iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Maher Arar

Maher Arar

Posted: June 28, 2010 04:31 PM

In Refusing to Hear My Case, The Supreme Court Has Put the World's Peace and Order in Danger

What's Your Reaction:

Last week the Supreme Court of the United States of America refused to hear my case. This eliminates any remaining hope for me of obtaining justice through the U.S. judicial system against US officials who sent me to Syria to be tortured.

Let me emphasize the fact that my case is not an isolated one. My case is unique in the sense that I was the only person who was rendered from US soil. But hundreds of other human beings have been rendered by the CIA and handed over to brutal regimes. No one knows how many of these people have died under torture or completely disappeared. Those of us who were lucky "survived" and were released, but now live with psychological and physical scars.

In times of turmoil and crisis, such as the ones we have been living since 9/11, the judicial system is supposed to do exactly the opposite of what it has done: it is supposed to stand up to the executive branch and make sure the constitution is respected. Unfortunately, the judicial system has abandoned its sacred role of ensuring that no one is above the law. In doing so it has given the executive branch the green light to continue abusing people's basic human rights. As a result of this willful blindness, it has put the world's peace and order in danger.

A lot of people had high hopes when Obama took his oath to uphold the Constitution. It later became clear that his administration was no better than that of his predecessor. Here we are, 18 months after he took office, and Guantánamo is still open, renditions are still being carried out and illegal assassinations by drone planes have increased tenfold. This latter tactic has claimed the lives of hundreds of innocent civilians so far. One can only wonder what is next in the so-called "war on terror."

What is the solution to this state of lawlessness that the world is experiencing today? In my opinion, the judicial system can, and should, exercise its full powers. American Judges should learn lessons from their Italian counterparts, who did not listen to their political masters when it came to laying charges against the CIA officers who illegally kidnapped an Egyptian cleric on Italian soil and rendered him to torture in Egypt.

The RCMP, the Canadian federal police force, has launched a criminal investigation into my case. They have been collecting evidence with the view to charge those Syrian and American officials who were responsible for my torture. Whether charges will be brought against these officials will be something I and other human rights advocates will be watching very closely.

History has taught us that civilizations prosper when they make sure that justice prevails. Those civilizations that forgot this important lesson saw their might vanish in the eyes of people. I have no choice but to agree with Benjamin Franklin, who once wrote, "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

 
Last week the Supreme Court of the United States of America refused to hear my case. This eliminates any remaining hope for me of obtaining justice through the U.S. judicial system against US official...
Last week the Supreme Court of the United States of America refused to hear my case. This eliminates any remaining hope for me of obtaining justice through the U.S. judicial system against US official...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 510
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Faiza Waseem
04:51 PM on 06/30/2010
Muslims for Peace http://www.muslimsforpeace.org/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JusticiaParaTodos
04:42 PM on 06/30/2010
Why is Congress and the President not holding Bush, Cheney, et al accountable for their crimes? Why are we still in Afghanistan and Iraq when it is clear that Al Qaeda is hardly a real threat to anyone other than themselves? Why have we the people permitted the president to renege on his promises of ending the wars, shutting down Guantanamo and bringing the so-called incarcerated terrorists to justice??

The state of this nation is indeed pathetic. The corporate elite along with their toadies in the Pentagon and Congress can do as they please, while people die and suffer! The good book teaches us that the love of money is the root of all evil, so true. So very true.
11:11 AM on 06/30/2010
@Maher Arar. I really wish that my wishes were followed by my elected officials. I was opposed to both wars and spoke out against them. I was treated by my fellow citizens as a traitor. If I had been Muslim, Arab or Persian, I may have suffered your fate or worse.
I was and still am ashamed of my Nation and fellow citizens who claim higher morality, while practicing the morality of sociopaths. I only wish there was a away to help people see that justice and morality (as well as our personal safety) are the same and must come from the same ethics and humanity we personally cultivate.
I wish you good luck and a good, happy life despite your inability to achieve public justice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Devaron Namsaar
11:11 AM on 06/30/2010
Once upon a time, like a fairy tale, the Supreme Court administered justice... now it administers "Just Us"... Its not about justice or law, these folks have proven themselves to be out side the law, not above it, just not in any way connected to it.
When corruption finally leaks into the highest justice system in the land, as it has recently, its a signal that the game of this nation is just about over and done.
There will be fighting in the streets, there will be a civil war once again but this time the outcome will be in favor of the people not the government. The moment is arriving.
You can only abuse and misuse the common people so much... and this government and the corporations have gone beyond the limits of human tolerance. Using our boys and girls to murder the neighbors and steal their property is morally and ethically wrong but this is exactly what the government/corporations are doing and have done.
The refusal of the Supreme Court to hear this case is in fact just another slap in the face of the people...
10:51 AM on 06/30/2010
Hang in there, people. The High Court (higher than what, I'd like to know...?) is so obviously engaged in a mad, frenzied exercise in ramming through as many unconscionable and insane decisions as they can. Roberts, Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and one other are running scared. They know the handwriting's on the wall with Kagan about to be approved. They're terrified that they are about to lose their treacherous majority. It's almost a laughing matter, except for the awful recent decisions, guns in Chicago, the anthropomorphism of corporations, etc. The dramatic change in the profile of the SCOTUS that we are about to enjoy may end up being Obama's greatest legacy.
02:17 PM on 07/01/2010
Wait a minute, wouldn't Kagan have been the one that argued for SCOTUS rejecting Arar's appeal on behalf of the Obama administration?
FreeAmerican7
It's hard to soar like an Eagle around Turkeys!
10:22 AM on 06/30/2010
Justice from the Supreme Court...LOL...
Get REAL!
Wake up!
Every Supreme Court Justice IS APPOINTED for LIFE by the corrupt POLITICIANS so that we remember them and suffer.
It is irrelevant whether the POLITICIANS (elected or defeated) are Democrats or republicans for they are the same players in a MUSICAL CHAIR game!
...and it is getting worse... With the appointment of Kagan; we are going to get stuck with the youngest Justice for FIFTY Years..... We might as well become a MONARCHY so that the people revolt and reenact the French Revolution.....
07:32 AM on 06/30/2010
The media has a great role to keep this alive and on the radar. Will they fail us as well?
09:52 AM on 06/30/2010
The media has been failing the country for the past 3 years.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
canobserv
10:05 AM on 06/30/2010
try the last 10......I remember a friend of mine telling me about a protest march in regards to the Iraq invasionI I knew then that the media was as far from "liberal" as you can get
05:08 AM on 06/30/2010
I for one sincerely apologize for being a citizen of a nation that tortured You. For being misguided into believing - even for a short time - that torturing innocents could in some way be the right thing to do. I am ashamed to the core of what my government did in my name. - To You and to so many others. Innocents they stripped of their most basic rights given to ALL HUMANS by our constitution. Innocents they knew never had anything to do with terrorism. Innocents they BOUGHT from anyone telling them he knew a terrorist.

I now know that 85% of the detainees were never caught by our CIA but sold by anyone willing to sacrifice another man's life and freedom for a lot of money.

What my government did and still does makes me ashamed and heartbroken because we are a great people. - A great people led by the most vile criminals this planet has ever seen. And I do not speak of politicians even though they sell our world to the highest bidder. I mean the ones who buy politicians with the money they steal from us.

I am very sorry for your plight and the ongoing crime of taking your human rights and calling it law.
01:01 AM on 06/30/2010
This just in: a former member of the Bush-Cheney administration has (from a reliable source "Groundball" ) that the Taliban has recruited genetic engineering PhDs. to combine genes from, poisonous south American frogs, crocodiles, and homing pigeons. The resulting animal is to be released in the Gulf of Mexico from submarines belonging to the Taliban Navy. They will be trained to creep ashore and terrorize American citizens scooping up the crude oil washing ashore. The Taliban has decided to nip this emerging mini-economy in the bud, and return dependence on Mid-East oil to the center of important topics
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawrence Kurnarsky
Wriiter, film director, teacher.
12:11 AM on 06/30/2010
See a pattern? From where I stand, it's obvious, whether it's Obama's toothless roar at the BP ecocidal maniacs, the pledge of healthcare reform uttered in the basso profondo of male authority wimping out and - eh voila! - it's a guarantee of perpetual profits for insurance and pharmaceutical corporations, the clarion call to end of these illegal, useless, bankrupting wars, as supported by a majority of the electorate, becoming an escalation of war, and the imminent castration of the much ballyhooed financial reform act. If it quacks like a duck, waddles like a duck, swims like a duck, one would think it's a duck.

Unless you're the mainstream media. Then you don't connect the dots, not if you want your job. When the heads of the top twenty economies announce a goal to cut their deficits in half by 2012. there's not even a tuneless whistle. Not one asks, what this means to schools, unemployment insurance, healthcare, or vital infrastructure repairs in these countries. Now what's the new plan to jump-start the green-economy and save the planet? It's another day and different news.

What's this to do with an innocent foreign citizen, between flights in New York, being abducted by our government's agents and sent to Syria to be tortured? Just that, la la la, there's been a silent coup in the land of freedom and liberty. Abracadabra! Justice for all becomes justice for some. Our constitution goes up in the same puff of smoke as the above. Poof!
09:18 PM on 06/29/2010
Up hold the constitution?? Why would you think that barak even understand the constitution. As he has said many times the constitution limits federal govt expansion and he wants it rewritten
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawrence Kurnarsky
Wriiter, film director, teacher.
07:45 PM on 06/30/2010
What has this to do with Obama? I mean plenty of things do, but this is for the judicial branch of the government to decide, not the executive branch. It's the politically right-wing hyper-activist Supreme Court majority who are distorting the Constitution, not Obama. Not here, anyway. The main impact of their activism is not to expand personal liberty, as you might imagine you would are in favor of, but to undermine and even curtail the rights of the people and transfer their power - not so much to the elected government, granted - but to the tiny group of super-wealthy people who run America's, banks, industries, and transnational corporations.

Now please show me "many times", where Obama - who just so you know, I do not like as a president - explicitly wrote that he wants the American constitution "rewritten" so that the powers of the government - I presume over the people - can be "expanded". Sources, please.

Or, "do not criticize what you don't understand".
08:34 PM on 06/29/2010
"As a result of this willful blindness, it has put the world's peace and order in danger"

Since when is there peace and order in the world?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
07:21 PM on 06/29/2010
Why not sue Syria instead?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawTalkingGuy
Rational human male.
07:53 PM on 06/29/2010
Because under American law and American Justice the plaintiff can sue any tortfeasor. In no justice system that I know of is it sufficient to say 'hey, why not blame someone else?' as a defence. Unless you're Syrian, mind your own business - the question is America atoning for American wrongs and not being a bunch of hypocrites that through out their laws, standards, 'freedoms', and everything else they pretend to hold dear the first time they see and advantage in doing so.

Take the log out of your own eye before you start worrying about what's in Syria's. At least they don't pretend to be a modern democracy with the rule of law and good christian family values. America does, and the play-act is wearing thin.
09:19 PM on 06/29/2010
he already has hit the lottery and got $10 million from canada
11:12 AM on 06/30/2010
I think I must become your 100th fan.
billstewart
Not a micro-biologist
01:29 AM on 06/30/2010
Canada doesn't have jurisdiction over Syria, so he couldn't sue there. And suing Syria in Syria's unlikely to be useful, given that they're a semi-dictatorship that tortures people. It might be possible for him to sue them under American law, even though he's a foreigner, because the US does have laws that allow just about anybody sue anybody for torture. But they probably don't override the President's apparent ability to refuse to allow lawsuits against the US on the dubious grounds of national security.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VANDERGRAAFK
Teacher
06:56 PM on 06/29/2010
I deeply regret the dismissal of your case. Alas, the whole system of extraordinary renditions needs to be eliminated and those officials who authorized these renditions during the Bush Administration need to be sent to the Hague. I don't know whether you as a citizen of planet Earth can independently make a complaint to the Hague. But, I for one wish you might. Some agency outside of the US needs to examine this whole derogation of rights during the Bush era.

If the criminal Serb regime under Milosevich can be taken to Hague to be judged and sentenced, then leading Bush officials should be taken there as well. And, I might add, so too should any Obama officials who wish to continue the practice of extraordinary rendition.
09:42 PM on 06/29/2010
What has changed during the Obama Administration? He hasn't changed anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawrence Kurnarsky
Wriiter, film director, teacher.
09:00 PM on 06/30/2010
Obviously, the gentleman is entitled to his day in court. Obviously, even if he had been proven guilty before a judge and jury, which he was not - and after that had he been exported to another country to be tortured - it matters not a whit, the rationale for the torture - that would have been, in itself, a felony. That crime would have outweighed any possible damage any individual terrorist could do this this country. But, this situation is far worse than that. This is flying a plane into the constitution.

The job of the supreme court is to redress instances where the government has behaved illegally, as it did, clearly, here. As it still regularly does. So, I agree, the Obama government is culpable. But it's ultimately only the supreme court that can make that culpability a legal fact. The right-wing activist zealots, who have been placed on the supreme court through a diabolical political conspiracy that aims to undermine personal liberty and civil rights, have betrayed their oath to the constitution in favor of their oath to fellow conspirators.

That's what Americans need to appreciate. They need to ask, who can now make the culpability of the supreme court traitors a legal fact? In the real world, even good freedom loving American governments, often overstep their powers. The Lincoln government certainly did, as did the FDR government. However, this tendency had been foreseen when the USA was established. Now what?
serena1313
Condemnation w/o investigation is hgt of ignorance
06:28 PM on 06/29/2010
America is not a perfect country nor are we perfect citizens, however, human and civil rights, the rule of law, decency and respect for all humankind mattered. Or were those just words?

As signatories and as a matter of law we are bound by federal, state, international laws & treaties: 113C of the US Criminal Code, War Crimes Act, Geneva Conventions, UN Convention Against Torture, Article VI of US Constitution, UCMJ to investigate whether crimes against humanity and/or war crimes were committed.

Given the overwhelming evidence showing prisoners had been waterboarded, beat, hung by their arms, deprived of sleep, forced into small boxes, shackled in contorted body positions, sexually humiliated and the dozens more who died after being kicked or beaten to death appear to qualify as war crimes under the G C:

"no physical or mental torture nor any form of coercion may be inflicted to secure information" and any prisoners refusing to co-operate "may not be threatened, insulted or exposed to any unpleasant or disadvantageous treatment of any kind" certainly brings to question how the SCOTUS reached their decision.

What we believe is reflected in what we do, not what we say. All human beings, in fairness and justice, deserve to be treated with a modicum of respect, dignity and given their day in court. It's not a privilege, it is the law, or so I thought.

In my eyes, the Robert's Court failed humanity. Needless to say, this is not one of America's finest moments.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawTalkingGuy
Rational human male.
07:57 PM on 06/29/2010
"As signatories and as a matter of law we are bound by federal, state, international laws & treaties: 113C of the US Criminal Code, War Crimes Act, Geneva Conventions, UN Convention Against Torture, Article VI of US Constitution, UCMJ to investigate whether crimes against humanity and/or war crimes were committed. "

If only America showed the same respect for those treaties in the application as they do at the signing ceremonies, the military and political culture that allowed this (and Abu Graihb, and renditions, and Camp No, and waterboarding, and Nicaragua, and Bay of Pigs, and...) would have been stamped out long ago.

"In my eyes, the Robert's Court failed humanity. Needless to say, this is not one of America's finest moments. "

Indeed. I always think of America's late arrival in WW2 as being one of its finest moments... are there some more recent examples I can use to set my 'finest moment' scale?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Red Herring
Retired Miner, living in third world
08:42 PM on 06/29/2010
They are just words.
serena1313
Condemnation w/o investigation is hgt of ignorance
11:38 PM on 06/29/2010
apparently they are "just words" now.