iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lou Dematteis

GET UPDATES FROM Lou Dematteis
 

Chevron Says These People Don't Matter

Posted: 04/12/2012 4:16 pm

Chevron says the people in these photographs don't matter.

They are, according to the oil giant, literally "irrelevant" players in a 19-year-old legal battle against Chevron for one of the world's largest oil-related environmental disasters.

Hundreds of people have died from cancer caused by contamination left by Chevron in the Ecuadoran rainforest, where it drilled under the Texaco brand from 1964 to 1992. Thousands, more suffer from respiratory illnesses, deformities, skin disease, spontaneous abortions and other ailments.

The Ecuadorans in these photographs and approximately 30,000 other rainforest residents recently won an $18 billion damage award from Ecuador's courts against Chevron. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, the company refuses to pay. If it did, the money would fund a cleanup of the contamination and provide clean drinking water and health care services for people living in Chevron's former concession area.

In a desperate effort to avoid paying the $18 billion judgment, Chevron lawyer Doak Bishop of King & Spalding recently said: "The plaintiffs are really irrelevant. They always were irrelevant. There were never any real parties in interest in this case... There will be no prejudice to [the rainforest communities] or any individual by holding up enforcement of the judgment."

Anyone who has seen the devastation in the rainforest and spent time with the people there, like I did when I took these photographs, would never make such a statement. (See more photos at: www.loudematteis.com).

Launch Slideshow
 HIDE THUMBNAILS
1 of 13
PLAY ALL
ADVERTISEMENT

I first traveled to the Ecuadoran Amazon in 1993 and witnessed first hand the contamination and environmental damage. During my trip, I spoke to a doctor at Ecuador's Ministry of Health who said the region was sitting on a time bomb. He told me that if the toxic waste was not cleaned up, the result would be an epidemic of serious and fatal health conditions.

Sure enough, when I returned to the region in 2003 for the start of the trial against Chevron, I found that the time bomb had exploded. Everywhere I turned, I encountered people with cancer, birth defects, respiratory ailments and other severe heath problems.

Enough is enough. Chevron should stop delaying the justice that the people in these photographs and so many others like them in the Ecuadoran rainforest deserve. (For more information, see the video at www.chevrontoxico.com).

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 116
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
01:12 AM on 04/15/2012
Not one of the super rich 1%?

Then you too are irrelevant.
06:20 PM on 04/14/2012
What I don't get is this. Even if the Ecuadorian Government allowed Chevron to dump toxic chemicals into the forest, into peoples drinking water, chemicals that are known the wreak havoc on the human immune system. Why would they? Wouldn't a thinking rational human being, that cared for human life, not do this kind of thing? That in itself is evil.

In my view, the Ecuadorians were irrelevant to begin with.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hikerguy22
This is your carbon footprint
08:10 PM on 04/15/2012
Chevron will soon be irrelevant and so will BP, and the list goes on for Big Oil, just like tobacco, they are being caught in their lies. Politicians, be it in Ecuador or USA, run were the money flows and it will stop flowing from Big Oil as climate change becomes more evident. The only problem is we have very little time to solve this crisis.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdollinter
12:35 PM on 04/14/2012
Now I know the reason why gas is approaching $5 gallon.
06:35 PM on 04/13/2012
If the story were as simple as "Chevron is an evil corporation", we would not be reading about one lawyer's arguably insensitive comments. The plaintiffs would have already enforced their judgment against Chevron in the United States (the US has the most permissive approach to enforcing foreign judgments of any country in the world). So why are we still reading about this?

The case is dragging on because the plaintiffs would not dare try enforcing the judgment in a US court because there is extensive evidence that the plaintiffs used fraud to swing the Ecuadorian trial against Chevron- they even wrote the judge's judgment for him!

My guess is that most HuffPo readers worry about the inequities of capitalism and have unfavorable presumptions about corporations and favorable presumptions about marginalized indigenous groups. Fair enough. But if that is your starting point, surely you are not so naive as to think that the answer lies in turning corporate hearts- the answer lies in effective litigation to shape corporate incentives!

Therefore, if the plaintiffs' allegations are true, then the real outrage is the plaintiffs reduced corporate accountability by tainting their own case with a sloppy fraud. And if the plaintiffs' allegations are unfounded, the outrage is that a failed attempt to shakedown a corporation through fraud operated to knock a bit of money out of countless average joes' 401Ks and into the pockets of high-flying lawyers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nomadrdw
Zen Druid
04:21 PM on 04/15/2012
first off, this crime is NOT enforceable in the US, any one should be aware of that if they were aware of the so called fraud the the Natives presented.
you are doing nothing more than fanatics on the right here do all the time. using inuendo and out right lies to cover the tracks of the criminals, which in this case is Chevron, but you used the same exact arguments about BP as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
g-moi
Let's GoGreen. We Can Do It.
04:04 PM on 04/13/2012
Another example of how corporations are NOT people. A person would most likely have wages garnished or end up in jail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FullFrontal
11:17 AM on 04/13/2012
i don't understand how these people won their settlement but the company doesn't have to pay them? where they do that at? usually when a judge says you have to pay, you have to pay......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:01 AM on 04/13/2012
AM I MISSING SOMETHING SOME WHERE....I HAVE READ THE ARTICLE THREE TIMES AND I CANNOT SEE WHERE CHEVERON IS SAYING "THESE PEOPLE DON'T MATTER"....COULD THIS BE ANOTHER MEDIA CREATING NEWS STORY....STIRING UP STUFF WITH FALSE REPORTING....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FullFrontal
11:16 AM on 04/13/2012
"The plaintiffs are really irrelevant. They always were irrelevant" NOT EXACT WORDS, BUT GOOD ENOUGH FOR GOV'T WORK
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
threnodymarch
Art is long, life is short.
11:19 AM on 04/13/2012
It's right there in the middle of the article.

"In a desperate effort to avoid paying the $18 billion judgment, Chevron lawyer Doak Bishop of King & Spalding recently said: "The plaintiffs are really irrelevant. They always were irrelevant. There were never any real parties in interest in this case... There will be no prejudice to [the rainforest communities] or any individual by holding up enforcement of the judgment."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DenverPainters
Painting a better picture
09:35 AM on 04/13/2012
What a Barbaric thing to say, thinking I've heard everything from a company.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipher
09:10 AM on 04/13/2012
Welcome to the jungle it gets worse here every day
Ya learn to live like an animal in the jungle where we play
If you hunger for what you see you'll take it eventually
You can have everything you want but you better not take it from me
08:30 AM on 04/13/2012
Next thing you know they will file bankruptcy. And just change the name and CEO of the company.
photo
crankyCrackPot
My imaginary friend says that you need a therapist
08:00 AM on 04/13/2012
Who has more geopolitical muscle... Ecuador or Chevron?
All of Scandinavia or Exxon?
Need I go on?
07:48 AM on 04/13/2012
make an example of chevron ,,for no one or big companies should be above the law
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fireslayer
06:29 AM on 04/13/2012
Chevron of the lovely, surreal- impressionist advertizing blitz to convince the US public of their environmentalist credentials.

18 billion dollar judgment that they suggest they above the law and will not pay? They have pumped millions into attempts to fight back the Ecuador democracy.

Ecuador, take back their oil holdings and take care of yours country!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rg9rts
Carpe Diem! This aint rehearsal
06:21 AM on 04/13/2012
D Driller I'll refer you to PG&E case of chromium dumping.
Kommonman
Fanned or reviled on a whim
09:49 AM on 04/13/2012
It does not matter what you say to driller..I have had long running arguements here on the forum with him...As an indusrty advocate his only concern is for the industry...the people affected are irrelevant
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rg9rts
Carpe Diem! This aint rehearsal
11:02 AM on 04/13/2012
Thank you for the heads up I won't waste my time on him.anymore. Must be a Texas stock holder.
photo
ClassicalGas
Colorado Rocky Mountain Hi!
05:20 AM on 04/16/2012
Perfect!
04:03 AM on 04/13/2012
Only thing that matters is maximizing shareholders' wealth. F the world.