House To Hold Hearing on Scheme to Disenfranchise Foreclosed Homeowners


The controversy over Michigan Republicans' reported plans to identify people whose homes are in foreclosure and publicly challenge their right to vote on Election Day -- a report that Republican Party officials now deny -- is continuing to escalate.

Today, the Michigan Messenger news blog is reporting that the House Judiciary Committee, headed by Michigan Congressman John Conyers, will be holding hearings into the alleged "caging" scheme, which some reports indicate is planned for Michigan and Ohio and possibly other "battleground" states. A Committee spokesman confirmed to me this morning that such a hearing has been scheduled for Wednesday but said the witness list and other details probably will not be finalized until tomorrow. A spokesperson for the Messenger, which also broke the original story about the voter suppression plan in Michigan ("Lose Your House, Lose Your Vote"), said that their reporter was not expected to be called to testify.

The hearing on Capitol Hill may draw more attention to a controversy that has the potential to affect key precincts in swing states in a close election but that has drawn little attention as national media have focused primarily on a meltdown in financial markets. Wednesday's Judiciary Committee hearing, which will occur at the same time as political leaders negotiate a $700 billion "bailout" of troubled financial institutions necessitated, in part, by a sharp rise in the numbers of home foreclosures, may raise the profile of the parties' struggles to affect voter turnout by legal and bureaucratic means.

The upcoming hearing will be just one more escalation of a controversy that has become increasingly belligerent over the past ten days. After the "Lose Your House' story broke, Democrats filed a lawsuit in a Michigan federal court seeking an injunction to block voter challenges. Last week, fourteen U.S. Senators and 33 Congresspeople wrote letters to Attorney General Michael Mukasey asking for an investigation into the "vote caging" allegations. On Saturday, the Republican National Committee's chief counsel, Sean Cairncross, convened a telephonic press conference to highlight a minor correction made in the Michigan Messenger's "Lose Your House" story, predicting that the news blog will recant the entire story soon. However, a Messenger representative has confirmed to me that the blog continues to stand by its reporting.

In Saturday's conference call, Cairncross also denied that the Republican Party ever engages in illegal voter suppression, notwithstanding court decrees, findings and convictions documenting Republican efforts to discourage minority and low-income voters from casting ballots in the past. OTB's coverage of that call, and of a key Democrat's response, can be read here. OTB's coverage of the original story and of a Democratic lawsuit to prevent such challenges can be read here.

The Michigan Messenger reports today:

In a letter to Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, released simultaneously, Democratic Rep. John Conyers Jr. of Detroit, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, asked McCain to denounce any efforts by the Republican Party to engage in voter suppression, including challenges based on a voter's home foreclosure status. Conyers requested that McCain direct his supporters to refrain from using that tactic.


"At a time when Americans are losing their homes at record numbers, it is difficult to imagine that anyone would attempt to capitalize on such misfortune for political gain," Conyers wrote. "Furthermore, a rejection of this strategy would be consistent with your recent commitment to a "fair and transparent election."

Last week the McCain campaign announced that it had formed an Honest and Open Election Committee, "with a mission to ensure that every qualified citizen has the opportunity to vote in a fair and transparent manner." In a press release that did not include contact information, the McCain campaign Web site announced on Sept. 15, "The committee will work with state and local election officials to anticipate, and where possible resolve in advance, problems likely to arise on Election Day."

Calls by Michigan Messenger to the McCain campaign/Honest and Open Election Committee were not returned.

Read the rest of the Michigan Messenger article here.

Follow M.S. Bellows, Jr. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/msbellows

 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:59 PM on 10/01/2008
Did this happen in the face of the financial crisis?

What is the alternate date if it did not?
04:07 PM on 09/28/2008
Until McCain makes a publically aired address calling attention to and denouncing any such activity, I will not believe he or his supporters intend to refrain from such practices. In fact, it will be difficult to believe any statement by the McCain campaign even if they do denounce this type of activity or any other, since they have been so dishonest and dishonrable throughout this campaign.

It is sort of like the story of the little boy crying wolf. When the campaign finally tells the truth, No One Feels They Can Believe Them.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Icantbelieveher
What you do for the least of my brethren, you do f
05:59 AM on 09/23/2008
The repubs stole the last two elections, but they have met their match in Obama. It shows every time they try to lie and cheat and he calls them on it and sends them running with their tail between their legs. All they can say is: that's not what we wanted to list for -- but they won't tell anyone what the list was going to be used for.

Keep putting the spotlight on them whenever possible. When McCain speaks, his face has that deer caught in the headlights look that so many republicans have nowadays. They are spending the bulk of their time backpedaling, and Obama is going forward!

Obama/Biden 08
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jadeba
12:47 AM on 09/23/2008
Mc's response is less than encouraging and "Honest and Open" means it'll be just the reverse. They won't stop - mail in ballots, everyone!
08:40 AM on 09/23/2008
1984 anyone
09:58 PM on 09/22/2008
Maybe THIS entire debacle, the tanking of Wall Street, and the ensuing bail-out sham, the tricky status of the conflict in the Middle East, is "The Mushroom Cloud" they were referring to during the run-up to the war in Iraq!! Instead of "Chickens coming home to roost," how about, "Vultures circling a dying carcass?" Call it Karma/God's Will, whatever, all I know is that God doesn't like ugly, and He doesn't care very much for the good-looking either!!
05:32 PM on 09/22/2008
In theory, if it can be proven that the RNC is coordinating multiple caging efforts across state lines, could they be subject to RICO prosecution?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
buggedabouttheus
Liberal, Progressive & Christian unashamedly
06:47 PM on 09/22/2008
I surely hope that rea subject to RICO. Maybe they will go to jail this time.
photo
peterg76
Freelance medical transcriptionist
04:50 PM on 09/22/2008
You didn't think that business about "Decisions by the Secretary... are non-reviewable ... and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency" was just a helpful bit of streamlining, did you?
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
01:32 PM on 09/23/2008
you don't think that was written by the lobbiests, do you????
04:11 PM on 09/22/2008
I think whatever Election fraud that is uncovered should be looked at as treason. From the top to the bottom, whoever participated. Treason.
05:46 PM on 09/22/2008
Then George W. Bush and Jeb Bush are traitors.
03:34 PM on 09/22/2008
Great post. A number of state courts have addressed the ambiguities in state election laws and found that homeless people cannot be denied the right to vote. I'll note just a couple of cases here; there are many.

A requirement that people live in a traditional dwelling in order to vote placed an unconstitutional constraint on the voting rights of homeless persons. Coalition for the Homeless v. Jensen, 187 A.D.2d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992).

And maybe this most notable case, given this particular state court's finding:

When registering to vote, homeless people may designate a shelter, park, or street corner as their residence. Fischer v. Stout, 741 P.2d 217 (Alaska 1987).

It doesn't take much research to know that caging is a vicious tactic designed to keep certain people from
legally voting. It always seems to be Republicans who are intent on breaking laws so "their" people get in or stay in power.

Great reporting.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
M.S. Bellows, Jr.
04:35 PM on 09/22/2008
Great point. In the '04 election, a colleague of mine was instrumental in helping the women in a battered women's shelter -- who aren't allowed to give out the shelter's address, especially since voter registration is public record -- get registered without ANY address; the county registrar allowed them to use the elections office's address instead. It was a wonderful victory and you shoulda seen the looks on their faces when they found out that being battered didn't disenfranchise them...