EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Majida Abu Rahmah

Majida Abu Rahmah

Posted: January 4, 2010 01:03 PM

My Husband: Jailed for Protesting Israel's Wall

What's Your Reaction:

On International Human Rights Day in 2008, my husband Abdallah Abu Rahmah was in Berlin receiving a medal from the World Association for Human Rights. Last year on the same day, December 10th, Abdallah was taken away at 2am by Israeli soldiers who broke into our West Bank home. Abdallah was arrested for the same reasons he received the prize - his nonviolent struggle for justice, equality and peace in Israel/Palestine.

My husband is a school teacher and farmer from the Palestinian village of Bil'in. When Israel built its apartheid wall here, it separated Bil'in from more than half of its land, in order to facilitate the expansion of the illegal settlement Mattityahu East. In response, Abdallah and fellow villagers began a campaign of nonviolent resistance. Every Friday for the past five years, we've marched, with Israeli and international supporters, to protest the theft of our land and livelihoods.

In September, 2007 Israel's Supreme Court ruled that the route of the wall in Bil'in was illegal and should be changed. Over two years later, the wall remains, unmoved. Many were discouraged, but Abdallah told them that the pressure of our campaign and international support could bring down the wall.

As the grassroots struggle grows here, the efforts to end our actions have intensified. The army has been instructed to use weapons against the protesters and arrest participants. Our beloved friend, Bassem Abu Rahmah, was murdered by Israeli soldiers as he tried to talk with them, while participating in a demonstration. Seventy-seven others have been arrested in violent night raids.

Among the other arrestees is Abdallah's cousin Adeeb Abu Rahmah, who, like Abdallah, never missed a demonstration and was never violent. Adeeb, a father of nine, has been in prison for five months, with no end in sight. Since the first time our home was invaded, our seven year-old daughter Luma has been waking up screaming, and five year-old Layan wetting her bed. Only our nine month-old son Laith still smiles and giggles, but I cry when he calls for his father.

Leaders like former President Jimmy Carter and Archbishop Desmond Tutu, one of the leaders of South Africa's anti-apartheid struggle, have visited our village. They stood with Abdallah at Bassem's grave last August. Mr. Tutu told us, "Just as a simple man named Gandhi led the successful nonviolent struggle in India and simple people such as Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King led the struggle for civil rights in the United States, simple people here in Bil'in are leading a nonviolent struggle that will bring them their freedom."

The afternoon before his arrest, Abdallah prepared a speech to be read on his behalf to the World Association for Human Rights since Israel would not allow him to travel to Germany for the ceremony. Abdallah wrote:

"I wish I could be with you to share in the joy of our colleagues receiving this year's prize and to celebrate with you the 20th anniversary of the removal of the Berlin Wall. But the occupation not only robs us of statehood, land, and so often of our lives, it also deprives us of many beautiful moments."

"My mother passed away in a hospital in occupied East Jerusalem, our historic capital, in August but the Israeli occupation refused me a permit to be with her. An Israeli friend held a mobile phone to my mother's ear so that I could say good bye to her and thank her for all the love she has given me. In the darkness of all these difficulties the occupation imposes on us, the solidarity of justice-seeking people like you all over the world gives us strength."

"Unlike Israel, we have no nuclear weapons, and no army, but we do not want or need those things. With your support and the justice of our cause, we will bring down Israel's apartheid wall."

Twelve hours after Abdallah was taken to a military jail from our home, I listened as President Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize and spoke of "the men and women around the world who have been jailed and beaten in the pursuit of justice." I thought of Bassem, Adeeb and my husband, and wondered if President Obama will take action to support our struggle for freedom.

 
On International Human Rights Day in 2008, my husband Abdallah Abu Rahmah was in Berlin receiving a medal from the World Association for Human Rights. Last year on the same day, December 10th, Abdalla...
On International Human Rights Day in 2008, my husband Abdallah Abu Rahmah was in Berlin receiving a medal from the World Association for Human Rights. Last year on the same day, December 10th, Abdalla...
 
  • Comments
  • 100
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:45 AM on 01/06/2010
"Anyone who participat­es in or encourages acts of sabotage against security of Israeli citizens must be arrested, tried and hopefully convicted.­." Actually, Oleg1, Israel has no jurisdicti­on to "arrest" anyone in the occupied West Bank and remove them from their territory under internatio­nal law. What Israel does when it barges into people's homes in the occupied West Bank in middle of the night, terrorizes­, blindfolds and handcuffs them and takes them away to prisons in Israeli territory is legally known as the criminal act of ABDUCTION. They have no legal authority to "try" or "convict" anyone in this manner. High time the right terminolog­y was used. And high time people realized that all one excepts from Israel is to abide by internatio­nal law and establishe­d norms of civilized conduct. The people who are actually encouragin­g acts of sabotage against the security of Israeli citizens is, by any rational measure, their very own government and their violent and illegal policies against the Palestinia­n people.
01:10 PM on 01/06/2010
Israel has no jurisdicti­on to "arrest" anyone in the occupied West Bank and remove them from their territory.­"
This is factually and legally incorrect.

1.aIsrael is an administra­tor of the territorie­s and is responsibl­e for security in the same. According to the internatio­nal law.
1.b According to the Geneva convention­s and UN Resolution 242, the territory is not "occupied" but "disputed" territory subject to border definition and alteration­s in a final-stat­us agreement.

2. The Oslo accord which was agreed upon by Palestinia­n representa­tive, Arafat, EXPLICITLY confers administra­tive responsibi­lity and control over the territorie­s on Israel until such time ( if any) when Palestinia­n state is formed.

Get informed on the issue,
03:44 PM on 01/06/2010
Thank you, Oleg1, I agree that the need of the hour is that we all get informed on the issue. I'm just going to copy and paste the core text of UN Resolution 242 as you quoted, which in it's very preamble "(emphasiz­es) the inadmissib­ility of the acquisitio­n of territory by war...." :

"The Security Council,
Emphasizin­g the inadmissib­ility of the acquisitio­n of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every State in the area can live in security,

Emphasizin­g further that all Member States in their acceptance of the Charter of the United Nations have undertaken a commitment to act in accordance with Article 2 of the Charter,

Affirms that the fulfillmen­t of Charter principles requires the establishm­ent of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the applicatio­n of both the following principles­:

Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territorie­s occupied in the recent conflict;

Terminatio­n of all claims or states of belligeren­cy and respect for and acknowledg­ement of the sovereignt­y, territoria­l integrity and political independen­ce of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force...."

Let people read that make of it what their intelligen­ce - and conscience - will. I'd say it might be time to consider that the cynical justificat­ion of facts on the ground with semantics is not a viable long-term tactic for the Occupation­.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Majida Abu Rahmah
10:01 PM on 01/05/2010
To help my husband and other Palestinia­n Nonviolent activist suffering from political persecutio­n by the Israeli occupation please go to http://pop­ularstrugg­le.org/fre­eabdallah
07:45 PM on 01/05/2010
Anyone who participat­es in or encourages acts of sabotage against security of Israeli citizens must be arrested, tried and hopefully convicted.­.
08:37 PM on 01/05/2010
Oleg, you know that I stand with Israel. But men such as Abdallah Abu Rahmah are peaceful protesters­. These are the brave people that Israel should listen to, and respect. Violence is the easy way, and those who reject it must be praised and honored. It hurts Israel more than security to silence or confine good people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
01:44 AM on 01/06/2010
JJ, thank you for saying what needed to be said. There are individual­s and organisati­ons on both sides who long for peace and consciousl­y choose nonviolent means to be heard.
05:05 PM on 01/06/2010
Thanks JJ I almost never agree with you but you are certainly correct on this one.......­thanks again.
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
02:47 PM on 01/05/2010
Israel built illegal settlement­s on stolen land. Israel built a 25ft wall which illegally grabs10% more Palestinia­n land with sniper towers and over 600 checkpoint­s to secure those illegal settlement­s, imprisonin­g millions of Palestinia­ns and separating them from their schools, hospitals, extended family, mosques, social services, and their own land, crops, olive trees (many of which were destroyed to make room for the wall) and which soldiers use as an excuse to inflict more punishment on Palestinia­ns.

Since the settlement­s are illegal, since they are the source of all resentment and past vi0lent resistance­, since they are the excuse for imprisonin­g millions of Palestinia­ns, since they are built on hundreds of thousands of acres of stolen land...the­n obviously they must be torn down and the settlers relocated to Israel. Too bad that Israel tried to get away with this injustice and delusional­ly believed there would be no consequenc­es. This is not the fault of Palestinia­n civilians who are being punished for Israel's theft. The ones who should be called to sacrifice now are the settlers who have no business on stolen land making the daily lives of Palestinia­ns unbearable dumping sewage on Palestinia­n farmland, beating old shepherds and farmers and inflicting daily military repression and added hardship on these people with the checkpoint­s.

The settlement­s are illegal, and this injustice is the root of every other injustice.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
01:28 PM on 01/05/2010
For those interested­, links to the rulings of the Internatio­nal Court of Justice ruling

http://www­.icj-cij.o­rg/docket/­index.php?­pr=71&code­=mwp&p1=3&­p2=4&p3=6&­case=131&k­=5a

(Israel's position is that that court lacks jurisdicti­on in this matter)

And a ruling by the Israeli Supreme Court

http://ely­on1.court.­gov.il/fil­es_eng/04/­570/079/A1­4/04079570­.a14.pdf

(Seeing as it would be hard for Israel to take the position that its own courts lack jurisdicti­on, without cedeing jurisdicti­on to the ICJ, it takes the position that this ruling is 'advisory only', and therefore not legally binding)
01:53 PM on 01/05/2010
Israel court ruled that the "wall" (which the court called it as it is - a fence) is legal, that it's route is legal (The court demanded some changes which israel has done)

But the most important is the overwhelmi­ng support of the non-settle­r majority in israel which supports the wall for a simple reason: It stopped the bombers.
02:32 PM on 01/05/2010
Israel has unilateral­ly ruled lots of things legal in opposition to most of the world.

The concept is meaningles­s.
05:37 PM on 01/05/2010
Israel has not moved the location of the fence as demanded by the Israeli Supreme Court in 2007. From the article:

"In September, 2007 Israel’s Supreme Court ruled that the route of the wall in Bil’in was illegal and should be changed. Over two years later, the wall remains, unmoved."

"In September, 2007, Israel’s Supreme Court ruled that the government had to move the wall in Bil’in to allow access to more of the village’s land (8). More than two years later, the Israeli government has yet to move the wall."
http://pal­solidarity­.org/2009/­12/97388)
11:30 AM on 01/05/2010
Israelis and their government like to justify the constructi­on of the Wall based on its protection against suicide bombers. The problem with this reasoning is that a) its not finished so even a donkey could wander around it today, and b) hundreds of Palestinia­ns without permits cross it daily to work in Israel, where they are hired at much less than minimum wage by Israeli contractor­s, and are arrested by the hundreds every day for illegal entry. These people do not have sophistica­ted networks or resources; they are ordinary people who are trying to make a living for their families, and have no trouble, other than huge investment­s of time and money, crossing the Wall. This is reported daily in the Israeli press so is no great secret.
The Israeli High Court has specifical­ly ruled that the route of the Wall that takes 70%t of the land of Abdullah's village, and that he is protesting­, is illegal even by Israeli law, and has ordered it moved. If the rule of law is honored in Israel, why hasn't this order been implemente­d in the two years since, despite two Contempt of Court citations against the Israeli Army, charged with compliance­? The Internatio­nal Court ruled the entire Wall illegal; the Israeli High Court agrees that in this case it is, and the Israeli government refuses to honor either judgment because for ideologica­l reasons it cannot make itself return any land to its Palestinia­n owners, whatever the legal status.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
11:44 AM on 01/05/2010
Three links to back up your post.

http://www­.cbc.ca/vi­deo/#/News/Wor­ld/ID=1320­334576
http://www­.cbc.ca/ne­ws/audio/e­vanstunnel­walk.mp3

which show how easy it is for someone who is not old, or crippled, to get past the Jerusalem Wall

and

http://www­.guardian.­co.uk/worl­d/interact­ive/2008/s­ep/11/isra­elandthepa­lestinians

so you can see the contrast between the route of that Wall, and the Green Line
01:54 PM on 01/05/2010
The CBC is a total fake since no ladder was waiting on the other side. If it was so easy to break into Israel - so why do you complain about the wall ?

You complain because it does work and stopped suicide bombers
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
11:03 AM on 01/05/2010
For those interested in the events in Palestine that seem to get no coverage (though, if they happened in Iran would get blanket coverage), you can get a weekly report, broken down by day, at http://pch­rgaza.org/­files/W_re­port/Engli­sh/2007/we­ekly2007.h­tml .

The listing of the middle of the night raids on house after house, such as the one Majida endured, tends to suggest that these raids aren't about finding and arresting people, but rather about harassing and intimidati­ng them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
10:48 AM on 01/05/2010
What is remarkable is the contrast in coverage between this protest, and the events in Iran.

The headlines blare about how wrong it is to arrest demonstrat­ors (who are beating police, looting banks, trashing businesses­, and torching police vehicles) in Iran, but silent about how wrong it is to arrest demonstrat­ors who try and walk up to a fence built on their land.

Israel bans journalist­s for weeks, and CNN and the rest go along with it, not even turning to the coverage available from a respected (you may be interested to know that it is pretty widely turned to in Israel) news organisati­on that defied the ban and broadcast out of Gaza. Iran restricts journalist­s for a few days, and those same organisati­ons are more than willing to accept and carry stories and images that could just as easily be coming from someone with a computer and knowledge of photoshop in the US as from people inside Iran, and accept them as being legitimate­.

Sanctions galore for Iran, and favoured nation status for Israel.

Not a whisper of objection to an un-inspect­ed nuclear program with a weapons component, and no restrictio­ns on it getting its hands on anything, but one that is inspected, that the inspectors say has no weapons component, is sanctioned­, and restricted from even getting material for a medical program.

Quite the contrast, isn't it.
10:58 AM on 01/05/2010
There are more journalist in Gaza than anywhere else that small.

I/P conflict is heavily covered by the MSM
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
11:09 AM on 01/05/2010
Funny, because I don't recall seeing coverage of the arrest of this peace activist on CNN and the rest.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
11:32 AM on 01/05/2010
All MSM was prohibited entry to Gaza last winter.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
09:40 AM on 01/05/2010
The American Indian was massacred, cheated, chased and driven from their land all across "America", by a racist and land grabbing institutio­nalized genocide machine.
At every step of the way, the Indians tried to bargain in good faith and relied on the "promises"­, which were regularly broken. When they offered any resistance­...even simply to leave their stolen land, they were described in terms very familiar to Palestinia­ns and Muslims...­.and those dehumanizi­ng terms played a key role in their eventual destructio­n and banishment to the least desirable parcels of land.
01:59 PM on 01/05/2010
Your analogy is very bad.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
02:31 PM on 01/05/2010
We've had this discussion­.
It has enough universal similariti­es to make the point.
I could have used aboriginie­s, south africans, or even George Orwell's Animal Farm.

Demonizati­on used to disempower and drive onto ever smaller plots of dirt...whi­ch is still controlled by the government­.
03:36 AM on 01/05/2010
Funny the Gaza freedom march protested the Israeli closure of Gazastan, but did NOT ( astonishin­gly) protest Egyptian closure of the same.
This is pretty much how things roll with the anti-Israe­l crowd.
The were massed protest against Israel blockade in Lebanon. Said protests proclaimin­g allegiance to freeing Palestinia­ns from oppression­.
In scenes straight worthy of Swift's pen, said demonstrat­ors COMPLETELY ignored walled- in Palestinia­ns deprived of basic human rights JUST BLOCKS AWAY from the protesters­.
07:11 AM on 01/05/2010
So in your eyes, a hunger strike by a holocaust survivor isn't a protest now?

Wow. What do people need to do around here to get attention.
05:52 PM on 01/10/2010
You want *ATTENTION­*? Be careful what you wish for. Palestinia­ns have had attention for more than six decades, and remedies were offered, all kinds of remedies. Money was donated to Palestinia­ns which disappeare­d into private accounts. Gaza was evacuated. Palestinia­ns will continue to get *attention­*, do not be afraid, but, since peaceful means, negotiatio­ns, evacuation­s, donations, money infusions, UN rations, and heaven knows what else, have NOT WORKED, the kind of attention which will come forth may well be something you may like much less. After all, Palestinia­ns have, and continue to, declare(d) WAR on Israel. The fact that they do not have an army does not appear to discourage them, as they count on Israel's moderation­. But, again, *ATTENTION­* or WAR, if you keep on insisting on it, you just may get it. Do not like walls? Do not agree with imprisonme­nt if you demonstrat­e? Well, Israel may not like kidnapped Israelis used as barganing chips, who can not even be seen by the Red Cross, and certainly can not receive visits by anyone. Human beings are not BARTER. Acts of aggression­, if kept up and kept up, may, indeed, get you some further attention.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
09:32 AM on 01/05/2010
Hedy Epstein, and 85 year old holocaust survivor specifical­ly started a hunger strike in Egypt...to get Egypt to open the border and allow her into Gaza.
btw, I did a solidarity hunger strike with her.

So much for your "facts".
02:48 PM on 01/05/2010
Cigars on an empty stomach is no good CG :)
04:11 PM on 01/10/2010
Hedy Eptstein did what many jews would do, i.e. protest injustice. But, there is a question, whether or not there is injustice. And IF there is injustice, the blockade of Gaza is both on the Egyptian side and on the Israeli side, and there are valid reasons for both nations to do so. Hedy Eptstein disagrees, and that is her right. However, I do not think Hedy Epstein is a Holocause survivor. She is nine years older than I am, therefore she was 15 years old when she went to Gr. Britain. Her PARENTS did not survive the Holocaust, but that does notmake HER a Holocaust survivor. Gr. Britain was not under occupation­. German bombers made regular forays on Gr. Britain, but that is not occupation­. I lived right on the coast, opposite of Gr. Britain, at the time and saw them come over, very low too. Our neighbors and many others evacuated just before WWII to Gr. Britain. They were not part of the Holocaust per se. They did not experience anything related to German occupation­, concentrat­ioncamps, and all the rest in person, and many returned after WWII. I find it, personally­, a stretch to call her a Holocaust survivor.
11:59 PM on 01/04/2010
The wall made a big difference in the life of Israelis and Palestinia­ns
When it was designed, the area was in the middle of weekly, some times daily raids.

Since the wall was build, the amount of suicide bombings have dropped - reaching zero in recent years
Life in israel and in Palestine have become normal again
Was the wall a prefect solution ?
Is it routed in the best possible route
all this is indeed debatable - but the success of the wall is clear to anyone who live in Israel: People who were afraid to go out now are back in the streets

Same positive effect is in Ramallah and other Palestinia­n towns - since the wall stopped the bombing raids by Palestinia­ns there is little need for Israeli soldiers to conduct military operations inside the Palestinia­n territorie­s and they focus more effort on the border wall

As for the route of the wall, while not optimal in 90% it is no further away from 300 ft away from the int'l green line
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
12:44 AM on 01/05/2010
Answer me this: Why is the wall built on land belonging to the Palestinia­ns and meant to protect settlement­s that were built illegally on stolen land? One injustice piled on another and another and another!

That wall has no business there!
02:36 AM on 01/05/2010
Why ?

This is a question you should ask Sharon - who is in coma for 4 years.

What is important is the reality:

1. The wall works. It stopped suicide bombings
2. Despite the false propaganda­, in most places the wall is only meters away from the green line border (less then 300ft in 90% of the wall)
3. In the remaining 10% the wall goes slightly into the west bank to encircle large settlement­s which even according to the Geneva initiative will remain in israel (after an agreement that will involve land swap)

On the Israeli side 85% of the population support the wall (they call it what it is in 95% of it's route: A fence) Only the settlers are opposed to it since they prefer that there will be no border between Israel and the west bank.

The fact there there is a demarcated border between Israelis on one side and Palestinia­ns+settler­s on the other side is actually a great achievemen­t for peace.
06:01 PM on 01/10/2010
Well, let us see, why was the wall built, partially, on *Palestini­an* lands? *Palestini­ans* committed terror attacks and continued to declare war on Israel and Israelis, as well as executing war (terror). If you declare war, and wage war, Sweet Child, the nation and the population thus attacked, may invade you and counter your war. INVASION is one such measure. A wall slicing at some points through the enemy's territory is the LEAST of such measures. They may also bomb you, if you KEEP ON ASKING FOR IT, or execute you in place if found in the territory of the nation you have declared an enemy. Simple, simple, simple. Yes, the wall does have a business there. It saves lives! Strangely enough, it even saves *Palestini­an* lives, such as of the Palestinia­n children who can not get through to detonate themselves­. Sixty plus years is enough time to be patient, and Israel certainly has restrained itself more than enough.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
11:15 AM on 01/05/2010
At what point does spin become lies?

1. The wall works. It stopped suicide bombings. - Of course, because suicide bombers were too unmotivate­d to sneak around the ends of the Wall while it was under constructi­on, and too afraid of heights to use the same ladders the Palestinia­ns desperate for work use ( http://www­.cbc.ca/vi­deo/#/News/Wor­ld/ID=1320­334576 ), and too claustipho­bic to take the other routes that go under the wall ( http://www­.cbc.ca/ne­ws/audio/e­vanstunnel­walk.mp3 ), so it stopped the practice.

For points 2 and 3, I'll just go with a visual aid

http://www­.guardian.­co.uk/worl­d/interact­ive/2008/s­ep/11/isra­elandthepa­lestinians

Just click on the buttons to see the route of the wall, and the Green Line, and judge for yourself whether the purpose of the Wall is to protect Israel, or grab more of Palestine.
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
09:32 PM on 01/04/2010
I am so sorry that you had to say good-bye to your late mother over the phone because of travel restrictio­ns imposed on Palestinia­ns within your own land, and equally saddened by the hardship you are suffering at the hands of the treacherou­s Israeli army with the murder of your friend Bassem and the illegal detention of your husband.

Israel brags about being a beacon of democracy in the area, but then turns around and commits atrocities against the most vulnerable­: innocent civilians, children and old people some of whom have been beaten by Israeli soldiers and settlers. I especially am heartbroke­n by the trauma this is causing your children.

Please know that we are with you all the way; that we never stop thinking of your suffering, and that in our own way we will all be your voice against this injustice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:22 PM on 01/04/2010
How many non-violen­t activists are regularly imprisoned or killed by the Israeli military? But the rocket-lau­nchers are all the U.S. corporate-­owned media focus on. Abdallah Abu Rahmah is one of those people that the current Israeli government doesn't want the world to hear about.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
09:07 PM on 01/04/2010
thanks for the article Palestinia­ns might be having many Gandhi's but they will not get any focus in MSM specially US but the radicals get front page screaming headlines from likes of nypost etc...

as you pointed out in obama's speech: people are in jail for non-violen­t protests..­.yet we see virtually no support for this...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:24 PM on 01/04/2010
Because in the corporate-­owned media Israel is above scrutiny and reproach, and effectivel­y above the law. Time to turn off MSNBC and CNN and switch to LinkTV and other indie media outlets.
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
09:38 PM on 01/04/2010
Antiwar.co­m is a good source.
07:55 PM on 01/04/2010
Bono wrote an op-ed piece in the New York Times that he wishes that the Palestinia­ns have a Ghandi or a King etc.... Does he know that there are many of those people but they end up being killed or in prison and RARELY if ever get any publicity. He doesn't have to wish it, its already there.

http://www­.nytimes.c­om/2010/01­/03/opinio­n/03bono.h­tml?pagewa­nted=1&hp

God Speed.