More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lonna Saunders

Lonna Saunders

Posted: August 26, 2010 12:06 PM

Memo to US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald: You won. Due to your legal team's efforts, former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich is a convicted felon. Remember how they got Al Capone, another Chicagoan? Not on racketeering nor on his mob-related activities. He was thrown in jail for his IRS woes.

Instead of preparing for a retrial, focus your time and talent on Blagojevich's sentencing hearing for lying to the FBI. That is where you should focus your efforts. That is what you should be discussing with Judge James Zagel--a date for the sentencing hearing. It is not as sexy as some of the other counts, but it is the meat and potatoes of what your office does. And let's face it. The City of Big Shoulders, is a meat and potatoes type of town.

The entire nation has Blagojevich battle fatigue. We can't take it any more. Despite Blago's effing golden remark captured on the government's wiretaps of his conversations, President Barack Obama's US Senate seat was not sold to the highest bidder. For if it had been, Rod Blagojevich's campaign war chest would have been six million dollars richer. But it wasn't.

Because his big brother Robert Blagojevich did not accept the six million dollar offer of an Indian businessman to give Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. the senate seat vacated by President Obama. If it was truly all about the money, why didn't brother Robert accept the six million? Roland Burris, who eventually got the appointment, didn't give Robert or Rod a dime for it or anything else of value.

Please return to sender brother Robert. Send him back to Nashville where he belongs. He is not a Chicago pol. He is a military man and a businessman with no prior political experience. He had no idea what he signed up for when he honored his mother's dying wish to help out his brother. Neither did his dying mother for that matter. You are not going to get a Chicago jury to convict the brother.

This isn't just one woman writer's humble opinion. It is a consensus of opinion from around the horn. It is rare to see the editorial boards of such politically disparate publications as The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post, agree on anything. Yet after the Blagojevich jury verdict was announced, both papers editorialized that your office should skip a retrial even though it is your right to seek one. Ditto Republican consultant Mary Matalin and Democratic TV talker Roland Martin as well as political commentator David Gergen who has worked both sides of the aisle, most recently for the Clinton White House. All three were on CNN last week, opining against a retry of the Blagojevich brothers.

So, are you listening? To repeat. Mr. US Attorney, sir, you got what you sought. Rod Blagojevich is now a convicted felon. You won.

On behalf of the people of the state of Illinos and the nation, let's put our money and mouthpiece on the penalty phase. Will Blago serve time in prison? If so, at which facility? For how long? Will he pay a fine? How much? Will he be required to do community service? What and for how long? Will he be required to make restitution? Will he be confined to his home with an ankle bracelet? Will he get to keep his hair or be forced to trim it? Just kidding on that last one. But for a guy who spent thousands on a single business suit, the mere thought of having to wear an orange jumpsuit every day, could be punishment enough. OK, just kidding on that one, too.

Seriously though, as actor Jon Hamm said to a female co-worker in a tight spot (Elisabeth Moss playing Peggy Olsen), on the Emmy Award winning drama Mad Men: "Move forward."

Let's move forward, US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, and spend the public's limited tax dollars and limited resources on catching some other bad guys. You did what you said you would do. Another former governor is a convicted felon. Hey, maybe George Ryan and Blago could even share a cell together. Stranger things have happened.

Please accept the jury's verdict and move on. Thank you for your consideration.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarkBraun
Library trustee; OTBAC; comic book hero
08:40 AM on 08/31/2010
Well said. Shades of Kennith Starr! We're spending millions of Illinois dollars when teachers and librarians are being put out of work?

Nothing, if anything, done by Blagojevich affected me, my family or most Illinois voters (well, then again, he did give seniors free bus rides, coraled taxes and commuters got i-Pass lanes), but the tens of millions wasted to pursue him and pursue him even further are dollars flushed away from already-beaten taxpayers. So, the guy who SAVED taxpayers money is being prosecuted by a guy who is spending us into a hole. Did I get that right?
11:21 PM on 08/30/2010
Is this retrial of Rod Blagojevich related to rumors that Fitzgerald is in line to become Obama's FBI Director? Is that why Blago's lying to the FBI conviction is such a big deal? That relevant conduct rule in sentencing is pretty interesting. Thanks for mentioning it for us nonlawyers, Shelly!
05:14 PM on 08/30/2010
And since it's federal he'll still do time for those things of which he was acquitted under the fed's relevant conduct rule. It's not right, but that's how they operate. He doesn't need to do a retrial from the punishment aspect; however, it may be the notariety he's looking for more than the conviction.
10:04 PM on 08/29/2010
Ther are elements of sadness in the total situation . You ,Lonna, have been able to express them without verbalizing them . Your moving from the serious to the facetious { Just kidding ,Just Kidding ]was your way of saying to your readers how sad you felt about the stain that once again smeared the beautifull city of Chicago . In so doing ,you also showed that the human elements had disappeared under the weight of the legalistic procedures . I loved your article and I loved the fact that you were able to show , without saying it , that there is still room for humanismm in every human tragedy . A job well done .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miles120
06:06 PM on 08/26/2010
Uh, are you a friend of the former governor? Because you blatantly advocate for him. Forwarding a narrative that he is innocent of the 23 charges is disingenuous, and there is nothing unusual about a prosecutor retrying them, especially when a lone juror was the cause of the mistrial. So, are you on a team?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lonna Saunders
06:41 PM on 08/26/2010
Dear Huffpost Super User,
To answer your question, no, I am not a friend of former Governor Blagojevich, and he has never been a client of mine either. The same for his brother Robert.
For the record, I do not know you and have never "forwarded a narrative" to you or anyone else that Blago is "innocent of 23 charges", as you claim in your post. I am not the one here who is "disingenuous", as you have put it. I call it as I see it, and evidently the prosecution saw it the same way as I did because late this afternoon, they decided to dismiss all charges against Robert Blagojevich as I had urged in the above post. In case, you wondered I have no inside track with the prosecutors either. Have a nice evening.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miles120
08:21 PM on 08/26/2010
That's good to know, because in your post titled, "Blagojevich Trial: Where's The Beef" you ask, "When did talking without action become a crime?" Every other legal analyst who weighed in on the trial observed that the conspiracy charges did not require a successful completion to be a crime. You also deflected his guilt by claiming that he got bad advice from advisors, while failing to mention his own career as a prosecutor. You asked, "where's the beef?" long before the trial had ended, as if to say that there was simply no grounds for the charges. So naturally, I just thought you might have some favorable connection.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
11:00 PM on 08/26/2010
There was not just one lone juror who caused the mistrial. Why don't you try to find the facts? Furthermore, if Ms. Saunders has been advocating a fair trial for the former governor, she is far outweighed by those participating in the witch hunt against him, the whole Chicago Tribune for a start.
photo
ThePeoriaKid
We're All Bozos On This Bus..
06:21 PM on 09/07/2010
Doesn't matter what the general public, Chi-Trib, or "witch hunters" think.

There is no "referendum" for which to vote on.

It's up to the judges, prosecution team, and the jurors.

Looks like someone bought Rod some "justice".. charges dropped.
photo
PalaceOfWisdom
Obama signed away habeus corpus
02:09 PM on 08/26/2010
I don't have any fatigue from the trial because I don't watch every moment of media speculation. I just waited to hear the verdict. If a sitting governor doing what he did doesn't merit prosecuting "to the fullest extent of the law" I don't know what does. The man is still openly defiant about what he did. How do you slap him on the wrist? How do we expect public officials to be ethical if they're treated with kid gloves when they betray our trust? Do we want a system where you merely need a lone juror to hold out on your behalf to permanently escape punishment for your crimes? He tried to sell a U.S. Senate seat. His failure to close the deal doesn't entitle him to leniency.
01:54 PM on 08/26/2010
Why not do both? Imprison him now, requiring him to pay a fine as well, then retry him on the unresolved charges once he is safely ensconced? It doesn't have to be either/or.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
11:01 PM on 08/26/2010
Uh, he has the right of appeal which I'm sure he's going to make use of.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lonna Saunders
12:33 AM on 08/27/2010
Rod Bl;agojevich's attorneys have indicated in open court that they intend to file an appeal on his behalf of his conviction on one count of lying to the FBI.