Louis Klarevas

Louis Klarevas

Posted: October 9, 2009 01:42 PM

Obama Wins the 2009 Nobel Promise Prize

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS
What's Your Reaction?

At 5:01 a.m. (EDT) I was awoken by a text alert from the Associated Press (AP) informing me that President Barack Obama had won this year's Nobel Peace Prize. Half asleep, I laughed at the AP for making such a gross reporting error. Obama wins the Nobel? Pleassseee!

But within moments, as the story broke on CNN, the BBC, the New York Times, and the Huffington Post, the laugh was on me.

All morning I have been wondering, how can it be? Why did Obama win this prestigious prize? What has he accomplished that rises to the level of a Nobel?

In media interviews, one member of the five-person selection committee indicated that the primary reason for the selection was President Obama's commitment to nuclear disarmament.

Nuclear disarmament? Hellooooooooo! The President has only been in office for 37 weeks. And in that time, the only measure toward disarmament was a United Nations resolution passed a couple of weeks ago embracing it in theory - a purely rhetorical act. In practice, since coming to office, South Asia has further de-stabilized, making steps toward nuclear reductions on the sub-continent less, not more, likely. And let's not forget that North Korea and Iran have not made any significant (and verifiable) commitments toward abandoning their nuclear programs.

Maybe the committee member misspoke? Maybe it was some other accomplishment that motivated the award?

But as I scanned the gamut of global issues, one by one I found each lacking. We're still at war in Iraq and Afghanistan (and let's not forget conducting military operations in Pakistan). We're still ignoring Darfur (and Congo and Guinea and insert any African country in crisis you wish here). We've done little to jump start the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. The Guantanamo Bay detention center is still open. We still haven't joined the International Criminal Court. And let's not forget that polar ice caps are still melting because states, including the United States, have not made a serious effort to arrest climate change.

It couldn't be for accomplishments in fighting piracy in Somalia, could it?

No matter how you look at it, President Obama did not receive this award because he brought peace to some place in the world (the way previous recipients like Jimmy Carter and Nelson Mandela did).

President Obama is this year's Nobel laureate not because of peace but because of promise.

As the Nobel Committee expressed: "His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population."

For the first time in a long time, a large part of the world feels hope and optimism that great things can be accomplished in the near future. The objectives cited above no longer seem idealistic - but instead realistic. And one man has been particularly instrumental in lifting our spirits and inspiring our endeavors of late: Barack Obama.

As a best-selling author, President Obama should see this award for exactly what it is: a book advance. Now we wait in anticipation and hope that the President delivers one hell of a history - preferably on deadline.

 
 

Follow Louis Klarevas on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NYUProf

 
Comments
4
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- als 360 I'm a Fan of als 360 2 fans permalink

The president didn't win because he is the president of for what he has acheived. Jimmy Carter won it for trying to bring peace to the middle east did he acheive it no but he was very outspoken. The award is not always given for achievement. The president since the campain has talked about a new way to approach the internationl deplomacy. It's just like americans to trivialize something so good for americans. We should all be proud our president of our country has recieved this. I expect it from the crazies on the right but for the left so be so critical is mind boggling. Wake up people the world look favorably on us again i know to some of you it doesn't matter but to most of us it does because when we do have to go to war maybe our friends won't turn our back on us Liberals WAKE UP, Progressives WAKE UP, Democrates WAKE UP. At least the right wing stick together no matter what they do the left just criticizes each other

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 10/10/2009
- ble44 I'm a Fan of ble44 2 fans permalink

Others deserved it more. I hope this doesn't lead to a redistribution of awards. I would hate to see this ever so important prize cheapened. Now Obama has to go that extra step and earn it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 10/09/2009
- als 360 I'm a Fan of als 360 2 fans permalink

are u serious? when will american be proud of the country and our leaders again this is an affirmation that the world doesn't see us as gun totin cowboys anymore. for the first time in 8 years we have an advocate for real change and a different way of dealing with other countries and all you can do is trivialize it. You should be proud. If the president would have not accepted it then it would be the ultimate show of arrogance and i think we showed enough of that already. be proud

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 10/10/2009
- Smithn I'm a Fan of Smithn 42 fans permalink
photo

Thank you for this objective and up lifting analysis--a melody amonst the washboard clamor.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 10/09/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect