMS federal regulators from BP flaks [ who provided the goils], and just before we found out that she perjured herself before a Senate hearing by stating that she did not know the amount of ''public input'' for the BP project when a 2009 internal memo with her name and remarks on it said she did...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
10:12 AM on 05/28/2010
Katrina act of Nature, Gulf oil spill act of ignorance and corporate greed big difference!
03:01 PM on 05/28/2010
Indeed, the differences should be apparent to everyone but never let facts stand in the way of a hackneyed cliche or sound bite.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reaniel
Breathing since 1983
09:43 AM on 05/28/2010
Dam building/repair as well as disaster relief for a flood = something with in Bush's arsenal.

Fixing/pluging a leaky oil well 1 mile under the sea = not available in Obama's arsenal, unfortunately.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Orly Holmes
01:19 PM on 05/28/2010
But combating that which is already on Louisianas shores is....

The Buck Stops Here eh....?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
02:30 PM on 05/28/2010
Being done.....

The buck has stopped.

I did notice that Jihndal, after decrying the need for any sort of disaster preparedness, and State's rights and the dangers of federal interference, is now crying to the Federal government for help.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Puller58
Man of Mystery
09:22 AM on 05/28/2010
Bush took a hit from Katrina that got the press over their shyness due to 9/11 for honestly reporting on the Bush administration. Obama has a chance to redeem himself if the spill is plugged by aggresively helping the Gulf Coast recover. Given his seeming bias in favor of oil lobbyists, I'm not hopeful.
09:04 AM on 05/28/2010
It's a slick little label isn't it, O's Katrina. It's also pre-school level thinking. To make the comparison, one has to be ignorant of or ignore years and years of buildup to this problem. This post merely passes on junk that plenty of other "media" have already said.

I would rather have Obama than any other contender, and I didn't expect the Messiah or Superman. Not did I expect such stupefying, raging opposition. Look what he has managed to accomplish nonetheless. If only people could stop b1tching and get behind his efforts.
09:32 AM on 05/28/2010
That's the issue. Of course he didn't cause the spill, but he has shown no efforts to get behind. Blind adulation is just as sad as the people who criticize his every move.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Yurdelite51
10:09 AM on 05/28/2010
Bull sh.ite.
10:35 AM on 05/28/2010
He did it so that small hearted, small brain southern state residents get a preview of how things work if they don't want government. They need help from government only when disaster strikes them not when they have to pay taxes to help other needy people.
11:48 AM on 05/28/2010
Fanned!! On point, on message.

Say it again!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaRonDrew
08:55 AM on 05/28/2010
I use to think that we would be known as the greatest generation because we inherited so much from prior generations, then the actor in chief decided that we should no longer work together and pull our own selves up by the boot straps, even if we had no boots and no straps!! The actor in chief also decided we are more exceptional than any other country and should rule over them with an iron fist and look down over them from our beacon on the hill. I hope we the people wake up before it's too late.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
02:38 PM on 05/28/2010
The 30 years of continuation of these proven failed policies and ideology leaves me wondering if it already too late.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaRonDrew
08:55 AM on 05/28/2010
I'm disappointed but not surprised by what it is happening in our country. The drill baby drill crowd, which wants government to get out of the way and allow corporations to do whatever they want, while oil is spewing into the Gulf, is now complaining that the government is not doing enough. The same crowd is now calling for nuclear power plants to be built in your neighborhood and mines (imagine what’s going to happen when a deregulated nuclear plant explodes). Proven once again there are two kinds of Republicans, rich ones and dumb ones. Weak kneed Democrats are no better, allowing every reform bill to be watered down to the point that it will be ineffective and not come close to accomplishing something our country needs. I predicted that when "we" the people elected Bush one in a half times, that our country is going to hell in a hand basket. Now we are fighting two wars, a million people are dead our environment is being threatened, our schools are failing, we are lying off teachers and building more prisons. While all this is happening, "we" the people are debating rather or not a poor person should have access to healthcare or a poor person from another country should be allowed to support their family doing work that we don't seem to want to do.
08:32 AM on 05/28/2010
Years of lax regulation is why oil is spilling in the gulf. The media is lazy and wants to make silly comparisons about apples and oranges.
How about the media ask how did we get to today and how do we make sure it never happens again? If you begin the narrative with substance maybe we can get to a substantive answer.
The narrative doesn't begin with PBO. Stop looking to blame PBO for something he didn't create
08:57 AM on 05/28/2010
Thanks for a reasonable and intelligent reply. The media is an unnamed culprit in the largely gross national superficiality. Without knowledge we reply with low emotion. In fact this whole post is based on the assumption that the media will determine for us what our frame of reference is (in order to drum up business.)
11:54 AM on 05/28/2010
Fanned again, jmbates, you are on the ball!!
09:06 AM on 05/28/2010
By your logic then, Bush is not to blame for Katrina because he didn't create the levies that failed.
09:17 AM on 05/28/2010
The levies failed because no one cared to reinforce the levies. Bush didn't cause the hurricane to come nor the levies to fail.
Bush is being blamed for not responding to people in need. The government's slow response caused people to die. Birds and turtles are not people dying. Big difference.
The media trying to place blame on the President is silly. The govenors/congressional leaders of those states know the risk of oil spills. Heck they are backed by big oil. Why were they not prepared for this risk?
Could the media ask a question that is pertinent to the situation?
08:23 AM on 05/28/2010
Obama's Katrina!! How could anyone be so stupid as to say that? Katrina was a disaster that everyone knew was going to happen. Our Government had been dealing with storms and Floods since the begining of time. Oil Blowouts are not something forseen or predictable. Our Government does not have Oil Equipment and Oil Experts to Waltz in and take control of a Blowout. To say Obama should take control of this Disaster is just plain Nuts. Besides, Obama HAS BEEN on top of this since the Begining. The only thing he did not do is go out and Grandstand about it. He brought in some of the Brightest Organizations such as NASA etc...He has done everything he could do except Grandstand. If Obama handed the entire thing over to the Republicans we would see some World Class back-peddaling and Excuses of monumental proportions. They could not do as good a job as is being done right now. The News Media and the Republicans are all just selling BullSh*t for the sake of Headlines.
08:35 AM on 05/28/2010
Thank u the MSM thinks that if you repeat a statement over and over people will believe it. PBO came out yesterday and explained everything and all the media can say is he is defensive, his demeanor etc etc.
Just pathetic.
12:11 PM on 05/28/2010
Johnniedog, your reply needs an article of its own. The media's pandering to controversy and neglect for substance is rallying our troops. People are getting sick of blaming Obama for everthing, Obama this, Obama that. What about DADT, health care, financial reform, immigration, cap and trade? All they want to do is increase their reader ship and cite polls.
The media are just as culpable as the Republicans who want him to fail to get the story!! He's not going to fail, because we are not going to fail. Notice how the media was way offbase with the recent elections?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
02:52 PM on 05/28/2010
Money. Profits. The only motive any longer.

Ratings and ad revenue.....Controversy increases ratings, which raise ad prices....

Media sources, like the health care industry lost most credibility when they became for profit endeavors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iyamchazz
Criticism is a form of autobiography.
08:05 AM on 05/28/2010
Katrina was a hurricane which was tracked by satellite for days
before it hit. The Bush administration then sat back saying stuff
like ' Heck of a job Brownie' while thousands of people were left
stranded. The BP disaster is as a result of corporate crime and
company people lying about the extent of the damage. To try to
compare the two makes apples and oranges one and the same.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DEMONDRICK
Obamas' perfect*imperfection)
06:40 AM on 05/28/2010
To call this Obama's Katrina is the underlining problem that the MSM has to be careful with in explaining,or even questioning for that fact.Constant looking to the POTUS for answers to problems that are man made,granted this is HUGE!!,will also cause an blaming effect,that will futher cause citizens to not trust in our governing body.And as much as it pains us to admit it,we as a country have a lot to do with this in not asking ourselves, will I leave this a better place than I found it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
06:29 AM on 05/28/2010
This is not Obama's Katrina. This is far worse than that. The Bush government failed to respond to Katrina competently because Bush was dumb and incompetent. To all appearances, Obama is failing to respond to this oil leak competently because he is a shill of Big Oil.

Or at least that's what it looks like.
12:18 PM on 05/28/2010
Please explain what suffices for a competent response to this oil leak. And don't say anything resembling granstanding.

Now what evidence do you have that Obama has not responded competently.

If you can do these 2 things, I'm open minded and will change my mind. But as of now, Obama was confronted with a heretofore unforseen technical challenge and assembled the right people to get the job done. And the long time it has taken is evidence ot the difficulty of the challenge, not the capability of the responders. We're talking about 1 mile under ocean where humans are out of their depth.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
02:56 PM on 05/28/2010
He did not wave his magic wand, clean the spill and preserve profits all at once......

Since "Blame Obama" has become the first response of conservatives of all stripes, it is difficult to take them seriously any longer.
12:31 PM on 05/28/2010
Exactly! fanned! 900,000 buys a president. Against offshore drilling during the campaign. For it after the money. It certainly does look like it.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
02:54 PM on 05/28/2010
Your bias is showing classlesswar.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msmPostcom
01:54 AM on 05/28/2010
Crying about the environment, shrimps, and lobsters from an oil spill we all knew were going to happen sooner or later. You should be asking where is all the money Louisiana got from oil revenues. Did they take some of that money to by oil spill equipment to protect their shoreline? Oh, they just spent the money for big Shrimp and Lobster dinners. Are Lousiana really fighting to protect their shoreline and industries OR Big Oil Revenues? Let's put the focus on the Gulf States readiness.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nmaddog7
02:16 AM on 06/11/2010
But I wonder if you said the same thing after Katrina hit, were they ignoring city infrastructure because they were to busy bankrolling lobster banquets? Would you have typed the words, "is New Orleans really fighting to protect the city from flooding?" after that disaster? No, most were joking about Heckuva Job Brownie.
01:38 AM on 05/28/2010
Katrina was a natural disaster which Bush competently failed to respond, the oil spill is a private matter which BP has 100% ownership. Calling this Obama's Katrina is just the GOP validating how fxxked up Bush was at that incident.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChicoBrisbane
Recovering Fox News addict
05:15 AM on 05/28/2010
People often overlook that it wasn't Hurricane Katrina that did so much damage, it was the failure of the levys and the failure of the Bush Administration to react to the warnings about our faultering infastructure. The warnings were not just speculation, but printed in plain old black & white just like the warning about Bin Ladin being determined to launch a terrorist attack inside of the United States. So, the levys failed, the bridge along interstate 35 in Minneapolis collapsed and people died. However, if you watch fox news, the difference between the oil spill and Katrina is that there are plenty of people to blame for the oil spill, but nobody to blame for Katrina unless you want to blame God.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
02:57 PM on 05/28/2010
Fanned for concise accuracy!